Miami Shores 93-1DCA SPECIAL ROUTING FORS;
TO: HATE:
'fj(v. N)
SUBJ: Distribution of Adopted Plan Amendment to Review Tear
Please find enclosed adopted comprehensive plan amendment
documents from the following local government:
L 'L
a
DOCKET # 91-- -NOI- - (A) - (I) / (N)
The Staff Evaluation Memo for the Notice of Intent (NO1)
must be prepared for -the Junior and Senior Staff meetings before
the DECISION DATE k)OThe NOI can then be
sent to the newspaper in time for 16ublication.
The cover letter transmitting the Notice of Intent (and' the
Statement of Intent if found not in compliance) to the local
government chief elected official is to be prepared for mailout
no later than one work day before the
NOI PUBLICATION DATE.
. Thank you for your assistance. Should you have any proce-
dural questions on this matter, please contact Robert Arredondo
at 7-4545.
RPM/ELP
9-16-91
dI
C'
- - 41 SUREW OF LOB.
Ov lOO50 N E SECOND AVENUE � �qp� yq} }{���
n MIAMI SHORES. FLORIDA 3313E-2362 PE..rO!'VI�f 1C�
FioRXva
TELEPHONE (305) 795-2207
FAX (305) 756-8972
October 20, 1993
Mr. Robert Pennock, Chief
Bureau of Planning
Florida Department of Community Affairs
Rhyne Building
2740 Centervlew Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
RE: Miami Shores Comprehensive Plan Amendments
(DCA 91-1)
Dear Mr. Pennock:
Attached please find a package of amendments to the
Future Land Use Element(several map changes and one policy
revision) plus the Infrastructure, Coastal Management and
Capital Improvement Elements of the Village's 1989
Comprehensive Plan as adopted by the Village Council on
October 19, 1993.
A copy of the adoption ordinance Is also enclosed.
The contact person for this application are either
myself or Mr, Stephen H. Pitkin of Robert K. Swarthout, Inc.,
Planning Consultants, 400 S. Dixie Highway, Suite 121, Boca
Raton, Florida 33432, 407-392-5800.
The potable water level of service standard was revised
as recommended In the ORC Report; this was the only
recommended change. Otherwise, there have been no changes to
the documents as submitted to DCA in May.
A copy of this packet Is also being sent directly to the RPC.
SInc�ereIy,
� 1
Tom Benton
Village Manager
Enclosure
CC: South Florida Regional Planning Council
ORDINANCE NO. 563-93
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1989 MIAMI SHORES COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN; AMENDING GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES PERTAINING
TO S-2 (DOG TRACK) ZONING; POTABLE WATER AVAILABILITY AND
POST DISASTER REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; PROVIDING EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the Village Council and Planning Board have
heretofore held public hearings and otherwise complied with The
Local Government Comprehensive Planning And Land Development
Regulation Act of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes,
BE IT ORDAINED BY MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE, FLORIDA:
Section 1.
The Miami Shores Comprehensive Plan, as adopted on
January 3, 1989, by Ordinance No. 519-89, is hereby amended as
shown in Appendix A, which is attached hereto, which amendments are
based upon data and analysis prepared by Robert K. Swarthout, Inc.,
in cooperation with the Miami Shores Planning Board.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective upon adoption.
PASSED on first reading this 4th day of
Mayy , 1993.
PASSED AND ADOPTED on second reading this 19th day of
October , 1993.
WILLIAM HFEWNAN, Mayor
ATTEST:
By.
• Scott-W. Davis
Village Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
William F. Fann, ,.fir.
Village Attorney !�
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Proposed Amendments to the
1989 Village of Miami Shores
Comprehensive Plan
I. Village Council Ordinance of Adoption on Second Reading, October 19, 1993 (Ordinance
Attached)
II. The Following Plan Elements With The Proposed Amendments Shown:
• Future Land Use Goals, Objectives and Policies
• Infrastructure Goals, Objectives and Policies
• Coastal Management Goals, Objectives and Policies
• Capital Improvements Goals, Objectives and Policies
October 1993
Application to be Submitted by the Village of Miami Shores
with Technical Assistance from
Robert K Swarthout, Incorporated
.laic1 c���iw � /I
10050 N, E. SECOND AVENUE
M VAMI SHORES, FLORIDA 3313E-2382
TELEPI-ZONE i30S) 795-2207
FAX (305) 756-a 972
OCTOBER 22, 1993
THIS LETTER WILL SERVE TO CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE
AND CORRECT COPY OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 563-93 AMENDING MIAMI
SHORES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
SCOTT W. DAVIS
VILLAGE CLERK
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
The purpose of this package of Comprehensive Plan amendments is to address five issues:
1. Change four downtown alley block -faces from Single -Family Residential to
Parking to match the zoning map.
2. Change the Future Land Use designation of the Biscayne Kennel Club parcel
from Restricted Commercial to Single -Family Residential; this will not impact
the dog racing operation in any way because the zoning will continue to authorize
this use.
3. Designate the new Archdiocese complex on Biscayne Boulevard as Institutional
to match the other church designations.
4. Change the potable water Level of Service standard to match the County.
5. Incorporate a post -disaster redevelopment plan, a 1989 Village commitment to
DCA.
PART II
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
AND
FUTURE LAND USE MAP
As Revised Pursuant to August 31, 1993
Objectives, Recommendations and Comments Report
of the Florida Department of Community Affairs
Miami Shores 1993 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Package
30
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
GOAL 1 Protect and enhance the residential and commercial areas of Miami
Shores.
Objective 1.1 By 1990, use the revised development code to coordinate new land uses
with soil conditions and the public facility system; supplement with a
traffic strategy .
Policy 1.1.1 If any new development over 6 units per acre in density or generating
more than 1,500 gallons per day occurs, require a tie-in to the sanitary
sewer system if at all feasible.
Policy 1.1.2 Develop traffic control strategies to minimize through -traffic on
residential streets; implement at least one pilot project by 1995.
Policy 1.1.3 Within one year of plan transmittal, review all development codes to
determine needed refinements relative to on -site drainage, open -space
and parking lot -access design standards, soil suitability for septic tanks,
and topography. The policies of this plan will form the basis of this review
although no known discrepancies exist.
Policy 1.1.4 Within one year of plan transmittal, the development code shall be
amended to specify that no development permit shall be issued unless
assurance is given that the public facilities necessitated by the project (in
order to meet level of service standards specified in the Traffic
Circulation and Infrastructure policies) will be in place concurrent with
the impacts of the development.
Objective 1.2 By 1992, achieve a detailed redevelopment implementation schedule for
the "Main Street Business District" (on N.E. 2nd Avenue) See the
Housing Element objectives and policies for strategy to eliminate
substandard housing in the corridor west of North Miami Avenue.
Policy 1.2.1 Using the 1984 Preliminary Plan (prepared by the Downtown
Redevelopment Board) as a base, determine a realistic implementation
schedule (with cost estimates) relative to parking, access, landscaping,
signage, zoning and urban design. Also, evolve a marketing plan to
improve the mix of uses.
Objective 1.3 Ensure reasonable protection of the limited natural resources and
environmentally sensitive land; see policies for measurability.
Policy 1.3.1 The Village shall retain the municipal golf course and its natural areas,
and by 1990, utilize environmentally sensitive landscape maintenance
practices such as xeriscape.
Policy 1.3.2 Within one year of transmitting this plan, complete a review of the
landscaping and open space provisions in the development code to assure
adequacy in protecting the limited vegetative communities elsewhere in
the Village through a site plan review process.
1.13
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
Objective 1.4
By 1990, refine as necessary the development code to facilitate mixed use
and planned unit development projects.
Policy 1.4.1
Within one year of transmittal of this plan, complete a review of the
proposed ROC Planned Office and Residential District (a mixed use
district) and the A-1 Multifamily District (PUD capability) to assess their
effectiveness in encouraging and achieving such projects.
Objective 1.5
Protect and retain the Village's extensive historic resources by
experiencing no demolition of the listed Village "historic landmark"
structures during the five-year planning period.
Policy 1.5.1
The Historic Preservation Review Board shall continue to review all
building or demolition permit applications for those properties designated
"historic landmarks" and shall continue to research properties on the
County list in order to add them to the Village's official list.
Objective 1.6
Use the Land Development Code to implement land use policies that
correspond to the categories on the Future Land Use Plan Map; review and
amend within one year of plan adoption.
Policy 1.6.1
The following land use densities, intensities and approaches shall be
incorporated in the Land Development Code:
• Single Family Residential: Single-family detached units at a density
up to 6.0 units per acre. The -2 Dog Track zoning district is hereby
authorized for the parcel bounded by N.W. 115th_St., N.W. 2nd Ave..
N.W. 112th Terr, and N.W. 5th Ave.: this zoning sball remain in
effect so long as dog racing is an active use thereby constituting a
conforming use and entit ing the owner to reconstruction after damage
in excess of 50 percent of value. Should the dog racing operation cease.
the Village shall consider a Planned Residential Zoning District option
within this density category for the subiect parcel.
• Multifamily Residential: In addition to the above housing types and
densities, multifamily units up to 31 units per acres. Floor area ratios
will be incorporated.
• Restricted Commercial: Office and light retail uses that are
compatible with nearby housing; housing is also permitted.
• General Commercial: A broader range of office and retail uses than
the Restricted Commercial category but no heavy highway or
distribution kinds of uses. it does ' ,.hide the dog _ ng tr ek.
• Parking: Parking uses in support of adjacent business.
• Institutional: This is full range of schools, colleges, churches,
municipal buildings and public utility installations.
• Recreation: This category includes primarily Village parks and the
country club.
Policy 1.6.2 Change the Future Land Use Plan slightly as shown in Figure 1.1; primarily to
add the Parking District and distinguish between the two business districts.
1.14
Policy 1.6.3 Review the land development code provisions relative to subdivision
control, sign controls and flood plain protection to assure their
compatibility with the intent and policies of this plan; at this time there
are no known discrepancies.
Policy 1.6.4 Use zoning provisions to facilitate the private redevelopment of the uses at
1) the intersection of N.E. 105th Street and Biscayne Boulevard and 2) the
Biscayne Boulevard eastside frontage between N.E. 91st and 93rd Streets;
the redevelopment designations on Figure 1.1 show the intent to use either
the proposed ROC mixed use district or other compatible zoning categories
to permit redevelopment to compatible uses. .
Note: Objectives not applicable:
• Urban Sprawl: since the Miami "suburban sprawl" northward has long ago
passed Miami Shores, moving into Broward County.
• Land for Utility Facilities: the water system is in place and no sewer trunk
extensions are planned; no treatment facilities are envisioned.
• Incompatible Land Uses: as noted in the Analysis, there are no incompatible
us es.
• Hurricane Evacuation: since the principal hurricane evacuation routes are not
in the Village and there is so little vacant land,
1.15
N. MIAMI AVE.
DADE COUNTY
a ao
IL11Iowa
B II
I
;� Ow 5'z
c, w a o
m w Q N m
3 S ClD
m
N y N
W n I
l0 O 0
3 m w o
y CD ID 0
3
(D 0 (D m
00
a 0 m
a' -
cn 3 Q
to 0.
3 w
7 l0 n C
QCD N C
m v, y w
D Z
> b�
x
0
K
w
•v
can cn -�
(min
m
-a
{w �{
n
>
m
p
K
K
Q
�r
p
K
m
{
<
C7 m
C
O vC
m
n
N
z n
(A
Z
r
v
m
r
0
i
aaiiRraaarrirai■
RiirfriRiRaaRarr
■iiraarfiiiiiRa■
■RaaRiiRafrifir■
fiiliRii■■iRiiri
riaaiiriaRaaiRi■
■rifiiifriiRiii■
iRafRifrifflrrif
■aRaiririiRisrr■
■aRiRrrafrairiai
MiUmaRRirrraif
■rriRaiiiiiriiRi
i■iiiiRiiRaaair■
rriaRiirriirifa■
irifiiiRiiirrii■
is:iiirrra■
F
40HipA
�ST C
ORSTR9JCwgY
INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
GOAL 1 To provide and maintain the public infrastructure in a manner that will
insure public health, safety and quality of life.
Objective 1.1 By 1999, correct certain deficiencies in the drainage system through a
program of facility improvements; the deficiencies are cited in the
policies and in more detail in the analysis. The other infrastructure
systems do not have deficiencies. Future Village "needs" are not
expected to exceed current needs due to limited development potential.
Policy 1.1.1 The Village (in tandem with several homeowners and the State) shall
implement a phased drainage improvement program and continue the
supporting catch basin cleaning so that adequate street drainage can be
achieved and maintained. The areas are on 10th Court near Northeast
105th Street, Northeast 103rd Street at Northeast 13th Avenue (require
homeowner participation), and two locations along Northeast 6th Avenue
(State responsibility).
Policy 1.1.2
Convert one Bay drainage outfall to a filtration system by 1994; see
Coastal Management Element.
Policy 1.1.3
Require the extension of sanitary sewers to serve any development that
exceeds 6 units per acre or produces more than 1,500 gallons of sewage per
day.
Objective 12
The Village shall provide an adequate level of service during the
planning period; see policies for measurable standards.
Policy 12.1
Sewage: Septic tanks shall be the level of service except as specified in
Policy 1.1.3.
Policy 1.2.2
Solid waste: The Village's trucks and the County disposal system shall
accommodate 6.5 pounds per capita per day.
Policy 1.2.3
Drainage: The Village's storm drainage facilities shall accommodate
runoff from a one -day storm that statistically occurs once in ten years.
Policy 1.2.4-* Potable Water: The water system shaH previde at least 10-0 g.M.-M.9 per
person per day at a pressure of at least 20 petmds . - . eh-.
(a) The reeional treatment system shall operate with a rated capacity
which is no less than 2 percent above the maximum day flow for the
preceding year.
(b) Water shall be delivered to users at a pressure no less than 20 pounds
per souare inch (psi) and no er ater than 100 psi Unless otherwise
approved by the Metro -Dade Fire Department minimum fire flows
based on the land use served shall be maintained as follows:
4.14
Land Use
Single Family Residential:
Estate Density
Single Family and Duplex:
Residential on minimum lots
of 7.504 square feet
Multifamily Residential.
Semiprofessional Offices
Hospitals. Schools
Business and Industry
Minimum Fire Flow
(gallons per minute)
Water quality shall meet all federal State and County primary
standards for potable water.
(d) Countywide storagga capacity for finished water shall equal no less
than 15 percent of the Countywide average daily demand.
(e) The system shall maintain the capacity to produce and deliver 200
gallons per capita per day.
Objective 1.3 The Village shall develop an emergency water conservation program by
the year 1994 and implement a regular water conservation program.
Policy 1.3.1 Utilize the emergency water conservation program at times of low water
supply; base it upon the South Florida Water Management District model
or similar prototype.
Policy 1.3.2 Village landscaping projects shall use xeriscape landscaping whenever
possible and use golf course irrigation techniques that do not impact
potable water supplies.
Objective 1.4 Protect the Village's natural drainage and recharge areas by retaining
the existing lake and prohibiting any new development with 100 percent
impervious coverage.
Policy 1.4.1 Through land development code techniques, protect the existing Mirror
Lake and assure adequate pervious areas in conjunction with new
development.
Objective 1.5 Maximize use of existing sewer and water lines by extending such lines
to vacant land only at the developer's expense.
Policy 1.5.1 Sewer lines will be extended to existing dense development (see Policy
1.1.2) if necessary to correct deficiencies and conform to regional
policies; although unlikely, any necessary extensions to vacant land will
be paid by developers. Note: water lines serve existing development; the
same vacant land extension policy governs.
4.15
Note: There are no wellfields or prime aquifer recharge areas within the
Village.
Objective 9J-5.011 (2) b 1 and 2 and related Policy (C) 1 are not applicable
since the County has programmed and funded sanitary landfill capacity
improvements to meet ten year future needs; there are no existing
deficiencies.
4.16
COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
GOAL, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
GOAL 1 To conserve, manage and use the environmental and man-made uses in
the coastal area of Miami Shores.
Objective 1.1 To retain the natural waterfront estuarine wetland stretches of the
Biscayne Canal by lack of artificial walls.
Policy 1.1.1 In conjunction with country club golf course maintenance, preserve (and
mitigate where necessary) the natural canal banks to further marine and
wildlife habitat.
Policy 1.1.2 If developers apply for permits to redevelop waterfront sites, the Village
shall carefully review plans in order to minimize impacts upon the Bay,
particularly their drainage and tree protection plans.
Objective 12 Preserve the existing scenic view and public access to the Biscayne Bay
shoreline.
Policy 1.2.1 Retain the Village park along the Bay.
Objective 1.3 Improve the environmental quality of Biscayne Bay and its estuarine
wetlands by eliminating one direct stormwater outfall by 1994 and other
supporting activities.
Policy 1.3.1 Convert one direct Bay outfall system to a French drain or other filtration
system. Note: no other coastal infrastructure improvements or
extensions are needed due to the fully developed land use pattern.
Policy 1.3.2 The City shall cooperate with Dade County in their Comprehensive Plan
policy of identifying the "most environmentally damaging stormwater
outfalls" as a basis for "elimination".
Policy 1.3.3 In conformance with the Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve Management
Plan, the City shall monitor the shoreline at Northeast 100th Street and
contact the County which has the responsibility to remove excessive trash
accumulation as necessary.
Objective 1A Achieve development code policies sensitive to shoreline uses, floodplains
and site plan controls.
Policy 1A.1 Fine-tune the code provisions that apply to the few vacant coastal tracts to
maximize environmental sensitivity including runoff, tree protection
and floodplain construction requirements.
5.21
COASTAL MANAGMEENT ELEMENT
GOAL 2
To minimize the adverse effect of major stomas upon property and lives
within the coastal zone.
Objective 2.1
Maintain existing hurricane evacuation times.
Policy 2.1.1
As a matter of land use policy, deny any major residential land use
density increase requests in the coastal area in order to avoid traffic
generation increases.
Policy 2.1.2
Continue to cooperate with County Police and Office of Emergency
Management officials on evacuation planning and in other ways
conform to the Metro -Dade Emergency Operations Plan for Hurricane
Procedures, including the post evacuation order time of 11 to 13 hours for a
major storm.
411
Objective 2.23 Preserve all historically significant resources as measured by no
demolition or significant alteration (no known archaeological sites are
within the coastal zone).
Policy 2,23.1 The Building and Zoning Department shall continue to monitor the
extensive historic resources within the coastal zone and refer all permit
applications for Village "landmark" properties to the Historic
Preservation Board for review according to their preservation
guidelines.
5.22
Objective 2.a4 Achieve the projected level of service in the coastal zone and high hazard
area with no increase in infrastructure facilities or service areas unless
Public safety so dictates, thereby avoiding additional dense development.
Measurability shall be no sewer line extensions into the single family
neighborhood.
Policy 2.34.1 Achieve the level of service standards as contained in the Traffic
Circulation and Infrastructure Elements relative to roadways, potable
water and stormwater runoff, respectively. Do no extend sanitary sewers
in the single-family residential areas of the coastal zone unless dictated
by septic tank failures.
Policy 2.34.2 Deny any plan amendments or rezoning requests that would increase
residential densities within the coastal zone high hazard area.
GOAL3
See next page
Note. 1) Shoreline Use Priorities: The Village's shoreline land use pattern is firmly
established due to fully developed residential nature e.g. marinas are not
feasible; therefore, 9J-5.012(3)(b)3 and (08 are not applicable.
2) Beaches: Given Miami Shores' Biscayne Bay frontage, there are no beaches so
this is not applicable.
3) Shoreline Public Access: Since one-fourth of the Village shoreline is in public
ownership (deemed adequate) and the balance already developed, this "need"
is not applicable.
5.23
Post Disaster Redevelopment Plan
Note: Underline not used due to length
GOAL 3 Re-establish the economic and social viability of the Village as soon
as possible after the disaster, and in an orderly manner.
Objective 3.1 Post -Disaster Redevelopment Task Force
In 1993 the Village Council shall appoint a PDR Task Force to coordinate
implementation of this plan.
Policy 3.1.2 The Task Force shall consist of the following:
Police Chief
Building and Zoning Director
Public Works Director
Finance Director
Chamber of Commerce representative
Metro -Dade Office of Emergency Management representative
ex officio: Village Attorney
FPL and Southern Bell representatives
Red Cross representative
Objective 3.2 Post -Disaster Assessment of Structures
The Directors of Public Works and Building and Zoning shall initiate a series
of damage surveys within 8 hours after cessation of hurricane winds; first
priority shall be the Hurricane Vulnerability Zone (HVZ)," i.e. east of
Biscayne Boulevard.
Policy 3.2.1 The Building and Zoning Director shall make an oral report to the Metro -
Dade Office of Emergency Management (DOEM) within 8 hours of cessation
of hurricane winds.
Policy 32.2 The Public Works Director shall complete FEMA/DOEM Forms B and C
relative to damage to public facilities and debris removal for submittal to
DCA within 48 hours of cessation of hurricane winds.
Policy 3.2.3 The Building and Zoning Director shall begin the assessment of business and
residential structural damage within 48 hours, working with the DCA team
leader and using DOEM Forms D and E.
Policy 3.2.4 The following criteria shall be used to rate damage:
• "Destroyed" - cost of repair, replacement or relocation exceeds 50% of pre -
disaster replacement value.
"Major Damage" - cost is 25-50%.
"Minor Damage" - cost is less than 25%.
5.24
Objective 3.3 Short Term Report Reviews
Within 5 days after the lifting of the state of emergency, Village officials shall
begin issuing Special or Disaster Repair Building Permits and otherwise
begin the redevelopment process.
Policy 3.3.1 Within 5 days after lifting the state of emergency, the Building and Zoning
Director begins 1) issuing Special Permits for "Minor Damage" repairs and 2)
ordering demolition of "Destroyed" structures that pose an immediate threat
(after insurance assessment).
Policy 3.3.2 Within 5 days, the Public Works Director begins application preparation for
State/Federal rebuilding assistance for Village infrastructure (likely to be
only streets, including sidewalks, drainage and trees plus the seawall).
Policy 3.3.3 Within 30 days, the Building and Zoning Director shall begin granting Special
Permit requests for 1) buildings with "Major Damage" and 2) preliminary decisions
on the rebuilding of "Destroyed" structures (subject to the policies under Goal 2).
GOAL 4 Reduce the loss of life and property in any future hurricane.
Objective 4.1 Redevelopment Plan
This redevelopment plan shall form the basis for special permitting
procedures following a hurricane.
Policy 4.1.1 The seawall shall be rebuilt as necessary.
Policy 4.1.2 The Land Development and Zoning Code shall be amended to require a Special
Approval for any houses in the Coastal High Hazard Area (i.e. directly adjacent
to Biscayne Bay). The criteria for granting such permits shall be as follows:
• Minor Damage - repairs authorized but not to any accessory buildings
with "major damage."
• Major Damage - same as above.
• Destroyed -
Park Extension: If a) located in a pattern that would result in a logical
extension of Bayfront Park, and b) a significant percentage of the cost is
provided by State and Federal sources, then consider a limited extension of
the park. In conjunction with extending the park, assure full replacement/
relocation payments (under Upton -Jones HUD provisions), acquire land for
park (with Federal funds under Section 1362 of the 1968 National Flood
Insurance Act) and apply for Stafford Act funds for park improvements.
Other Parcels: Otherwise, require no greater floor area than before plus
maximum feasible setback from seawall (at least 50 feet), including
partial waiver of streetside yard requirements and prohibition of
accessory buildings.
5.25
Policy 4.1.3 Structures located in the HVZ (east of Biscayne Boulevard) but not in the
CHHA shall meet the following criteria:
• Minor Damage - repairs authorized.
Major Damage - rebuilding must result in a structure that meets current
South Florida Building Code requirements and uses/site design that
meets the Land Development and Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan,
including (if feasible) ground floor elevations at 8 or 9 feet above MSL in
the AE flood zone (in conformance with the FEMA map). Historic houses
listed in the Comprehensive Plan shall be exempt from these provisions.
• Destroyed - same as Major Damage above.
Policy 4.1.4 If Major Damage or Destroyed applies to the eastern Biscayne Boulevard
frontage in the 9100, 8800 and 8900 blocks, redevelopment should occur
through demolition and new site planning.
Objective 4.2 Financing
The Village shall initiate short term and long term financial measures to
implement this plan.
Policy 4.2.1 The Village shall consider an impact fee. For example, it could be levied
against any house in the CHHA or directly facing the CHHA that was
declared "Destroyed" and that rebuilds on -site; the purpose is to create a fund
to assist in City hurricane clean-up costs.
Policy 4.2.2 Following a major hurricane, the Village's capital improvement program and
capital budget shall be amended to fund emergency public facility repairs not
covered by State and Federal grants.
Objective 4.3 Land Use Policy
The Village shall avoid any increase in land use intensity in the Hurricane
Vulnerability Zone (east of Biscayne Boulevard).
Policy 4.3.1 The Village shall consider the hurricane damage implications of any Land
Use Plan or Land Development and Zoning Code amendments that would
increase the density or intensity of land use east of Biscayne Boulevard (the
HVZ).
5.26
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
GOAL 1 To undertake capital improvements necessary to keep its present public
facilities in good condition and to accommodate new development,
within sound fiscal practices.
Objective 1.1 The Capital Improvement Element shall be used as a means to assess
the Village's public facility deficiencies and then achieve an affordable
implementation schedule.
Policy 1.1.1 The operating budget shall continue to accommodate annual systematic
replacements such as police cars and trash trucks plus street overlaying
and park facility renovations.
Policy 1.1.2 By 1994, the Village shall complete the preliminary engineering studies
to determine the cost implications of any sidewalk/bikeway extensions,
the drainage improvements, the western park facility, a pilot street
traffic diversion project and any downtown improvements.
Policy 1.1.3 The Village shall continue the annual preparation of a five year capital
improvement program, including one year capital budget. This shall
be the opportunity for the department heads to utilize their policies for the
systematic replacement or renewal of municipal facilities.
Policy 1.1.4 Overall priority for fiscal planning shall be those projects that enhance
residential neighborhoods and the downtown, as per Land Use Plan.
Specifically, the Traffic Element calls for a street barrier pilot program
(initially from operating budget), the community center improvements
(from the Recreation Element) which enhance residential
neighborhood life and the possible parking/street furniture
improvements which will encourage the redevelopment of downtown
(Land Use Element).
Policy 1.1.5 In setting priorities, the following kinds of criteria will be used:
• Public safety implications: a project to address a threat to public
safety will receive first priority.
• Level of service or capacity problems: next in priority would be
projects needed to maintain the stated Level of Service.
• Ability to finance: A third criteria is the budgetary impact; will
it exceed budget projections?
• Quality of life projects: lowest priority would be those projects not
in categories 1 or 2 but that would enhance the quality of life.
Policy 1.1.6 Continue to pursue a prudent policy in terms of borrowing for major
capital improvements; in no case borrow more than one percent of the
total assessed value in any one loan or bond issue.
9.6
Objective 12 Village officials shall use both the Future Land Use Plan and financial
analyses of the kind contained herein as a basis for reviewing
development applications, in order to maintain an adequate facility
level of service.
Policy 1.2.1
Policy 1.22
Policy 1.2.3
Policy 1.2.4
Policy 12.5
The Level of Service for sewage disposal shall be septic tanks except as
noted in the Infrastructure policies.
The Level of Service Standard for drainage shall be adequately
accommodating stormwater runoff from a one day, 10 year frequency
storm.
ineh The Level of Service Standards for notable water shall be:
(a) The regional treatment system shall operate with a rated capacity
which is no less than 2 percent above the maximum day flow for the
preceding year.
(b) Water shall be delivered to users at a pressure no less than 20 pounds
per sauare inch (psi) and no greater than 100 psi. Unless otherwise
approved by the Metro -Dade Fire Department, minimum fire floas
based on the land use served shall be maintained as follows:
Land s
inele Familv Residential:
Estate Density
Single Family and Duplex:
Residential on minimum lots
of 7,500 sauare feet
Multifamily Residential.
Semiprofessional Offices
HosQtalla, Schools
Business and Industry
Minimum Fire Flow
(gallons per minute)
I
(c) Water quality_shall meet all federal, State and County primary
standards for notable water.
(d) Countywide storage capacity for finished water shall eaual no less
than 15 percent of the Countywide average daily demand.
(e) The system shall maintain the capacity to produce and deliver 200
gallons per capita per day.
The Level of Service Standard for solid waste shall be 6.5 pounds per
capita per day.
The Level of Service Standards in the Recreation Element (see Table
7.3 in that element) shall form the basis for assessing parks.
9.7
Policy 1.2.6 The Level of Service Standards for streets shall be of D for collectors
and arterials (except F on Biscayne Boulevard); this is a State road.
Objective 1.3 Any major future development projects shall pay their fair share of the
public improvement needs they generate.
Policy 1.3.1 The building permit review process shall continue to require on -site
detention and drainage structures acceptable to regional
environmental agencies.
Policy 1.3.2 The downtown redevelopment plan (to be completed by 1992) shall
consider the role property owners and merchants should play in the
provision of adequate parking and street furniture, in tandem with the
Village.
Policy 1.3.3 The development code review shall include the consideration of impact
fees.
Policy 1.3.4 Sidewalks shall be installed as a part of all new development.
Objective 1A Achieve mechanisms whereby public facility requirements generated
by new development are adequately funded in a timely manner.
Policy 1A.1 The development code shall be amended to specify that no development
permit shall be issued unless assurance is given that the public
facilities necessitated by the project (in order to meet level of service
standards) will be in place concurrent with the impacts of the
development.
Objective 1.5 No infrastructure facilities shall be extended into the coastal high
hazard area except in the case of sewer lines to serve a failed septic tank
or redeveloped apartment 1 commercial areas.
Policy 1.5 The City shalt use the annual capital improvement programing process
to achieve this objective.
Note: Development orders: no prior development orders contain public facility
conditions that have not been met; therefore, this policy requirement is not
applicable.
9.8
.tr
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
2 7 4 0 CEN TERV IEW DRIVE a T A L L A H A S S E E, FLORIDA 3 2 3 9 9- 2 1 00
LAWTON CHILES
Governor
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: FILE
THROUGH: Maria Abadal, Plan Review Administrator
Tim Cannon, Planning Manager, TEAM A
LINDA LOOMIS SHELLEY
Secretary
FROM: James E. Truesdell, Planner IV, Bureau of Local Planning
DATE: November 30, 1993
SUBJECT: VILLAGE OF MIAMI SHORES AMENDMENT 93-1 (6 Amendments)
STAFF EVALUATION FOR THE NOTICE OF INTENT
NOI DECISION DATE DECEMBER 2, 1993
NOI PUBLICATION DATE DECEMBER 9, 1993
NEWSPAPER: MIAMI HERALD
MAILING ADDRESS
MAYOR
10050 NE SECOND AVENUE
MIAMI SHORES, FLORIDA 33138-2382
CITY HALL ADDRESS: 10050 NE SECOND AVENUE, MIAMI SHORES, FL 33138
cc: TOM BENTON, VILLAGE MANAGER
CAROLYN A. DEKLE, EX. DIR., SFRPC
ADOPTED AMENDMENT RECEIVED OCTOBER 28, 1993
ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE NO. 563-93 OCTOBER 19, 1993
DCA DOCKET NO. 93-1-NOI-1317--(A)-(I)/(N)
PLAN HISTORY
ORC MAILED
PLAN ADOPTED
NOI (IN) MAILED
NOVEMBER 10, 1988
JANUARY 3, 1989
FEBRUARY 23, 1989
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT • HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
COMMUNITY PROFILE
The Village of Miami Shores is a relatively compact, built -
out, single-family residential community located on Biscayne Bay
in northeastern Dade County. The Village has a land area of 974
acres of which only 6 acres are vacant.
Although water and sewer services are provided by the County,
most of the Village's single-family residences are on septic tanks.
Garbage is collected by the Village and disposed of at the County
landfill.
The 1990 population is 9,9447 with a projection of 9,674 by
the year 2006. Planning timeframes are 1993 and 2006.
SUMMARY OF ADOPTED AMENDMENT 93-1
The Village of Miami Shores has submitted three (3) adopted
Future Land Use Map amendments and three (3) adopted text
amendments to the Future Land Use Element, the Infrastructure
and Capital Improvements Elements and the Coastal Management
Element.
The Future Land Use Map amendments changes four downtown
alley block -faces, (a total of 1.8 acres), from Single -Family
Residential (6 Du/Acre) to Parking to match the zoning map;
changes the future land use designation of the Biscayne Kennel
Club Dog Track parcel, a 22 acre track, from Restricted Commer-
cial (office and light retail) to Single -Family Residential (6
Du/Acre); and, changes the new Archdiocese Church complex (4
acres), on Biscayne Boulevard from Single -Family Residential (6
Du/Acre) and Multi -Family Residential (up to 31 Du/Acre) to
Institutional, to match the other church designations.
The Department raised no objections at the ORC stage for
these amendments.
The Future Land Use Element text change involves a
modification of a policy concerning the dog track parcel; the
Infrastructure and Capital Improvements text change involves a
change to the potable water level of service standard to be
consistent with the County's LOS standard; and, the Coastal
Management Element is being modified to incorporate a post -
disaster redevelopment plan for the Village.
The Department raised no objections at the ORC stage for two
of the text amendments. An ORC objection was raised for the
potable water LOS standard and this is discussed below.
The Village proposed to amend the text of Potable Water
Element Policy 1.2.4 and Capital Improvements Element Policy
1.2.3, concerning the level of service standard for potable water.
Pa
At the time of adoption of the Village Comprehensive Plan,
the Dade County Comprehensive Plan was still being prepared.
The Village's LOS standard was therefore modeled after the DCA
Model Element.. The Village now wishes to incorporate the'same
LOS standard as the County for consistency, since the County's
facilities serve the Village's potable water needs.
However, the City incorporated only one of five sections of
the County's LOS standard rather than the entire LOS standard.
This resulted in a LOS standard expressed in terms of a
percentage of the regional plant capacity rather than a LOS
standard expressed in terms of the capacity per unit of demand.
CITY'S RESPONSE
The City revised the adopted amendment consistent with the
ORC recommendation to adopt the County's LOS standard for potable
water facilities by incorporating the County's LOS standard in
it's entirety (see Attachment A).
CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE AND REGIONAL PLAN
The City has satisfactorily addressed the issues outlined in
the ORC Report and as there are no outstanding issues remaining,
the adopted plan amendment is not inconsistent with the State
Comprehensive Plan or the Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan of
the South Florida Regional Planning Council. This amendment was
submitted and adopted under the new Chapter 163, F.S., revised
procedures.
Catherine Stephens of the South Florida Regional Planning
Council was contacted by telephone on November 23, 1993. The
Council reviewed the adopted amendments and determined that the
amendments were consistent with the South Florida Regional Policy
Plan.
3
VILLAGE OF MIAMI SHORES AMENDMENT 93-1
NOTICE OF INTENT COMPLIANCE DETERMINATION
DEPARTMENTAL FINDINGS
ORDINANCE NUMBER 553-93
IN COMPLIANCE
NOT IN COMPLIANCE
.- \.�•` - ..ems •#,�
Policy 1.2.2 Solid waste: The Village's trucks and the County disposal system shall
accommodate 6.5 pounds per capita per day.
I
Policy 1.2.3 Drainage: The Village's storm drainage facilities shall accommodate
runoff from a one -day storm that statistically occurs once in ten years.
Policy 1.2.,P Potable Water: The water system A&H provide at least 190 gallefts pe
W_ The regional treatment system shall pperate with a rated gulpagjtv
Xhich is no less than 2 percent above the maximum day flow for the
preceding veer.
T1111M on
. - • MIHIVA,
I
Objective 1.3 The Village shall develop an emergency water conservation program by
the year 1994 and implement a regular ouster conservation program.
Policy 1.3.1 Utilize the emergency water conservation program at times of low water
supply; base it upon the South Florida Water Management District model
or similar prototype.
Policy 1.3.2 Village landscaping projects shall use xeriscape landscaping whenever
possible and use golf course irrigation techniques that do not impact
potable water supplies.
Objective IA Protect the Village's natural drainage and recharge areas by retaining
the existing lake and prohibiting any new development with 100 percent
impervious coverage.
Policy 1A.1 Through land development code techniques, protect the existing Mirror
Lake and assure adequate pervious areas in conjunction with new
development.
Objective 2.6 Maximize use of existing sewer and water lines by extending such lines
to vacant land only at the developer's expense.
INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT
GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
GOAL 1 To provide and maintain the public infrastructure in a manner that will
insure public health, safety and quality of life.
Objective 1.1 By 1999, correct certain deficiencies in the drainage system through a
Program of facility improvements; the deficiencies are cited in the
policies and in more detail in the analysis. The other infrastructure
systems do not have deficiencies. Future Village 'needs" are not
expected to exceed current needs due to limited development potential.
Policy 1.1.1 The Village (in tandem with several homeowners and the State) shall
implement. a phased drainage improvement program and continue the
supporting catch basin cleaning so that adequate street drainage can be
achieved and maintained. The areas are on 10th Court near Northeast
105th Street, Northeast 103rd Street at Northeast 13th Avenue (require
homeowner participation), and two locations along Northeast 6th Avenue
(State responsibility).
Policy 1.1.2
Convert one Bay drainage outfall to a filtration system by 1994; see
Coastal Management Element.
Policy 1.1.3
Require the extension of sanitary sewers to serve any development that
exceeds 6 units per acre or produces more than 1,500 gallons of sewage per
day.
Objective 1.2
The Village shall provide an adequate level of service during the
planning period; see policies for measurable standards.
Policy 12.1
Sewage: Septic tanks shall be the level of service except as specified in
Policy 1.1.3.
Policy 1.2.2
Solid waste: The Village's trucks and the County disposal system shall
accommodate 6.5 pounds per capita per day.
Policy 12.3
Drainage: The Village's storm drainage facilities shall accommodate
runoff from a one -day storm that statistically occurs once in ten years.
Policy 12.0 Potable Water: The water system shall provide at least 100 gallens Pe
person per day at it pressure of at 4east 20 pounds. - . th:
4.14
fe) The sygtem -IsH maintain the capacity to produce and deliver 200
gallons per cg ita nCr day.
Objective 1.3 The Village shall develop an emergency water conservation program by
the year 1994 and implement a regular water conservation program.
Policy 1.3.1 Utilize the emergency water conservation program at times of low water
supply; base it upon the South Florida Water Management District model
or similar prototype.
Policy 1.3.2 Village landscaping projects shall use xeriscape landscaping whenever
possible and use golf course irrigation techniques that do not impact
potable water supplies.
Objective IA Protect the Village's natural drainage and recharge areas by retaining
the existing lake and prohibiting any new development with 100 percent
impervious coverage.
Policy 1,4.1 Through land development code techniques, protect the existing Mirror
Lake and assure adequate pervious areas in conjunction with new
development.
Objective 1.5 Maximize use of existing sewer and water lines by extending such lines
to vacant land only at the developer's expense.
Policy 1.5.1 Sewer lines will be extended to existing dense development (see Policy
1.1.2) if necessary to correct deficiencies and conform to regional
policies; although unlikely, any necessary extensions to vacant land will
be paid by developers. Note: water lines serve existing development; the
same vacant land extension policy governs.
4.15
N
a,
�v)rntzir
�> TJ C) t=7
rno-ola,rn
--j 'J -13 -13 —]
Qn N N Q` t•n
O IPa co W Go
1; 1AW
la lP o o �
\N N [V N
c o 1� s_n IA
I-- r.-
+.n O 1P N
1-- N
�] W a` Ln a, 4n
N
r�o1�w r +
�D
Oo
O
�]3
rtnr A
MCri
r nr A
1,r1
O
-
0
, rO+
71a--�
`O V1
ram- &
`O l~n
0040
V w
0000
m
0 +O Oi 0
m
0 0 Oi 0
A.
+ww
P
+IDS
q
Y
C
fD
10 10
IO 10
C
co
%O tO
H
ID ID
H
%a ka
a
a
IQ
m
9 9
b
C1 V N I LO
V tipmNm !D � tipmNm O
ra- (DD
V-1 mm-jV n -4CO o+mmIo b
N N V m1� W N 1nN Um►j Vpi
n
s
r� rrr►, C+ rr rrrl� p
WU W m V:N a 4.0 W 0om P 14
apN N10 Q1 V 1�D r l0 U IONN ID
H H
H O
1 1 [J N o w ��Y V1 ti] lT lT l0 n
001P 01 P.Ow N1P W N m
1 1 11 1 1
1•+N NNW W In1P 0�0101
W W 00 1p m tN
1P 1P W O% U 1P U V 1P Q1 m 00
1P�, UtDWN NO V1C 61-'
`
µo
µo
1., x
w
a s
o0.
a s
o.
00,
o
C
y
hl
x.,
0000
mdw
C)
0000
w
t7H
FO.,.
O
r+
(D
0000
0
f+
o000
O+
Y--�
O tp a,
D O
A.
10 1P
10 ID
F+•
(�
l•I
O �
q
b
In
��
0
O�01TQ1 O�
H
t�O 1�0
H
•�
x
1
O
x
H
O Ih
o
1-n
tD
-jLq
E
ji-40
C
w gip' O
rn
r w w1
1a
rn
W r N
cn
ce
0
Z
o m
n
I.-Ul
tr �D cc cn
rD
tr
�1
In �a CO
►-'
1. 0
V Q1
U
�
(�
y
1j
U~•
�• h+1
N N
Or
w F•1 IJ N
1+mm W
('}
N N
W N
1••1 N N N
co W
[^
Hx
r (�
^ G
rnr�rm
O
Fes„
y
fD
On1
oars
Ip
i.11p
m+ira
h7
� G
V+1-n
1
H
r
o O i
:5
Q,
O
1
6
14 n
�
1 1
�
m 0
"�
r r r
W r I•+ O� m
LM
U
'*+
r
►-1 1
10 C%
N I Fr N
1n r cn O
r+
�
N N
T 1--�
N I••1 r N
V 01 m W
a
A
5C
ro
CD w
InW
WIOW W
fD
Vtil N
O(nm�O
O
rry�
0
H
1
cD
Q.
o
N
CDfD
V1 �OUNA
O
1�+
w tly
I w
w l wIn
0
r w
1-'N W lT
'1
x
C1 w
►•'.
pl
r w
U
11-4
r]
r n
NO
ry
O O
m O+
W 10 V V
�Q r
CO V V
0
N
F
01 V WN m
N
U
@
N �OLa
1•+ V W N
9'
O
(_nn
1
Ill ol
CO V
•P ID m•P
mm
UO]m
rF
NNNI�N
111
H
w
O� N O U N
O
1
1 I 1
D 0
1 1--�
m
1--� N w
.PrO+O
1PW
wV41O
C
1P 1�OW•P
0
+
0
.
OIG
41V W•P
OW
•PmWU
M
STATE OF FLORIDA �W 3 - ��wp,
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINV-Y"
BISCAYNE KENNEL CLUB, INC., )
Petitioner, )
VS. )
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS )
and THE VILLAGE OF MIAMI SHORES, )
Respondents. )
APR 25 199E
DEPT, OF Corp,,,,
GENERAL
CASE NO. 94--0257GM
THIRD ORDER OF CONTINUANCE
Petitioner has filed a Joint Motion for Continuance in
this case. It has been represented in the motion -that the
parties have resolved their dispute. It has also been
represented that the parties are drafting a Stipulated Settlement
Agreement. Finally, it has been represented that all parties
join in requesting a continuance of the final hearing of this
matter.
Based upon the foregoing, it is
ORDERED:
1. The Joint Motion for Continuance is GRANTED;
2. in. a eYn e o e
J,95 s ANC> I EII and
3. On or before June 1, 1995, the parties shall file a
report informing the undersigned of the status of this case. If
the report is not received by the Division of Administrative
Hearings on or before June 1, 1995 it will be assumed that the
parties have finalized the settlement of their dispute and the
Division of Administrative Hearings' file will be closed.
DONE and ORDERED this day of April, 1995, in
Tallahassee, Florida.
LARRY TIN
HeariAlgrofficer
Division of Administrative Hearings
The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550
(904) 488-9675
Filed with the Clerk of the
Division of Administrative Hearings
this -day of April, 1995.
Copies Furnished To:
Clifford A. Schulman, Esquire
Adrienne Friesner Pardo, Esquire
1221 Brickell Avenue, 23rd Floor
Miami, Florida 33131
Terrell K. Arline
Assistant General Counsel
Department of Community Affairs
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
William Fann, Esquire
Village of Miami Shores Attorney
9999 NE 2nd Avenue
Miami Shores, Florida 33138c
2