09-12-1991 Regular MeetingMIAMI. SHORES VILLAGE
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD REGULAR MEETING
September 12, 1991
A regular 'meeting of the Miami Shores Village Planning & Zoning Board
was held on September 12, 199.1, The meeting was called to order at 7;35 P.M.
by Chairman, Mr. Fernandez with the following members present;
Richard M, Fernandez, Chairman
Terrell F, Chambers Jr.
Les Forney
Thomas Laubenthal
Larry T. McClure
Absent; -Prank LuBien, Director of Building & Zoning
1. MINUTES - AUGUST 8, 1991
The minutesof the meeting of August 8, 1991 were approved by a motion
made by Mr. McClure, seconded by Mr. Laubenthal, and carried unanimously.
It was announced, Mt. LuBien is not present for this meeting. He is out
studying in depth the run and shoot.offense. Mr. Laubenthal has gone beyond t -
the call of duty, by remaking this meeting. He is breaking an attendance streak.
Mr. Laubenthal has not missed a Hurricane game since 1981, Mr. LuBien will
be held accountable at the next meeting,
2,. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PLA.NSFOR POLE SIGN
DIAMOND SIGNATURE, 8985 BISCAYNE BLVD.
Mr. Charles Royer, owner stated he had begun this request since 1/11/91.
He presented a letter from Mr. John Militana, the property owner, signed and
notarized. Mr. Mili.tana stated in the letter, he has no objection to the sign
so long as it complies with appricable codes and does not restrict or delete
parking. (This letter will become a permanent part of these minutes.)
Mr-. Royer indicated the sign will be black and yellow, and will not be lit at
night. Also he indicated he does not need DOT approval.
Members received •in their'packet a. copy of the minutes of 2/28/91, a
memo to Frank LuBien from Code Enforcement Supervisor of DOT, a. location
sketch detail (without Western Union and without the addressl. Certain materials
requested for consideration of the sign have -i �ot.beet.7gro ded.
Mr. Fernandez. called Members attention to the very narrow parking space
at the location, the pole sign is off the driving surface. The question is if
the sign is appropriate at that location, considering the safety .aspect, and
precedent being set,
In response to query from Mr. McClure.., is the sign as presented in com-
pliance? Mr. Fernandez responded be badconversation with Frank LuBien. To the
best of Mr. Fernandez's knowledge the question is one of determination that this
Board acts as an Architectural Board as to the appropriateness of color, size,
etc.. As to the dininsions there is some liberalism allowed.. in. the B-2 zone. Also
the Board 'must make determination for the best interest of the Village. Mr. Royer
responded that Western Union logo, lettering, and address will be added to the
sign, It was noted that the problem is that e.acb ti' 1R.the application comes be-
fore the Board, there is a different owner, the sign is not the final sign
location nor is the proper wording indicated for the sign.
LANNINC & ZONING BD BEG MEETING -2- 9/12/91
Considerable discussion ensued concerning the safety of location and
State standards. Other materials being incomplete. Also is this a variance
request as noted on the. agenda? -
Nrr. Stan Pechter of Modern.Dis?lay indicated, there is nog setback re-
quirement shown, as he was advised that the. Board will.make the setback determi-
nation. Iie was advised by DOT they. have. no jurisdiction, T?te numbers will run
vertically down the pole and the pole will be a 6" cast - iron steel pipe.
Mr. Laubenthal noted the. recommendation of Florida DOT is referred to as
design 700 standard with. a 16' setback , McClure commented. that it is ex-
tremely -tannsual for Mr. LuBien to indicate that this Board will make the determi-
nation where the sign will go. He has mentioned on numerous occasions, this
sign is outside the property line, and the applicant has had much opportunity to
show -exactly where be intends to: place the sign. In response, Mr. Pechter
noted that lft. LuBien indicated to him, that once the Board makes its' decision,
then it will be determined what the setback will be.
All Members concurred on the safety aspect.
Discussion continued on the unsightliness and the safety Co. real concern)
of the sign. lair. Laubenthal`indicated there is latitude -within the site itself
to place a sign that is safe and responsible with all the rest of site amenties.
Mr.'Laubenthal made a motion that the application.as submitted, and re-
vised by the applicant, for a 2.! setback from the sidewalk. and aligned with a
stripe, be approved.; The motion was seconded by Mr. Forney. Mr. Chambers
offered an amendment, that the property owner concurr with the final location of
the sign. The amendment was accepted by Mr. Laubenthal and Mr. Forney. The
vote was called and the motion carried by,,a 4/1 vote. Mr.,• Fernandez voted no.
This item will be called to the attention of )Is Macdonald to determine if
Council approval is needed, The applicant will be notified if yes.
3. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR DISH. ANTENNA. (VARIANCE)
S. T. TAYLOR, JR, 9301 N. E. 12th AVENUE
Mr, Fernandez opened the discussion by noting, this is a request for a
variance. as to location and height of the dish antenna.
Mr. Taylor noted he has moved from one location to another and made his
home in Miani Shores for eight years, and is interested in keeping it beautiful.
He feels his antenna is more secured, well hidden and meets setback requirements.
The .location and the height was discussed at length by the Board. Members
concurred that the positioning of.the antenna is clearly visible to neighbors
and there is no basis for a variance. Also the setting of a precedent.
Mr. Fernandez noted he had visited the site and found E. Dixie Hwy to be
higher, the property dips, therefore requiring additional height; and the
currently existing landscap} Ag a combination of the two make the location a
better one.
In response to Mr. McClure,.Mr. Taylor indicated he can position the
atenna on the east if that is what the Board wishes, but feels where he wants to
place it is a more optimum location.
Mr. Laubenthal made a motion that the application as submitted be denied,
seconded by Mx. Forney, Discussion continued concerning location and height,
dangeri of setting a precedent. The vote to deny the application as submitted,
passed unanimously.
Right of appeal to Council was explained to Mr, Taylor.
PLANNING & ZONING 13D REG MEETING -3- 9/12/91
4. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR CARPORT ENCLOSURE
ROLAND & ELLEN GIUERRA, 1050 N. E. 107th ST
Mr, Guerra indicated he has a 2 bedroom, 11 bath. horse, 2 children, and
needs the extra room. Ria addition will include a master bedroom,and master bath
and a den.
Mr. Fernandez explained for Mr. Guerra, all garage or carport enclosures
come to the Planning & Zoning Board for aesthetics and so as. not to create a
problem of rental property.
Mr. Guerra noted he will use masonry construction where on the front
elevation wood was previously noted, and this is so reflected on the plans.
Members discussed the location of the residence, knee wall, placement of
doors, alley services and parking sides, ona construction, and cut back of
concrete driveway.
Mr. Laubenthal made a motion that the application as submitted, with
correction to A3 Casing cbs construction) and the driveway ribbon cut back be
approved. McClure seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
A ten minute break was taken at 9:00 P.M..
5. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF ROUSE COLORS
JAMES SULLIVAN, 9334 Noyam' AVENUE
This comes to the Planning & Zoning. Board as a result of a code viola-
tion and several complaints, The house was painted without a permit, there-
fore no color approval.
Mr. Sullivan indicated he is before the Board to request:: cblor approval.
The painting contractor slept thru the whole proceeding, in spite of the fact
that persons present tried to awaken him,
Mr. Laubenthal indicated he had seen other houses with,the similar yellow,
but the red trim is too close in toneto the bricks, the problem is in the
amount of the accent color used. The trim color shobld be confined to the
trim area, Re has no problem with.,yellow and white.
Mr. Fernandez commented -concerning the pulling of a permit and color
approval. Mr. Sullivan indicated he can change awning color but doesn't like
white.
Mr. Laubenthal moved that the application as submitted be denied, seconded
by Mr. McClure and carriedunanineusly.
6. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL -OF PLANS FOR FLAT ROOF ADDITION
JERRY BERGERON, 1163'N. E. 101st STREET
Mr. Fernandez noted that there are some unusual circumstance concerning
this project which Mr, Bergeron will fill in later. Mr. Laubenthal explained
this project is in 3 phases, a bedroom.addition, item 2 to be discussed this
evening, and.±tem 3 not before the Board.
In reply to query, Mr. Bergeron said construction is part done, Construc-
tion permits have been obtained. It has been a tedious job going on since
October 1990, East Concractors Co... whom he first contracted with went banrupt
and moved out of town, The second phase is to enclose an area and connect the
atrium.
PLANNING & ZONING BD REG MEETING -4- 9/12/91
Members discussed the 15% flat. roof permitted and it being well within
the requirement: Also dscussed2.was._:the awareness of the homeowner to the
ramifications of additional flat. roof not shown.
Mr. McClure moved for approval of the application as submitted, Seconded
by Mr. Chambers for discussion, It was noted there is no. other solution,. It
was made clean to Mr. Bergeron,. there is no guarantee that phase 3 will -be
approved, It .was noted the addition, and the:: workml .n, hip :-is G.he.a a.tiful. The vote
was called and the. motion to approve passed unanimously,
7. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF VARIANCE TO ALLOW FABRIC CARPORT IN THE FRONT
YARD AND CANTILEVER AWNING IN BACK YARD..
JAMES L. DENTICO, 10055 BISCAYNE BLVD,
Members concurred that the requests whould be heard as two separate items,
Jane Dentico noted, she has a small lot and needs the 2 canapies to pro-
tect several old cars. She does use herone car garage.
Members concurred that no front yard awning carport is permitted in Miami
Shores.
Mr. Laubenthal moved that the application for a front yard awning carport
be denied, seconded by Mr. Forney and carried unanimously.
BACK YARD
Members discussed the setback encrochment, the 15% requirement away from
the main building, cantilever and the tot size.
Mrs. Dentico stated she has an investment in these vehicles. She has no
place:to park ::them -for protection and doesn't understand the setback requirement.
Nr. Laubenthal made a motion that the application for a rear cantilever
awning be denied, seconded by Mr. Chambers and passed unanimously,
Mr. Fernandez explained to Mrs. Dentico her right to appeal to Council.
Mr. Forney expressed concern regarding the Landscape Ordinance, He feels
grass in the front yard is a must. Also., the residential and commercial issues
should be separate., It was requested by the Chairman that the Landscape..Ordinance
be placed on the next agenda.
8. DISCUSSION - METAL STRUCTURES
Product approval in the Dade. County Code is already in existance
according to discussion with Mr. Knezevich. The questions to be asked is;
where? and how much?
Members agreed to forgo further discussion at this time,
9. DISCUSSION - 2nd FLOOR ADDITION TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES
Mr. Fernandez spoke with Bob Stobs concerning the Subject, It is one
Mr. Stobs is knowledgable in, having done 2nd floor additions. With theapproval
of the Board lir. Fernandez will ask that he speak to Members on the subject.
Everyone agreed, this is a good idea.
The meeting adjourned at 9;50 P.M,
r•4
cre
•
August 20, 1991
Charles Royer
Instant Money, Inc.
8985 Biscayne Blvd.
Miami Shores, Florida 33138
Dear Charlie:
This letter will confirm my permission as landlord for you to
install a sign depicting Western Union and Instant Money, Inc.
This sign shall comply with all applicable c requirements and
not restrict or deplete parking. The siould also conform
architecturally with the building.
JM:ps
V
ilitana
SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this
My Commission Expires:
NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF FLORIDA.
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: MAY 31, 1993a
BONDED THRU NOTARY PUBLIC UNDERWRITERS?
B
day of August, 1991.
Notary Public/State • Flori