Loading...
02-28-1991 Regular MeetingMIAMI SHORES VILLAGE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD - REGULAR MEETING February 28, 1991 A regular meeting of the Miami Shores Village Planning & Zoning Board was held on February 28, 1991. The meeting was called to order at 7;40 P.M. by Chairman, Mr. Fernandez, with the following members: present: i ebard M. Fernandez, Chairman Terrell F. Chambers, Jx. Les Forney Thomas Laubenthal Larry T. McClure Absent; Frank LuBien, Director of Building & Zoning 1. MINUTES - February 14, 1991. Mr. Forney moved to approve, as mailed, the minutes of the meeting of February 14, 1991,.seconded by Mr. McClure, and carried unanimously. Mr. Fernandez updated Members on the lively and lengthy discussion by Council, at their last meeting, on the Color Wheel. He further reported that there was no mandate from the Council for Planning & Zoning to proceed with implementation. 2. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF POLE SIGN 8985 BISCAYNE BLVD TENANT: DIAMOND SIGNATURE CONTRACTOR: MODERN DISPLAY Mr. Stan Paehter of Modern Display presented the case for Diamond Signature, Inc. In Members packet was a Location Sketch. A Plan showing where the sign is anticipated being placed and a drawing of the proposed sign. Since the application Western Union was added to the lettering and Mr. Pachter gave each Member a copy of this. It is proposed this will be a new pole sign, 6' X 6' with double faced cabinet, in yellow with black lettering. Mr. McClure raised the question of the sign appearing to be outside the property line, on the plot plan. Question was raised about the cdlor also. Mr. Laubenthal noted standards set down by Florida DOT along Biscayne Blvd. (The sign should be set back from the edge of the road 15' - 17` for any permanent mounting). He further noted the applicant needs to do more re- search, documents are missing, and a more accurate drawing should be submitted. Dr. Wm. Dyer stated he owns the business and in conversation with Mr. LuBien he was told no precedent is being established, and the sign is alright. After further discussion, it was suggested the applicant may wish to with- draw his request and return at his earliest convenience with additional information. Mr. Pachter and Dr. William Dyer then decided to withdraw the application as submitted. PALNNING & ZONING BOARD -2- 2/28/91 3. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR ALTERATION H. B. Konover 170-180 N. E. 99th_STREET Mr. Robert Rodriguez introduced himself as the property manager for Mr. Konover. with the applicant. Mr. Chambers excused himself & left the room. Discussion continued. Mr. Chambers returned following the vote. Members received in their packet a copy of the Site Plan, drawing of the proposed partial ground floor plan, existing front elevation, and the proposed new elevation. Mr. Rodriguez proposed the glass front windows in the waiting room, and the doors, he further explained the stucco method and places, and the coloring. The original angle will remain in front. The rear shack will be replaced, the coral rock on the building will remain. Mrs. Witte noted she had not had the time to discuss the proposed changes with Mr. Konover, however; she is interested in the property owner compling with DRB Guidelines. She is interested in restoring all windows with 80% clear glass and the coordination of colors. There was extensive discussion on the clear glass &the paint color. An overall color cheme with painting in front and rear was discussed. Comment was made, the windows are being preserved and the window facade is reasonable. There were other comments on the stucco and the coral rock. Mr. Fernandez asked Mr. Rodriguez to relate to Mr. Konover the great deal of appreciation of Planning & Zoning Board for his cooperation. Mr. Laubenthal moved to approve the application as submitted, contingent on the continued cooperation of Mr. Konover, with Frank LuBien and the DRB, be approved. Notion was seconded by Mr. Forney. In discussion, it was determined, the paint is not a part of this approval and painting, as proposed, come back to Planning & Zoning for approval. It was pointed out that the motion, as made, was not proper with the conditional clause. Following the offer of an amendment to approve the application as submitted, and acceptance by Mr. Forney and Mr. Laubenthal, the motion passed unanimously. Mr. Chambers returned following the vote. 4. FINAL GUIDELINES - DRB Mr. Fernandez noted, this is the last phase of a long process in working with Mrs. Barbara Witte and the Downtown Revitalization Board. Planning & Zoning has taken various segments of the code for discussion, various sugges- tions made. There has been lengthy discussion on color, facade, awning, air conditioning, etc. and the Planning & Zoning Board has worked with DRB in formulating their Guidelines, PLANNING & ZONING BOARD �3- 2/28/9.1 Mrs. Witte presented each Member with a new copy of the DRB Guidelines. She noted the color peach has been added to the color palette. Clear glass as opposed to tinting was discussed at length. Historic significance to be considered in every case for downtown property, Addition of mail boxes not visible from the street, There ensued a lengthy discussion on signage. Pole signs should be prohibited. Also noted in this discussion on signs was the new North Miami Beach ordinance which prohibits pole mounted signs and her inability to have a copy for this meeting. Comparison was :made with Pg 159.3 of the Code Book and Pg 12 of the DRB Guidelines. It was commented, signage is an area which .might stand continued discussion. Monument signs were mentioned and Members would like to see what DRB has in mind concern- ing this area. All signage should be in harmony and included in the Guide- lines. All Members would like to see all absolutes removed from the Guide- lines and conditional statements inserted. Mr. Fernandez suggested that these are DRB Guidelines, they are not to be adopted or approved but endorsed. He further noted he seriously dislikes prolonging endorsement, but would definitely like to see a final draft. Word smiting is necessary on the final item. Also the final Guidelines would indicate submitted by and the date. Further it was suggested that Mr. LuBien include Signage for discussion after the final discussion on Design Guidelines. 5. DISCUSSION ROOFING MATERIAL,' SOUTH FLORIDA ROOFING AND SHEET METAL ASSN. The Board was advised that South Florida Roofing & Sheet Metal Assn. was unable to provide a speaker for this meeting. They will shoot for the March 14th meeting, and will be in touch with Mr. LuBien. It was suggested the speaker be made aware of Miami Shores Village regula- tions. The meeting adjourned at 8:45 P.M. •