08-22-1985 Regular MeetingMIAMI SHORES VILLAGE
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING
August 22, 1985
A regular meeting of the Miami Shores Village Planning & Zoning
Board was held on August 22, 1985, at the Miami Shores Village Hall,
Mr. Stobs called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m., with the following
members present:
J. Robert Stobs, II, Chairman
Patrick Duffy
Thomas Laubenthal
Robert J. Rossi
J. Leslie Wiesen
Absent: None
Also.present: Frank J. LuBien, Director of Building & Zoning
1. MINUTES
Mr. Wiesen moved to approve, as written, the minutes of the
meeting of August 8, 1985, seconded by Mr. Laubenthal, and
passed unanimously.
2. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR ADDITION
VILLAGE LODGE #315
9855 N. E. 2nd AVE.
The pertinent information regarding this request, outlined by
Mr. LuBien are an addition to a building in B-1 zone. The
area of the present building is 3,745 sq ft., the area with
the proposed addition will be 4,615 sq. ft.. The required
parking spaces are provided for, as are the set backs.
Mr. LuBien noted the Downtown Revitalization Board has re-
viewed the plans and had no objection. Approval is required
by the Planning & Zoning Board according to the Schedule of
Regulations. Mr. LuBien further noted the only problem he has
is the soakage pit (a technical problem) on the construction
site. In response to Mr. Stobs query, he stated there is no
problem with pollution control. The septic tank is clear of
proposed construction and ok.
Discussion followed. The question of the soakage pit inlet
arose. This was clarified by Mr. Art Taylor representing the
Village Lodge. Discussion continued.
Mr. Laubenthal moved to accept the plans as submitted in terms
of the review of site plan, providing for a follow up with the
appropriate letters to resolve any questions regarding engineer-
ing of the soakage pit and how it may affect footing. Motion
seconded by Mr. Wiesen and carried unanimously.
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
-2- August 22, 1985
3. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR OPEN STRUCTURE
BORMAN CHEVROLET
8730 BISCAYNE BLVD.
Mr. LuBien noted the site plan review is required according to
the Schedule of Regulations and Article VI: He also informed
Members, this differs from the previous request in that it is a
more permanent structure and the roof deck is a B/U gravel.
Mr. Dick Turner, Turner-Horodowich Inc, General Contractor and
Construction Manager for Borman Chevrolet noted this structure
will be bar joists with metal or stucco fascia, according to
the Board's recommendation. Following some discussion, Mr. Turner
did indicate he will abide by the Board's recommendation for
the stucco ceiling and soffit.
Following further discussion, Mr. Rossi moved to approve the
site plan with the stipulation that the roof be of built up
gravel, the fascia and ceiling be cement stucco. Mr. Duffy
seconded, the motion carried unanimously.
4. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING
AMENDMENT TO PROVIDE FOR PROCESSING FEE FOR VARIANCES
In discussion Members concurred that the amended Ordinance
shall apply to requested variances only and that the $25.00
to $50.00 fee is reasonable. Regarding the last sentence,
Mr. LuBien explained his reasoning for this,and also noted
that the Village Attorney had reviewed the proposed changes
and has no problem with it.
Following further discussion, Thursday, September 12, 1985
was set for the Public Hearing.
5. DISCUSSION OF HEIGHTS OF WALLS AND FENCES ON STATE AND FEDERAL
ROADS.
Mr. LuBien enclosed, in Members packet, a copy of the discussion
by Council regarding this matter.
Discussion occured regarding consideration of 5' walls in front
yards on busy state and county roads.
Mr. Rossi stated that, he does not feel the need to set a precedent.
To rewrite the Ordinance for the benefit of one or two pieces of
property is unjustified. Miami Shores is a residential community
and the image need not be changed by walling in areas. He further
questioned, Why should the ordinance be changed?
•
•
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
-3- August 22, 1985
Mr. Duffy indicated that he does not see any need to change the
ordinance, however does feel a petitioner needs special consid-
eration for uniqueness of his home site.
Mr. Wiesen, is not in favor of altering the ordinance, but feels
requests, because of peculiar conditions should receive special
consideration.
Mr. Laubenthal, understands Council points regarding state and
federal roads, but feels special zoning issued to these corridors
is unwarranted. He further noted that, Biscayne Blvd. with its
heavy traffic and high degree of exposure makes it less vulner-
able, crime wise. Mr. Laubenthal stipulated also that front set
backs created space that softened the contrast between various
architectural styles. To place the wall at the sidewalk would
create aesthetic conflict. Mr. Laubenthal does not want to see
the character of Miami Shores Village change and is not in favor
of a change in the ordinance.
Mr. Stobs, indicated that there has never been a request for a
5' wall on any busy thoroughfare in Miami Shores. There may
have been a request for a hedge on 103rd St. for sound buffer
only, not for safety reasons. Mr. Stobs does not feel there is
any justification for a change of the ordinance. 5' walls in front
would completely change the character of Miami Shores Village,
and would be difficult, if not impossible to regulate.
Mr. Stobs further noted that he has not seen nor heard any
justification for the ordinance change.
The Board further discussed reducing the height limitations in
required side yard on corner lots from 5' to 3%', as requested
by the Village Council and concluded that no changes are warranted.
The meeting adjourned at 8:45 P.M..
co ; -1.e) ��
crery