Loading...
11-07-1996 Regular Meeting• CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING Village of Miami Shores, Florida November 7, 1996 A regular meeting of the Miami Shores Village Code Enforcement Board was held on Thursday, November 7, 1996, at Miami Shores Village Hall. The meeting was called to order at 6:30 P.M by Chairman Asmus. Present: Also Present: Barry Asmus, Chairman Prospero G. Herrera, II, Vice Chairman Rod Buenconsejo, Member Margaret Burch, Member Eugene Colson, Member Thomas Leonard, Member William Nelson, Code Compliance Director Richard Trumble, Senior Code Enforcement Officer Amos Pierre, Code Enforcement Officer Mark S. Ulmer, Esq., Village Attorney I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ms. Burch moved to approve the Minutes of October 3, 1996. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. AGENDA II. HEARING A. Penalty Cases CASE NO. 5074 Lack of off street parking 145 NW 95 Street Owner: Michael and Dawn Elvis Schedule of Regulations - ISP. Lack of off -Street Parking Vehicles must be parked on driveway or outer approved off-street parking area(s). Mrs. Elvis reported her tenants were still living at the property. She submitted a letter from her attorney stating a Writ of Possession had been filed and a hearing was scheduled for Thursday, • • • CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING November 7, 1996 Page 2 November 14, 1996. The Board determined Mr. and Mrs. Elvis were applying due diligence in trying to vacate the current tenants. Ms. Burch moved to table this case until the next scheduled Board Meeting. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5050 Unsightly fascia, soffit, house exterior 246 NW 93 Street Owner: Arrington Wells Section 12-133 Depredation of surrounding property. The exter/or of every sbucture shall be so maintained with reasonable amacllveness so as not /n the case of excessive scaling or paint or excessive mildew, to cause a substantial depredaffon /n properly values In the immediate neighborhood. The exterior surfaces shall be kept free from materia/s, objects and oonditlons which wit/ have an adverse effect on adjacent premises. Officer Pierre reported the violation had not been corrected. Mr. Wells had been notified of this Penalty Hearing and was not present. An administrative fee of $180.00 had been assessed but no fine levied. Ms. Burch moved to levy a fine of $25.00 a day retroactive to the compliance date set in the original hearing of October 5, 1996, and this fme shall run until the date the violation is brought into compliance. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5082 Unsightly fascia, soffit, house exterior 615 NE 97 Street Owner: Jairo Gavira 12-133 Depreciation of surrounding property. The exterior of every sbucture shall be so maintained with reasonable attractiveness so as nod in the case of excessive scaling or paint or excessive mildew, to cause a substantial depreclatfon in property values in the Immediate neighborhood. The exterior surfaces shad be kept free from materials, objects and conditions which wN have an adverse effect on adJacentpremises Staff recommended dismissal. Vice Chairman Herrera moved to dismiss. Ms. Burch seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. • CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING November 7, 1996 Page 3 CASE NO. 5087 General unsightliness 325 NE 96 Street Owner: Scott L. Warfman Section 0-1. Property to be maintained in safe. clean and sightly condition It shall be the duty of all owners of lots, parcels and tracts of land within the Wage to keep such property kr a safe, clean and sightly condition and to remove therefrom all surplus gra weeds and other growth and all trash and rubbish and to till in all excavations and depressions thereon. Officer Trumble reported the violation had not been corrected and the pile of trash remained in the yard. Mr. Warfman nor a representative was not present to testify. At the original hearing, an administrative fee of $180.00 was assessed and ten days was given to comply. Ms. Burch moved that a fine of $30.00 per day be levied retroactive to the original compliance date of October 13, 1996, and this fme shall run until the date the violation is brought into compliance. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5094 Failure to obtain an occupational license 9029 Biscayne Boulevard Owner: Boris Morris Section 14-17. Required: Hours tor retail sales. No person shall, within the lim/Is of the village, engage nor manage any business, ocaupalon or profession without first hating pall the amount of license tax required by this chapter and without first having obtained a village ocaupatonal llcense therefore issued for an applying to the current occupational Hawse year, or fractional part thereof, during which such business, occupation or profession is commenced, carn'ed on or engaged in. Suck occupational license shall be applied for and obtained before the commencement of any such business, occupation or profession, and annually thereafter on or before October 1 or each year as long as such business, ocarpal/on or profession is canted on. Provided, nevertheless, that the retail sale of consumer goods between the hours of 1:00 gm. and 5.b0 a.m. Is prohibited. Staff recommended dismissal. Ms. Burch moved to dismiss. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. B. New Cases CASE NO. 5108 Failure to maintain parkway 10516 NW 2 Avenue Owner: Ageline Jean -Baptiste Section 20-17. Failure to maintain parkway. • • • CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING November 7, 1996 Page 4 Failure to maintain parkway by allowing paving and/or landscaping to detelorate, or by allowing unsafe conditions, or failure to maintain parkway ovate area by allowing landscaping to deteriorate shati be unlawful Repave with acceptable material, refurbish and maintain landscaping (remove trash, weeds and /Itter), or remove unsafe condition, as maYappl* Officer Pierre reported the parkway was badly deteriorated and an Order to Correct had been issued on September 5, 1996. A Notice of Violation was issued on September 17, 1996, and the violation remained uncorrected. Ms. Jean-Baptiste's daughter, Ms. Carol Felix, was present to testify. Ms. Felix stated her mother wanted to do the work herself as it was too expensive a job to hire a contractor, but they were unable to pay the $300.00 bond which needed to be posted prior to undertaking the work. She asked if she could plant grass on the parkway in order to save money. The Board discussed her request and determined grass would not be a satisfactory solution. Mr. Nelson recommended the Board move for a continuance to allow inspection of the property by Code Enforcement before reaching a decision. Chairman Asmus recommended the Board take action on the violation as a continuance was not warranted. Ms. Burch moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to Section 20-17 of the Miami Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation within 30 days and shall notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 30 days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator up to $250.00 per day which will constitute a lien against the property. Costs in the amount of $23.50 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expenses in prosecuting the violation to date. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5109 Lack of off street parking 10516 NW 2 Avenue Owner: Ageline Jean -Baptiste Schedule of Regulations - LSP. Lack of oft -Street Parking Vehicles must be parked on ddvewayorother approved off-sfreet parking area(s). • • • CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING November 7, 1996 Page 5 Officer Pierre reported the homeowner needed to stop parking cars on the grass and to resod the area immediately. Ms. Felix informed the Board that three cars regularly parked at the house, and Chairman Asmus explained that each car needed its own paved parking space and parking on the grass, sidewalk, or street for any reason was prohibited. Ms. Burch moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to the Schedule of Regulations of the Miami Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation by the next Board Meeting date of December 5, 1996, and shall notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 30 days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator up to $250.00 per day which will constitute a lien against the property. Costs in the amount of $23.50 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expenses in prosecuting the violation to date. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. The Board discussed the issue of the next Board Meeting date being less than 30 days. Chairman Asmus asked for a Motion for Reconsideration of CASE NO. 5108 to change the compliance date to the next scheduled Board Meeting date of December 5, 1996, instead of 30 days. Village Attorney Ulmer advised what the Board wished to do by changing the compliance date to the next Board Meeting date was not correct. He explained that prior to the second hearing, a Code Enforcement Officer would reinspect the property and, if the violation was not corrected, a notice of the penalty hearing (second Board Meeting) would then be issued to the homeowner. After the Board levied a fine and prior to the third Board Meeting, a Code Enforcement Officer would again reinspect the property and issue a penalty hearing notice if the violation was not corrected. Therefore, the violator would not reappear before the Board until the third Board Meeting (in this case January 1997). The only way to avoid this would be for the Board to give only 15 days to comply which would not be reasonable. Village Attorney Ulmer recommended the reconsideration be given to CASE NO. 5109 changing the date of compliance from the next Board Meeting date of December 5, 1996, to the same 30 day compliance date as set forth in CASE NO. 5108. • • CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING November 7, 1996 Page 7 CASE NO. 5090 Landscaping design and maintenance standards 9204 NE 10 Avenue Owner: Betty R. Wright Schedule of Regulations. Landscaping design and maintenance standards. Properly owners are responsible for proper maintenance of landscaping on Moir property and parkway areas. All open space shall be planted w/!h grass, sod or living ground over. Chattahoochle stone or similar materials shall not be substituted for grass, sod or living ground cover. Resodd/ng lawn and swale area /s required! Chairman Asmus read a letter from Ms. Wright which requested a continuance until December 1996 so that she may be present to testify on her own behalf. Officer Trumble reported all pertinent notices were posted on the property and Ms. Wright had proper notice of this hearing. Ms. Burch moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to the Schedule of Regulations of the Miami Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation within 30 days and shall notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 30 days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator up to $250.00 per day which will constitute a lien against the property. Costs in the amount of $60.57are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expenses in prosecuting the violation to date. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5105 Maintaining a nuisance 10635 NE 11 Court Owner: David G. Haylock Section 10-5, Maintaining source of noxious odors or gas. disturbing noise. or other nuisance. /t shall be unlawful to maintain any source of cause of noxious odor or gas or of any loud, disturbing noise orothernuisance, or to cause the same to eadst Officer Trumble reported the swimming pool water was stagnant and green and contained mosquito larvae. Mr. Haylock was not present to testify. Mr. Colson moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law • that a violation exists to Section 10-5 of the Miami Shores Village Code. • • • CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING November 7, 1996 Page 8 The offending party shall correct the violation within 30 days and shall notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 30 days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator up to $250.00 per day which will constitute a lien against the property. Costs in the amount of $25.31 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expenses in prosecuting the violation to date. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5106 Unsightly fascia, soffit, house exterior 10635 NE 11 Court Owner: David G. Haylock Section 12-133. Depreciation of surrounding property. The exterior of every structure shaft be so maintained with reasonable attractiveness so as no in the case of excessive scaling or paint or excessive mildew, to cause a substantial depredation in property values In Ute immediate neighborhood. The exterior surfaces shall be kept free from materials, objects and conditions which will have an adverse effect on adjacent premises Officer Trumble reported the home had faded, peeling paint, mildew, a broken window, and missing tiles. Mr. Haylock was not present to testify. Mr. Leonard moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to Section 11-133 of the Miami Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation within 30 days and shall notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 30 days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator up to $250.00 per day which will constitute a lien against the property. Costs in the amount of $25.31 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expenses in prosecuting the violation to date. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5104 Overgrown foliage 10635 NE 11 Court Owner: David G. Haylock Section 10-1. Property to be maintained in safe. clean and sightby condition. It shall be the duty of all owners oflots, parcels and tracts offend within the village to keep such properly Ina safe, clean and slghdy condtion and to remove therefrom all surplus grass, weeds and othergrowth and all trash and • • • CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING November 7, 1996 Page 9 rubbish and to fill In all excavations and depressions mereon. Officer Trumble reported the backyard was severely overgrown with wild vegetation. Mr. Haylock was not present to testify. Mr. Colson moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to Section 10-1 of the Miami Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation within 30 days and shall notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 30 days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator up to $250.00 per day which will constitute a lien against the property. Costs in the amount of $25.31 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expenses in prosecuting the violation to date. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5128 Unauthorized storage of materials 150 NE 98 Street Owner: Reynald J. P. Blanchard Section 501(k1. Prohibited uses. No use shall hereafter be established in any district unless the same is Included among Bre uses perm/tied In such district as set forth in the schedule adopted by Argyle IV, ether by specific listing or by the application of standards spedfled in this ordinance For the purpose of darf lcation, Bre following list sets forth uses that are among those that shall not be deemed to be pemhA7ed anywhere in the village. Storage ordlsposa/ofJunk trash, Including but not fmited to dereNc4 Inoperable, or partially dismantled trailers, boats, vehicles, machinery, refrigerators, washing and drying machines, plumbing fixtures; or any other similar type of personal property; provided, nevertheless, Itis not the intent hereof to prohlb/t Bre deposit of such items /n a usual location for waste collection, provided ft Is not or will not become a nuisance, and the same will be collected the waste dhdslon of Bre public works department, or a Adam/ Shores Village authorized commercial waste collector. However, in the case of hazardous waste (as defined by Bre Dade County Code), such waste shah be promptly transported to a certified hazardous waste disposal facility. Section 10-1. Property to be maintained in safe. clean and sightly condition. Itshal/be the duty of all owners of lots, parcels and tracts of land within the village to keep such property In a safe, clean and sightly condlton and to remove therefrom all surplus grass, weeds and other growth and all bash and rubbish and to flu in all excavations and depressions thereon Staff recommended dismissal. Ms. Burch moved for dismissal. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5146 Overgrown foliage 557 NE 87 Street Owner: Rena Hambelton Section 10-1. Property to be maintained in safe. clean and sightly condition. • • • CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING November 7, 1996 Page 10 Itsha//be the duty of all owners of lots, parcels and facts of land within the Wage to keep such property In a safe, clean and sightly condition and to remove therefrom a/I surplus grass, weeds and other growth and all trash and rubbish and to fill in all excavations and depressions thereon. Officer Trumble reported there was wild vegetation and foliage overgrowth behind the stores. Ms. Hambelton was not present to testify. Mr. Colson moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to Section 10-1 of the Miami Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation within 30 days and shall notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 30 days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator up to $250.00 per day which will constitute a lien against the property. Costs in the amount of $72.48 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expenses in prosecuting the violation to date. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5148 Inoperable vehicle on premises 323 NE 91 Street Owner: Gregory L. Staninski Section 13-1. Inoperable vehicle on premises . It Is prohibited to maintain a vehicle not In provable operating condNon and not stored In a garage. Store vehicle In agarage or remove vehic% Store in garage or remove from premises Officer Trumble reported an old Mercedes automobile was parked at the property partially covered by a tarpaulin with the muffler and tail pipes hanging down and unsightly. Mr. Staninski was not present to testify. Ms. Burch moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to Section 13-1 of the Miami Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation within 30 days and shall notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 30 days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator up to $250.00 per day which will constitute a lien against the property. Costs in the amount of $26.81 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expenses in prosecuting the violation to date. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. • • • CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING November 7, 1996 Page 11 CASE NO. 5149 Pet limitation and control 323 NE 91 Street Owner: Gregory L. Staninski Section 5-22. et limitation and control. No more than three dogs and/or four cats over six months maybe kept Dogs and cats shall not engage in frequent or habitual barking, meowing, etc. Remove excessive pats, restrain pets from being noisy, or keep enclosed fn building. Contain dog inside ofhouse or yard. Officer Trumble reported the homeowner owned a medium sized black dog who was continuously loose and chased people. A Mrs. Vogel accepted the notice, tore it up, and stated she was the homeowner. She was not present to testify. Village Attorney Ulmer advised the Board that they could set a one-time fee up to $250.00 for the dog being loose. Should the violation not be corrected, the violator could be called back on a second offense and fined up to $500.00 per day until compliance. Mr. Colson moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to Section 5-22 of the Miami Shores Village Code. Costs in the amount of $26.80 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expenses in prosecuting the violation, and a one-time fine of $250.00 is hereby levied Should this violation arise in the future, the Board could then levy a $500.00 fine per occurrence. Ms. Burch seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5147 Unauthorized storage of materials 323 NE 91 Street Owner: Gregory L. Staninski Section 501(k). Prohibited uses. No use shall hereafter be established In any district unless the same Is included among the uses permuted in such district as set forth In the schedule adopted byArl/da IV, either by specific //sting or by the application of standards specified in this ordinance For fie purpose of clarification, the following fist sets forth uses drat are among Horse that shall not be deemed to be permitted anywhere in the village. Storage or disposal of Junk trash, including but not limited to derelict inoperable, or partially dismantled trailers, boats, vehicles, machinery, refrigerators, washing and drying machines, plumbing fixtures, or any other siml/ar type of personal property provided, nevertheless, itis not the intent hereof to prohibit the deposit of such items in a usual location for waste co/lection, provided it is not or will not become a nuisance, and the same will be coo//eoted the waste division of the public works department or a Adami Shores Village authorized commercial waste collector. However, fn the case of hazardous waste (as defined by the Dade CountyCode), such waste shat be promptly bansported to a certified hazardous waste disposal facility. Section 10-1. Properly to be maintained in safe. dean and sightly condition. It shall be the duty of all owners of lots, parcels and tracts inland within the village to keep such property in a safe, clean and sighty condition and to remove therefrom all surplus grass, weeds and olhergrowth and all bash and rubbish and to Nil in all excavations and depressions thereon. • • CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING November 7, 1996 Page 12 Officer Trumble reported a truck topper, truck wheels, and other unknown items were being stored underneath a silver tarpaulin in the front yard. No representative from the property was present to testify. Mr. Colson moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to Section 501(k), 10-1, of the Miami Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation within 30 days and shall notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 30 days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator up to $250.00 per day which will constitute a lien against the property. Costs in the amount of $26.80 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expenses in prosecuting the violation to date. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5154 Unauthorized construction/alterations 1 NW 110 Street Owner: Jean I. And Rose J. Fontaine Section 6-4(a). Required emits - Applications generally. No person shall erect or construct or proceed with Are ereC11on or construction of any building or structure, nor add to, enlarge, move, improve, alter, convert extend or demolish any bul/ding or stvdure, or any group of buildings and/or structures under one (1) or Joint ownership whether on one or more lots or tracts of land; or cause the same to be done where the cost of the workls one handled dollars ($100) or more In value; and on any remodeling or alterationlob of any value; without first obtaining a permit therefor from Are Wilding deparbnent Staff recommended dismissal. Vice Chairman Herrera moved for dismissal. Ms. Burch seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5156 Inoperable vehicle on premises 30 NE 99 Street Owner: Constantine Hinds Section 13-1 Inoperable vehicle on premier . it is prohibited to maintain a vehicle not /n provable operati'ng condh#on and not stored in a garage. Store vehicle in agarage or remove vehicle. Store In garage or remove from premises Staff recommended dismissal. Vice Chairman Herrera moved for dismissal. Ms. Burch 1111 seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously • CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING November 7, 1996 Page 13 CASE NO. 5153 Unauthorized construction/alterations 103 NW 103 Street Owner: Realko Investment 86 Associates, Inc. Tenant: Secretary of HUD Section 8-4(a). Required Permits - ApplicationsgeneraUy. No person shall erect or construct or proceed with the erection or construction of any building or structure, nor add to, enlarge, move, improve, alter, convert extend or demolish anybuidfng or structure, or any group of buildings and/or structures under one (1) or jointownershi, whether on one or more lots or tracts ofland; or cause the same to be done where Me cost of the work Is one hundred dollars ($100) or more in value; and on any remodeling or alteration job of any value; without first obtaining a permit therefor from the building department Staff recommended dismissal. Ms. Burch moved for dismissal. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. CASE NO. 5158 Unsightly fascia, soffit, house exterior 130 NE 98 Street Owner: Maria and Jose Grosso Section 12-133. Depreciation of surrounding property. The exterior of every structure shall be so maintained with reasonable alb -activeness so as not in Me case of excessive scaling or paint or excessive mildew, to cause a substanlla/ depreciation In property values in the immediate neighborhood The exterior surfaces shall be kept free from materials, objects and conditions which will have an adverse effect on adjacent premises. Officer Pierre reported the homeowner had pulled a permit to paint his home in December 1995 but never completed the job, and the home was unsightly with incomplete painting. Ms. Burch moved for a finding of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists to Section 12-133 of the Miami Shores Village Code. The offending party shall correct the violation within 30 days and shall notify the Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If the violation is not brought into compliance within 30 days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board may then assess a fine against the violator up to $250.00 per day which will constitute a lien against the property. Costs in the amount of $54.86 are hereby assessed for tonight's proceedings to recoup the Village's expenses in prosecuting the violation to date. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. • • • CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING November 7, 1996 Page 14 CASE NO. 5161 Unauthorized construction/alterations 1345 NE 105 Street Owner: Gregory Hoffman Section 6-4(a). Required Permits - Applications generally. No person shall erect or construct or proceed with fire erection or construction of any bulling or structure, nor add to, enlarge, move, improve, alter, convent extend or demolish any building or structure, or any group of buildings and/orstructures under one (1) 0r Joint owner hip wheffier on one or more lots or tracts of/and; or cause the same to be done where the cost of the work Is one hundred dollars ($100) or more In value; and on any remodeling or alterat/onlob of any value; without first obtaining a permit ffrereforfrom the building department Staff recommended dismissal. Ms. Burch moved for dismissal. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. III. NEW BUSINESS Election of Board Chairman and Vice Chairman 1. Chairman Vice Chairman Herrera nominated Chairman Asmus. There were no other nominations for Chairman. Ms. Burch moved the nominations be closed. Chairman Asmus was reelected to serve another term. 2. Vice Chairman Mr. Patnik nominated Vice Chairman Herrera. There were no other nominations for Vice Chairman. Mr. Buenconsejo moved the nominations be closed. Vice Chairman Herrera was reelected to serve another term. Mr. Colson discussed the possibility of having these two elections every 14 months instead of 12 months in order to allow new Board Members the opportunity to get to know the other members before nominations took place. Chairman Asmus explained that for the past 14 years these elections have been held at the first or second meeting of the new fiscal year. Village Attorney Ulmer stated there was no provision for these elections in the Village Code, but the provision did appear in the Board's Rules and Regulations. A change to the Rules and Regulations could be effected by unanimous Board vote to have these elections in • • CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING November 7, 1996 Page 15 December or January. The Board determined that no action to change election dates would be done at this time. IV. GOOD AND WELFARE Welcoming of New Board Members Mr. Nelson took a moment to welcome the three new Board Members. Chairman Asmus expressed his appreciation for their excellent participation in their first meeting of the Board. V. ADJOURNMENT Ms. Burch moved to adjourn. Vice Chairman Herrera seconded the motion, and the motion passed unanimously. Chairman Asmus adjourned the meeting at 8:22 P.M. Carol Ann Ragone, Recordiin ecretary