Loading...
12-05-1996 Regular Meeting• CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING Village of Miami Shores, Florida December 5, 1996 A regular meeting of the Miami Shores Village Code Enforcement Board was held on Thursday, December 5, 1996, at Miami Shores Village Hall. The meeting was called to order at 6:30 P.M by Chairman Asmus. Present: Also Present: Barry Asmus, Chairman Prospero G. Herrera, II, Vice Chairman Rod Buenconsejo, Member Margaret Burch, Member Eugene Colson, Member Thomas Leonard, Member John Patnik, Member William Nelson, Code Compliance Director Richard Trumble, Senior Code Enforcement Officer Amos Pierre, Code Enforcement Officer I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ms. Burch moved to approve the Minutes of November 7, 1996. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. AGENDA II. HEARING CASE NO. 5141 Landscaping Design and Maintenance Standards 420 NE 91 Street Owner: Marius J. Pagos Schedule of Regulations. Landscaping design and maintenance standards. Property owners are responsible for proper maintenance of landscaping on their property and parkway areas All open space shall be planted with grass, sod or Iiv/ng ground over. Chattahoochle stone or similar materials shall not be substituted for grass, sod orliving ground cover. Resodding lawn and swale area is required. Officer Trumble reported the violation was for the lawn having deteriorated to weeds. Ms. Betty Lash, Realtor, Century 21 Realty, 9301 NE 6 Avenue, was present to represent Mr. Pagos. She advised the home was rented and the tenants was responsible for upkeep of the property i • Code Enforcement Board Meeting December 5, 1996 Page 2 and were not doing so. The tenants had received an eviction notice and were in the process of moving out. Ms. Lash stated as soon as the tenants had vacated, the property would be brought into compliance. Ms. Burch moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to the Schedule of Regulations of the Miami Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation within 30 days and shall immediately notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 30 days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator of up to $250 per day or $5,000 per violation which shall constitute a lien against the property of the violator. Costs in the amount of $17.00 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expense in prosecuting the violation to date. Ms. Burch was asked to amend her motion to state costs of $45.17. Ms. Burch amended her motion. Officer Trumble stated the "$5,000 per violation" was incorrect and should be "$500 per violation." After discussion, the Board determined to eliminate this phrase from the motion as the Village Attorney was not present to verify whether the $5,000 typed on the sample motion was correct or incorrect. Ms. Burch was asked to amend her motion to omit the phase "$5,000 per violation." Ms. Burch amended her motion. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5143 Failure to Maintain parkway 420 NE 91 Street Owner: Marius J. Pagos Section 20-17. Failure to maintain parkway. Failure to maintain parkway by allowing paving and/or landscaping to deteriorate, or by allowing unsafe conditions, or failure to maintain parkwayswale area by a//owing landscaping to deteriorate shah be unlawful. Repave with acceptable material, refurbish and maintain landscaping (remove trash, weeds and titter), or remove unsafe condition, as may apply. Officer Trumble reported the violation was for a deteriorated driveway approach and gravel with weeds. Ms. Lash said the property would be brought into compliance as soon as possible after the tenants had vacated. Chairman Asmus explained a permit must be pulled and the driveway area must be paved and not patched with added gravel. • Code Enforcement Board Meeting December 5,1996 Page 3 Mr. Buenconsejo moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to Section 20-17 of the Miami Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation within 30 days and shall immediately notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 30 days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator of up to $200 per day which shall constitute a lien against the property of the violator. Costs in the amount of $45.18 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expense in prosecuting the violation to date. Mr. Buenconsejo was asked to amend his motion to reflect a fine of up to $250 a day. Mr. Buenconsejo amended his motion. Mr. Colson seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5162 Unlawful loose materials 425 NW 111 Street Owner. Jacques Salomon Schedule of Regulations - 270. Unlawful loose materials. Using loose materials such as grave/ or mulch for parking area or driveway is prohibited. Remove loose materials, gravel or mulch. Obtain penult from Building and Zoning to instal/ approved materials such as concrete, asphalt and/or masonry products (I.e. - interlocking pavers or brick). Officer Pierre reported the violation was for unauthorized loose gravel for driveway and parking area. He said the Salomon's had been adding gravel to the driveway and swale area instead of pulling a permit to properly pave the area. Ms. Marie Salomon, 425 NW 111 Street, was present to testify. She stated she had purchased the home in 1982 and had added gravel from time to time until cited with this violation at which time she stopped adding the gravel. Officer Pierre testified this was not true. Chairman Asmus read the section of the Code dealing with off-street parking space materials because Ms. Salomon did not believe she was in violation as the purchase date of the home preceded the Code restriction, and her driveway had been gravel at that time. Mr. Nelson advised Planning and Zoning had revisited the issue of allowing gravel for driveways as many Miami Shores' residents had gravel driveways, and it was determined that gravel would not be allowed. Ms. Burch moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to the Schedule of Regulations -270 the Miami • Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation within 30 days and shall immediately notify the Code Enforcement Officer when • • • Code Enforcement Board Meeting December 5, 1996 Page 4 the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 30 days, the Code Enforcement Offficer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator of up to $250 per day which shall constitute a lien against the property of the violator. Costs in the amount of $62.88 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expense in prosecuting the violation to date. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5180 Maintaining a nuisance 135 NE 98 Street Owner. Guillermina Saehlbrandt Section 10-5. Maintaining source of noxious odors or gas. disturbing noise. or other nuisance. It shell be unlawful to maintain any source or cause of =dolls odor or gas or of any loud, disturbing noise or other nuisance, or to cause the same to exist. Officer Pierre reported the violation was for causing a loud disturbing noise by operating a mechanical sanding machine to refinish cabinets. In addition, a police report had been documented on December 3, 1996, concerning a complaint from next door neighbors. Officer Pierre stated this was an ongoing case and he had been called to the home more than one time for the same complaint. Chairman Asmus read the police report and signed affidavit from the complainant, Mr. Ronald Pelham, which extensively detailed the noise nuisance he and his family were suffering and his suspicions that the tenant was operating a commercial woodworking business at his home, into the record. (A copy of these documents is attached to these Minutes.) The complainant, Ronald Pelham, 125 NE 98 Street, Miami Shores, FL; the tenant, Greg Drenaber, 135 NE 98 Street, Miami Shores, FL; and the property owner, Guillermina Saehlbrandt, were present to give testimony. Mr. Pelham stated he had not heard any woodworking noises for the past month and he thought perhaps the tenants had not been advised of Miami Shores Code prior to moving in. In any event, he asked the Board to instruct Mr. Drenaber in the Code restrictions concerning noise nuisances and commercial business operations on residential property. Mr. Saehlbrandt asked to put a signed petition from Miami Shores residents stating they were not affected by any loud noises coming from the property into the record. Chairman Asmus replied this evidence was unacceptable and only live witnesses subject to cross-examination would be allowed. Mr. Saehlbrandt said people throughout the Village did work • • • Code Enforcement Board Meeting December 5, 1995 Page 5 in their garages which included the use of woodworking equipment and machines. He also stated his tenant did not operate a commercial business from the residence. Mr. Drenaber stated he did not operate a woodworking business from his home but did, however, make and/or refmish furniture as a hobby and for personal use. He explained he was a subcontractor, left for work at 8:00 A.M. every morning, and therefore could not be causing disturbing noises during the day as Mr. Pelham alleged. Mr. Drenaber did say that other workers would meet him in the alley behind his house and put tools into their trucks before work also. After hearing extensive testimony and rebuttal, the Board determined Mr. Drenaber was in violation of causing a noise nuisance. Chairman Asmus advised Mr. Drenaber he could, however, soundproof his garage and continue with woodworking as a hobby. Mr. Leonard moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to the Section 10-5 the Miami Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation immediately and shall notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance immediately, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator of up to $250 per day which shall constitute a lien against the property of the violator. Costs in the amount of $31.08 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expense in prosecuting the violation to date. Chairman Asmus asked Mr. Leonard if he would consider amending his motion to add "if any future similar violations happen, a fine of $250 per violation shall be assessed? Mr. Leonard amended his motion. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed 6-1. Mr. Colson opposed the motion. CASE NO. 5178 Business from residence 135 NE 98 Street Owner. Guiilermina Saehlbrandt Schedule of Regulations. Business from residence. Conducting or operating a business from a residence is prohibited. Cease and desist conducting or operating business from residence Remove directory listing or otter advertising. Officer Pierre reported tenant appeared to be running a business from his residence in the way of storing, handling and/or refinishing Code Enforcement Board Meeting December 5, 1996 Page 6 cabinets. Also tenant's business cards reflected his office location at his • home address. • • Mr. Colson. moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to the Schedule of Regulations of the Miami Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation within 7 days and shall immediately notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 7 days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator of up to $250 per day which shall constitute a lien against the property of the violator. Costs in the amount of $31.07 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expense in prosecuting the violation to date. Mr. Leonard seconded the motion. Mr. Nelson asked for a notarized statement from Mr. Drenaber within 7 days stating he had ceased all business operations from his residence. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5074 Lack of off street parking 145 NW 95 Street Owner: Michael and Dawn Elvis Officer Pierre reported the tenants had been successfully evicted and the property would be brought into compliance. Mr. Nelson recommended dismissal. Chairman Asmus asked that Code Enforcement keep abreast of the compliance issue until corrected. Ms. Burch moved for dismissal. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO 5092 Unsightly fascia, soffit, house exterior 1009 NE 94 Street Owner: Yngwie Malmsteem Staff recommended dismissal. Ms. Burch moved for dismissal. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5133 Unsightly fascia, soffit, house exterior 323 NE 91 Street Owner: Gregory L. Staninski • • Code Enforcement Board Meeting December 5, 1996 Page 7 Section 12-133. Depredation of surrounding property. The exterior of every structure shalt be so maintained 14461 reasonable attractiveness so as no M the case of excessive scaling or paint or excessive mildew, to cause a substantial depreciation In property values In (he immediate neighborhood The exterior surfaces shall be kept free from materials objects and conditions which will have an adverse effect on adjacent premises Officer Trumble reported the violation was for peeling paint on the house exterior. Mr. Nelson advised the high administrative cost was due to the number of calls and complaints his office was receiving about the property. He recommended the Board increase the daily fine fee to send a clear message to the property owner who had been before this Board on a number of other violations. Ms. Burch moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to the Section 12-133 of the Miami Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation within 10 days and shall immediately notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 10 days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator of up to $250 per day which shall constitute a lien against the property of the violator. Costs in the amount of $137.29 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expense in prosecuting the violation to date. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5135 Weathertight and watertight structures 800 NE 91 Terrace Owner: Emile St. Fleur, Tenant: Pierre Raymond Staff recommended dismissal. Ms. Burch moved for dismissal. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5139 Landscaping design and maintenance standards 354 NE 91 Street Owner: Pauline Mindes Staff recommended dismissal. Ms. Burch moved for dismissal. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded • the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. • • • Code Enforcement Board Meeting December 5, 1996 Page 8 CASE NO. 5140 Landscaping design and maintenance standards 360 NE 91 Street Owner. Edy Glodowski Schedule of Regulations Landscaping design and maintenance standards_ Property owners are responsible for proper maintenance of landscaping on their property and parkway areas. All open space shall be planted with grass, sod or //wring ground over. Chaltahoorh/e stone or similar materials shall not be substituted for grass, sod or living ground cower. Resodd/ng lawn and swede area Is required. Officer Trumble advised the lawn area had deteriorated to weeds. No one representing the property was present to give testimony. Mr. Colson moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to the Schedule of Regulations of the Miami Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation within 30 days and shall immediately notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 30 days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator of up to $250 per day which shall constitute a lien against the property of the violator. Costs in the amount of $90.35 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expense in prosecuting the violation to date. Mr. Buenconsejo seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously CASE NO. 5145 Failure to maintain parkway 428 NE 91 Street Owner: Luis Carazo Section 20-17. Failure to maintain parkway. Failure to maintain parkway byallow/ng paving and/or landscaping to deteriorate, or by al/owving unsafe aond/tions, or failure to maintain parkway swa/e area by a/low/ng landscaping to deteriorate shall be unlawful. Repave with acceptable material, refurbish and maintain landscaping (remove bash, weeds and litter), or remove unsafe condition, as mayapply. Officer Trumble reported the violation was for a deteriorated driveway approach. Mr. Carazo had asked for additional time which was granted, but the violation was still not in compliance. Ms. Burch moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to the Section 20-17 of the Miami Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation within 20 days and shall immediately notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 20 days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator of up to • • Code Enforcement Board Meeting December 5, 1996 Page 9 $250 per day which shall constitute a lien against the property of the violator. Costs in the amount of $71.16 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expense in prosecuting the violation to date. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5152 Unauthorized construction/alterations 857 NE 98 Street Owner: Franklin E. Grau Staff recommended dismissal. Ms. Burch moved for dismissal. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5163 Unlawful loose materials 225 NW 92 Street Owner: Reynald Emile and Eliphete Fede Schedule of Regulations - 270. Unlawful loose materials. Using loose materials such as gravel or mulch for parking area or driveway Is prohibited. Remove loose materials, gravel or mulch. Obtain permit from Building and Zoning to instal/ approved materials sus* as concrete, asphalt and/or masonry products (ie.-Inter/ock/ngpavers or brick) Officer Pierre reported the violation was for unlawful use of loose gravel on driveway approach. No one representing the property was present to give testimony. Vice Chairman Herrera moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to the Schedule of Regulations -270 of the Miami Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation within 30 days and shall immediately notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 30 days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator of up to $250 per day which shall constitute a lien against the property of the violator. Costs in the amount of $62.88 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expense in prosecuting the violation to date. Mr. Buenconsejo seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5164 Unsightly fascia, soffit, house exterior 225 NW 92 Street Code Enforcement Board Meeting December 5, 1996 Page 10 Owner. Reynald Emile and Eliphete Fede Staff recommended dismissal. Ms. Burch moved for dismissal. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5169 Unauthorized construction/alterations 955 NE 98 Street Owner. James and Reagan Hanson Staff recommended dismissal. Ms. Burch moved for dismissal. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. III. NEW BUSINESS No New Business items were discussed. IV. GOOD AND WELFARE • No Good and Welfare items were discussed. V. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Burch moved to adjourn. The motion was properly seconded, and Chairman Asmus adjourned the meeting at 8:46 P.M. Carol Ann Ragone, Recorduig Secretary • • • Police Case: #7609/96 Code Enforcement Case: Numbers 5178 & 5180 Complainant: Ronald Pelham 125 N.E. 98 Street Miami Shores, FL Alleged Violator: Greg Drenaber Tenant - 135 N.E. 98 Street Miami Shores, FL On 12/03/96 Community Affairs Specialist, William Nelson and Code Enforcement Officer, Amos Pierre interviewed Officer Jessup of Miami Shores Police Department Re: Disturbing noise from 135 N.E. 98 Street. Officer Jessup stated the following: He responded to 135 N.E. 98 Street about a complaint of loud disturbing noise and observed tools and woods. Tenant, Greg Drenaber told Officer Jessup that he was building cabinets for his personal use. • • • Our Miami Shores Community has developed a certain quality of life that is recognized throughout Dade County. The beautiful, well maintained homes, lush landscaping, variety in architecture, extensive recreational facilities, fine law enforcement organization and an active village government, all serve to ensure the perpetuation of this lifestyle. Our celebrated reputation is rooted in the willingness of our citizens to adopt proven, democratic procedures. Among these procedures is a body of regulations that invoke a required minimum standard of care for your home. Additionally. there are also certain "golden rule" civil codes that provide for the peaceful enjoyment of that American fixture called– the family home. The Code F,nforcement Division of Village government, is charged with seeing to the actual compliance with Village Codes. For the past ten years, I have sought to live peacefully with the variety of "renters" that periodically move in and out of the house just east of ours. During those years we have suffered through loud vulgar music played at late-night parties; drive-by shootings of the occupants property, junk cars marooned in the front yard, the loss of use of what little strip of yard we have due to mounds of dog droppings fouling the air. Even during the cool winter months, when we can finally tum off the air conditioner and let in some fresh air, we are forced to keep our windows closed because of the stench of dog feces. Renters have no incentive to invest in the pride of Miami Shores. They are renters. It is up to the owners to notify the renters of our Village Codes and our willingness to enforce them. I must first explain that, this rented house is separated from our home by less than six yards. Our bedrooms are along the eastem wall that faces the rental. My bedroom, in the northeast corner, is closest to the garage of this rented house. It is from this site– the garage and driveway–that the current renters have engaged in, wood sawing, sanding, wood finishing, cabinet refinishing and manufacturing, using machines such as air -powered staplers, nailers and power saws and air compressors. The driveway work production times have varied. Sometimes beginning as early as 8:OOam, hired hands arrive, park in the alley and begin to glue on veneer sidings, cut frames, rout edges, tack in strips of molding, and on and on. Continuing intermittently throughout the day until dark, 7 or 8pm. Since my wife and I have full-time jobs and the kids are in school, the house is mostly empty during working hours. Frequently we have left for work in the morning to the loud noisy whir of a power saw, and sander, the thuds of air staplers, and the constant din of an air compressor. At the end of the work day, we come home only to be greeted by the same disturbing noises. We have talked to the tenants themselves several times. I felt sorry for him when he told me, how he lost a contract to build and install cabinets in an apartment complex due to my insistence that he observe the rules and stop using the driveway and garage as a commercial woodworking shop. We talked about his business and what it involves. I even suggested he find someplace in un- incorporated Dade where pretty much, anything goes— but not here in the Shores. We have called Miami Shores law enforcement to come out several times, after continuous problems. We have talked to the house owner many times about the disruptions. Yet, the problems continue. We are being denied the quiet enjoyment of our most private chamber–the bedroom. These violations and disruptions have now escalated into a crisis. As evidenced by the last encounter. Both my wife and I are now in Graduate School. The renters must cease the noisy disruption caused by what appears to be commercial woodworking for off-site installation, being conducted in the garage and driveway of this house. The weak excuse given to me and authorities has been that, all this work was being done for use of personal items in the house. If that is the case, the kitchen cabinets would had to have been installed and torn out, and re -installed countless times. And tables should fill the house. Enough is enough. Obey the rules and regulations of the code. We have been very patient and tolerant with the last group of tenants. However they have shown no understanding of the purpose of codes in the Village of Miami Shores. The codes help keep property values up and seek to • • • secure a certain quality of life here in the Shores. It is up to all Miami Shores citizens to help maintain the good of the whole for us all. The owner of the house is fully aware of this concept. Please, enforce compliance with the Village Codes so that we can re -capture some semblance of sanity, and peacefull enjoyment in our home, and not have to suffer through the hammering, sawing, stapling, routing. It's very disrupting. Would you want this going on, just outside your bedroom window, at the house next to yours?—for the past year or two?? It must stop. "At ctibism, ant ctitAtwed, Waik4 ail 9 leAgA4) a�rAzot M,, prof( Lab. A SPRY P4/6 OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL O..(i BARBARA ANN FUGAZZI `` Al COMMISSION NUMBER 4J. �' CC3601yy9q 1 4 '444� �N MV COMMISSION EXP. SOF FSO CAA 1(11,10 9 Code Violations by tenants cause repeated annoyances, problems. Summary of problems: Wood sawing, sanding, and wood finishing Cabinet refinishing and manufacturing Some of the equipment used in production of the above wood products: air -powered staplers, nailers, and power saws This rental house and my home are separated by no more than six yards. ►I " ots are very lose. o f ot4Aboine- bedroomylare along the eastern wall that faces the rental. Our bedroom is in the northeast comer- the closest room to the garage and driveway of the rental. It is from this site— the garage and driveway —that the current renters have engaged in the noisy, disruptive, activities listed above. Sometimes starting as early as 8AM— we have been jolted from our sleep (day off work). Saturday mornings and on through the day, have been regularly disrupted. During an illness, my wife could not get rest in our bedroom due to the noise. The sawing, sanding, stapling, nailing and pounding stops and starts at various times. We have talked to the tenants; the house owner; Miami Shores Police; and Miami Shores Code Enforcement. We have talked on and off for about a year or more. I videotaped one of our encounters as I told them of their violation of Miami Shores Codes. We certify that the above is true. I have personally witnessed these occurrences, and am willing to verbally attest to the same before any authoritative body. The most recent incident involved my taking photos of cabinet-making in progress. The scene became ugly and Miami Shores Police were called in. Officer Jessup and three patrol cars arrived in the back alley. They observed another episode of cabinet construction. Again the tenants claimed to be making them for use in the house. Jessup called the Code Enforcement people who could not be reached— it was after 6:30pm, Thursday, Oct. 3, 1996. After speaking with the officers and my neighbor just across the alley from my home, I subsequently left for open -house at my daughter's school. On Saturday evening Oct. 5, 1996 at about 5:15pm during a break in rain, the hammering and sawing began again. Ronald Pelham and Sandra Pelham • 125 NE 98th Street Miami Shores, FL