03-10-1988 Regular MeetingMIAMI SHORES VILLAGE
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING
March 10, 1988
The Miami Shores Village Planning & Zoning Board convened on March 10, 1988,
at the Miami Shores Village Hall, at 7:30 P.M.. Chairman Rossi called the meeting
to order with the following members present:
Robert J. Rossi, Chairman
Terrell F. Chambers, Jr.
Richard M. Fernandez
Larry T. McClure
Absent: Thomas Laubenthal
Also present: Frank LuBien, Director of Building & Zoning
Elly F. Johnson, Village Manager
Spero Canton, Mayor
William F. Fann, Jr., Village Attorney
1. MINUTES - February 25, 1988
Amendment to the minutes, called for by Mr. Fernandez, was on pg. 5,
paragraph 3, line 3; to insert it has between opinion and not. Motion
made by Mr. Fernandez to approve the minutes as amended, seconded by
Mr. Chambers, and passed unanimously.
Mr. McClure made a motion to take item 5 on the agenda next, seconded by
Mr. Chambers, and passed.
5. RESOLUTION OF INTENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF AMENDMENT TO OUR ZONING ORDINANCE
REZONE N. E. 2nd AVE. FROM SOUTHERN BORDER TO N. E. 94th ST.,
FROM RESIDENTIAL TO MODIFIED RESIDENTIAL
For the purpose of review and update, Mr. Rossi explained that the Planning
& Zoning Board had requested the Village Attorney and Staff to prepare a
resolution of intent to set a public hearing, date, and time for the purpose
of considering amendment to the zoning ordinance.
Mr. Johnson gave each Member a copy of the second resolution as drawn up by
Mr. Fann, for their perusal.
Mr. Fann explained he prepared the resolution after discussion with the
Chairman of the Planning Board to determine what exactly is expected from
him, since there are only three ways to amend the zoning code. Mr. Rossi
explained that the Planning Board is interested in having a hearing for the
purpose of receiving input from the owners and neighbors of the property in
question, and the public. Mr. Fann then explained to Mr. Rossi that a
public hearing can be held without a resolution. If; however the public
hearing is for the purpose of constituting the first step toward amending
the Ordinance for a particular purpose in a particular way a resolution is
necessary. Mr. Fann then cited the most recent zoning case in the Third
District Court of Appeals, Dade County, of Machado vs Muscro, and stated
that in a case where there is a Comprehensive Plan, as is the case in Miami
Shores, this Plan must first be changed before any zoning change can take
place.
Much discussion continued concerning the Comprehensive Plan.
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING -2- 3/10/88
Mr. Rossi then commented the charge from Council is to look at all buffer
zones in Miami Shores beginning with this area on N. E. 2nd Ave., specifically
not to use one particular idea. He further noted that Mr. Fann had prepared
two resolutions. Also he talked at length with Mr. Swarthout who has pre-
pared our Comprehensive Plan update, and was advised that any change to be
made, so far as buffer zones, should be looked at as one package, holding the
public hearing and incorporate in the Plan, at this time.
Mr. Fann defined the different types of public hearing possible, as befit the
resources, what might be appropriate and financial limitations. In response
to query concerning spot zoning, Mr. Fann noted that Commercial activity in a
residential neighborhood cannot be condoned. A change in zoning must encom-
pass a great deal of study, it cannot be arbitrary. And again he advised the
Comprehensive Plan must first be changed.
Mr. Rossi read a paragraph from the Comprehensive Plan, indicating the
redevelopment of the Downtown area of Miami Shores is being looked at as an
ongoinJstudy. The Plan will be adopted after public hearing, then sent to
Village Council for their adoption and then sent to the State.
Mr. Joseph Weil made a brief comment that, he is present as representing
Barbara North Burton in her request for rezoning a particular piece of property.
He indicated that Mr. Fenn is 100% correct in stating that the Comprehensive
Plan must be changed. He referred to provision in Chapter 163 which addressed
amendment to the Plan and feels that both issues can be taken simultaneously.
Discussion continued on the Comprehensive Plan.
It was clarified that two (2) public hearings are required to amend the Plan
in effect now and since 1979. Once .adopted the Comprehensive Plan can be
amended twice a year.
Mr. Rossi explained that action needs to
time. The Resolution attached to .Zoning
motion to adopt.
Mr. Fernandez made a motion to adopt the
packet, to establish a date and time for
rezoning of N. E. 2nd Ave. south of 94th
was seconded by Mr. Chambers, and passed
There was further discussion.
be taken on one. Resolution at this
Ordinance 270 failed for lack of a
Resolution,, as received in Members
public hearing, to consider the
St. to El Portal Village, motion
unanimously.
iIn response to Mx. Johnson's query, as to whether this would be a workshop or
a public hearing, all. Members concurred they prefer to follow State Statues
and notify all residence within the 500' of the area for a balanced input.
Mr. Johnson indicated he is prepared and notices can be mailed in a couple
of days. Lists and labels are complete.
Barbara North Burton stated she had worked with Gail McDonald, and Mr. LuBien,
she has identified all homeowners in the area and legal description of all
property obtained, labels are printed and notification is ready. She is
however, interested in knowing if following the public hearing the Planning
Board can adopt the change to be sent to the Village Council. Again, it was
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
-3- 3/10/88
explained the Comprehensive Plan must first be changed. There wasfurther
discussion concerning the benefits resulting from the public hearing, etc.
Alternatives and procedures which follow.
Following continueddiscussion, the public hearing date was set for Wednesday,
March 23, 1988, 7:30 P.M.. It was further agreed the regular meeting of the
Planning & Zoning Board will be changed to that date also. Members requested
the hearing be held at the Community Center. Mr. Johnson will verify the
availability of the Community Center for this hearing.
2. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR GARAGE ENCLOSURE
MARCUS GARCIA
173 N. W. 94th ST.
In the absence of Mr. Garcia, Mr. LuBien presented this request to the Board.
He indicated that the only problem he has with the request is that the Plan
does not indicate the cut back of the concrete ribbons and the placement of
a flower bin or shrubbery to camouflage the change. Mr. LuBien, in response
to request brought in plans for the house which show window change had been
made. Following further brief discussion Mr. Chambers moved to approve the
plans provided that the concrete ribbons,now existing be cut back three (3)
feet, and appropriate shrubbery put in place. Mr. McClure seconded the
motion, which passed unanimously.
3. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR NEW FAA BUILDING
BARRY UNIVERISTY
11300 N. E. 2nd AVE.
Mr. Fernandez noted that he will abstain from voting, but will participate
in discussion, this because of his affiliation with the University.
Mr. Czerniec indicated this request is for the approval for the site plan
for the new FAA building just north of the Andreas Business School, on the
North Miami Avenue side. Mr. Czerniec then introduced the Architects from
Spillis Candela & Partners to review the Plans for Members.
The architects showed through drawn and colored chart boards the various
elevations of the building. It will be two floors with a tile roof, and
colors will be the same as Andreas Business School. In response to questions
from Mr. McClure they indicated the building will house Computer Science Dept,
Communication Center, TV Studio, Speech Lab, Office of Administrator, and a
Computer Lab. In response to further query., Mr. Czerniec indicated that the
request for satellite dish antenna is very possible. There is an interest
for uplink and downlink, but he cannot be specific at this time. There will
be the need since this will be a nationwide staff training, graduate program
for training Air Traffic Controllers and research. It is planned to aid the
FAA to develope its' mission.
Mr. LuBien advised that this plan must be approved by the Village Council at
their next meeting, Tuesday, March 15, 1988. Discussion followed.
Mr. Rossi advised the Team from Barry that the Satellite Dish Antenna is now
being reviewed for use in the Commercial Zone and facility for uplink. Down-
link may be approved if it meets our requirements. Hejemphasized that it
•
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
-4- 3/10/88
must be made very clear that approval of this plan does not constitute
approval for any antenna installation, either on ground or roof top mount.
Discussion continued concerning the public hearing regarding dish antenna
in the commercial zone and uplink/downlink. Also discussed was the parking,
which was indicated is adequate. In discussing the Landscape Plan it was
agreed that the drawing is not detailed enough and further information is
necessary.
Mr. Chambers moved to approve the Site Plan subject to presentation of a
detailed Landscape Plan, seconded by Mr. Mc Clure, the motion passed by a
vote of three out of four with one abstaining.
Mr. LuBien explained that this will be referred to the Village Council for
their approval at their meeting next Tuesday.
Brief discussion concerning public hearing regarding commercial dish
antenna and the desire to have the Univers.ity1 at the hearing ensued. represented
4. DISCUSSION RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE VILLAGE CODE TO. ASSIST HISTORIC
PRESERVATION
There was no one present from the Historic Preservation Board for this
discussion.
Mr. Rossi noted that the Planning Board has taken the proper steps to add
a paragraph to the Code. Section 703, Historically Designated Structures
Variance. The Ordinance paragraphfrs composed by the Planning Board along
with an amended Ordinance, and,a copy of Definition of Historic Landmark
will be sent to the Village Attorney for review, refinement of language,
and placement in correct Ordinance form. Correct procedure for adoption
will be followed.
6. Members received in their packet a copy of the Comprehensive Plan to date.
Discussion followed concerning an explanation of procedure and process of
the Plan. The first draft is complete and a calendar or timetable progress
report was included with this draft. The old Plan is from 1979.
7. Mayor Spero. Canton returned to the chambers for discussion and clarification
on the action taken concerning the rezoning issue. Open give and take
session followed. Mayor Canton commended the Board on the action taken.
There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting adjourned
at 9:30 P.M.
crAtary