Loading...
O-668-08 ORDINANCE NO. 668-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE COUNCIL, AMENDING THE MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ADDRESS ISSUES AND WHERE APPROPRIATE, INCORPORATE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS' OBJECTION, RECOMMENDATION AND COMMENT REPORT, PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, After a public hearing held on December 4, 2007, the Miami Shores Village Council passed Resolution No. 1138-07 and Resolution No. 1140-08 authorizing transmittal of the Miami Shores 2025 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and various other governmental agencies; and, WHEREAS, The DCA solicited comments from the other governmental agencies and together with comments from DCA on the Plan (DCA No. 08-1ER), wrote an Objection, Recommendation and Comment Report (ORC), which was forwarded to the Village; and, WHEREAS, the Village Administration has reviewed the ORC and has addressed the objections, recommendations and comments raised in the document, and is proposing the amendments contained in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof; and, WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Village to approve the amendments and adopt the ordinance; NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Miami Shores Village Council: Section 1. That the amendments to the Miami Shores 2025 Comprehensive Plan, designated as DCA No. 08-1ER by the DCA and contained in Exhibit A are hereby approved by the Council and shall be transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs in accordance with the proper procedures outlined in the Florida Statutes and the Florida Administrative Code. Section 2. That this Ordinance become effective immediately upon it adoption by the Village Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 1st day of July' 2008. ATTEST: L Az'�w a Herta Holly, Mayor Barbara A. Estep, MMC Village Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Richard Sarafan Village Attorney EXHIBIT "A" MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO DCA"ORC"REPORT 2007 EAR-BASED AMENDMENTS DCA No. 08-1ER Adopted J u 1 v, 1 , 2008 Miami Shores Village Council - 1 - Table of Contents Here A. WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES WORK PLAN SUB ELEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT ..........................................................................4 OBJECTION1.SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................4 DCA RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................................4 MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 1 COMMENT 1.............................6 MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 1 COMMENT 2...........................11 MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 1 COMMENT 3...........................13 MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 1 COMMENT 4...........................14 MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 1 COMMENT 5...........................15 B. COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT ........................................................ 16 OBJECTION 2.SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................16 DCARECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................................................16 MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 2.....................................................17 FUTURE LAND USE MAP...........................................................................................................20 COASTAL AREA-COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA..........................................................21 C. OBJECTION: THE AMENDMENT DOES NOT MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS IN CHAPTER 163, F.S., AND RULE 9J-5, F.A.C., FOR AN EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENT...........................................................22 OBJECTION3.SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................22 DCA RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................................................22 MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 3.....................................................23 OBJECTION4.SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................24 DCARECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................................................24 MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 4.....................................................25 OBJECTION 5.SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................30 DCA RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................................................30 MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 5.....................................................31 OBJECTION6.SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................32 DCA RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................................................32 MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 6.....................................................33 OBJECTION7.SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................34 DCA RECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................................................34 MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 7.....................................................35 OBJECTION 8.SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................36 DCARECOMMENDATIONS..............................................................................................................36 MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 8.....................................................37 -2- RESPONSE TO C. OBJECTIONS 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8:.....................................39 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT...................................39 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT............................................................40 EDUCATION ELEMENT....................................................................................43 -3- IFA.Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Sub Element of Infrastructure Element OBJECTION 1.SUMMARY Although the Village has no responsibility regarding the permitting and distribution of potable water to its citizens, there are certain Water Supply Work Plan requirements that must be addressed by the Village. The Village has not identified the amount of water it receives from Miami-Dade County and the City of North Miami or included data and analysis to demonstrate that these service providers have planned for the Village's future water needs.The Work Plan also needs to be more specific about the actions the Village and its water supply providers are taking concerning conservation and reuse. Objective 1 of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element generally requires coordination between the Village comprehensive plan and plans for other governmental entities, including the District, but there is no policy requiring coordination with the South Florida Water Management District's Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update. The Village has not included a policy to address water supply concurrency requirements pursuant to Section 163.3180(2)(a), F.S. There are also inconsistencies in the Infrastructure Element between the text on page 56 and the table on page 57 when referring to the level of service standard and population projections that should be resolved. The population figures and level of service standard for potable water discussed on page 56 are different than the population figures and the potable water level of service standard included in the table on page 57. The 100 gallons per capita per day level of service standard discussed on page 56 is inconsistent with the adopted level of service standard of 200 gallons per capita per day. The Village also has not adopted potable water levels of service for non-residential land uses such as office,commercial,and mixed use. Citations: Sections 163.3167(13), 163.3177(6)(c), (d), and 163.3180(2)(a), F.S; Rules 9J- 5.005(3), (5), 9J-5.0055(2), 9J-5.0 11( 1), (2)(b)2, 4, (c) 1, 2, 9J-5.0 13(1)(c), (2)(b)2, and 9J-5.0 15 (3)(b)2, 3,(c) 1, 3,and 11,F.A.C. DCA RECOMMENDATIONS Revise the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Sub-element to: 1. Include the amount or percentage of the water supplied by Miami-Dade County and City of North Miami to the Village and include information to demonstrate that the Village's 10-year Water Supply needs can be met, or that plans are in place to meet this future demand, 2. Provide data and analysis addressing the extent to which potable water needs for the Village are met through conservation measures such as the conservation and reuse program identified in the Miami-Dade County Water Supply Plan Appendix D, 3. Revise the Capital Improvements Element to include a policy to require potable water concurrency as part of the Village's concurrency management system, 4. Include a policy in the Intergovernmental Coordination Element requiring coordination with the Water Management District's Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update, and 5. Revise the population figures to be consistent in the text on page 56 and in the table on page 57. Revise the water use projections on page 56 based on the adopted level of service standard of 200 gallons per capita per day. The Village should also adopt -4- potable water levels of service for non-residential land uses such as office, commercial, and mixed-use. Such actions will be helpful in assessing water supply needs for future site-specific non-residential land use amendments. -5- MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 1 COMMENT 1 The Miami-Dade County, "Water Supply Facilities Work Plan,"dated March 2008, Support Data, CDM Project NO. 6430-57901-061, Kenneth L. Caban P.E., BCEE,For Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. is incorporated by reference. Miami Dade County provides 100% of the potable water for Miami Shores Village and the volume is accounted for in the Miami Dade Water and Sewer Department, "Water Supply Facilities Work Plan,"dated March 2008, Support Data, CDM Project NO. 6430- 57901-061,Kenneth L. Caban P.E., BCEE,For Camp Dresser&McKee Inc. Appendix C,Water Supply for Municipalities and,Exhibit 3-1 Water Supply Service Area,Retail Customers by Municipality. Miami-Dade County provides water to the City of North Miami that is distributed to the area of Miami Shores Village north of the Biscayne Canal and along NE 105'h Street from a water main located along Biscayne Boulevard through the City of North Miami's distribution system. The City of North Miami bills Miami Shores Village residents directly for the water. The following language responds to Objection 1, Comment 1 and is included in the amended comprehensive plan starting at page 56. The new language has a double underline: INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT GOAL Provision of Potable Water Supplies and Facilities: Potable Water Supply The Miami-Dade County "Water Suo_oly Facilities Work Plan:" dated March 2008. Support Data, CDM Project NO, 6430-57901-061, Kenneth_L. Caban P._E.. BCEE_, for Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. is herby incorporated by reference. All potable water for Miami Shores is supplied by the Hialeah-Preston Water Treatment Plant located in Hialeah. The plant has a design capacity of 235 million gallons per day (MGD) with an average daily demand of 166.1 MGD and utilizes a lime softening treatment process. The plants average daily water demand for 2005 was approximately 166 MGD and served about 993,872 persons. Demand attributable to Miami Dade estimates Miami Shores is estimated oetable water demand at 1.88 million gallons per day, based on the 29)S 2007 population estimate of 40,486 12.159 and per capita water use of I88 -6- 200 gallons per capita per day or equal the Miami-Dade County standard, whichever is less edeas daily per Fess def4. There is no way to measure the amount of potable water consumed by Miami Shores since Village properties receive water directly from the Miami-Dade County water system. According to WASD, the water purchased does not run through a central location that can be monitored. There are no industrial uses in the Village; therefore, it is not necessary to increase the gallons per capita figure to account for industrial water demand. Water Distribution System The City of North Miami and WASD operate water distribution systems in the Village. North Miami serves the predominantly residential land uses along N.E. 105th Street and north of the Biscayne Canal from a six-inch water main located along Biscayne Boulevard that Fries water ffem M8ai )add North Miami serves3 single family homes and 380 multi-family residences for a total of 537 units served. The Miami-Dade WASD system serves the remainder of Miami Shores with a series of 12-inch water mains along N.E. 2nd 6d', and 10"' avenues, N.E. 95th Street and N.W. 5th Avenue. These mains supply the water distribution lines that range in size from ten inches down to two inches. Needs Assessment Miami Shores Village does not intend to provide potable water treatment or distribution facilities. New development or redevelopment will be served by the existing City of North Miami and Miami-Dade water distribution systems. These systems supply potable water meeting all health and safety requirements and provide a satisfactory level of service for Miami Shores. The identification of existing and projected facilities needs will remain the responsibility of the City of North Miami and the County. These facilities are expected to adequately accommodate the 2025 projected Village demand of ',' 1.91 mgpd since the County treatment plant capacity is currently 501 MGD, with a system peak demand of only 380.31 MGD in the year 2005. As well, the County plans to bring the system capacity to over 600 MGD by 2025 with the addition of approximately 111 MGD to its current treatment capacity. Miami Shores Village will work closely with theses service providers to assure that potable water needs continue to be met satisfactorily. -7- _ s Mm nhtM,ALML WA .fid,®19\®/!P]A,a^.�A®J ixay6l da o'er • • ■ • • • ■ ■ ••1•.lt•,• ,•r�,;J lR:1.:L:11P1•� •��r •l•1 l�'�•.1• rl•,••„ •lyyy, • • • RmFiE • • j 11i 11 : MilghTsTAL • . ill �.�� • _1 � 1 • • 1 • , ' •l • . ' - 1 lip • -u.1 • -••L11"1 "i :• _1• . � M : • 1• •• •l • 1•Ll L ell : 1� ►.• y MI1 ■• 11".Y "•� .�� • • . ff 1 11 : •1. V. -1! l " � 11 ' . •" 1 •. 1�llllvll _�•-1 • 1 � �"� l" • X11 1• 1• _•1 -1 " 1 lllllg ♦ . ,- • • - • • -� • �( � Lam. m ff GTA no i .1 1 1' • _ 1 � K • • • • •• -• . - 1 P -• 1 1- • l � 1 • - • • r, l l •11 � MOM • _• 1 1 'fir •1 •. � . •� �-� •Ii 11 . l �.• - • 1 � �" •• tl"1 • •-FIFM1 r •1 l - r• r • r • • • • l - - tt • - r- r Me •-•M 1 " r' L 1 - _smil 1 1" 1 1 _:Ifir "lel ' �l 1 1 . rr • -r • l- • _1 • •. 1 - - 11.1-• "11"1 _ � K Ilr 11 l- • •1 • "1 • • . rr •_ 1 tl•R • -• • . l- 1 1 .�• •� • "l - 1 X11 ' r. _-• •l r• r • l _1. • � r- • -► • _ ll _l r. "� l" lir -1 • 1 • : ' l9wrlwavilmill Met • r- . r .•- •- 1 -• o- •. r •l Itswell • ♦ • 1" •1 ••- r- . r r • - r •• • • .• • _ •1 LFII IT MoWmvmtr r - - ••-• - • Ll- 1�. •1 • 1" � RMOMMEMMUFTMEEMIM -• -� � ��- - • 1.11-1• . • �- - • r-� r .l �• •1 • 111 !_-- - r - -1 -• • l- :•. neffellakw4celilt • •l _ _11 l - • • - •yu-lr . •1 � - - .•• r -• r ir Toom 1. • "t •11.1 • • •1 ' r • 1 .•• • 1 ' . • lr • "1 -• 1 1" 1 1 y ' � r• •- •1 Il-l�. •l rll t-• • 1 - C ,1� - • � 1, - - • r � . - - - 1 •- r- . r • : r 1 Reuse.• MDWASD has committed to implement a total of 170 mad of reuse as noted in the County's 20-year water use permit. A list of the reuse projects and deadlines s presented in Exhibit 30 of the County's 20-year water use permit and are included in Appendix F. Reuse projects to recharge the aquifer with highly treated reclaimed water will be in place before additional withdrawals over the base condition water use are made from the Alexander Orr and South Dade subarea wellfields. These wellfields supply water to several municipalities included in MDWASD's retail and wholesale customer service area In addition reuse irrigation projects are anticipated for the North and Central District Wastewater Treatment Plants, These Rroiects will be implemented in the C Y of North Miami and North Miami Beach, and are currently under construction for Key Biscayne. EKM*GI Wafer Supply Sayre Area Rera Cuscamers 6Y��Y *Wcl1,el poll-batm P-Oad . ""s.Ara Pepuw- Web.Supply by&MABD-".4.dAWRrfthsdWabr CUAKKpmty (m)-imuec v Y- w vermrra 30 735414 38224 XIM 3890 37335 030 496 24 24822 24874 357 394 178 3.82 387 383 O.W a SkBI7 81,380dEw 53jw WV48 64158 emoem 7.88 T98 B.10 fl22 833 8.46 0 41730 b3 65821 OOT os fl 8.83 7.88 8.26 B. .99 oral 33 31888 4S 9 0878 69 888 woe®neoddpai S.1S S.e9 B.Be 7.38 7.78 8.20 Portal 1 1,860 1 7831 t 18 t, sena es 0 028 02g 0 2a 018 1 808 7 13 1 638 13858 14.174 samom 1.86 1.88 2.06 210 215 220 404 418 8 50T 496788 621030 emaem 62M 8997 68.65 7282 76.88 80.78 0.aaerrs 100 1 108 /1 118638 121044 128 828 et 84,407 67,417 70 73 8.74 ebb lo.OD 10.45 1090 11.38 1.siov 24888 26673 27.015 464 2B 804 31.333 ewer as 3.85 398 4.10 4.41 493 426 Shwas 1 1S9 1 1 / 1 4 1 serge m 198 1 1.80 1.90 1.01 1.82 28800 378 28607 ]1 93 36781 same as 4.1 4.32 4b7 495 5.12 S.� 18489 18 698 OW 21,323 wmm 10T 3.08 311 Me 25 391 Moroi 1 117 12738 3 1 4 2- E2 14876 smrm as 1,82 197 296 2 4 2T2 1 1 846 14,1 ,039 1 IB 17886 senan T.it 220 233 24 2.80 2.70 7 9 828 1 11 MW inw, Nebo: 1.A Portion ofAcenmra's neW@pal POW40 n served by North lAm80each 6449} 2.WerN OeNen's 4unitlyel Bowldary bwOtln NBmd•OadeWefer eM 68aer 0eDermrer2N40WA6DA 448 w1a COyofQpaLaFe'a Service Awe.Thawater auppyfore porBon of4iwm Owderys mwpoputmkoaetp9P N4B§ Service Area is prwlded by 4DWASD.In 2m8,aabr for the ara Within MM suppled by NDWASD.eM be provhted by the C870l NAB. 3. PopWatlon p4elecDone Pnwl4ed b7tdieM-Dade DepeMmntdPl4nNng ar4l Zonhq 7rm+spwSon Anatyab Zone RAZlT006 poputwbn dma. 4.2DOS-MMASD ea longer suppOm North Weed Beach service area. 6.Popldadm b Urban Pxpanaba Areas krCtaded le pmlec6wm after 2076. 8.Projedons basedon nyffiemaW average Per capib of 155%xd. 7.M d=galh percapifaperday 8.Mal DF=areaverage d.Dy Dog e.mm c rrtlm..got"Per day - 10- MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 1 COMMENT 2 Water conservation measures such as the conservation and reuse program identified in the Miami-Dade County Water Supply Plan are addressed in the Infrastructure Element on pages 54 and 61 of the Miami Shores 2025 Village Comprehensive Plan. The following language responds to Objection 1,Comment 2 and is included in the amended comprehensive plan Infrastructure Element on pages 54 and 61, and is added to the Conservation Element on page 79.The new language follows and has a double underline: INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT GOAL Objective 10: Maintain inter-local agreements for potable water treatment and distribution. Policy 10.4: The Village shall maintain and improve the land development code and other regulations that include the following: • water conservation-based irrigation requirements • water conservation-based plant species requirements derived from the South Florida Water Management District's list of native species and other appropriate sources • lawn watering restrictions • use of ultra-low volume water saving devices fer .bstaRba rehabilitatien-and new construction as required by the Florida Building code • other water conservation measures, as feasible. Objective 11 : Water Planning Policy 3: The Infrastructure Element addresses water planning and contains water saving measures including: • The Village shall maintain and improve the land development code and other regulations that include the following: o water conservation-based irrigation requirements o water conservation-based plant species requirements derived from the South Florida Water Management District's list of native species and other appropriate sources o lawn watering restrictions o use of ultra-low volume water saving devices for substai#4a+ new construction as required by the Florida Building code 0 other water conservation measures, as feasible. CONSERVATION ELEMENT CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOAL Objective 3: Water quantity. The Village shall maintain and improve the land development code and other regulations that include the following: • water conservation-based irrigation reauirements • water conservation-based plant species requirements derived from the South Florida Water Management District's list of native species and other appropriate sources • lawn watering restrictions • use of ultra-low volume water saving devices f r s bsta"� new construction as reauired by the Florida Building code • other water conservation measures, as feasible. - 12- MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 1 COMMENT 3 The Village will amend the Capital Improvements Element Objective 1,Policy 2.1 Potable Water,to include a policy to require potable water concurrency as part of the Village's concurrency management system. This information is elsewhere in the code including Future Land Use and the Education Element however. The following language responds to Objection 1,Comment 3 and is included in the amended comprehensive plan Capital Improvements Element on page 99.The new language follows and has a double underline: Capital Improvements Element, Objective , Policy 2.1 Potable Water: ■ The Village shall maintain and improve as part of the land development code a concurrency management system that shall specify that no development permit shall be issued unless the potable water supply meets or exceeds the level of service standards specified in the Infrastructure Policies or will be in place concurrent with the impacts of the development or the permit is conditional to assure that they will be in place. The requirement that no development permit shall be issued unless public facilities necessitated by the project are in place concurrent with the impacts of development shall be effective immediately and shall be interpreted pursuant to the provisions of Policv 1.4 of the Eu-t-ur-e- Land Use Element. [93-5.016 (3) (c) 61 - 13- MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 1 COMMENT 4 Miami Shore Village will add language to the Comprehensive Plan intergovernmental Coordination Element to coordinate with the Water Management District's Lower East Coast Water Supply Update The following language responds to Objection 1, Comment 4 and is included in the amended comprehensive plan Intergovernmental Coordination Element on page 90. The new language follows and has a double underline: Policy 1.7• The City shall oarticioate in the development of a Regional Water Supply Plan in conjunction with the SE MD. - 14- MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 1 COMMENT 5 1. Please see the response to No. 1 above. The population figure now used is based on Miami-Dade County population projections for Miami Shores Village as identified in the"Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Support Data,"Revised March 2008, beginning with a 2007 estimated population of 12,159. The figure used in the preceding document is approximately 2,000 residents higher than the figure provided by the Miami-Dade Planning Department. 2. The Village will adopt an LOS of 200 gpcd of potable water or equal to the Miami- Dade County standard,whichever is less. The village is predominantly single-family residential,has no industrial development,very limited office or commercial development and virtually no vacant land,therefore no LOS is necessary for industrial, office or commercial uses. - 15- B. Coastal Management Element OBJECTION 2.SUMMARY Objective 5 of the Coastal Management Element establishes hurricane evacuation times for in county evacuation of 19 hours and out of county evacuation of 62.2 that are not inconsistent with Section 163.3178(9)(a), F.S. This section of the statute allows a local government to comply with Rules 9J-S.012(3)(b)6 and 7., F.A.C., when considering a comprehensive plan amendment within the Coastal High Hazard Area if the local government adopts a level of service standard for out of county hurricane evacuation is maintained for a category 5 hurricane, or a "12-hour evacuation time to shelter is maintained for a category 5 storm event....and shelter space reasonably expected to accommodate the residents of the development contemplated by the proposed comprehensive plan amendment is available;" or appropriate mitigation, as outlined in the statute,is provided to satisfy these evacuation times. The Village's out of county evacuation time does not ensure a safe evacuation time for residents that will need to evacuate during a category 5 hurricane and the in county evacuation time is inconsistent with the evacuation time established in the statue. The Village has not included a definition of the Coastal High Hazard Area within their Coastal Management Element consistent with Section 163.3178(2)(c),F.S. Citations: Rules 9J-S.0 12(3)(b)6, 7, and (3)(c)7, F.A.C.; Section 163.3178(2)(d), 163.3178(9),F.S. DCA RECOMMENDATIONS In order to use evacuation times as an alternative to complying with Rules 9J-5.0 12(3)(b)6 and 7, F.A.C., the Village must revise Objective 5, in the Coastal Management Element, to be consistent with Section 163.3178(9), F.S. The Village can either establish an out of county evacuation time that ensures a reasonable and safe evacuation time for residents during a category 5 hurricane or that is supported by data and analysis that is professionally acceptable and applied, establish a hurricane evacuation time for evacuating to a shelter reasonably expected to have shelter space that does not exceed the standard in the statute, or delete the proposed evacuation times and accept the statute evacuation times as default times. The Village must also include the new definition of the Coastal High Hazard Area as defined in Section 163.3178(2)(c), F.S., and depict this area on the Future Land Use Map or map series by July 1,2008 as required by Section 163.3178(9)(c),F.S. - 16- MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 2 The following language responds to Objection 2 defining coastal high hazard area and adopting a level of service of 16 hours for out of county hurricane evacuation for a category 5 storm and is included in the amended comprehensive plan Coastal Management Element on pages 66 and 67. Map 1.4 Future Land Use, has been amended to add a note identifying the area east of Biscayne Avenue as the Coastal High Hazard Area. Map 5.1 Coastal Area, has been amended to identify the Coastal Planning Area as the Coastal High Hazard Area. The new language follows and has a double underline: COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT GOAL Objective 4: Direct population concentrations away from the coastal high hazard areas. hurricane vulnerability zone and limit coastal high hazard area hurricane vulnerability zone infrastructure expenditures. Direct population concentrations away from the coastal high hazard areas, hurricane vulnerability zone and limit the expenditure of Village funds on infrastructure within the Coastal Hioh Hazard Area, hurricane vulnerability zone if such infrastructure would have the effect of directly subsidizing development which is significantly more intensive than authorized by this Plan. This ebjeetive shall be FneasuFed by its implementing pelie8es. [93-5.012 (3) (b) 5 and 6] The Coastal High Hazard Area is defined as the area below the elevation of e category 1 storm surae line as established by a Sea. Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computerized storm surae model. Monitoring and Evaluation: Annual record of Village actions to direct away or reduce the population of the hurricane vulnerability zone. Progress towards meeting this objective shall also be measured by the implementation of the following policies. Policy 4.1: The Village shall restrict development in accordance with the Future Land Use Map of the plan. It is the legislative judgment of the Village that the Future Land Use Map provides the most appropriate way to limit development in the coastal high hazard areas, hurricane vulnerability zone - 17- consistent with reasonable property rights and long-established land use patterns. [93-5.012 (3) (c) 9] Policy 4.2: The Village shall limit its funding of public infrastructure expansion if such funding and such expansion would have the direct effect of direet' subsidizing a specific private development in the Village. [93-5.012 (3) (c) 7] Policy 4.3: Objective 4 and Policy 4.2 above shall not be implemented in such a way as to preclude the Village's plans to improve drainage facilities or reconfigure streets in order to provide adequate infrastructure to serve the Future Land Use Plan development pattern or development for which rights were vested prior to enactment of the Plan. [93-5.012 (3) (c) 9] Objective 5: Hurricane evacuation. The V",11ae.e Shal. SW Analysis Reeeft, US GeFos- Ene4neers and PBS80. 29G3-;-The VillaOe adopts and shall maintain a level of service of 16 hours for out of county hurricane evacuation for a category 5 storm event as measured on the Saffir-Simpson scale. and 62.2 heurs fer eut ef epuftgDeuatien. The Village shall maintain the evaeuafien cleamnee time wh*eh is based en beth pFe HurFleane Andre planning and pest HurFieane And nee. in additien, the Village shall. maintain the EUFrent (as ef guly, '999' 1 i 9.25 te 17.25 heur Gategert z-and�Tevacuatien eararfee-t+meand the--esar„ated-22.5 this ebjeetive aFea based en Table 1.4 entitled ""1993 Base Year HurFie tifnes; and rapid, medium and leng . [93-5.012 (3) (b) 7] - 18- Monitoring and Evaluation: Annual record of public actions taken within the Village, which contribute to reduction in hurricane evacuation times. - 19- I I �lnrRitfRrar� �r18k!'P{ip}$y{<R1 `' L.trllWo�Yec a UNiNCpRORATEp ' FIY NII-D74DE COUNTY UKXWCO IEA - IRi�I�tg$ r rx tWn®re`lm� ... .e ;otiee+e6w.Mt�.e� � rmvrgecasmt � � Legend � h � �' tmsrgaritiar n ftbetlt6,iiRral _ y, 91a ,e-F.amlyReSltlehp2l } a, ' �IMbteW:FseResiderRPdMnst(tudanal °rc - Mur&Fam4yResldentIai ff - :C,ep"C.Dmmetelal RestrlctE CiathMertial Instltutir nal 0CbD0°'m - tr4BfA0i1H111 Pa ord RecreationAmao lies ParWhg sr��e°Pa,erRv:na�ramesr � � � � 50tJRGE: WILAM I SHARES VILLAGE El P&tgkl rtenr�4rtltar �e+.anrx t N'- EVALU#tT IOP AISIT3 fFPP.FRISA i REPORT.2©O5 Comme�erat j 111Y MC OI PQ�tAT Efl. 0- 0:25 0:5 0:75 1-ml les % I F A1�+II-DitD'E�'C�U1l•N'I:Y - 1 Y i t Y . d5b�'.T�Trxy}'(�S.y,�.Snstt:J3U5 Npltia�f1n:;1m�.9r+.5d4c1r4YT7aa PY33 IT � SuuORM VILLA diQ70 FUTURE, .Ll"11\lL USE:J,VJ-" r 454 475 9 50 OMPRE WE PIAT FUTURE LAND USE MAP -20- a A�A o+o+A o �; fit++A�c+A+A+ooAA +�+ +ice++°s.�r+.•�' iz �asx� "'� o+C�99.4•,+-8•twAA®AAAw�� �' S r � % s 9a�i O MISMINIM i tz mop-DgglyaA bmRmffir. — ..mow �'i ^' - '`r '��,��L`. s f , ,q�®'®'��i°��►,yv�A�i' �®��'a►��-i'�ly�®• ..r,� 7 • Mm IMIRMNAMMI, � w '< - • Himarm WMPMW� r�saa ta' ' v iwo 1 '8 .a a r � �cF�aca ✓�'n.C2'f�AA6*z.cs 23��:�...9 't�, gp� v '_,y. ¢aoaerse• mmmuIRRIMM WHOM M�13 M. mU-1-1 —B b. '� �vtq„®w-,�Yrar � - :a�'' ARM 93SHIM own � �F7d_ S�y� , Jf iEs rrg„a•vra �"�a.A'A.,��ff-�r da�� � vn *3:..r � �.,'$ r`�`"w ���..�� . ' —+ Old91 E 1 z— , Azo i i� s `j;F '��' ,"r^ �.�j ,n�&'asfA�r��'-'�v,�'�ry>aY,tvs. x s•. ' t .;:. w w^ .. 1390111 3BEMN I law 6 :3 :.: J/f�._..,m._ .7'-(m�,��`�•�3 2i�.s��y�NY®8D�.P�•�d�,g���tx��"'•ri3`��$�i( ,�,�,,.. a �'� '�' �'�'�`"``�x-T;,.' �'yx - 1— '` � N �� Ian �J� �� ����l���A�F�€��������l `^��v���N �• �� ��` ' ,,� ��: � _� �, i��v lbw 4s y.%�+p✓*„®�A A4,�A,��iLe4o_'es.sri®d��f �E( �- � ��.. = F., i ".':', J :.J'an 'ti s:'=• YOU 4m, �I ..x"'W+_. �):' k „•gy.y''v'c"���+d�.b►+a°G"_w•,bPi`•4`'�+X84`aLi'9 �•�0•d�a4!�+j®tdd' �''V4 R "l' , J//f .r�� ����P:���������@�rb+>D`WAAA+ds 9 4•w'N A'$•��►4�4"�F<""`�„-r��a��"�''ac -,��::�'� ��- .�.r :_ /I � r'�a.���S w��t>aw O�.p..��®i°�A®b�d,"8C�•®®,p'�Pd•+J+aA+f', �p g:�:�-v����� :.���.CS: . +•� ,�''�y$�A�®4 d+<DAA,��d tAP1 f• ? 3 9-e�i+'�.e e�aR,'�+,®w'IDa�it�'ZEA.Y'.�°7 -`'i'```f �fC �`-� + A+ A+ +A+o+owls+a'Q�r,�96,�+����+�a®w+A,��ww+,a•P+++s�b��� a� � : o s• - �fi' • �,.;.�,wAo+owA*�A�++�4P°+A++A+o o�A A$o+yaw+A A r �' _ ® A�o�A+�s'�w+a�smA+Avs,+f.•®A�++�w�, � 4•►oa o N A AAe+9AA��4$Y•6e%�'=yvmw'�in�+$u���fr � �Le�"a ®. "� �w?�a"��+s�a�� Se i- i eAe • •� o .���o�mA�6�c,�e:�tb�G-+►_m_a..s s�ir.2'9•�.9i?�w..�.a:.:..'�'.i'�s"��.�a 4 m�.�s lll a ® d e s l a ® 1� • COASTAL C. Objection: The amendment does not meet all of the requirements in Chapter 163, F.S., and Rule 9J-5, F.A.C., for an Educational Facilities Element The proposed educational facilities element does not contain all of the objectives and policies required to be in an educational facilities element, pursuant to Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Rule Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The shortcomings are detailed below, with the particular statutory and administrative rule citations. OBJECTION 3. SUMMARY Proposed Policy 2.2 establishes a level of service standard of 100 percent utilization of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity with relocatable classrooms. This is an acceptable level of service standard; however, Policy 2.2 also prescribes that schools which achieve 100 percent of permanent FISH capacity should no longer utilize relocatable classrooms to achieve the LOS standard except as an operational solution (during remodeling, replacement or expansion of a school facility). Thus it appears that the City is establishing a two-part LOS standard which may lead to inequities in the application of the concurrency management system. Citations: Rules 9J-5.0055, and 9J-5.025(3)(c)7,F.A.C.; Section 163.3180, F.S. DCA RECOMMENDATIONS Revise the description of the public schools level of service standard in the educational facilities element to make clear that there is only one level of service standard to be applied during concurrency review. -22- MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 3 The following language responds to Objection 3 amending Policy 2.1 and 2.2 and is included in the amended comprehensive plan Education Element, Intergovernmental Coordination Element and Capital Improvements Elements on pages 108 and 109. The new language follows and has a double underline: POLICY 2.1: Beginning January 1, 2008, the adopted level of service (LOS) standard for all public school facilities within and served by Miami Shores Village is 100% utilization of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) Capacity With Relocatable Classrooms). This LOS standard, except for magnet schools, shall be applicable in each public school concurrency service area (CSA), defined as the public school attendance boundary established by Miami- Dade County Public Schools. The adopted LOS standard for Magnet Schools is 100% of FISH (With Relocatable Classrooms), which shall be calculated on a district wide basis POLICY 2.2: Although not the established LOS standard, it is the goal of Miami-Dade County Public Schools and the Village for all public school facilities to achieve 100% utilization of Permanent FISH (No Relocatable Classrooms) capacity by January 1, 2018. To help achieve the desired 100% utilization of Permanent FISH by 2018, Miami-Dade County Public Schools should continue to decrease the number of relocatable classrooms over time. Public school facilities that achieve 100% utilization of Permanent FISH capacity should, to the extent possible, no longer utilize relocatable classrooms, except as an operational solution to achieve the level of service standard during replacement, remodeling, renovation or expansion of a public school facility. However, the LOS standard for concurrency purposes remains as established in Polciy 2.1. By December 2010, the Village in coordination with Miami-Dade County Public Schools will assess the viability of modifying the adopted LOS standard to 100% utilization of Permanent FISH (no relocatable classrooms) or all Concurrency Service Areas -23- OBJECTION 4. SUMMARY The proposed educational facilities element does not meet the requirement in Rule 9J- 5.025(3)(c)2, F.A.C., that it contain a policy which requires' the adoption of annual plan amendments adding a new fifth year, updating the financially feasible public schools capital facilities program, coordinating the program with the 5-year district facilities work plan, the plans of other local governments, and, as necessary, updates to the concurrency service area map. The requirement for annual plan amendments is intended to help ensure that the capital improvements program continues to be financially feasible and that the level of service standards will continue to be achieved and maintained. Although this issue is addressed in the proposed interlocal agreement, a policy is also required in the proposed educational facilities element. Citations: Rule 9J-5.025(3)(c)2, F.A.C.; Section 163.3177(12)(g)( 1), F.S. DCA RECOMMENDATIONS Revise the educational facilities element to include a policy which requires the adoption of annual plan amendments adding a new fifth year, updating the financially feasible public schools capital facilities program, coordinating the program with the 5-year district facilities work plan, the plans of other local governments, and, as necessary,updates to the concurrency service area map. -24- MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 4 The Education Element, pages 110 and 111 and the Capital Improvements Elements pages 101 and 102 have been amended to respond to this objection. The new language has a double underline. EDUCATION ELEMENT POLICY 2.5: Ensure, via the implementation of the concurrency management system and Miami-Dade County Public School Facilities Work Program for educational facilities that existing deficiencies are addressed and the capacity of schools is sufficient to support residential development at the adopted level of service (LOS) standards throughout the planning period in the 5-year schedule of capital improvements. POLICY 2.6: Miami-Dade County Public Schools will provide the Village with a copy of its Facilities Work Program annually, pursuant to the timeframes established in the Interlocal Agreement. POLICY 2.7: evaluated en an annual basis te enswe that the level ef sery'ee standafds Pursuant to Chanter 163, Florida Statutes, the Miami-Dade County Public Schools 5-Year District Facilities Work Program, developed by Miami-Dade Public Schools and adopted by the Miami-Dade County School Board on September 5. 2007 is incorporated by reference into the city's Capital Improvement Plan, as applicable. Miami-Shores Village shall coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools to annually update its Facilities Work Program and/or concurrency service area maps to include existing and anticipated facilities for both the 5-year and long-term planning periods, and to ensure that the adopted level of service standard will continue to be achieved and maintained Miami- Shores Village, through its annual updates of the 5-year Capital Improvements Element and Program will incorporate by reference the latest -25- adopted Miami-Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program for educational facilities. Miami Shores Village, Miami-Dade Cokunty Public Schools, and other local governments will coordinate their planning efforts prior to and during the Village's Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment process, and during updates to the Miami-Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program. The Miami-Dade County public Schools Facilities Work Program will be evaluated on an annual basis to ensure that the level of service standards will continue to be achieved and maintained throughout the planning CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Public Schools Facilities Level of Service (LOS): Coordinate new residential development with the future availability of public school facilities consistent with the adopted level of service (LOS) standards for public school concurrency to ensure the inclusion of those projects necessary to address existing deficiencies in the 5-year schedule of capital improvements, and meet future needs based upon achieving and maintaining the adopted level of service standards throughout the planning period. Beginning January 1, 2008, the adopted LOS standard for all Miami-Dade County Public Schools facilities is 100% utilization of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) Capacity (with relocatable classrooms). This LOS standard, except for magnet schools, shall be applicable in each public school concurrency service area (CSA), defined as the public school attendance boundary established by Miami- Dade County Public Schools. The adopted LOS standard for Magnet Schools is 100% of FISH (With Relocatable Classrooms), which shall be calculated on a districtwide • LOS standards for public school facilities apply to those traditional educational facilities, owned and operated by Miami-Dade County Public Schools, that are required to serve the residential development within their established Concurrency Service Area. -26- LOS standards do not apply to charter schools; however, the capacity of both charter and magnet schools is credited against the impact of development. No credit against the impact of development shall be given for either magnet or charter schools if their enrollment is at, or above, 100% FISH capacity. • Certification of the availability and commitment of capacity by Miami-Dade County Public Schools during the concurrency review process shall be sufficient to demonstrate that such facilities are available to meet the impacts of a residential development, and shall be consistent with the availability standard in Section 3.3180(13)(e). Florida Statutes. • Public school facility capacity improvements programmed in the first three years of the Miami-Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program shall be counted as available capacity for purposes of concurrency. The necessary public school facilities must be in place or under actual construction within three years after issuance of final site plan approval. • The Village in coordination with Miami-Dade County Public Schools shall include proportionate share mitigation methodologies and options for public school facilities in its concurrency management program and the Updated and Restated Miami Shores Village and Miami-Dade County School Board Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning consistent with the requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. The intent of these options is to provide for the mitigation of residential development impacts on public school facilities through Public School Mitigation Agreements that provide for one or more of the following: (1) contribution of land; (2) the construction expansion, or payment for land acquisition or construction of a permanent public school facility; or (3) the creation of a mitigation bank for the right to sell capacily credits. • Pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes the Miami-Dade County Public Schools -Year District Facilities Work Program, developed by Miami-Dade Public Schools and adoptee d September -27- 5 2007, is incorporated by reference into the Village's Capital Improvement Plan, as applicable. • The Miami Shores Village shall coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools to annually update its Facilities Work Program to include existing and anticipated facilities for both the 5-year and long-term planning periods, and to ensure that the adopted level of service standard. ' will continue to be achieved and maintained. T47L-Miami Shores Village, through its updates of the Capital Improvements Element and Program, will incorporate by reference the latest adopted Miami-Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program for educational facilities. TbL-Miami Shores Village and Miami-Dade County Public Shcools will coordinate their planning efforts rior to and during the Village's Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment process and during updates to the Miami-Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program. • The Miami-Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program will be evaluated on an annual basis to ensure that the level of service standards will continue to be achieved and maintained throughout the planning period. • Miami Shores Village shall update its Capital Improvements Element and Program annual) . to include the annual update of e Miami-Dade County Public Schools 5-Year District Facilities Work Plan. • The Village shall maintain and improve as part of the land development code a concurrency management system that shall specify that no development permit shall be issued unless the potable water suppiv meets or exceeds the level of service standards specified in the Infrastructure Policies or will be in place concurrent with the impacts of the development or the permit is conditional to assure that they will be in place The requiremen that no development permit shall be issued unless public facilities necessitated by the proiect are in place concurrent with the impacts of development shall be effective immediately and shall -28- be interpreted pursuant to the provisions of Policy 1.4 of the Future Land Use Element. f93-5.016 (3) (c) 61 -29- OBJECTION 5. SUMMARY The proposed educational facilities element does not meet the requirement in Rule 9J- 5.025(3)(c)3, F.A.C., that it contain a policy addressing coordination of the annual review of the element with the school board, the county and applicable municipalities, coordination of annual review of school enrollment projections, and establishing the procedures for the annual update process. Policy 1.8 in the proposed educational facilities element provides for the annual review of the element by Miami-Dade County and Miami-Dade County Public Schools; however, it does not address coordination with municipalities, review of school enrollment projections, or procedures for the annual update. These issues are included in the draft interlocal agreement, but they should be included in the educational facilities element. Citations: 9J-5.025(3)(c)(3)F.A.C.; Section 163.3177(12)(g)(1), F.S. DCA RECOMMENDATIONS Revise the educational facilities element to include a policy addressing coordination of the annual review of the element with the school board, the county and applicable municipalities, coordination of annual review of school enrollment projections, and establishing the procedures for the annual update process. -30- MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 5 The Education Element contains the necessary language on page 108. POLICY 1.8: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools and applicable local governments through the Staff Working Group of the Interlocal Agreement to review annually necessary revisions to the Educational Element and school enrollment projections. -31 - OBJECTION 6. SUMMARY The proposed educational facilities element does not meet the requirement in Rule 9J- 5.025(4)(b), F.A.C., that it contain a future conditions map or map series which depicts the planned general location of public school facilities by year for the five year planning period, and for the end of the long range planning period for Miami-Dade County. Citations: Rule 9J-5.025(4)(b), F.A.C.; Section 163.3177(12)(h), F.S. DCA RECOMMENDATIONS Revise the educational facilities element to include and adopt a countywide future conditions map or map series which depicts the planned general location of public school facilities by year for the five year planning period, and for the end of the long range planning period. -32- MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 6 The Education Element is amended to include a countywide future conditions map series which depicts the planned general locations of public school facilities by year for the five year planning period, and for the end of the long range planning period. In addition, maps identifying school boundaries are included. The map series was provided by Miami-Dade Public Schools and is the most current data available. The Education Element is included in its entirety beginning on page 43. The map series is attached to the end of the Education Element. -33- OBJECTION 7. SUMMARY The proposed educational facilities element does not meet the requirement in Section 163.3180(13)(d)(1), F.S., that it shall set forth a financially feasible public school capital facilities program, established in conjunction with the school board, that demonstrates that the adopted level of service standards will be achieved and maintained. Although Policy 2.1 states that the Village incorporate by reference the latest adopted Miami-Dade County Public Facilities Work Program for education facilities, this policy does not reference the Work Program correctly nor does it require an annual update to the Comprehensive Plan when the school district work plan is updated each year. Citation: Section 163.3180( 13)(d)( 1),F.S. DCA RECOMMENDATIONS The City should revise the plan to incorporate the School District Work Plan being adopted by reference to specific date, author, and title. A policy is also required specifying annual updates of the Comprehensive Plan to include the annual update of the school district work plan. -34- MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 7 The Education Element is amended to incorporate the School District Work Plan being adopted by reference to specific date, author, and title on pages 110 and 111. A policy is added to annually update the Comprehensive Plan to include the annual update of the school district work plan. POLICY 2.7: The Miami Dade Geunty Pubk Seheels Facilities WeF'( PFearafn will be evaluated en an annual basis te ensure that, the level ef sewuee standafEls Pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. the Miami-Dade County Public Schools 5-Year District Facilities Work Program, developed by Miami-Dade Public Schools and adopted by the Miami-Dade County School Board on September 5, 2007 is incorporated by reference into the villa eg s Ca iteral Improvement Plan, as applicable. Miami-Shores Village shall coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools to annually update its Facilities Work Program and/or concurrency service area maps to include existing and anticipated facilities for both the -year and long-term-planning periods, and to ensure that the adopted level of service standard will continue to be achieved and maintained. Miami- Shores Village, through its annual updates of the 5-year Capital Improvements Element and Program will incorporate by reference the latest adopted Miami-Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program for educational facilities. Miami Shores Village, Miami-Dade County Public Schools, and other local governments will coordinate their planning efforts prior to and during the Village's Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment process, and during updates to the Miami-Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program. The Miami-Dade County public Schools Facilities Work Program will be evaluated on an annual basis to ensure that the level of service standards will continue to be achieved and maintained throughout the planning period. -35- OBJECTION 8. SUMMARY The proposed revision of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element does not meet the requirement in Section 163.3177(6)(h)(4)a, F.S., that local governments must execute an interlocal agreement with the district school board, the County, and nonexempt municipalities pursuant to Section 163.31777, F.S. The local government shall amend the Intergovernmental Coordination Element to provide that coordination between the local government and school board is pursuant to the agreement and shall state the obligations of the local government under the agreement. Although Policy 1.2 requires the procedures established in the interlocal agreement to be followed, the procedures are not included in the policy; the policy does not require the adoption of the interlocal agreement; and the policy does not identify the City's- obligations under the agreement. Citation: Section 163.3177(6)(h)(4)a, F.S. DCA RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation: Revise the Intergovernmental Coordination Element and Policy 1.2 to obligate the City to execute an interlocal agreement with the district school board, the County, and the other nonexempt municipalities pursuant to Section 163.31777, F.S. The policy also must include the procedure to be used to ensure coordination with the school board and identify the City's obligations under the agreement. -36- MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE RESPONSE TO OBJECTION 8 Miami Shores Village included an Interlocal Agreement in its original submittal and the Interlocal Agreement was found sufficient by the Florida Department of Education. Miami Shores Village is including a copy of the signed interlocal agreement as part of this response. Policy 1.2 on pages 88 and 89 of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element has been amended to obligate the City to execute an interlocal agreement with the district school board[already transmitted and approved by the Florida Department of Education],the County, and the other nonexempt municipalities pursuant to Section 163.31777,F.S. The policy also includes the procedure to be used to ensure coordination with the school board and identifies the Village's obligations under the agreement. The new language has a double underline: Policy 1.2: Miami Shores Village and Miami-Dade County Public Schools shall follow the procedures established in the adopted 'Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement for Public Schools Facilities Planning in Miami-Dade County" and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan's Educational Element and Capital Improvements Element for coordination and collaborative planning and decision making of land uses, public school facilities siting, decision making on population projections, and the location and extension of public facilities subject to concurrency. The Village shall execute the Interlocal Aoreemen with Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Miami-Dade County, and other nonexempt municipalities pursuant to Section 163.3177, Florida Statutes. and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan's Educational Element. Intergovernmental Coordination Element and Capital Improvements Element Coordination of the Interlocal Agreement, and the City's obligations therein, shall be achieved via participation in the established Staff Working Group of the Interlocal Agreement. • Coordination of Land Use and Demographic Information for Consistency. The Village shall maintain Village population and land use data and shall meet with the School Board and/or its staff to review and exchange demographic and land use information in order to ensure consistency in data, projections, and plans germane to: population and student enrollment -37- projections, needs for school sites or expansion of existing sites, collocation and joint use opportunities, potential infrastructure needs to enhance access and safety, and related funding needs. • Coordination of Comprehensive Plan, Rezoning Amendments, and Development Applications Impacting Schools. The Village shall coordinate proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and/or zoning map with the School Board and/or its staff when such amendments materially impact student enrollment projections or school land and facilities planning. In addition, the Village shall notify the School Board of proposed land development proposals that may materially affect student enrollment projections, or school site and facility needs. The Village shall promote collocation of school and neighborhood facilities such as parks, libraries, community centers, and similar facilities compatible with school activities and adjacent land uses. • Planning Board Representation. In accordance with the requirements of and to the extent required by Section 163.3174 (1), Florida Statutes, the Village shall invite a staff representative appointed by the School Board, as a nen Yeting member-, to attend on an as needed basis, Planning Board meetings at which proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezonings that would, if approved, increase residential density. • Dispute Resolution. If the Village and School Board are unable to resolve disagreements surrounding land use and school facility planning, the Village and the School Board will employ dispute resolution procedures pursuant to Chapter 164 or Chapter 186, Florida Statutes, as amended from time to time, or any other mutually acceptable means of alternative dispute resolution. -38- RESPONSE TO C. Objections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8: The amended Intergovernmental Coordination Element and Capital Improvements Element are provided below with the complete amended Education Element including map series, responding to Objections 3,4,5, 6, 7 and 8,follow. The new language has a double underline: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT GOAL Establish and maintain processes to help assure coordination with other governmental entities where necessary to implement this plan. Objective 1: Coordination with Miami-Dade County and other agencies. In general, coordinate the Village of Miami Shores Comprehensive Plan with the plans of Miami-Dade County School Board, Miami-Dade County and adjacent municipalities. In particular, achieve maximum feasible levels of consistency between the plans for Miami Shores, Biscayne Park, Miami-Dade County, the Miami-Dade County School Board (herein referred to as the School Board), EI Portal and the City of Miami, South Florida Regional Planning Council, South Florida Water Management District, State of Florida, and Department of Community Affairs. implementingits iFflpleffienting peli-ey. E99 5.0!5 (3) (b) 11 Policy 1.1: The Village shall monitor the Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Plan process as the County Plan is updated and revised. The Village will also review the comprehensive plans of Biscayne Park, Miami-Dade County, EI Portal and the City of Miami. [91-5.015 (3) (c) 5] -39- Policy 1.2: Miami Shores Village and Miami-Dade County Public Schools shall follow the procedures established in the adopted "Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement for Public Schools Facilities Planning in Miami-Dade County" and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan's Educational Element and Capital Improvements Element for coordination and collaborative planning and decision making of land uses public school facilities siting, decision making on population projections, and the location and extension of public facilities subject to concurrency. The Village shall execute the Interlocal Aareemen with Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Miami-Dade County, and other nonexempt municipalities pursuant to Section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan's Educational Element. Intergovernmental Coordination Element, and Capital Improvements Element. Coordination of the Interlocal Agreement, and the City's obligations therein, shall be achieved via participation in the established Staff Working Group of the Interlocal Aareement, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Objective 2: Maintain Level of Service Standards through sound Capital Improvement Planning. Policy 2.1: The following Level of Service (LOS) standards shall be maintained by the Village to the greatest extent possible given the status of the Village as a built-out community and the affect of external development on the LOS within the Village: Public Schools Facilities Level of Service (LOS): Coordinate new residential development with the future availability of public school facilities consistent with the adopted level of service (LOS) standards for public school concurrency to ensure the inclusion of those projects necessary to address existing deficiencies in the 5-year schedule of capital improvements, and meet future needs based upon -40- achieving and maintaining the adopted level of service standards throughout the planning period. Beginning January 1, 2008, the adopted LOS standard for all Miami-Dade County Public Schools facilities is 100% utilization of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) Capacity with relocatable classrooms). This LOS standard, except for magnet schools shall be applicable in each public school concurrency service area (CSA) defined as the public school attendance boundary established by Miami- Dade County Public Schools. The adopted LOS standard for Magnet Schools is 100% of FISH (With Relocatable Classrooms) which shall be calculated on a distdcb8 ide basis. • LOS standards for public school facilities apply to those traditional educational facilities, owned and operated by Miami-Dade County Public Schools, that are required to serve the residential development within their established Concurrency Service Area. LOS standards do not apply to charter schools; however, the capacity of both charter and magnet schools is credited against the impact of development. No credit against the impact of development shall be given for either magnet or charter schools if their enrollment is at, or above, 100% FISH capacity. • Certification of the availability and commitment of capacity by Miami-Dade County Public Schools during the concurrency review process shall be sufficient to demonstrate that such facilities are available to meet the impacts of a residential development, and shall be consistent with the availability standard in Section 63.3180(13)(e). Florida Statutes. • Public school facility capacity improvements programmed in the first three years of the Miami-Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program shall be counted as available capacity for purposes of concurrency. The necessary public school facilities must be in place or under actual construction within three years after issuance of final site plan approval. • The Village in coordination with Miami-Dade County Public Schools shall include proportionate share mitigation -41 - methodologies and options for public school facilities in its concurrency management program and the Updated and Restated Miami Shores Village and Miami-Dade County School Board Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning, consistent with the requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. The intent of these options is to provide for the mitigation of residential development impacts on public school facilities through Public School Mitigation Agreements that provide for one or more of the following: (1) contribution of land; (2) the construction, expansion, or payment for land acquisition or construction of a permanent public school facility or (3) the creation of a mitigation bank for the right to sell capacity credits. • Pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the Miami-Dade County Public Schools 5-Year District Facilities Work Program, develo eg d by Miami-Dade Public Schools and adopted September 5 20071 is incorporated by reference into the Village's Capital Improvement Plan, as applicable. • The Miami Shores Village shall coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools to annually update its Facilities Work Program to include existing and anticipated facilities for both the 5-year and long-term planning periods, and to ensure that the adopted level of service standard. interim stafidefd&-, will continue to be achieved and maintained. The-Miami Shores Village, through its updates of the Capital Improvements Element and Program, will incorporate by reference the latest adopted Miami-Dade Counter Public Schools Facilities Work Program for educational facilities. :ie-Miami Shores Village and Miami-Dade CountyCbunty Public Shcools will coordinate their planning efforts prior to and during the Village's Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment process, and during updates to the Miami-Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program. • The Miami-Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program will be evaluated on an annual basis to ensure that the level of service standards will continue to be achieved and maintained throughout the planning period. -42- • Miami Shores Village shall update its Capital Improvements Element and Program annually, W include the annual update of the Miami-Dade County Public Schools 5-Year District Facilities Work Plan. • The Village shall maintain and improve as part of the land development code a concurrency management system that shall specify that no development permit shall be issued unless the notable water supply meets or exceeds the level of service standards specified in the Infrastructure Policies or will be in place concurrent with the impacts of the development or the permitis conditional to assure that they will be in place. The requiremen that no development permit shall be issued unless public facilities necessitated by the project are in place concurrent with the pacts of development shall be effective immediately and shall e interpreted pursuant to the provisions of Policy 1.4 of the Future Land Use Element. [93-5.016 (3) CQ 61 EDUCATION ELEMENT Educational Element Goal Develop, operate, and maintain a system of public education by Miami-Dade County Public Schools, in cooperation with the village and other appropriate governmental agencies, which will strive to improve the quality and quantity of public educational facilities available to the residents of Miami Shores Village and Miami-Dade County, Florida. OBJECTIVE 1 : Promote the reduction of the overcrowding that currently exists in the Miami- Dade County Public Schools, while striving to attain an optimum level of service pursuant to OBJECTIVE 1.2. Work with Miami-Dade County Public Schools to develop additional solutions to overcrowding so that Miami-Dade County Schools achieves public school enrollment in Miami Shores Village that will meet state requirements for class size by September 1, 2010, while recognizing that Miami- Dade County Schools has only one school in Miami Shores Village, an elementary -43- school, and while recognizing that Miami Shores Village is a built out community with almost no vacant land or opportunity for development that will increase enrollment. POLICY 1.1: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools in their efforts to continue to provide new student stations through the Capital Outlay program, as funding is available. POLICY 1.2: Collect impact fees from new development for transfer to Miami-Dade County Public Schools to offset the impacts of these additional students on the capital facilities of the school system, while recognizing that Miami Shores Village is a built out community with almost no vacant land or opportunity for development that will increase student enrollment. POLICY 1.3: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools in their efforts to develop and implement alternative educational facilities, such as primary learning centers, which can be constructed on small parcels of land and relieve overcrowding at elementary schools, in so far as funding, land availability and rules permit. POLICY 1.4: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools in their efforts to provide public school facilities to the students of Miami-Dade County that operate at optimum capacity, subject to funding availability. Operational alternatives may be developed and implemented, where appropriate, which mitigate the impacts of overcrowding while maintaining the instructional integrity of the educational program. POLICY 1.5: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools in their efforts to maintain and/or improve the established level of service LOS), for Public Educational Facilities, as established for the purposes of school concurrency. POLICY 1.6: Miami-Dade County Public Schools' comments shall be sought and -44- considered on residential comprehensive plan and zoning amendments which could impact the school district, to be consistent with the terms of the state mandated Interlocal Agreement pursuant to Sections 1013.33 and 163.31777, Florida Statutes. POLICY 1.7: Capital improvement programming by Miami-Dade Public Schools shall be based on future enrollment projections and demographic shifts and targeted to enhance the effectiveness of the learning environment. The future enrollment projections shall utilize student population projections based on information produced by the demographic, revenue, and education estimating conferences pursuant to Section 216.136, Florida Statutes, where available, as modified by Miami-Dade County Public Schools based on development data and agreement with the local governments, the State Office of Educational Facilities and the State SMART Schools Clearinghouse. Miami-Dade County Public Schools may request adjustment to the estimating conferences' projections to reflect actual enrollment and development trends. In formulating such a request, Miami-Dade County Public Schools shall coordinate with the Cities and County regarding development trends and future population projections. Miami-Dade Public Schools shall consider development trends and future population projections for Miami Shores Village based on Miami Shores Village as a built out community with almost no vacant land or opportunity for development that will increase population or school enrollment. POLICY 1.8: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools and applicable local governments through the Staff Working Group of the Interlocal Agreement to review annually necessary revisions to the Educational Element and school enrollment projections. OBJECTIVE 2: Coordinate new residential development with the future availability of public school facilities consistent with the adopted level of service standards for public school concurrency, to ensure the inclusion of those projects necessary to address existing deficiencies in the 5-year schedule of capital improvements, and meet future needs based upon achieving and maintaining the adopted level of service standards throughout the planning period. -45- POLICY 2.1: Beginning January 1, 2008, the adopted level of service (LOS) standard for all public school facilities within and served by Miami Shores Village is 100% utilization of Florida Inventory of School Houses FISH) Capacity With Relocatable Classrooms). This LOS standard, except for magnet schools, shall be applicable in each public school concurrency service area (CSA), defined as the public school attendance boundary established by Miami- Dade County Public Schools. The adopted LOS standard for Magnet Schools is 100% of FISH (With Relocatable Classrooms), which shall be calculated on a district wide basis. POLICY 2.2: Although not the established LOS standard, it is the goal of Miami-Dade County Public Schools and the Village for all public school facilities to achieve 100% utilization of Permanent FISH (No Relocatable Classrooms) capacity by January 1, 2018. To help achieve the desired 100% utilization of Permanent FISH by 2018, Miami-Dade County Public Schools should continue to decrease the number of relocatable classrooms over time. Public school facilities that achieve 100% utilization of Permanent FISH capacity should, to the extent possible, no longer utilize relocatable classrooms, except as an operational solution to achieve the level of service standard during replacement remodeling, renovation or expansion of a public school facility. However, the LOS standard for concurrency purposes remains as established in Polciy 2.1. By December 2010, the Village in coordination with Miami-Dade County Public Schools will assess the viability of modifying the adopted LOS standard to 100% utilization of Permanent FISH (no relocatable classrooms) for all Concurrency Service Areas POLICY 2.3: In the event the adopted LOS standard of a CSA cannot be met because of a proposed development's impact, the development may proceed, provided at least one of the following options is satisfied: a) The development's impact can be shifted to one or more contiguous CSAs that have available capacity and is located either in whole or in part, within the same Miami-Dade County Public Schools designated geographic areas (Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, or Southeast) as the proposed -46- development; or, 0 The development's impact is mitigated, proportionate to the demand for public schools it created, pursuant to a Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement through a combination of one or more appropriate proportionate share mitigation options, as defined in Section 163.3180 (13)(e)1, Florida Statutes, as amended. The intent of these options is to provide for the mitigation of residential development impacts on public school facilities, guaranteed by a legal binding agreement, through mechanisms that include, one or more of the following: (11) contribution of land; (2) the construction, expansion, or payment for land acquisition or construction of a permanent public school facility; or (3) the creation of a mitigation bank based on the construction of a permanent public school facility in exchange for the right to sell capacity credits. The Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement is subject to approval by Miami-Dade County Public Schools and Miami Shores Village Village Council and must be identified in the Miami-Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program; or, Q The development's impacts are phased to occur when sufficient capacity will be available. If none of the above conditions is met, the development shall not be approved. POLICY 2.4: Concurrency Service Areas (CSAs) shall be delineated to: 1) maximize capacity utilization of the facility; limit maximum travel times and reduce transportation costs; 3) acknowledge the effect of court-approved desegregation plans; 4) achieve socio-economic, racial, cultural and diversity objectives; and 5) achieve other relevant objectives as determined by Miami-Dade County Public Schools' policy on maximization of capacity. Periodic adjustments to the boundary or area of a CSA may be made by Miami-Dade County Public Schools to achieve the above stated factors. Other potential amendments to the CSAs shall be considered annually at the Staff Working Group meeting to take place each year no later than April 30 or October 31, consistent with Section 9 of the Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning_ POLICY 2.5: -47- Ensure, via the implementation of the concurrency management system and Miami-Dade County Public School Facilities Work Program for educational facilities that existing deficiencies are addressed and the capacity of schools is sufficient to support residential development at the adopted level of service (LOS) standards throughout the planning period in the 5-year schedule of capital improvements. POLICY 2.6: Miami-Dade County Public Schools will provide the Village with a copy of its Facilities Work Program annually, pursuant to the timeframes established in the Interlocal Agreement. POLICY 2.7: The Kama Dade Geunty Publie Seheels Fae'l-ties Werk Pr-eararn will be- Pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the Miami-Dade County Public Schools 5-Year District Facilities Work Program, developed by Miami-Dade Public Schools and adopted by the Miami-Dade CounhL3chool Board o September 5. 2007 is incorporated by reference into the village's Capit tal Improvement Plan, as applicable. Miami-Shores Village shall coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools to annually update its Facilities Work Program and/or concurrency service area maps to include existing and anticipated facilities for both the -year and Iona-term planning periods, and to ensure that the adopted level of service standard will continue to be achieved and maintained. Miami- Shores Villaae, through its annual updates of the 5-year Ca ictal Improvements Element and Program will incorporate by reference the latest adopted Miami-Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Proamm for ucati -nal facilities. Miami Shores Villaae, Miami-Dade County Public Schools, and other local governments will coordinate their planning efforts prior to and during the Village's Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment process, and during updates to the Miami-Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program. The Miami-Dade County public Schools Facilities Work Program will be evaluated on an annual basis to ensure that the level of service standards will continue to be achieved and maintained throughout the planning period. -48- OBJECTIVE 3: Obtain suitable sites for the development and expansion of public education facilities. POLICY 3.1: Where possible, Miami-Dade County Public Schools should seek sites for future educational facility development, which are adjacent to existing or planned public recreation areas, community centers, libraries, or other compatible civic uses for the purpose of encouraging joint use facilities or the creation of logical focal points for community activity. POLICY 3.2: When selecting a site, Miami-Dade County Public Schools will consider if the site meets the minimum size criteria as recommended by the State Department of Education or as determined to be necessary for an effective educational environment. POLICY 3.3: When considering a site for possible use as an educational facility, Miami- Dade County Public Schools will review the adequacy and proximity of other public facilities and services necessary to the site such as roadway access, transportation, fire flow and portable water, sanitary sewers, drainage, solid waste, police and fire services, and means by which to assure safe access to schools, including sidewalks, bicycle paths, turn lanes, and signalization. POLICY 3.4: When considering a site for possible use as an educational facility Miami Dade County Public Schools will consider whether the present and projected surrounding land uses are compatible with the operation of an educational facility. POLICY IS: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools in the potential use of appropriate public schools as emergency shelters as necessary during emergencies. POLICY 3.6: -49- In furtherance of Objective 1.3 and its associated policies, the Village shall encourage Miami-Dade County Public Schools to submit proposed site plans for public school facilities in Miami Shores Village to the Village for its review and approval. POLICY 3.7: Maps indicating the current and future public school and ancillary facility locations over the planning period (2008 through 2013) shall be included and updated as needed in the CLUP data and analysis. OBJECTIVE 4: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools towards minimizing and mitigating adverse impacts of public school facilities on the surrounding communities, particularly as it relates to traffic, infrastructure, landscaping, operational activities, security, and aesthetics. POLICY 4.1: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools and other adjoining jurisdictions and agencies in the development of policies and procedures that address the adverse impacts of existing and new public school facilities on the surrounding communities. POLICY 4.2: Miami-Dade County Public Schools shall develop and operate all of its public school facilities within the framework of the Village's established land use regulations,, processes, and procedures. POLICY 4.3: In furtherance of Objective 1.4 and its associated policies, the Village shall encourage Miami-Dade County Public Schools to submit proposed site plans for public school facilities in Miami Shores Village to the Village for its review and approval. OBJECTIVE 5: Miami-Dade County Public Schools, in conjunction with the Village and other appropriate agencies, will strive to improve security and safety for students and staff. -50- POLICY 5.1: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools to develop and/or implement programs and policies designed to reduce the incidence of violence, weapons and vandalism on school campuses. Encourage the design of facilities which do not encourage criminal behavior and provide clear sight lines from the street. POLICY 5.2: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools to develop and/or implement programs and policies designed to reduce the number of incidents related to hazardous conditions as reported by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the fire marshal, the State Department of Education (DOE), and other appropriate sources. POLICY 5.3: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools to provide for the availability of alternative programs for at-risk students at appropriate public educational facilities. POLICY 5.4: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools and other appropriate agencies to provide for pedestrian and traffic safety in the area of schools, and signalization for educational facilities. POLICY 5.5: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools' Division of School Police and other law enforcement agencies, where appropriate, to improve and provide for a secure learning environment in the public schools and their vicinity. OBJECTIVE 6: Develop programs and opportunities to bring the schools and community closer together. POLICY 6.1: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools in their efforts to -51 - provide "full service" schools, parent resource centers, adult and community schools and programs as appropriate. POLICY 6.2: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools in their efforts to continue to provide opportunities for community and business leaders to serve on committees and task forces, which relate to the development of improved provision of public educational facilities. POLICY 6.3: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools to continue to work with the development industry to encourage partnerships in the provision of sites and educational facilities including early childhood centers. POLICY 6A Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools through agreement with appropriate agencies to increase medical, psychological, and social services for children and their families as appropriate. OBJECTIVE 7: Miami-Dade County Public Schools will continue to enhance effectiveness of the learning environment. POLICY 7.1: Miami-Dade County Public Schools is encouraged to continue the design and construction of educational facilities, which create the perception of feeling welcome, secure and positive about the students' school environment and experiences. POLICY 7.2: Miami-Dade County Public Schools is encouraged to continue to design and construct facilities, which provide better student access to technology designed to improve learning, such as updated media centers and science laboratories. POLICY 7.3: Miami-Dade County Public Schools is encouraged to continue to improve -52- existing educational facilities, as far as funding is available, through renovation and expansion to better accommodate increasing enrollment, new educational programs and other activities, both curricular and extra- curricular. OBJECTIVE 8: Miami-Dade County Public Schools, the Village, and other appropriate jurisdictions shall establish and implement mechanism(s) for on-going coordination and communication, to ensure the adequate provision, compatibility, and quality of public educational facilities. POLICY 8.1: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools, the State, and other appropriate jurisdictions and agencies to develop or modify rules and regulations in order to simplify and expedite proposed new educational facility developments and renovations. POLICY 8.2: The location of future educational facilities should occur where capacity of other public facilities and services is available to accommodate the infrastructure needs of the educational facility. POLICY 8.3: Miami-Dade County Public Schools will coordinate school capital improvement plans with the planned capital improvement projects of the Village and other jurisdictions and agencies. POLICY 8A Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools in their efforts to ensure that they are not obligated to par for off-site infrastructure in excess of their fair share of the costs. POLICY 8.5: Miami-Dade County Public Schools shall periodically review the Educational Facilities Impact Fee Ordinance to strive to ensure that the full eligible capital costs associated with the development of public school capacity (new schools and expansion of existing ones) are identified when updating the impact fee structure. Pursuant to the terms of the state mandated -53 - Interlocal Agreement, Miami-Dade County Public Schools shall annually review the Ordinance, its formula, the Educational Facilities Impact Fee methodology and technical report, in order to make recommendations for revisions to the Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners. POLICY 8.6: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools in the annual review of the Village's Educational Element, and make amendments as necessary, pursuant to Florida Statutes, the Interlocal Agreement;, and other ob' iv and policies herein. POLICY 8.7: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools in formalizing criteria for appropriate sharing of responsibility for required off-site facility improvements attributable to construction of new public schools or expansion of existing ones. The criteria should be prepared prior to the next full review of the School Impact Fee Ordinance. POLICY 8.8: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools and other jurisdictions and agencies as appropriate to eliminate infrastructure deficiencies surrounding_existing school sites. POLICY 8.9: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools to ensure the availability of adequate sites for the required educational facilities while recognizing Miami Shores Village as a built out community. POLICY 8.10: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools as to the appropriate roles and responsibilities of affected governmental jurisdictions in ensuring the time) orderly rderly and efficient provision of adequate educational facilities. POLICY 8.11: Account for the infrastructure needs of new, planned or expanded educational facilities when formulating and implementing its own capital improvement plans. -54- OBJECTIVE 9: Monitor, evaluate, and implement public school-related provisions in the Educational Element, Intergovernmental Coordination Element, and Capital Improvements Element. POLICY 9.1: Coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools with reference to the monitoring, evaluation, and implementation of the Educational Element, Intergovernmental Coordination Element, and Capital Improvements Element, in accordance with Florida Statutes and the Interlocal Agreement. OBIECTIVE 10: Include and adopt a countywide future conditions map series which dem the planned general location of proposed educational facilities. POLICY 0.1: The map series showing the general location of proposed existing and ancillary educational facilities in Miami-Dade County is hereby adopted as part of the supporting documents, data, and analysis associated with the adoption of this element. -55- I I 1 tnsNtutlana� Single Penally ResldeiMlal ••�'••••••- --- --- UNINCORPORATED I MIAMI-RADE COUNTY 7neti6+tlonal �m UNINCORPORATED MIAMI-DADE COUNTY Village of vow n— -- - --- --- UNINCORPORATED �� �•• MIAMI-DADE COUNTY I Biscayne 111WtFu•• I i Single Family l Park aW.wapm••t•.m . Residential .� ------ — ti insdume • ej ! 1 j 'r� ulti-Famay MResidential Legend Single Family Residential �r.�e`nlJL18 ® iami Single-Family Residential -m®® Shores Infixed-Use Residentiallbstitutlonal 6 Goif& ®BOO Country �n (mss Glub lJ Multi-Family Residential ® General Commercial �® • t7 I� Blsca ae r Say Restricted Commercial �� Law-Denslty L��UJ.�1 ®®• Institutional Residential LO® ®� ® Parks and Recreation ®®EFJ® a O®®o a Parking �� ® _ The Coastal High � Mu1B nFa Sigle mily - --- --- -- Ir i Residential Hazard Area lies Single Famsy Residential I I Single Family Residential omea a, I --- - east of Biscayne vacant I Village of - Avenue gSlr���1�----�, SOURCE: MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE El Portali Forney Reaidentfal EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL 1 REPORT,2005 �� Gbmmercial I UNINCORPORATED 0 0.25 os L 0.75 1 wiles 1 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY I I Fort LaNova rdale, 1.3.10Ale 5 MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE l+rtn lanaicrdrak,i+1.�.�.�17 FUTURE LAND USE MAP phone.95447&W70 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN fax: 954--075-9550 Figur id - Proposed, Existing, an. Ancillary Educational Fa.,.—ies Located in the Northeast Area - 2012/2013 a o .? ;, � F. 818 tG gAgE NRGOIkA aoetx+riri < r tu'wrves' ��+ecaiExiaxwro • oANe m f-;,'n; CdIRIT,E6 cumQQ �t WWIL1N�y .:�Fpkn2Wt6118 �q Mmm • fW ' LEH.MAN CY ` A NORLANO� as So d MAItlsi 'A', �4Es oAp Eb; _ ow ♦ �� BP[MIWOOG'RAWKWES ES' DCOYWL8JY 414 Sta. CARQ /IA1p f mor C3 a ♦Y E8 • % f tliY1W LANE 87EVEli8RR *C f t 6REYp0.0! , All NWi#R CAt1W i GROVE® fAN�=ES }LAILEE3 BIPLIAWBABlJ. }sy �i .' \ il SUNNY iRNS�eE ., Es wJ • eAwtwArus • �� � IKOMEDYg SLE$B 1 16'5 826 Ey aoet Gl wncaxnEs fi a �} q{ 11uN$PORfATidV � � ". aixuaar* Manxi� to + a nER� •wuxeMr w ♦a°�0we y ,. v 14pGWGEB gIRN- .. ♦ K� cs 'a 3,p Lim WAlllEb .� Y/j $c,9 tironAe YS Lays ♦ HIGOAAL } S '� K 7 0, t BftYA, S1 ��C�rIcNY 96TH S 1'Y NW 1 TH T,., _ wrili+tifRGna ♦ egNusdoa r�,' N HWAGE 3 r t ,�� ,. 61s9A•n�ES "TKO 71 STS E 79TH ST 79 fH STCY 0 0.375 0.75 1.5 F > Miles z � c � �iY £ SOURCE:MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, z PUBLIC SCHOOLS SYSTEM,2007 _C Legend R W44 Educational Facilities I12THHY 7TMM ]195 JULIA TU LEC • Elementary a� 4 K-8 Center o +� Middle # Senior 'NETIAN CYVENETIAN F09ERG FGRFN W + Other Educational Facility 139,5 Mqc ■ Ancillary Facility © 2008-2013 School Openings ST SITYa Highways F j N PWNEB Northeast Area rn � m Northeast Area Existing Educational Facilities GAFF slc Ares 'k. h a az 1 .1f * * LEpMAN M - �, ♦ BARBANII BpF11�00p Ea �y� � WMYUWIT MB , ,o c 'c CAN 1: 87flIj SiEVEMB p3 . iYghE`` IMApY6NE8 �dS�ThSDEp h - ARM# `SESbaQ�ES p/KKNAYp3t to=EBP� sion xs ' RENK Y11,8 ,k pMpl } 51lNNYIAL6'e p BEAM91�e 1c j6^4%U$' �.�3^" tFMfEMpdtJH 6AldEB p dillz, a - ^ cwwieEO t #x J4aTU EWSATlpp 691YEp .T ti 5 y { k < 4ui \ IIOAIN ERRE k ^'t pAy®uppp;SE, 1 uuw�a ♦PAN *� r y �mpsceniert ``xxgw aM pr '� r gR 1� pAmnu t .i , µr mmoEes � � I W. .x t z�>•, i l � ��ouxApe@ wik ik y , x it 1€'a" PON q' NW14fp ST � �' TK Sxp=BES 0S kAWIN F U,S S 3MAYMEEB NE—HST MY F� aw�spEE � W E �4 Legend x ST �'� pAETAU8 p3�BEACE�.�al S7 Educational Facilities n`LIA TUlT 6Y g • Elementary K-8 CenterE€ACp,, r • MiddleWy wv o �ea pyp �N * YL.tTl ww o Senior ��YYl1M Y-� � F�P.TNNI'y VENEt1AN\vY ` 4 y a FISeER14 /i Jg � REENTER + Other Educational Facility. k +� F0 RM AWL ACppWIpRY ■ Ancillary Facility Highways ' . I-$IIY>? �� 0 Northeast Area HS\v xTll St Northwest Area Existing Educational Facilities FLURIDATP .}4 A �W, y X ,,� a" •• µytonA RWNN r i i [[uxrm waecui• z WRNM au�Rs FALN Mom ER 1 .5y VIa R I 71 n. � M1 YMMI MMM ?t LH '` ¢ W R6 WIAII � -,A w x SRR a ' ia t fir. �i k �^ i DmLa * * y �5,"�' � r ,' £ l t } �`•u f t t `s:.a as es �e IR�AWgIw '•r�s��', `. �- �t.f Y4MSERAM[9 € T t \� '� •i #OM1 3 � iNIR { q.1`�MSflR1 Y a r $ a ty" 9 F• OxyS, Es s t tOdfNFi E6 �':i rrn sr cRM w HAMMY �oxxa a mw 2 Fe{ R --� u�anerEa • �� 4gt• °BSP,. ViCM IMYN i'= ,� x - wiylRYw � c'' ��` � -. i [ AuuD wtiiMrNiuwlet r R L .`* r '' AVAiRAiwB �" •T � r. 4 1FAoARROORAL3t" ?fbA wA RAMMUw vlT�t S f PR NEwNw" hR A WH N: 3. .. w216NTw '1&Nlw � r� T 41� i i -SLLIR[ �a in�Rus,„�9'uty> ¢ .ey'� eatrRRk � ? M tR Y '.tf ,< Y 4 MMM Nw c4 i R STHaw* 4 t y �h'c i„>ZZ* 4,. R eroaaE JamNltd A ,gNMI a 6 RYA \ * -��'� i•, `' .,vuRMs 4 't h vii i:�^ MSM t. Es ARB IIMHY (S} � MM J6TH 8T M CE PO= ,. CRMIRR H S • f„ MAW 9IgMo pm Legend M"R'w Educational Facilities w6J • Elementary • MATER EO K-8 Center " BW8TNS1" • Middle * Senior + Other Educational Facility ■ Ancillary Facility Highways Northwest Area Figure B - Proposed, Existing, anu Ancillary Educational Fafties Located in the Northwest Area - 2012/2013 FLORIDA TP 1 } Y ALMES s � r --a WA xy' 4 V �ex 3 Gt 'a BARBAFA "' s rt am _'t f ,+ E� f✓OIFJAII It�e %,!C LOCNA WGo ♦W' fj MoarxaJe r$ `� � wasaie OC K; ,.fir, i "C� •' �a®TRS (� , ;�"`" ' W•: GRAMMW , tlEIDtEO'afi %r St, z 'PO eue � .yup PALM �A77GA,�,PY DIw TH ST 5 I Y y`, BPpIWG6 d sq W fi(� k INC@lfiFA 70NI0 • IGUFANIH S ...y `IRjIi6`8 _ New -J . ies L \. i :r, B61 FKR 6PIgIG6N6 j -+ R1pNt�W ■LINMIMitW®1 x 4 + v'^ � tiro.. ` so GORTN aFE ". �I r' < #-u a-wnuarwttW xulwxW certGx 't: • • aoxr#c PoMa�° N "GOGIM, "IH' �r ) Z .( HFrGi�E6 IYADBOMRB mmww Q MWOUT Yh'P``' Ike OORI I y • RA wemoealea ♦ F y�:J �B fi NAtFANFg YOm618AC�i10Y dRl/ R d 4 F� 6�EIRW $ 1 ' - O WEXQIIDICG _ IFGR �h � ,{, t ♦ °gGpp; 116 1�fn�A1 ,� ( NmM 6GiRRRIAIFAx IORAH mWu6mW qy ♦ - s` eiBingtEms EY E i .WTR11R6 H6GR8 W MB "= 112TH HY u r ®i631�6�AM$ 'lbw 316TH ST Rv G11N!A�'NU - ,T r 18A x s o OOV N SR 66 EX �. z Legend ?� � CHARiWR „�. RM MUM Educational Facilities •• J �.. ', W � • Elementary ♦ bY(GGitlG♦ATWW er�amW ��' f ♦ K-8 Center Sw 8THaT • Middle N * Senior + Other Educational Facility ■ Ancillary Facility DO 2008-2013 School Openings - 0 0.3750.75 1.5 Highways �� SOURCE:MIAMI RADE COUNTY 5� Northwest Area PUBLIC SCHOOLS SYSTEM,200 ®Miles Figure -i B - Proposed, Existing, ana Ancillary Educational Fames Located in the Southeast Area - 2012/2013 �'nLLW 79TH TO °y ®. A i N 7� n8 R}L96NpfL p@66 } MA sdlLo ONO � •`�'�� � A1a1,AI�EB � •. I12TH ranuamxus s JC1-L4 ti w 6� HY 19�. NW 36TH ST F ET SR 836 EX r L SW 8TH ST ` - .rata'itinFs '• �ti t� a r woxxur�'� 6tihYeN� -' i 47 n> ` O1FMLY fB IEgNIBEB 7£ 6 ',i FIXr111O28 OIN 2E9 } 1's �, v Yq dWF RhMB � 8I { !' * .' uBpMiOM'E6 f FiW1�RE6 1 f * d v ssp .' { soumwle-+ 'Wel arow.r qrW ^ .� O rnelrs f dl�yr3 5 L�ODUEe � 'Y ,o W 5NAFT'SR ��yti` am,es N 9AW i` C� MM kk rlmaC� t� � N1 mfIYwlNgA r I 2 f f fr r INROgF� _ Y ragilt/k •� SOURCE.MIAMI DADE COUNTY -? [PUBLIC SCHOOLS SYSTEM, 200 .es aroun+vwwMst M. W A w°' Legend :. Educational Facilities • Elementary wwspewao K-8 Center a ■ Middle RM 98 * Senior + Other Educational Facility • ■ Ancillary Facility QO 2008-2013 School Openings r * W":ft Highways A Southeast Area � :,a Southeast Area NE19T 7TH STCK RUM Existing Educational Facilities g z .TN�PJ9 `x 1DUS4VNTL EES E8�'jT A6 ����9arrrrr r E4p SPAYNON �M1WYN E3((�, 8 y�ed�. WW PLI:N'm 1ANNS �j,NOHETIRE F RO N��g<fJc .IXSO4127N HY ",1193 INilATTSY"{T. NW 36TH ST ��IAYA W10aWE6 _ G w ♦ onlH� "�' BilENA �k'` Ci COMTOOrcFS NNTTN L44DSEYNOp1t416 TECN ED W, VD PLF1C SR 13S EX '$ EST �IWSE YNSHMDiO �ovEE3 SNS NOUS CENTER RTjr CDRL6. Rr! D6 :: OROi'E18� FCAG.kR E$ �'�'jDo��N.' �,ti RNE�OEFS �93HP>' tfN B tarticTdB "11"IEEs T+STfB FN WNES • �. sw nTN ST ♦ ''' EAN E$ n h sE vwu� EDM G'T K c vnr OP GRLOSJ .. �^ Ejmores - pa� os '- +cEHtw. atA{°A�ifaS,IN �°&� od°� ygT RIcxENDacx�RCK s AD i YS:^ Aru RCCrcWAKTPSl� 85NrNiF9 TE oDYRCnENY Et&RSONES ^k 3� OLYWIR GROVES t�SM�wk5 TNOMMES y`� S§;Z ♦#WWCESS RNIERAY9 ?,; .w$ WESTGLORG6 TUCMER ES S ;. s - Ji" WA8315,,} „ L3BgG;ORYES 4 5� K' �`ciraEs3Es �.. Kamm t bN5P9ER �'� �� �� 9� tEON 1d � CAE6(ES R �. a SODTHA9NA +.9�LEE t3 t ♦ �S 1..t#s OOwUtanis ppCq F � C ti mME5 t6 MAM S ♦ S .y2¢ k G 510-0 SVNSET � SES waaT • a 3 gREaESTE3. '. � � LEDERNES` S kt ��?" atanwts ewe�rru �� LEERtOODESmom RLLE$fE43 ',„, aA� - 1Rr"s F xlye z,rr. FRAMCRAMORD ¢CB IEp DORQTNYlr�, CartTFID90UDT b '.` SES Cq.01ML :.DQE 60UTXIIOW M4 x f 4 a! 4 d XAGE Enaf - b PERRIE3 Si ROOM RUM E Legend SID Educational Facilities NNESES k dR'Es • ^'j Y,� • • Elementary K-8 Center OmFSTRFABE3 ` + Middle . CaITFNtJFt,A14 g8 * Senior + Other Educational Facility ■ Ancillary Facility z ROBERT WRCJN muma % Highways TECHNICAL EoutAnoruL F Southeast Area y _ . Southwest Area sR 0,ex Existing Educational Facilities MI�LEY xi t _e � a �#RtEOMJIR Iq. � Y� � gNs.°��. H� • •19.166E � S t i UpAR', S E1N�KOOBt ,�N)YAf. LWDDE BECxNAY EB A,EB ECC RDYREE k werPw dPOSTER JOIN' AM SO MUUM SURM HVtlAROA * S HR jy :OODIIM Mt JFEK SNAPPER OWES, WNDALE ' RAW (REEK RX LAMES ES 'x,•J 2 ♦ our" "DOMES 'i Yi L PP ♦ PRUDE GLUM ES PEPPERS. ♦ DEVOKAM x y'zs NAINNOW IN 5 I DEVON ,f'l 4 tt DRATARVI 0 @0 LP081BLE$'.,; 9 * ` hY k �.. `•' JOAGEN1i 4� TMMOOL r a a " f I.M • COIDI IpIT' �"+*`t x�A 4� " MI . cEF'�P�Ea�pVEiu BOSSARDES w,: y$ F >„' 3 .� Yr'L�i 71P1[OFli6E0 WMExAm CENTER ',� ;� stt ,. x ;z ,. •. ,: `�a rz'z}� f is SOUTHWEST �' 1 �' AMIID >� RMtdu A,q� �1! YaD�RT MDkLuw� wr. ON S06H I'm HEIGHYS ES r uaseA - - z z a s OOUIDS fi �•: A:. CE+ w On �s t p _ TRAMS00"TMW - RFDEFMOYS�REiiWll' 0a Ylg1ENRKCE � ES„ W E ¢� NR 1T-P---iA ♦ 3 - �•'QIgMAMEg k SOUTH * �.�, Legend �.,.` :°°�° Educational Facilities i PESMCfi Reo�Es Elementary ♦ < WRES SOUTH-EADOLT • ♦ W= CBRER K-8 Center HOSESiFADWS } Tbt * Middle ONA'RPAKWCOOPER OWES? ' eDOCABORUCEDiER * Senior ♦ LA C + Other Educational Facility iYE8T SAUC ES HDME$TTO1B fib 1{01916• _ ;:� D M P ■ Ancillary Facility SW34dTN ST CVPAIJA UR. WF ,;:.'A,', x Highways �. Southwest Area Figm 3 - Proposed, Existing, a.... ancillary Educational Fa ies Located in the Southwest Area - 2012/2013 Rei 00 T v "�U# GB t'•`- 9Rk670GC1W Vi a A e`�'•t,y." ' .�'l W :�'�t^4a�4�'as. zr 9RAgO�cOOIC �,� v1 i z N K J��, OOIflN p Ece 51MRM ♦ ♦BMMf t . � AM- g a% SNAPPER ly ' swxt lmtnA�M , "v' CREEK E �? 9 z$* id ys U!i W w SCUM 'MCU4 w''� Iparetm ES 5 } a �` CMPIBTW PFl@BtW ♦" . ' a RawacMM�M i icMce �P 1,;a LWFIEMHd � & ♦ fix'i , �.. ` �x fi � r.. rpwu ♦ iwuMoxmIM 44 k Viol COMM= K MW til t. �s\ y{ ,.g '' cpN�mmA HHO_eRI ,� y u � 7!'f+IIIC!1FeMt RtS�MeRMNt* N NIB 3?' sgv' q J w' t'fiWLMM tT ) CEll�t — PANT�a} �wMWa��nn� 'rl � 0 1 2 " yy SOURCE VAM[bApECtNJNTY � r� y s�, �� 3 a�� Mx�Es ,� PUBUCSCHG!CLS�3 �20G1 y Legend y 9 t ;cr rwa Educational Facilities MMMIM " �,� Mwnnoers ♦ '� • Elementary i ♦. v + �k K-8 Center * Middle Senior dWMzCUTRm s � + Other Educational Facilit5. yk Ka O ■ ry AncillaFacility Mir :♦ Es Rorwmao w t ' t iItlRMY1„ x'a r 2008-2013 School Openings W FIA DR * rez y Highways r Southwest Area NE Area Elementary School Boundaries Q MUN O IGOM U VKtO1Nl ♦ �}� Y a �s ♦ e ORWOODE CH DWID E MIAMI IRLAND ES AES REN ES -♦ W SES ♦ - WKI BN eA I RE �lJEtiscuses L ♦ STYIEW E KWAV Es (/♦—� :0 EYN DS EIS ♦ - ' lamer* ♦ ♦NWRO E RARKIIEMI Ee = TT\ I =Q LM L - E8 ♦ LM Es pEN BUNGEE OAKm DARK E8 ROVE E9 � CENTNORER. RAMSOW ♦ IC LANOUAGEs♦VARKES - BISC E RD Es p ♦ LIND NORTH LENTI AMIES ENT ♦ �-„S �y, ,� 0-44 ock4 ♦ ♦ wXyRYK, d�k'.� Q,., FRANKIlN Es ♦ W\\J lJR'I h l p�� bl 96TH ST I Nw I _—.�7 i .F :. ♦rY HARB CENTE MIAMI SHORES EB -- 0�5 BuscA a Es — (♦ O� HSTCY suRE NCEs' ♦ SRO I NORTH BEACH ES eFF�O 112TH HY 1105 JULIA CY `O NW 36TH ST 2 O 2 � a N ea / F s RG- 1E K- 3 _`---- F EN ER Bu "W C Legenda"�R -- '`� 57 OUTH ♦ Elementary Schools and K-8 Centers ♦O—E s Highways Northeast Area P N E Area Middle School Boundaries - __ Q NORLAN❑ Z _ UNITY MS CAROL RY ME LAKEI °•SPT - 87EV�B M8 JOHN P A7NNEOYMB y 4 SR$6 D( . a NORTH EMB THOMAS PPERSON M9 NX-8 1 NTER i pPglpctl / N S t 96TH ST �(y„ RUTH K ER ~•�'� NWJ NAR BCENTE V0 I 4� 0y � NORACE AIANN Ms L, NpF Q 7 HS Qip Rp Fo o AUTILU&MS eFF`RO 112TH Hy lies JULIAT CY W m 36TH ST o a X00 N M E K- �3g5f Fl EN R SRWEX �9C RTy�R cy Legend 5TH ST • Middle Schools and K-8 Centers Highways Pa a ®Northeast Area Eby N3 N N E Area Senior School Boundaries a WILLIAM LEHMAN CY a- ,N # &w naAtiU Ys ', ; �' p Nart�aio Yi' x J Me N LL .MM� t 13 a„ l R 926' SIV S� NORTH oP4 40% 1 T NW 1 0 oa a r 7 H STCY N 1 4 �p cyo AFF Rp RFFc S'O 112TH Hy 1195 JULIA.TuALE CY W Nw 39TH ST W N Z N a �3gSE C RTy�RcY 5TH ST Legend • Senior High Schools Highways ® Northeast District S� `S� RICKENBACKER CY NW Area Elementary School Boundaries FLORIDA TP SPANISH LAKE ES �l€CC t1 D - -...-PALM �I SPRINOR NORTH ES / \ 'J CATgN CENTEfl I NSAMIlAKEB I OPA _ -_ �d CENTEft to �( THAN YI E N PALM CAR ZEE SMEWES PAL PY 1 .QARDENB EB N i ACY 3-1N SES pAl@LIf� HENRY EB MEW E! EARHA(tT E8 REEVESA A, '' A - MNMI VAN E KE8 --:PON- EA E 1 FLAM OO ES BROADM \� -- �-. D NENRYVV_ \ e RIK Lrt ftiveR 8►4 SPRINGVI E�\ R HL41UH HIALEAHES M NMESA A S 81�ES L SMITH ES JOHN I K S E S ESN - KELSEY L -"MR E8 ( �'\ 1ttTH HY tHm3 ___ OEES 0 EY E EMM 8 �$MIND WE A a y N S 1 5 1a 0 6 5� Legend mN r7 Elementary Schools and K-8 Centers Highways Northwest Area NW Area Middle School Boundaries FLownnTP E CATION MIJkMI CENTER SMS a n g MIAMI LAKES �!(d CENTER X �• lY VEW MS AMILAM K-SCENTERPALM WEI N8 MAINSON HENRYS • LERMS � EUGENIAB - i -1 F LE N THOMAS K- Yq ` p' CENTER WS N� AIMB I� LLE MS • 112TH HY I I I RUBES DARIO LW CtlAMUNITVMB sw Sr a N Legend yam°^p • Middle Schools and K-8 Centers Highways Northwest Area NW Area Senior School Boundaries a - - Z N SENIORAMERICAN �I SENIOR ttiH P a NIMILANES CXNOLODICAL IDR HIGH X„ —elUtEMA 6 r GOLENAN SENIORHIGH 1 XWLEAN MIAMI.CENTRAL RCNALDK - REMANNORAL (9WR HIGH N j 2 112THW 1195 BIW 38TH ST a _ SR 838 EX sw UH ST a N 1 Legend 5� • Senior High Schools N Highways Northwest Area 3 v, ILLER E El e enta School Bou darie LfTTLE 79 HSTCY VER ES -� O�``Cy0 JIOLM� I _ NINGSID ES THEN CROWDJW E L \ LLA E3 OUSSAPI7J�, I s OU .—E EY— N 11 N Y UIUATUTTIECY Hw 38TH ST ANGEL �9AHT Q CONST A HLLL EA EY E9 �i EDERI SR838IX Z N - LAs Cq R 0 (� - �..,. GROVE ES ,Q HENRYA� _KINLBC"H PLAGLE -HK E ,$NEIDES RSAE AAQ E8 UBURNO' U 'LJ` OR CARLOSJ aw ArN1A --- rK TS ES CORA A, ROCNWAYf� UFF EB 'R" /�E.4NV ES . ME ONDAIAE9 - I ONUT �P,AWCHILD :,CIE E 8T - �KER ES S CYPRE SOUTH MIAMI X.8 CENTER SNAP A tgREE __ --- BUNSET ES ,LUOLAA9 E /-\ KEY SISCAYN KS CENTER A DA EES - P RSiECRESTES / S7� _VPI DES GLORIA 7D ES -MEUO ES FLOYD /-DRIVE ES �— FRANKCRAWFORD TIN K• - — _-- CORAL EF J -_,E" ,EES _ r COLONIAL DRIVE ESINNE LAKE ES k"INE ES "ELF BECNFORN.� RICHMOND ES RUSS E ON ON E� 1 WHISPERING —_— — SEL- MES ES AME ES N A a, REAM ES E DREDWARD L 1 ILLAE -IGFIAM ES - Legend --- -- r A Elementary Schools and K-8 Centers LO^ES Highways Southeast Area S E . ,.�d 79 STCY Middle School Boundaries _ �FnO N I N MS W N Y8 v�S 1IBus JULIA TUTTL CY Nw 39TH ST EG 6 2 SR838IX O -US � _--- KMLOCH */. ROV YO M AGR gKMS EMy AOA ERRITT CY . (.8C EVERGL I =CE ECORALWAY WEST y., y XE ACE Xb18R R� NQgC IMSC WAY Y _f 2 S souTX MIAMI ENTERTX - N MIAMI ,{N.ADES MS OMMURI 0 KEYSISCA" Kd CENTER A KENYWOD ... SCENTER 5� LA4A METTOMS `IJI JJJ J RANK K.AWFORD I K. \ EI0 �QouTXW00D MS CUTLER AIDOE MB ZENTEMMMS s A MI NITYMS N SaaZ'� Legend • Middle Schools and K-8 Centers Highways Southeast Area SE /Area YE'Y wW 119TH ST Fey oe� 0 a 79 STCY MI NOR ♦ �N ♦ D IONAND KSON CHITECTV ESHS 11Yft1 1195 ♦, JULIA CY NW WW 38TH ST ♦ 2� > �o o ! � ENT NOTCH SR 839 a ♦� 'kac vR MIAMI I Cy SHE H ST S J CORAL K xs �"���•Q ENBgCKEW CY ---- �_— (,MARITIME A SCIENCE COfl^L �HNOLOGYACADEMY �4�LE5 ' ♦ SOUTHNSST ` -IpAMI BHS .—J SOUTH J MIAMI 5O �T9 k j `b { PALMETTO SNS Ir a7 F M i F X fr r� i COR EE HS ♦ G� Legend ♦ Senior High Schools Highways Southeast Area SW.,..a Elementary School Bound a ie s SR&Wa M sr -E . N toN' e . E E8 4;1 ,R NTE BO TER - WNSTON N _ :; -PARK K- -__.— TEB ES'. EMpp BCENTOR RES GLANCE USA EB CHS PEPPERES -- -- V. p� — TTS EVONAIRE 01 CENTER • I T NORMA BUTLER - S x W Q _roars EB �CAR�AN EB f $ XOLANC IS / CNV K- ACE N AUR HCMEi=EAd a UN SES r Legend A Elementary Schools and K-8 Centers o Highways Cq Southwest Area SW. ....a Middle School Boundaries SNI 8TH ST N m m N K ULAE RRY Me DANES HOWARDD ROSERTS N• CENTER ,"ILLAN MS S MSTON fin/ PARK K. 6CENTER 1� OGRE MS JORGE MAS CANOSAMS �3CXOOL �V' } 4 i A - M8 nIANDLD MS A } �0 5 LELMURE .. - CRY K- SCE T �$OUTHDADE MS • Legend < W CAMPBELL DRWE MS A Middle Schools and K-8 CentersY" j'I • z- Highways Southwest Area ' Area Senior School Boundaries N 0 HOLMES BRADDOCK SENIOR HIGH ♦ JON FERGUSON - ♦ MIAMI SUNSET ENK)A HIGH ♦ m FEUXVAR SENIOR NI 1a �0 t v� y0 SOUTH DADE .SENIOR HIGH i rc Y Z/ HOMESTEAD �SENNM HIGH S/♦ Legend o ♦ Senior High Schools Highways Southwest Area OG Za 9Q