Loading...
01-26-1989 Regular MeetingMIAMI SHORES VILLAGE January 26, 1989 The Miami Shores Village Planning & Zoning Board regular meeting was held on January 26, 1989, at the Miami Shores Village Hall at 7:30 P.M.. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Rossi, with the following members present: Robert J. Rossi, Chairman Terrell F. Chambers, Jr. Richard M. Fernandez, Esq. Larry T. McClure Absent: Thomas Laubenthal Also present: Frank LuBien, Director of Building & Zoning 1. MINUTES - January 12, 1989 The minutes of the meeting of January 12, 1989 were approved, as written, by a motion made.by Mr. Fernandez, seconded by Mr. McClure, and passed unanimously. 2. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF. PLANS FOR GARAGE ENCLOSURE HOLT 39 N. W. 102nd Street Mr. LuBien explained, this request is a carry over from the last meeting, the owner was not present, and Members wanted to ask Mrs. Holt some questions. The work has begun. Mr. Rossi explained to Mr. & Mrs. Holt that many single family homes were built with the garage, enclosure of the area may be permitted, but must come to the Planning & Zoning Board for approval when architectural harmony or design is to be changed. There is no exterior.access and aIsmall side window. In response to query from Mr. McClure, Mrs. Holt stated the blocks in the garage door opening will be flush with the wall when the job is completed. He advised Mrs. Holt, one of the main concerns.of the Board is that it not look like an enclosed garageand it cannot, be inhabitated as a private living facility. Much discussion followedconcerning a window. on .the front of the house to match the other windows. It was determined this would, create a tremendous hardship since it must be a jalousie window to match: the others, and these windows are.no longer.permitted. Also Mrs. Holt. was advised no window is .necessary. The Members would:like to see two or three feet of the driveway strips cut back, and suitable.landscapping placed in front of the enclosure. Mrs. Holt agreed to all these suggestions. Mr. Fernandez moved to approve the plans for enclosure on the condition the parking ribbons are cut back three feet and a 5' or 6' high tree and other suitablelandscapping be placed in front. The motion was seconded by Mr. :Chambers, and passed unanimously. Mr. Rossi explained to Mrs. Holt the permit process, and advised her to call Mr. LuBien for inspections. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD -2- 1/26/89 3. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR CARPORT ENCLOSURE THOMAS JOSEPH 39 N. W. 101st STREET Mr. LuBien explained the existing carport is attached to a garage and in turn connected to the house with a porch. There was no. architect seal on the print plans, this was discussed and Mr. Joseph was advised this is necessary. Mr.. Joseph was also advised that the plans are incomplete. Mr. Joseph, in answer to questions, stated this will be made into a playroom for his children, it had a washing machine in the room and the plans were drawn by a draftsman. Mr. LuBien agreed the floor plan doesn't track with the elevation plan, while Mr. Fernandez noted the difficulty in approving a drawing which is uncertified and incomplete. Mr. McClure raised the question of the footing, a very important factor to be considered. in the enclosure. There seemed to be many inconsistancies in the drawing and Members had a real problem determining all details.. Mr. Rossi suggested that Mr. Joseph may prefer to withdraw his request, return to the draftsman:for a more complete, corrected and certified set of plans. Mr. Joseph withdrew his request and agreed to return with a sealed set of drawings. Mr. LuBien gave Mr. Joseph his card and suggested he have the architect or draftsman call him. 4. APPROVAL OF RECONSTRUCTED NON -CONFORMING ACCESSORY BUILDING JOSE ESTRELLA 10704 N. W. 2nd AVE. Mr. LuBien advised Members that :this request requires a variance. The exist- ing metal and wood structure (material non -conforming) was rebuilt. Mr. Fernandez abstained from discussion and voting, he represented the seller at the time Mr. Estrella bought the house. Mr. Rossi explained the voting procedure. The three remaining Members present must vote for approval if Mr. Estrella's request is to begranted, or he may wish to wait and havethe request heard by a full Board. Mr. Estrella chose to proceedwith his request. Mr. LuBien explained that this existing non -conforming structure had com- pletely rotted and everything has been replaced except -the metal framework which supports all the wood. There is also.one section on the front which must be removed, because. it was not therein the -beginning. This is not only in violation of the South Florida..Building Code, but also the Miami Shores set back requirements, and building material.requirements. Mr. Estrella stated, the old and run down building and existing slab was there when he bought the house, he proceeded to repair the roof and replace the deteriorated outside sheathing. He further noted he uses the building as a workshop, storage and utility building and washer room. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD -3- 1/26/89 Mr. Rossi explained to Mr. Estrella that he purchased a non -conforming structure, and in Sec. 524, the Miami Shores Code of Ordinance clearly addresses non -conforming structures. It attempts to bring an old non- conforming structure into compliance by not prolonging the 'life of the non -conforming building. The intent is to keep all buildings or structures in Miami Shores conforming to the Ordinances. Masonry structures, setbacks, tile roofs, etc. Mr. McClure noted this does not. fit in the category of the 120 sq ft metal storage building which is generally allowed in Miami Shores. It appeared to be an awning type aluminum structure which someone made an attempt to enclose. Another serious part of the problem is the utility line which extends over the roof, this in violation of the South. Florida Building Code. Mr. McClure moved to reject the request, seconded by Mr. Chambers, and passed 3-10. Mr. Fernandez abstained. Mr. Rossi explained Mr. Estrella's right to appeal to the Village Council, in writing, within ten (10) days of their meeting of February 7, 1989. 5. APPROVAL OF SOLAR PANELS ON ROOF Michael. Schou, M. D. 1343 N. E. 104th St. Mr. LuBien noted this job was completed without a permit, and the roof panels are visible from the street. Mr. Alan Towsley of Sunworks stated the application was incomplete, but or that he had to bring the request 3 Mrs. Schou stated she paid $7,000.. he had applied for ape/mit, was advised was not apprized of everything needed, to the Planning & Zoning Board. for the solar panels for her pool heater. Discussion ensued concerning placement in the particular place, harmony, precedent, if any. Mr. LuBien sees no technical problem, but the job has not been permitted, nor inspected. Mr. McClure moved to approve solar panels on the roof, provided a permit is obtained, and the proper inspections made, motion seconded by Mr. Chambers. Mr. Fernandez inquired about the size of the panels. The vote was called, and the motion carried unanimously. 6. APPROVAL: OF EXTERIOR COLOR JOHN MUMFORD 10130 N. MIAMI AVE. Members were advised by. Mr. LuBien that. he went to. the house in response to a telephone call. No permit was obtained and the intensity of the color piiak needed approval. Mr. Mumford stated he is an artist and had resear.ched.the color. It is a definite improvement from the way it looked before. He chose this color to be in keeping with the Bermuda look. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD -4- 1/26/89. Much discussion continued concerning the intensity of the color, vibrant shade of pink, the history of the house, architectural style, is it historically designated? It was pointed out that. there were at least two complaints, and if this is only one coat of paint, .the second would be even more intense. Toning down by mixing with white was also discussed, and the fact that it definitely is not harmonious. Mr. Fernandez moved to deny the color as submitted, seconded by, Mr. McClure, motion passed unanimously. Mr. Rossi explained the right of appeal. to Village Council. Also, he pointed out that a permit. must be obtained and color sample submitted before painting. 7. DISCUSSION - T V DISH ANTENNA Mr. Rossi introduced. the Ordinance for discussion with. the hope that it has been studied throughly, by all.. There was discussion concerning 2. Location. b. Roof Mounted (3) Non- commercial dish antenna It was determined this section will remain as is. Under 4. Screening & Color (b) Roof Mounted - it was decided to strike the word thereof and insert of the antenna. Followingcontinued discussion., Mr. McClure stated the Planning & Zoning Board had worked diligently on this ordinance for some time, and he feels it is an ordinance the Miami Shores Village will need in the future. In response to the reservations by the Village Council it. was re -addressed. It is a very workable ordinance.. Mr. McClure moved to send it to the Village Council with the minor change made this evening, for Village Council approval. The motion was seconded by Mr. Fernandez, and carried by a unanimous vote. There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 9:00 P.M. O-� ird &ed,4 ecrry •