06-01-1989 Regular Meetingaiami cS1zores9lllage
F L 0 R 1 D A
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING
June 1, 1989
The Miami. Shores Village Code Enforcement. Board regular meeting was held
on June;1, 1989 at 7:35 P.M., at the Miami Shores Village Hall. The meeting
was called -to order by Vice Chairman, Owen Henderson, with the following members
present: Owen Henderson, Vice Chairman
Richard A. Colangelo
Charles M. Custin
Royal D. LaBarre
John L. Stokesberry
Arthur. H. Taylor
Absent Barry K, Asmus
Also present: Frank LuBien, Director of Code Enforcement
Robert Rodriguez, Code Enforcement iDiispector
Jack Wilson, Code Enforcement Inspector
MINUTES - May 4, 1989
Mr. LaB.arre moved to approve, as distributed, the minutes of the meeting of
Nay 4, 1989, seconded by Mr. Stokesberry, and passe40unanimously.
Appeals were heard first and then cases in order listed on the agenda, and
those people who were present for the meeting. Mr. Henderson announced that if
an appeal is denied) an appeal to the Circuit Court is the next step.
1. APPEAL, CASE NO 000135
LOUIS MILHOMME, 10816 NW 2 AVE
UNSIGHTLY HOUSE EXTERIOR
(TABLED AT LAST MEETING).
Mr. Wilson noted this case was tabled at the last meeting,. The notes on
the case enclosed in Members packet are explanation. Mr. Wilson further
noted the violation.has been corrected.
Mr. Taylor moved that the $110.00 Administrative feeremain, but the fine
be dismissed, seconded by Mr. Colangelo, and passed by unanimous roll call
vote.
2. APPEAL, CASE NO 009815
HEDGE VIOLATION
JOE IORIO, 425 NE 93 ST
Mr. LuBien advised Members that materials involving this case is in their
packet. Further he noted the violation has been corrected, but the $110.
Administrative fee was assessed because the violation had not been corrected
when the case was heard on May 5, 1988.
Mr. Iorio, Mr, LuBien, Mr. Wilson, and Mr, Rodriguez were sworn_ in.
Nr. Iorio, after being sworn in, stated he felt he did everything right.
He moved the hedge in good faith. He inquired as to how -judgement was made
ODE ENFORCEMENT HOARD MEETING -2- 6/1/89
as to compliance, and Mr. LuBien responded., a copy of the survey was not
provided.
Photographs of the violation were again reviewed.
Mr.
Stokesberry moved to denythe appeal, seconded by Mr. LaBarre, and
passed unanimously.
3. APPEAL CASE NO 000100
VARIOUS VIOLATIONS
GEORGE L. ONETT, 950 NE 96 ST
Mr. Onett was sworn in. He stated, he never ever received any notice of
any kind, either at the Miami Shores. address or. at the address in Reddich,
this ina:pite of notices sent by certified mai.l.and,.reguiar._mail. He further
noted, his son, Michael lived in the house, and he madecorrections without
benefit of notice, because he wanted,to. He had been in the process of
painting and remodeling the house.. He alsostatedhe.makes this appeal on
the basis of improper notice.. Notice of this meeting. is the first mail he
received from Miami Shores Village, concerning this matter.
Mr. LuBien noted the original. notice was sent.December 13., 1988, the Post
Office notified Mr..Onett twice in the month. of December,but certified
mail was never. claimed. Signed certified receipt was never; returned to
the Village. Notice was sent to both addresses. Mr. LuBien further stated,
he visited the site once and noticedwork in progress. .He read the note
dated.January 31,. 1989, taken from telephone conversation with Mr. Onett's
secretary, stating the violation will be corrected. .Nr. Onett was aware of
the violations., which are now corrected.
Mr. Custin arrivedat this point.
In depth discussion ensued concerning.proper notif,ication, of the violation.
Legal questions were raised, 'lack of guidance ;from Legal Council, Certified
mail should be picked up. Notification plastered:on the house. Mr. Onett's
contact with the Village, and action of Mr. Kay concerning. the violation.
No permits were pulled for the work completed.
Mr. Stokesberry moved that the, violation of December 13, 1988, in light of
the insufficient strength of the case, be dismissed at this time, all
subsequent fees and fines also be dismissed, in light of. the.fact, there is
no.case. Mr. Colangelo seconded the motion,which passed,.by.the following
roll call vote; Mr. Taylor No
Mr. Colangelo Yes
Mr. Stokesberry Yes
Mr. LaBarre Yes
Mr. Custin Abstain (Arrived late in discussion).
Mr. Henderson Yes.
It was determined that legal guidance from Council will be discussed at the end of
this meeting..
4. APPEAL, CASE N0 000103 & 000104
VARIOUS VIOLATIONS
WILLIAM MORELL, 1100 NE 91 TERR
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING -3- 6/1/89
Mr. Morell was sworn.in, He stated he is a first, time homeowner. He has
spent thousands of dollars, in repairs on the house, he got rid of the first
tenant, who was.bad news, He was not aware of violation notices, because
he spends a.great deal of time in Take Wales, F1. with his ill parents.
On April 4, 1989 when he. did'. learn of Violations, everything was corrected,
and he gave Mr, LuBien another address at Yhirh.he could be reached.
There was discussion concerning non -conforming structure.. Both violations
have beencorrected, and the premises looks better than it ever has. Run
down of the violations and proper notification was discussed. Mr. kay's
handling of the case was also discussed.
Mr. Taylor moved_to deny the appeal, seconded by Mr. Stokesberry, for
discussion. He stated, this is not different from the previous case,there
is no evidence of proper receipt of notification of the violations, The
question was called and the. motion failed by the following roll call vote:
Mr. Taylor Yes
Mr. Colangelo No
Mr, Stokesberry No
Mr..LaBarre No
Mr. Custin No
Mr. Henderson No
Mr.. Custin moved that there is insufficient evidence of notification of
the violations. Since violations have been corrected, fees and fines be
cancelled, and case dismissed. Mr. LaBarre seconded the motion which
passed by the following,roll call vote:
Mr. Taylor No
Mr. Colangelo Yes
Mr. Stokesberry Yes
Mr.. Labarre Yes
Mr. Custin Yes
Mr. Henderson Yes.
5. APPEAL, CASE NO 000158
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE
HELEN M. JOSEPH, 88 NW 111 ST
Mr. LuBien stated notices were sent and received by Mrs. Joseph. The case
is referred.for appeal because Mrs .Joseph agreed to pay the.Administrative
fee of $110.00, but since the violation was corrected., she refused to pay
any fines.
Mrs. Joseph, after being sworn in., stated she is an RN at Jackson Memorial
Hospital. The truck parked, at the premises does not belong to her, and she
knew nothing about.it.. She called Jack:^Wilson uponreceiving notice and
was'told by Jack Wilson that he waw the vehicle and would check into it.
It was,moved shortly thereafter, She stated she lived in the house with
her mother and cousin:and none drive a. commercial,vehicle, or own one.
Mr. Wilson agreed with. Mrs. Joseph, but the case:was not removed from the
computer as a closed case because he could not verify a correction date.
Mr. Stokesberry moved to keep the $110.00 Administrative fee and dismiss
the454O.00 fine, since the violation. was corrected.. Mr. Taylor seconded
the motion and it passed.with a unanimous roll call vote.
Mrs. Joseph paid the $110.00 Administrative fee by check.
CODE. ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING ,4- June 1, 1989
III 6. HRARTNG, CASE NO 000338
UNAUTHORIZED-CONSTRUCTION/ALTERATIONS
KEVIN.M. DOYLE, 91 NW 92.ST
Mr. Wilson stated. the pictures he had taken,of the violation this morning
had disappeared. There. is much work going on ,without. a permit, the nature
of which is not. known. Mr,Doyle was informed thatall.work cease until a
permit and plans are obtained.
.After Mr. Doyle was swornin, he stated he put in garden beds, four years
ago, a wood deck, 12.years.ago, he didn't know he needed a permit, viewing
it as a backyard project. While building the wooden walkways he received
notice. of violation,, he came into Village Hall to inquire what he needs to
correct the violation. He has not had time to submit the plans, but will
include all the work.on the permit.
Mr. LuBien stated there are loose ties and dirt around, and the stipulation,
construction without a permit, is the present concern. The flower beds do
not require permit, they are not a part: of the violation.
Mr. Stokesberry moved for Finding of Fact work has been done without a
permit, Conclusion of Law, this is a violation. of Sec 6-4 of. Miami Shores
Village Code of Ordinance, ordered that an Administrative fee of $110.00
be assessed, and if the violation is not correctee in thirty days, a fine
of $50.00 per day will,be levied. Mr. Custin seconded the motion which
passed by unanimous roll call vote.
7. HEARING, CASE NO 000377
INOPERABLE VEHICLE ON PREMISES
BERNARD D. DORSON & GERMAINE.A.. REMUS, 10634 NE 11 AVE
Mr. LuBien stated the violation was an inoperable grey Ford. Fiesta parked
in the alley.
Mr. Dorson was sworn.in. He stated -he and his wife Germaineare the
owners of the property. His son will soon be 16 and>he is saving the
car for him. He further noted he has been lax in' making the vehicle
operable.. He has been in the process of moving his business, and this
kept.him pretty busy. He has put air in the tires, and the vehicle was
taggedjtoday (June 1, 1989). The violation is corrected,
Mr. Rodriguez showed 'photographs :he took on May 25, 1989, the vehicle was
still inoperable at that time, the due date for correction was 5/20/1989.
Mr, Stokesberry made..a<motion for Finding of Fac --t, the violation existed,
Conclusion of Law, the inoperable vehicle was a violation of. Sec 13-1 of
the Code of Ordinance, ordered that $110.00 Administrative cost be levied,
the motion was seconded by:Mr. Colangelo, and passed'by"unanimous roll call
vote.
Mr. Dorson objected -to the: Administrative fee of $110., and Mr, Henderson
explained. the decision of the Board.
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING -5- 6/1/89
8. HEARING, CASE NO 000395
INOPERABLE VEHICLE UN PREMISES
EMANUEL JONASSAINT, 22 NW 103 ST
Mr. Wilson stated the violation.has been corrected, but. it was not so by
the due date.
Mr. Job.assai.n.t was sworn in. His corminIs friend owned the car but it has
since been removed, and the violation is corrected. The house belongs to
his cousin who livea,:.in New York.
Mr. Henderson explained the problems of others parking inoperable vehicles
on the premises.
Mr. Custin moved for Finding of Fact and Eonclusion.of ,Taw this was a
violation of Sec;13-1 of Miami Shores Village Code of Ordinance, ordered
that Adm4nistrative cost of $110.00 be assessed. The motion was seconded
by Mr. LaBae and passed by unanimous roll call: vote.
Mr.. Henderson explained that his cousin as the owner of the property must
pay $110.00, to which Mr. Jonassaint stated he will pay the money.
9. HEARING, CASE NO 000351
GENERAL;UNSIGHTLINESS
JOSE LUIS SANTANA, 301:NE 96 ST
Mr. LuBien noted this is a violation of extensive unsightliness which was
• to be corrected by. May 12, 1989.
Mr. Santana was not present at the meeting.
Mr. Rodriguez stated that he inspected the property on'May 15, 1989, and
.it was still not in compliance. He.delivered the violation in early A.M.
on that date. Mr.. Santana has been almost impossible to reach. The due
date for. correction. was. May 12, 1989. The property was -inspected again,
and the violation was corrected a.week after the due -date. -
There was discussion concerning previous violationby the same person, it
was determined a. previous case should not have bearing on this case. Also
computer problems were mentioned in regard to fees and fines assessed,
Mr. LaBarre moved.for Finding of Fact and Conclusion of -Law, the unsightly
yard violates Sec 10-1 of Miami Shores Village Code of Ordinance, ordered
that an Administrative fee of $110.00 be assessed, and an additional fee
of $100.00 for the days the violation existed Last the;due date. ($10.00
for each day). Mr:. Colangelo seconded the mbtion, and it passed by
unanimous roll call vote.
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING -6- 6/1/89
10: HEARING,CASE NO. 000376
INOPERABLE VEHICLE ON PREMISES
LEONOR 114 RONDON, 10690 NE 11 CT
TENANT: MIKE WOOD
Neither Mrs. Rondon nor Mr. Mike Wood was present at the meeting.
Mr. Rodriguez stated the owner was cited on May 5, 1989 for an inoperable
BMW. The photographs were taken on May 25,.1988, and the BMW was still
not in compliance. He received no answer to his knock on the door, nor
has there been response to notice left on the door. A signed receipt of the
letter of violation was in the file.
Mr. Custin moved for Finding of Fact that the BMW is not tagged, Conclusion
of Law, this is a violation of Sec 13-1 of Miami Shores Village Code of
Ordinance, ordered that Administrative cost of $.110.00 be assessed, and if
the violation isnot corrected in thirty days, a fine of $25.00 per day will
become effective. The motion was seconded by Mr. Taylor, and passed by
unanimous vote.
Mr. Henderson asked if the next three cases could be heard together since all the
properties are owned by the same owner.. Mr. LuBien explained the violations are
listed separately because of the different addresses and different tenants. In
making motions, each location is treated, and assessed as a violation.
11, 12, &13. HEARING, CASE NOS. 000381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388 & 389
JUAN BERRY, PEDLEY CORPORATION, TENANT ADDRESSES FOLLOW:
650 NE: 88 TERR, 8817,8825, 8833, 8841, 8849 Biscayne Blvd
8851, 8861, 8871 BISCAYNE BLVD.
These were all discussed as one case.
Mr. LuBien stated he has photographs of the violation.
Mr. Rodriguez noted the violations.were sent to Juan Berry, Pedley Corp.,
2549 NW 74 Ave, they were returned with note that Pedley Corp had moved
and left no .forwarding address.
Mr.. Taylor suggested a call to the Secretary of State could give you the
name of the Corporation and the correct address. There wascontinued dis-
cussion on who the owner might be, and other violations which. -may exist at
the property. Discussion continued.
Mr. Colangelo moved to table.thesecases 381 - 389 inclusive., until a
corrected name and address'is found, Mr. LaBarre secondehfhe motion which
ppssed unanimously.
14. HEARING, CASE NO 000396
INOPERABLE VEHICLE ON PREMISES
THOMAS P. EUGENE, 9595 NW 2 AVE
Mr. Wilsonstated that, he inspected this property for the inoperable vehicle
on May 25, 1989 which was on.Ffiday, the vehicle wason the premises, but must
have been moved over the weekend, because it wasin compliance on Monday.
CODE:ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING -7- 6/1/89
Mr. Eugene was not present at the meeting.
Mr. Custin moved for. Finding of Fact, the inoperable vehicle was parked
on the premises, Conclusion of Law this is. a violation of Sec 1341 of
Miami. Shores Village Code of Ordinance, ordered that $110.00 Administrative
cost be levied, and there be no fine, the motion was seconded by Mr. LaBarre,
and passed unanimously.
CASE #000287
MRS. HABERSIN, 51 NE 99 ST
Mr. Henderson read aloud the note from Mrs.. Habersin as taken by the
Secretary. He advised the BoyScouts will work to clean up her property
on Saturday. This is done under the direction of .the Miami. Shores Village
Homeowners. Assoc.. Mr. Henderson will be present, as Mrs. Habersin re-
quested, to supervise and observe.
There was discussion concerning fees and fines and means of collection.
Mr. Custin requested a list of outstanding fines and who the debtors are. Mr. LuBien
replied, explaining the present process. He will ask. Ms. Gail Macdonald, Finance
Director if this information canbe obtained "from the computer. Mr. LuBien also
mentioned:. there is no need for the Boardto have' this •information, to which
Mr. Custin stated, he wants to know what the fruit of their labors are.
There being no further business,t-the meeting adjourned at 9:30 P.M.
Vreea-'kt y
Approved.. U
Chairman - Protem
cdz