07-14-1988 Regular MeetingMIAMI SHORES VILLAGE
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING
July 14, 1988
The Miami. Shores Village Planning & Zoning Board convened on July 14, 1988,
at the Miami Shores Village. Hall at 7:35 P.M.. The meeting was called to order
by Richard Fernandez, with the following members present:
Terrell F. Chambers, Jr.
Richard M. Fernandez, P.A.
Thomas Laubenthal
Larry T. McClure
Absent: Robert J. Rossi, Chairman (Mr.. Rossi's absence is due to his
mother suffering a stroke, she is in Hollywood MemorialHosp.
Mr. Fernandez has been requested to chair the meeting).
Also present: Frank LuBien, Director of Building & Zoning
1. MINUTES - June 30, 1988
A correction was called for on page 6, #ll, the action passed 4-0.
Mr. Laubenthal moved the minutes of the meeting of June 30, 1988 be approved,
as corrected, seconded by Mr. McClure, and passed unanimously.
It was agreed that items 4 & 5 on the Agenda will be at the end of the meeting,
if the person requesting the addendum item shows up.
2. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF 4' FENCE IN FRONT YARD
THOMAS B. CHAILLE
352 N. E. 98th ST.
Mr. Laubenthal left the room,.: stating he had a vested interest in this issue.
Members received in their packet the form indicating request for approval of
a 4' wrought iron fence in the front yard, this would replace an existing
pipe and wire fence on Historic Landmark property. Also in the packet was a
letter outlining reasons for the request, a sketch of survey, a petition
signed by immediate neighbors -approving, and a Certificate of Appropriatness,
signed by Margo Newton, Chairman of the Historic Preservation Board.
Dr. Chaille asked that his request be withdrawn, at this time. Mr. LuBien
commented that, in light of the fact that Members areworking on an amendment
to include Historic Landmark as a consideration in determining a variance,
this criteria could be applied to this particular case, since this is the
basis for the variance request. The wrought iron fence has been installed
with the stipulation that it will be moved if he fails to obtain the variance.
The fence had to be put in because of the pool installation and for safety.
In response to query, Mr. LuBien further noted the Ordinance will go into
effect after Public Hearing and approval by thiss.Body, and the two readings
by Council. Also there is no difficulty in delaying Dr. Chaille's request
because the fence is in place.
Mr. Fernandez noted this could be the first case heard under the new ordinance
when it goes into effect.
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
-2- 7/14/88
Mr. McClure moved to table the request, at this time, seconded by Mr. Chambers,
and passed unanimously.
Mr. Laubenthal returned to the room.
Mr. Fernandez requested Mr. Laubenthal take the chair for the next case, since he is
affiliated with the University, and cannot participate in the vote.
3. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR F.A.A. BUILDING
BARRY UNIVERSITY
11300 N. E. 2nd AVE.
Representing Barry University, and outlining their Landscape Plans were;
Jorge E. Iglesius and Angel Marks, Landscape Architects, and Ed Turner and
Freddy TJlloa from Barry. They showed drawings of the elevations of the
F.A.A. Building, also drawing of the parking lot and landscaping across the
street. Mention was made of parking assessibility to. the school, there will
be no.berm, no erosion, landscaping at the parking entrance & exit; Some
existing trees are beingrelocated, sodding and irrigation will be put in
place. Basically a flat profile will be maintained, hedges & ground cover
around perimeter, with a plaza in the center. Right-of-way frontage will remain.
Following further brief discussion, Mr. McClure moved to approve the request
as submitted, seconded by Mr. Chambers, and passed 3/x with Mr. Fernandez
abstaining. 0
6. ADDENDUM ITEM - REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR GARAGE ENCLOSURE
PIRECE KELLY
270 N. E. 104th ST.
Mr. Franklin Grau was present to represent Mr. Kelly.
Members reviewed site plan, floor plan, and North elevation. Mr. Grau noted
the windows will be aluminum awning windows and the interior doorway will re-
main?as this will continue to be a laundry. room, there are no interior
changes. A portion of the existing driveway ribbons will be removed and the
area will be sodded. A full set of plans was available for review also.
Mr. Laubenthal moved to approve the request for garage enclosure, seconded by
Mr. Chambers, and passed unanimously.
OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE REQUEST
DAVID ALEXIS
210 N. E. 98th ST.
This item is not on the agenda, but Mr. LuBien presented it for approval as
new business. Mr. Alexis wants to operate an office only at 210 N. E. 98th St.,
to provide services for painting and landscaping.
To answer Members questions, Mr. Alexis stated he will be next door to Jolly
Mutt, at the back side of Center Pharmacy. He will have no storage or sales
at the premise, it will be office use only.
Mr. Laubenthal moved to approve the request for a service oriented office,
seconded by Mr. McClure,,and-passed unanimously.
PLANNINE & ZONING BOARD -3- 7/14/88
4. DISCUSSION - LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE
Mr. Laubenthal distributed copies of the Proposed Landscape Ordinance, as he
has drawn it up to date. The proposed Ordinance.contained a:refinement of
language along with a definition of intent at the beginning and terminology
and definition section in the end.
Members were very impressed with the work. Mr. McClure commented, that
Mr. Laubenthal cannot be appreciated enough for the tremendous undertaking,
accepting the full burden of formulating this Ordinance.
The proposed Ordinance was reviewed step by step. It was determined the
heading would read, Landscape & Screening Requirements for Schedule of
Regulations.
R District ...1. Last five words will be replaced with, on the premise.
5. Home Professional office - See Paragraph 1.
6. Home Occupation - See Paragraph 1. Number 10.& 11 will be scratched.
A-1 District...There was much discussion as Mr. Laubenthal outlined his
theory and reasons for this wording.
A-2 District and 0 District... were discussed and determined to be alright.
B-1 District was reviewed, #8, #10, and #11 were discussed and determined
to be ok. #12 will be scratched, in favor of Dish Antenna Ordinance.
B-2 District, C District and S-1 District (Barry University) are alright.
S-2 District (Dog Tract) was discussed at length, any change will require
approval by the Planning & Zoning Board.
P District and X District identified ok.
Definitions: Research was donea.nd figures arrived at using standards of the
U S Forrestry. Department and other Municiplaities, this under Equivalent Value.
Definition for Open Space which was omitted, will be included. Sightline
Triangle was discussed and explained by Mr. Laubenthal.
Following full review and amendments, and since the full burden has been his,
Mr. Laubenthal determined, this ordinance is not yet ready for Public Hearing.
He feels it should have Official review and comments from the Downtown
Revitalization Board. He further noted he will extend copies to Council and
other Boards for review at the Public Hearing. An extension of time is needed.
A five minute break was taken,., at this time.
5. DISCUSSION - LICENSING LANDLORDS
Mr. Fernandez opened discussion, stating Village Council forwarded to the
Planning & Zoning Board a Zoning Ordinance from.the:City of Gainesville, F1.,
Licensing Landlords.. It was discussed briefly at the last meeting and if
someone hasspecificpoints we willhear them. He suggested we think about
it first ton the basis of policy . and determine what kind of policy we want to
think about and thengo back and address specifics. The 45 days allowed by
Council to come back with a report is somewhat vague in terms of what is
wanted, if there is no objection., we can start from the Policy standpoint.
Mr. Chambers raised the question, how is this working in. Gainesville, and
what rights are being taken away that cannot be taken away?
•
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
-4- 7/14/88
this type of license, pertaining to
Mr. Fernandez had researched a couple of books of State Statues, and he
could find only a couple of references to Condominium Association Manager
being licensed. The question arises, is the Village of:Miami Shores attempt-
ing to license the business of leasing houses? Is this a type of Occupa-
tional Lichnse? Further, he advised Members that imbedded deep in the
Gainesville Ordinance are many set ups foncohallenge, and we should steer
clear of it. legal
Mr. McClure felt that when landlords do not need occupational license, it
becomes different from other businesses, and this is not right, a business
is a business, and functions as any other business, and the least that they
should.•.have is an occupational license.
Discussion continued concerning apartment owners having Occupational License,
and renting of property being a commercial venture for profit, and requiring
licensing. Axe there other means to accomplish the goals, code enforcement
problems with rented houses, revocation .of occupational:license and lease-
hold rights. Also mentioned is the fact that a State License is required if
three or mores properties are owned and rented.
contigous
Mr. LuBien explained code enforcement procedure for citing rental property,
also in Chapter 14, Occupational License and Business Regulations, apartments
are licensed with.fee schedule based on the number of rooms. Mr. LuBien
further inquired of the possibility of including single family houses under
this heading.. Discussion continued on Section 14-31, revocation, owner and
leasee responsibility.
The 45 day time periodwas again mentioned. Mr. Fernandez suggested going
the Occupational route may be the better way.
Mr. Laubenthal suggested a recommendation to Council that the existing section
be modified to expend and include single family residences as suggested by
Mr. LuBien, also make a statement, to consider going any.further a Policy
decision must be made to make it significantly more enforcible at all levels.
It was finally decided that discussion on this issue will continue when
Mr. Rossi is present.
The Secretary will mail a copy of Chapter 14 to each Member.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:00 P.M.