Loading...
05-08-1986 Regular MeetingMIAMI SHORES VILLAGE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING May 8, 1986 A regular meeting of the Miami Shores Village Planning & Zoning Board, was held on May 8, 1986, at the Miami Shores Village Hall. The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairman, Bob Rossi, at 7:30 P.M., with the following Members present: Robert J. Rossi, Acting Chairman Patrick Duffy Larry T. McClure Thomas Laubenthal Absent: J. Robert Stobs, II Also present: Frank J. LuBien, Director of Building & Zoning 1. MINUTES The minutes of the meeting of April 24, 1986 were approved, as written, by a motion made by Mr. Laubenthal, seconded by Mr. McClure, and passed unanimously. 2. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR FOOD MART BISCAYNE EXXON 9020 BISCAYNE BLVD. Members reviewed from their packets, a plot plan showing the Gas Station and a sketch of the building now being used as a cashier's office, and sale of other miscellaneous items, where the Food Mart will be; thereby establishing a new use. A sketch of the sign, which will be attached to the building was submitted for approval also. Mr. Alex Aguilera, lease owner of Biscayne Exxon was present. He stated that he will sell items such as; bread, soda, milk, misc. staples, cigeretts, etc. He will not sell beer or wine, which he fully understands is not permitted. He presented a picture to the Board of a projected future store on the site, stating that this Food Mart is a market test before investing $80,,to $100,000 on the project. Following discussion, Mr. Laubenthal moved to approve the plans for the Food Mart and the sign as submitted, seconded by Mr. Duffy, and carried unanimously. Mr. Aguilera was advised that this will be reviewed by Council at their next regular meeting on Tuesday, May 20th. 3. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR FLAT ROOF ADDITION CHARLES CUSTIN 1451 N. E. 102nd St. This request requires a variance to Sec. 225(e), plans for a flat roof on a foyer addition. Members reviewed a sketch of the basic concept, and also a larger more complete set of plans presented by Mr. LuBien. He stated, the main objection is that the addition is visible fron the front elevation. PLANNING & ZONING BOARD -2- 5/8/86 Lengthy discussion followed with Mr. Custin explaining his goals and objectives in the design. He and Mr. Richard Coba, Architect answered questions from the Members, and explained details of the design and its relationship to - and view of the canal. Mr. Custin noted, he feels this is a very positive and pleasing addition to the neighborhood. Mr. Rossi explained that flat roof variances are granted, but the problem here is that it is on the front of the house; however there is a parapet wall higher than the flat roof, which actually camouflages the flat roof. This Board can recommend.approval, but the final decision is with Council Members. It was the consensus of the Board that the addition is indeed aesthetically pleasing, it maintains the integrity of the archi- tectural design, it significantly upgrades the property and the neighborhood, and though'.it does not comply with the code to the letter, the spirit of the law prevails. The solution is sound, there is masonry construction throughout, from the street side it does not have any appearance of a flat roof, and is not at all objectionable. It was further determined the addition does qualify as a room and requires a variance, as it does not technically comply. Following continued discussion, Mr. Laubenthal moved to approve the plans as submitted, on the basis that the foyer with the skylight does not satisfactorily qualify as a room and therefore warrants a variance, and also the profile of flat roof construction does not exceed the allowable calculations for the house. The motion failed for lackof a second. Mr. Duffy moved to approve the plans as submitted, because the over- all plans significantly upgrades both the property and neighborhood, and further that the task is to work within the spirit of the code rather than the strict letter of the code. This motion failed for lack of a second. Discussion continued with clarification on points of the Code. After passing the gavel to Mr. Laubenthal, Mr. Rossi moved that the variance request be granted, citing Sec 702 (b) - the roof structure cannot have a pitch and be aesthetically harmonious to the rest of the house, alndalso sub paragraph (d) - the variance request is in harmony with the intent and purpose of the ordinance, it does not weaken the ordinance, also it does enhance the property and neighborhood. The motion was seconded by Mr. Duffy, and passed by a 3-1 vote, with Mr. Laubenthal dissenting. Mr. Laubenthal agreed with the architectural intent, but voted No, because all 4 requirements to allow for a variance were Mr. Laubenthal explained this will proceed to Council at their meeting not on Tuesday evening, May 20th. met, • PLANNING & ZONING BOARD -3- 5/8/86 4. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR MEDICAL CLINIC ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL 9600 N. E. 2nd AVE. Mr. Henry Everett, owner of the building was present and stated this is not a Clinic, as there will be no beds or surgical procedures, but rather operated as Doctor's offices. The changes are from stock broker offices to doctor's offices. There will be interior remodel- ing only, no changes to the exterior and no addition. The window lettering will read - Medical Offices. Mr. H. C. Alexander, Jr., Architect explained there will be a small lab, Xray room enclosed with lead glass, and staffed by one doctor, 8-8, seven days. Following discussion, Mr. Duffy moved to approve the request as submitted, seconded by Mr. Laubenthal, and passed unanimously. This request does not need to go to Council for approval. 5. SEMINAR REPORT Mr. Laubenthal, Mr. Stobs, and Mr. LuBien attended the Seminar: "Local Planning: Implementing the 1985 Growth Management Initiative". Mr. Laubenthal reported that it was interesting and a worthwhile seminar. There were several facets of the discussion which trans- pired which directly related to the Board and the Village. They had the opportunity to meet withseveral key people in various levels of government in the State of Florida, and involved in community affairs, whom they could call on when questions arise. Mr. Laubenthal further felt that some of the information gleaned will be helpful in land use planning to facilitate the needs of small cities who do not staff a planner. Mr. LuBien reported that he came away with a very difinite under- standing that the Comprehensive Plan is now known as Growth Management. Some of the problems and impact of State growth were outlined. In the scheme of things the State is in charge of Growth Management, Regional is next, then comes County and Coastal, which is the Village. If we fail to react to a responsibility or problem or proposal - action can be forced by the higher agency. Our next Growth Management Plan is due on December 31, 1988. Mr. LuBien also noted that in the discussion on budget, he came away with the definite opinion that there could be up to $25,000. made available to Miami Shores Village for professional assistance in the preparation of this document. The meeting adjourned at 8:30 P.M.