Loading...
02-23-1984 Regular MeetingMIAMI SHORES VILLAGE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 23, 1984 A regular meeting of the Miami Shores Planning & Zoning Board was held on February 23, 1984, 7:30 p.m., at the Miami Shores Village Hall, with the following members present: J. Robert Stobs, Jr., Chairman Robert J, Rossi Patrick Duffy J. Leslie Wiesen Thomas J. Laubenthal Absent: None Also present: Frank J. LuBien, Dir. of Building & Zoning L. R. Forney, Jr., Village Manager Steven Rubinstein, Staff Asst., Revitalization Bd. 1. MINUTES: The minutes of the February 9, 1984 meeting were approved as written, motion made by Mr. Rossi, seconded by Mr. Duffy and carried unanimously. 2. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF FRONT YARD PARKING FOR MOTOR HOME & TRAILER EUGENE A. FELKER 10295 N. W. 1 AVENUE The members of the Board reviewed pictures of the parking violations as Mr. LuBien outlined Sec 501 (s) (1) of the code. He also showed copies of Mr. Felker's Handicapped Person's Parking Permit. Mr. LuBien noted he researched the Felker file to determine if there is an area available on property for parking use, but was unable to find anything of significance. The particular property faces on N. W. 1 Ave., and side and rear yard are too small to handle such a large motor home & trailer. Mr. Felker stated he is requesting the variance on the basis of disability, and financial hardship. He stated the main use of the motor home is recreational, but is necessary for the con- venience it pro rides on his infrequent trips. Mr. Felker also stated that this is not his primary means of transportation. Members, though very sympathic to Mr. Felker's plight, felt that since the vehicle is recreational, Mr. Felker should ex- plore other possibilities for parking or storing same. Following:lengthy discussion, Mr, Wiesen moved to table the matter for thirty (30) days or until the 2nd meeting in March (March 23), seconded by Mr. Duffy, passed unanimously. -2- February 23, 1984 3. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF FENCE LOCATION L. GRAVER 1155 N. E. 103 STREET Mr. LuBien distributed a sketch of the property showing the proposed fence location, He called attention to Sec, 518 (a) (2) for restrictions. (31/2/ on any corner plot with 20/ set back). He pointed out that the property is bounded on three sides by streets. The back yard abutting on 104 Street, giving the appearance of a front yard, Mr. Graver stated he desires to construct a 5' wood fence to secure the mango trees on his property, The mango trees are 61 inside his property line and still there is constant raiding of the trees. He noted that a 31/4/ fence would not provide adequate protection, Following much discussion concerned with visibility at the intersection, Mr. Rossi moved that in as much as the property is unusually bounded by street frontage on three sides and not inhibited by a 90° intersection obstruction, causing restrictions to traffic entering and exiting on Biscayne Blvd and on 104 Street, the variance for fence height and in- stallation be granted, seconded by Mr. Wiesenf,and carried unanimously, Mr. LuBien noted that this variance must now come before the Council for approval, 4, DISCUSSION OF WATERFRONT -PROPERTY 'AND II SCELLANEOUS ITEMS WITH STEVEN RUBINSTEIN, Upon an invitation from Mr, Stobs, to speak, 'W. Forney, Village Manager stated he came to the meeting to listen, and is primarily interested in research by Steven Rubinstein and thoughts of the Planning & Zoning Board concerning Waterfront Property, Mr, Stobs informed members that questions are arising concern- ing set -backs, structures, docks, etc,, and who has jurisdic- tion to control or impose waterfront property restrictions. Mr, Rubinstein informed members that he had written various State agencies for information regarding regulation of water- front property. In turn he has received -.various pamphlets from the Department of Natural Resources, State of Florida, Army Corps of Engineers, and the South Florida Water Management District. A11 are comprehensive documents that basically state that, anything done on any waterway comes under the jurisdiction of the State, the Corps of Engineers, and does not leave much to Miami Shores Village to regulate. Anything done on the other side of the property line in the water, becomes the responsibility of a higher office, Discussion followed dealing with a municipalities authority to regulate. It was agreed there is a need for an ordinance, or guide lines addressing set back, and structure restrictions for waterfront property. Members agreed the Ordinance should be • • February 23e 1984 amended to read, items that occur on the other side of the property line requires a permit which would be contingent on approval from XYZ. The remainder of the ordinance to remain as is except where a variance is required, Mr, Rubinstein was advised to draft such an ordinance. CHURCH ZONED PROPERTY: Mr, Forney advised the Board that in discussion with Mr. Wm, Fann, Jr, Village Attorney, a change is desirable in the residential zoning which permits churches in residential areas, It was agreed to change Church zone use from resi- dential to commercial use, except for existing churches which are grand -fathered in. In other discussion, Mr. Forney stated that he will be send- ing the Planning & Zoning Board a letter requesting classi- fication of the land adjoining the Country Club for recrea- tional use. The Comprehensive' Plan must be reviewed every five (5) years, it must coincide With the State Plan and any revisions must be sent to the State by July. Mr. Forney and Mr. Rubinstein will work on this change. Mr. Stobs requested that an inviataion be extended to Mr. Franklin Grau, Chairman of the Downtown Revitalization Board to address the Planning & Zoning Board, and outline their work as ideas are formulated. Mr, Duffy asked Mr, Rubinstein to provide copies of all the minutes of the Revitalization Board meetings thus far> Planning & Zoning Board members will receive these minutes in their next packet of materials. All members expressed appreciation to Mr. Steven Rubinstein for taking the time to attend this meeting. The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. and all future meetings,