Loading...
01-25-1996 Regular MeetingMIAMI SHORES VILLAGE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 25, 1996 The regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board was held on Thursday, January 25, 1996 in the Chamber of the Village Hall commencing at 7:30 P.M. The meeting was called to order with the following members present: Present: Cliff Walters, Chairman Robert Blum Thomas J. Caldwell Les Forney Absent: Frank Hegedus Also Present: Mark Ulmer, Village Attorney Frank LuBien Lisa Kroboth ITEM #1 MINUTES - DECEMBER 14, 1995 Mr. Forney moved for approval of the December 14, 1995 minutes. Mr. Blum seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous in favor. ITEM #2 REQUEST APPROVAL OF PAINT PERMIT FOR THE ROOF. JaNene Church 1070 NE 95 Street Mr. LuBien stated that the applicant is seeking approval to change the color of the roof Ms. Church was present on her own behalf She stated that the roof was gray cement tile painted red. Ms. Church presented a sample tile from the roof. She has chosen a pale green color for the exterior of the home. If the color of the roof were to remain red, the home would look like Christmas year round. She is requesting that the Board approve the suggested white as this color is also more energy efficient. Discussion as to whether a gray cement tile roof painted white is considered a conforming roof ensued. The Board referred to Section 225 of the Code. As the Code states an allowable material as being white concrete tile, Mr. LuBien stated that white concrete tile has, in the past, been interpreted to be gray cement tile painted white. Questions arose as to the age and life of the roof. Ms. Church stated that the roofer confirmed that the roof should last another three to four years. She does not wish to replace the roof at this time, as there is other aesthetic work she would like to complete. • Planning & Zoning January 25, 1996 Page 2 Based on the generation of the roof tile and since the roof is not red color through tile, Mr. Blum suggested that the roof be sandblasted to remove as much of the red paint as possible. This would leave the gray cement tile, thus allowing the roof to be painted white. Ms. Church withdrew the application and will proceed with the suggestion of the Board. ITEM #3 REQUEST APPROVAL OF PAINT PERMIT FOR THE ROOF Mr. & Mrs. Pedro Brasac 9500 N. Bayshore Drive Mr. LuBien explained that the applicant would like to change the color of the existing white roof to red. Mrs. Teresa Brasac was present on her own behalf. She stated that as the home is located on the bay, the white roof requires a high degree of maintenance due to the mildew and salt water. Mr. Forney noted that half of the roof was already painted red. Mrs. Brasac confirmed that this was the case. She stated that the contractor hired to do the job claimed he did not need a permit. The work ceased when a Code Enforcement officer noted there was no permit to paint the roof. Mr. Forney moved that the request be denied. Mr. Caldwell seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous in favor. ITEM #4 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR ALTERATIONS Lahoud Coin Laundry 8851 Biscayne Blvd. Mr. LuBien stated that the Coin Laundry was originally in one corner of the building. Mr. Lahoud, the owner of the laundry, then acquired another store. He proceeded to tear down the partitions and add more washing machines which in turn initiated more problems. There was no provision for the excess discharge or overflow from the additional washing machines. A change was also made to the exterior of the building. The applicant is requesting approval from the Board for this exterior change. George Desharnias, the contractor for the property, explained the changes made to the storefront. There are currently aluminum hurricane shutters on the storefront thus making the business an open front building. Referring to Section 502 of the Code, Mr. Ulmer stated that an open front building was prohibited. Mr. Desharnias stated that the owner would like an open front due to • the heat generated by the machines. Mr. LuBien noted that the applicant did not have a permit for the changes made to the storefront. There was discussion regarding the plans submitted. Should the Board decide to consider a sliding glass door storefront, Mr. Ulmer stated that a variance would have to be granted. However, if the facade is restored to its original appearance, no variance would be required. Referring to Section 607, he noted that the plans must be in harmony with the surrounding property. • • Planning & Zoning January 25, 1996 Page 3 Mr. Forney inquired whether the Board had the authority to act on the petition as Mr. Lahoud is not the owner of the property. Mr. Lahoud confirmed that his contract states that the tenant must maintain the building. Mr. Blum asked if the application was complete as the signage was not part of the application. Mr. LuBien stated that signage would be considered as a separate item. Mr. Forney moved to approve the request as modified by restoring the building to its original storefront appearance replacing the jalousie windows with a window that meets today's Code. Mr. Caldwell seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous in favor. ITEM #5 BOARD COMMENTS Mr. Caldwell asked if the Village Attorney could note on the agenda material which section of the Code pertained to items on the agenda. Mr. Ulmer noted that he received the agenda at the same time as the Board members. Mr. LuBien stated that he would comply with this request as he prepares the agenda. Mr. Walters brought the Board up-to-date on the status of the Code Review Committee. Mr. Walters stated that he had gone before the Village Council to request that professional Planners be on hand to help develop a new Code. The Council is considering the request. Mr. Ulmer noted that, as the Village Attorney, he feels he should not be on the Committee due to conflict of interest. Mr. Blum suggested that, should an opening become available on the Committee, Mr. Charles Smith be considered for the position. Mr. Caldwell inquired as to the status of the Everett Building. Mr. LuBien stated that the architect has been notified that time has run out on the extension. Further discussion regarding the building ensued. ITEM #6 ADJOURNMENT Mr. Forney moved that the January 25, 1996 meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board be adjourned. Mr. Caldwell seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous in favor. The January 25, 1996 meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board was adjourned at 8:57 P.M. a Eliza, eth A. Kroboth, Recording Secretary