03-02-1989 Regular Meeting•
aiami crhoresc-illage
F L OR ID A
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING
March 2, 1989
The Miami Shores Village Code..Enforcement Board. -regular meeting was
called to.order by Vice Chairman, Owen Henderson, on March 2, 1989, at 7:30 P.M.,
at the Miami Shores Village Hall. The following members were present:
Owen Henderson III
Richard A. Colangelo
Charles M. Custin
Royal D. LaBarre
Absent: Barry K. Asmus, Chairman
John L. Stokesberry
William :Schroeder
Also present: Frank LuBien, Director:of Code Enforcement
Herb Kay, Code Enforcement Inspector
Jack Wilson, Code.. Enforcement Inspector
1. .MINUTES - FEBRUARY 2. 1989
The minutes of the meeting of February 2, 1989wete approved, as written,
by a motion made by Mr. LaBarre, seconded by Nr.,.Custin, and passed by
unanimous vote.
2. APPEAL OT' BOARD DECISION OF CASE #000079 & CASE #000083
ERNEST L. RENZETTI
10395 N.: E. 12th AVE.
Mrs. Renzetti call Mr. LuBien this evening about 7:00 -P.M. to explain
that they are very busy at• the. business, and could not get away. She re-
quested the appeal hearing be postponed to the April -meeting, Mr LuBien
explained this is not -tout of order if the Board so chooses.
Mr. Custin moved to recognize the request to postpone the appeal to the
April meeting, seconded by Mr. LaBarre., and carried unanimously.
3. HEARINGS
CASE #000159
UNLAWFUL STRUCTURE
143 N. W. 110th Street
ANDREW J. PARKER
Mr. LuBien explained that Mr. Parker .is aware of the violation. He was not
aware that the aluminum;canopy is prohibited, northat the contractor did not
take out a permit. The contractor did:advise Mr.. Parker that should there
be any problems with the structure. he will take care of it, and he gave
Mr. Parker an affidavit to this effect. The contractor has since come in and
paid.the.$50.00 fee for a variance and:is scheduled on the agenda for the
Planning & Zoning Board on Thursday, March 9, 1989, Mr, Parker happens to be
a victim of.circumstance.
•
•
•
CODE ENFROCEMENT BOARD
-2- 3/2/89
Following Brief discussion -,.Mr. LaBarre moved to table the hearing until it
is heard by. the Planning & Zoning Board.. Motionwas seconded. by Mr, Custin,
and passed unanimously,
CASE # 000199
GENERAL UNSIGHTLINESS
253 N. E. 101st STREET
JO GALBRAITH
Mr. Pilchmoni., Mr. LuBien, Mr. Kay and Mr. Wilson were sworn .in.
Mr. Pilchmoni stated he is the husband of Jo Galbraith, and is attending the
meeting on her behalf. He stated, he had some medical problems last year
and compliance was difficult, but he is ok now...
Mr. Kay/in response to query from Mr. LuBien explained that letters were sent,
and a card left at the door, though heis now in compliance, he was not so
by the date due, February 23, 1989. Mr. LuBien further noted this is a
recurring violation.
Mr. Custin moved for Finding of Fact, the property:was generally unsightly,
Conclusion. of Law, this is a violation of Sec.. 10-1 of the. Miami Shores
Village Code of Ordinances;, ordered that an. Administrative fee of $110.00
be assessed. Following further -,brief discussion by Mr. Pilchmoni, the
motion:passed by a. -unanimous roll call vote...
CASE #000136 -- CASE #000137 - CASE #000138
UNSIGHTLY. FASCIA, SOFFIT, HOUSE FXTERIOR AND -GENERAL, UNSIGHTLINESS
29011. W. 93rd STREET
LEROY. SLOAN
Mr. Wilson explained that he.has had fulland complete cooperation from
Mr.. Sloan. There were three violations, but Mr. Sloan is almostin complete
compliance. The house looks 100%_ better.
Mr. Sloan was.sworn in,. and stated,.the house was.a total wreck when he
bought it. He started to work on the inside,but when violations were called
to his attention he then began, to work outside. He tried to do what he
could, as fast as he could.
Mr. LuBien notedthe first notice was:sent January 10, 1989, violation to be
corrected by.February 8, 1989, the only problem. left is the'painting of the
roof, which Mr. Sloan said he could do in fifteen (15) days, with the benefit
of an extension.
Mr. Custin moved that in view:of the attempt to comply an.extension of 15
daysbe granted. The.Administrative.fee will be waived.: Mr. LaBarre
seconded the motion which passed by a unanimous roll call vote.
•
•
•
CODE ENFORCEMENT, BOARD
-3- 3/2/89
CASE #000113:AND CASE #00011.4
UNAUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION/ALTERATIONS
10704 N. W. 2ndAVENUE
JOSE, R. ESTRELLA
Mr. Wilson explained the structure in Case #000113 has been torn down, and
the fence violation in Case #000114 has.been corrected.
Mrs. Estrella:.was sworn in. She stated, throughher interpreter, that
Mr, Estrella is out of town, the violations were corrected by the dates
required, but they did not know that: --they must inform the inspector.
Mr. Custin moved to find that the violations are corrected, the intent to
comply has been met, therefore the Administrative:fee be waived. Motion
was seconded by Mr. Colangelo, and ended with the following tie vote.
Mr.. Colangelo. - Yes
Mr. Custin Yes
Mr. LaBarre No
Mr. Henderson No.
In discussion, Mr.. Custin explained thatthe Estrell's'did respond to the
notices, and action was taken. Our rain:.objective is to get a violation
corrected, and a sincere attempt has been made to _comply.
Mr. Wilson explained that permit had been obtained, and violations were
corrected, the only question is we weren't notified,
The vote was again called on the same motion, and passed by a unanimous
roll call vote.
Mr. Henderson explained the Board's decision .to Mrs. Estrella.
CASE #000176
GENERAL UNSIGHTLINESS
43 N. W. 110th STREET
LYONEL NOEL & MARIE DORNEZA
Mr. Dorneza was sworn in,
The facts behind the violation. were read. by Mr. LuBien
Photographs of the violationwere reviewed by the. Board. Mr. Wilson stated
the first notice was sent January 26, 1989, and the violation was to be
corrected by February 10, 1989. Some. work. has been done, his concern is the
commercial dryer on the patio,., and the unacceptable plumbing.
Mr. Dornexa noted he bought the house with the attached carport, and the
plumbing connections for washer and dryer were in place. He bought the big
dryer.which is stored on the carport temporarily. He was: told the.plumibing
connections are a non -conforming situation. So far as the grass is concerned,
he has tried several.timesto get grass -=growing without luck.
Mr, LuBien explained the computer was not programed for,the laundry equipment
violation which should be inside the building,,. What is the intent of 'this
laundry equipment? The violation being considered this evening, is the
general unsightliness of the yard. (No grass, water running on ground, etc).
•
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
Discussion continued.
-4- 3/2/89
A motion was made by Mr. Custin for Finding of Fact, the yard is unsightly,
Conclusion of Law, this is a violation of A:0-1 of Miami Shores Village Code
of Ordinance., Ordered that an Administrative fee of $110.00 be assessed,
and the yard must be in compliance in 30'days':(1ean upit properly sodded,
and grass growing), at which time a $20,00 per day fine will kick in. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Colangelo, and passed by unanimous roll call vote.
Mr. Henderson explained the Member's action.
Mr. LuBien also explained to Mr. Dorneza that the washing machine must be
moved in 15 days (by March 18, 1989). Following furtherdiscussion with
Mr. Dorneza, Mr..LuBien told him that he.and-Mr. Milson will meet him at
9:00 A. M. tomorrow:to point out the violations.
CASE # 000135
UNSIGHTLY FASCIA, SOFFIT, HOUSE EXTERIOR
10816 N. W. 2nd, AVENUE
LOUIS MILHONME
Mr. LuBien read the facts behind the violation, the exterior of the
structure not properly maintained. Mr. Wilson indicated he had no
response to violat-ion,notice, and the violation continues.
Mr. Colangelo moved for. Finding of Fact, there is excessive peeling paint
and mildew on. the house, Conclusion of Law, this is a violation of
Section 12-133 of the Miami Shores Village Code of Ordinance, ordered that
an Administrative fee of $110.00 be assessed, and if the violation is not
corrected in thirty days, a fine of $25.00 per day will be levied.
Mr. LaBarre seconded the motion„ which passed by unanimous vote.
CASE #000146
UNAUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION¢ALTERATIONS
10130 NORTH MIAMI AVENUE
JOHN MUMFORD
The facts behind the violation were read by Mr. LuBien. He explained to
Members that Mr. Mumford was notified, the color he painted the house with-
out a permit is unacceptable. He requested a hearing before the Planning
and Zoning Board which denied the -color, and also -an appeal to Council was
denied. No further action has been taken.. to correct: the problem.
Mr. Custin moved for Finding of Fact, and Conclusion of. Law, the house color
painted withouta permit is a violation of Section 6-4 of Miami Shores Village
Code of Ordinances, and an Administrative fee of $110.00 is assessed. If the
violation is not corrected in thirty days a fine of $20.00 per day will be
levied, motion was seconded by Mr. Colangelo. In of the fact no action
was taken following Council denial of appeal, -Mr. LaBarre moved to ammend
the motion to:levy a fine of $50.00 per day if not corrected,in 30 days. The
amendment was accepted by Mr. Custin and Mr. Colangelo. The motion by
Mr. Custin passed unanimously, the amendment by Mr; LaBarre passed unanimously.
•
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
('ASE #000155 and CASE.#000156
LACKOF OFF STREET PARKING
INOPERAB.LE.VEEHIELE ON PREMISES
52 N. W. lllth STREET
WILLIE. MAE SAPP
-5- 3/2/89
The facts behindthe violation were read. by 'Nr. LuBien, and at his
suggestion the Board heard each case separately.
Mx. Wilson showed Members photographs of.the violation. One auto without
a license plate was removed, a.plate Which spired in 1988 was placed on
another car. Futther,.Mr. Wilson was informed this is,a staging area:for
cars destined to be moved to Haiti,
Mr. Colangelo` in Case:.#000155. moved for Finding ofFact., and Conclusion of
Law, the.vehiclesgare illegally parked on the lawn, and this' is.a violation
of Miam — Shores.Village Schedule;of Regulations, ordered that a $110.00
Administrative fee be assessed, and if notcorrected in 30. days, a fine of
$25.00 per day'will be levied, Mr. Custin seconded.the motion which passed
unanimously.
In, Case #000156, Mr. ,Cdlangelo: moved: for Finding'of'Faet., and Conclusion of
Law,. the vehicles are not:in provable. operating. condition, against the Miami
Shores Village Code. of; Ordinances Section 13-1. A $110.00LAdministrative
fee will be assessed, and.if notcorrected-in thirty.days, a fine of $25.00
per day will be levied.
CASE #000.158
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE IN RESIDENTIAL ZONE
88 N. W. 111th STREET
HELEN M. JOSEPH
Mr. Wilson showed photographs of, the violation to Members. He stated this
violation continues to exist.
Mr. Custin moved. for. Finding of Fact, a commercial vehicle parked in the
residential zone is a violation, Conclusion of Lara; the Schedule of Regulations
is the section.of the Miami.Shores Village Code being violated, a,$110.00
Administrative cost id assessed, and a fine: of $20.00 per -day -will be levied
if not, corrected in thirty days.. Motion was seconded,by Mr. Colangelo, and
passed unanimously.
CASE #_000180
UNAUTHORIZED. CONSTRUCTION/ALTERATIONS
105 N. E. 95th STREET
ANDRE THEVENIN
Mr. LuBien read the facts:behind the violation, and explained that immediately
upon being notified of the. violation Mr. Thevenin contacted Mr. LuBien who
explained the requirements for correction;. Mr. Andre T'heveniniias brought in
plans, andis scheduled for consideration. by the Planning & Zoning Board on
March 9, 1989, the proper motion is to. grant an extension.
Mr. LaBarre moved to grant a..30 day extension oruntil the. Planning & Zoning
Board has reviewed the plans, motion was seconded.by.Mr. Custin, and passed
unanimously.
•
•
•
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
-6- 3/2/89
Mr. Colangelo inquired about computer. printouts, and how,the Code Fnf.orcement
process is working on,the,.computer. Mr. LuBien explained, there are glitches
as with any new system, overall we are ahead of other•.eommunities in timely and
effective enforcement.
In reply„to query from Mr.. Custin concerning: the new house at N,, E. 105th St
and Biscayne Blvd, Mr, LuBien noted that corrective measures.are.required before
a Certificate of -Occupancy can be issued; The -owner -has been advised of the
problems as requiredby the Planning & Zoning Board, -and by Mr:. LuBien. Little
work has been done on the property, but so long as 180 days do not.laps.e between
inspections or work going on nothing can. be done by this Board.
Concerning 934 N. E. 98th Street, Mr. LuBien explained that prospective new owners
of the property were in today to look.at the original plans and obtain a permit.
He had the gentleman write an:affidavit to:the effect'that`he will.be.the new
owner and plans to finish the, construction begun,.
There being nofurther business to come before:the.Board, the meeting adjourned
at 8:50 P.M.
c7,4/ 0W./
ecre ary
Approved
Owen Henderson III, Vice Chairman