Loading...
01-27-2005 Regular Meeting1 • • • MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 27, 2005 The regular meeting of the Miami Shores Planning and Zoning Board was held on Thursday, January 27, 2005, at the Village Hall. The meeting was called to order by Richard Fernandez, Chairman at 7:00 P.M. with the following persons present: ITEM I: ROLL CALL: Richard Fernandez, Chairman Tim Crutchfield (Arrived at 7:08pm) Sid Reese W. Robert Abramitis Cesar Sastre (Arrived at 7:04pm) ALSO PRESENT: Al Berg, Planning & Zoning Director Richard Sarafan, Village Attorney Irene M. Fajardo, Recording Secretary Mr. Sarafan swore in all those participating in the meeting. Mr. Fernandez disclosed that he visited 1065 NE 96 St, 1213 NE 94 St, 842 NE 96 St, 1301 NE 103 St. Mr. Crutchfield did not make any disclosures. Mr. Abramitis, Mr. Reese, and Mr. Sastre visited all the sites. ITEM II: APPROVAL OF MINUTES - The December 16, 2004 minutes were moved to the end of the agenda. ITEM III: SCHEDULE ITEMS PZ05-0127-01 Marguerite Voorheis (owner) Sheri Ashcraft (agent) 307 NE 99 St. Sec. 604: Site plan approval -carport to storage Mr. Berg explained the basis of the request, the site conditions, and recommended approval of the application subject to installing a circular driveway in the front which will accommodate two parking spaces on the property. Additionally, the construction proposed for the carport enclosure does not meet the masonry code requirement for the Village. The openings in the carport will have to be masonry, not CDX plywood, wire lathe, and stucco. The applicant is requesting site plan approval to enclose an existing 12' x 19' carport into a storage room, add a rear driveway, and a new circular driveway. The property owner, Marguerite Voorheis passed away and the granddaughter, Sheri Ashcraft, was there to present the case. The case was brought back at the end of the Planning and Zoning 1 January 27, 2005 • • hearing. Proper documentation was submitted to the Board showing the property was in a trust showing Voorheis as the trustee and Sheri as the successor trustee. Ms. Ashcraft explained the reasons for the enclosure and the site plan proposed. Ms. Ashcraft explained that she will install a circular driveway in the front to accommodate the parking requirement. The Board discussed the material that will be used for the openings in the carport and stated that material will be a permit issue. After further discussion, Mr. Sastre made a motion to approve the site plan subject to the submittal of a Declaration of Use and the installation of the circular driveway in the front of the property. Mr. Crutchfield seconded the motion. Motion passed 5-0. PZ05-0127-02 Nicholas Marian and Linda Ortigoza 1065 NE 96 St. Sec. 701: Admin. Appeal -paint color The case was tabled. No one was there to present the case. PZ05-0127-03 Regina Avila 161 NW 107 St. Sec. 604: Site plan approval -garage enclosure Mr. Berg explained the basis of the request, the site conditions, and recommended approval of the application. The applicant is requesting site plan approval to enclose part of an existing 13' x 20' garage for a bathroom addition. The Board inquired about parking on the property. Mr. Berg stated that there is plenty of parking on the property. After a brief discussion, Mr. Crutchfield made a motion to approve the site plan. Mr. Sastre seconded the motion. Motion passed 5-0. PZ05-0127-04 Boris Moroz (owner) G.G. Salon 9061 Biscayne Blvd. Sec. 604: Site plan approval -wall sign Mr. Berg explained the basis of the request, the site conditions, and recommended approval, conditional on the Board's approval of the color. The applicant is requesting approval for 25 sq. ft. wall sign to be erected on the wall of the building. After reviewing the colors submitted by the applicant, G. G, Mr. Crutchfield made a motion to approve the wall sign. Mr. Sastre seconded the motion. Motion passed 3-2. (Chairman Fernandez and Mr. Abramitis voting no). PZ05-0127-05 Urkia Hernandez 1213 NE 94 St. Sec. 604: Site plan approval -lot split Planning and Zoning 2 January 27, 2005 • • Mr. Berg explained the basis of the request and the site conditions. The applicant is seeking approval for a lot split. Applicant seeks to separate Lot 2, which is improved, from Lot 3, which is vacant. Lot 2 was a the subject of a site plan review in January 2003 where the Board approved the development of this lot which subject to the removal of a section of the home in order to meet the side yard setback requirement. A final survey has been provided and the existing house is 9.44' from the property line where the setback should be 10'. The attorney, Marcie Lowman, was there to represent the owner and present the case. Ms. Lowman explained that they are looking for the Board to approve the 9.44' setback to be able to make use of the Lot 3. The Board discussed the issues in regards to setback requirements. Chairman Fernandez opened the hearing for public comments. The attorney, Robert Atler, was there to represent the O'Donnell's, who want to purchase Lot 3. Mr. O'Donell is willing to give up 6.5 inches of his client's property in order to meet the setback requirement. They would have to build at a setback of 10 1/2' from the west lot line. Chairman Fernandez closed the hearing for public comments. Ms. Lowman submitted a copy of the plat for the record. After further discussion, Mr. Sastre made a motion to approve the lot split subject to having indemnification for the Village, $3,000.00 administrative costs, and a covenant recorded on the on the vacant land and on the other property stating that there will always be a 20 feet separation between the two structures on Lots 2 and 3 so not to have any problems with measurements. Mr. Crutchfield seconded the motion. Motion passed 4-1. (Chairman Fernandez voting no). PZ05-0127-06 Shores Village Partnership (owner) Ruben Matz (agent) 9519 NE 2nd Ave. Sec. 604: Site plan approval -new use, exterior remodeling, and parking lot upgrade. Mr. Berg explained the basis of the request, the site conditions, and recommended approval of the project. The sign package is tastefully done and the storefront will improve the NE 2" Ave elevation. Parking counts will remain the same as the use has not changed. A landscaping plan was submitted to the Board at the hearing. Staff's main concerns are the seating arrangement proposed in the site plan behind the Mercer Building and the septic tank system and drainage plan. The architect, Ari Sklar, and the owner, Ruben Matz, were there to present the case. Mr. Sklar explained the intentions of the site plan. He stated that the plan had not been engineered to verify the drainage on the lot. He also stated that Oak trees will be used in the landscaping plan. The Board discussed all the issues mentioned by staff. They also expressed their concerns about the wooden detailing on the building. Mr. Sklar assured the Board that the awnings will not covered the wooden detailing. The Board discussed the signs for the building. Mr. Matz explained that the lease for the tenants will state that the signs cannot be pasted on the windows. After further discussion, Mr. Sastre made a motion to approve the site plan not including the seats behind the Mercer Building, the sprinkler system, or the drainage plan. Mr. Crutchfield seconded the motion. Motion passed 5-0. Planning and Zoning 3 January 27, 2005' • • 1 PZ05-0127-07 Clint Staples 842 NE 96 St. Sec. 518: fence in front yard Mr. Berg explained the basis of the request, the site conditions, and recommended deferral of the item until the fence type and height issues are resolved. The applicant, Clint Staples, was there to present the case. Mr. Staples agreed to install a 3 %2 white wooden picket fence. After a brief discussion, Mr. Crutchfield made a motion to approve the site plan. Mr. Sastre seconded the motion. Motion passed 5-0. PZ05-0127-08 Evelyn D'An 1301 NE 103 St. Sec. 523.1(3): Variance to allow roof painting where code requires color thru. Mr. Berg explained the basis of the request, the site conditions, and recommended denial of the request. The applicant is appealing Sec. 523.1 and requesting a variance to allow her roof tile to be a different color. The Board discussed the issues in regards to color thru tile. Mr. Berg advised that Ms. D'An will have to completely remove the white paint on the tiles all the way down to the original gray before she can paint the tiles a different color. The applicant, Evelyn D'An, was there to present the case. Ms. D'An will find out the cost for stripping down the white paint. After further discussion, Mr. Crutchfield made a motion to approve the application under 5-26 subject to the complete removal of the white paint and reapplying the beige color as mentioned in the application. Mr. Sastre seconded for the discussion. The Board members discussed the color proposed. They also discussed the standards necessary for a variance. The motion was withdrawn. Mr. Crutchfield made a motion to table the case. Mr. Sastre seconded the motion. Motion passed 5-0. ITEM II: APPROVAL OF MINUTES- December 16, 2004 Mr. Sastre made a motion to approve the December 16, 2004 minutes. Mr. Abramitis seconded the motion. Motion passed 5-0. V. NEXT MEETING. The next regular meeting will be on February 24, 2005. V. ADJOURNMENT The January 27, 2005 Planning and Zoning meeting was adjourned at 9:45 P.M. Planning and Zoning 4 January 27, 2005