06-07-1984 Regular Meetingiami cShores91.lIage
F L 0 R 1 0 A
•
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MEETING
JUNE 7, 1984
A regular meeting of the Miami Shores Village Code Enforcement
Board was held on June 7, 1984, 7:30 p.m., at the Village Hall, with the
following members present:
Santos Rivero, Acting Chairman
Donald L. Bednar
Kenneth Cutchens
Arthur H. Taylor
Absent: Julie A. S. Williamson
Barry K. Asmus
Franklin E. Grau
Also present: Frank LuBien, Code Enforcement Director
Jack Wilson, Code Enforcement Inspector
1. MINUTES
Mr. Cutchens called attention to the wording of a motion on
pg 4, pg 6, and pg 9. Mr. Bednar suggested the motion should
read a $500.00 Administrative fee be imposed. In addition
$250.00 per day,
Following this amendment, and typographical corrections, Mr. Bednar
moved to approve the minutes as amended, seconded by Mr. Cutchens,
and carried unanimously.
2. HEARING, CASE NO. 84-2113-084
JAMES F. JONES, JR., 520 N. E. 107 ST.
PEELING PAINT AND MILDEW
Facts of the violation, as outlined by Mr. LuBien were, peeling
paint on fascia with mildew on soffit was observed on Feb. :9, 1984,
at which time a notice was sent. Upon re -inspection and non-
compliance another notice was sent on Feb. 24, 1984. There is no
violation at this time.
After being sworn in, Mrs. Jones stated that major remodeling was
being undertaken on the house, house painting was the next project,
but unfortunately our timetables did not coincide; therefore, the
delay in compliance.
Mr. Bednar made the motion that Mr. & Mrs. Jones are now in compli-
ance, and an Administrative fee of $110.00 be imposed. The motion
was seconded by Mr. Cutchens. Mr. Bednar explained to Mrs. Jones,
it is not the intention of the Code Enforcement Board to charge fees
indiscriminately; however, the Village must recover a normal charge
for having;:brought:.the:case : to this -point.
The motion passed unanimously.
•
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
-2- 6/7/84
3. HEARING CASE NO. 84-2250-087
BENJAMIN PEREZ, 10658 N. E. 10 COURT
"FOR SALE" SIGN ON CAR
Mr. LuBien outlined the facts of violation. A notice was sent
on April 13, 1984 when a "FOR SALE" sign was first observed on
a car. The premises were visited on April 26, 1984, occupant
acknowledged that Mr. Perez had received the first notice. The
signs were not removed, and on 5/9/84, the signs were still on
the car. Mr. Perez made no attempt to acknowledge receipt of the
notices, nor did he respond to the Notice of Hearing.
In response to Mr. Rivero's query, Mr. LuBien stated he had made
about six visits to the site, and as of this day the car has been
removed.
Mr. Cutchens moved to assess $110.00 Administrative cost, seconded
by Mr. Bednar and carried unanimously.
4. HEARING, CASE NO. 84-2288-088
RAUL J. BARRETO, 72 N. E. 104 ST.
VARIOUS VIOLATIONS
Upon complaints, inspection was made at the above address. Motor-
cycles were on the premises, also indications of repair work on the
motors. A motorcycle trailer and inoperable motor vehicle
were also observed. Several notices have been sent, without response.
Mr. LuBien stated that in today's inspection, he did not observe
continuing repair work, the inoperable motor vehicle remains on the
property; therefore, there is partial compliance.
Mr. Cutchens moved that there is
Law partial violation continues,
$110.00 be imposed. In addition
thirty days, if the violation is
motion carried unanimously.
Finding -of -Fact, and Conclusion of
and that an Administrative fee of
$25.00 per day commencing after
not corrected at that time. The
Mr. LuBien following the direction of the Code Enforcement Board,
obtained an opinion from the Planning and Zoning Board,. regarding
the matter of reed screens. The Planning and Zoning Board discussed
the issue of reed screening, canvas, and other similar materials as
not being fencing material. It was the unanimous opinion of the
Board that reed screening is non -conforming, inharmounious,: and not
allowed.
5. AFFIDAVIT OF VIOLATION, CASE NO. 84-2168-085
DOROTHY M. SMITH, 122 N. E. 105 ST.
UNLAWFUL REED SCREEN
Unlawful reed screen was observed on March 8, 1984. Notices were
sent and the reed screen was cut to 5 feet.
This case was tabled at the last meeting pending an opinion from
the Planning and Zoning Board.
Considering the opinion, as stated above, Mr. Bednar moved that there
is a Finding -of -Fact, and Conclusion of Law and that we proceed to the
next step, seconded by Mr. Taylor, and carried unanimously.
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
-3- 6/7/84
6. AFFIDAVIT OF VIOLATION, CASE NO. 84-1248-086
WILLIAM RIDINGER, 142 N. E. 111th ST.
UNLAWFUL REEN SCREEN
This case:was>tab.led at the last meeting pending an opinion from
the Planning and Zoning Board.
Mr. Bednar moved there is a Finding -Of -Fact and Conclusion of Law,
and that we proceed to the next step, seconded by Mr. Taylor and
carried unanimously.
7. REPORTS FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS:
A) CASE NO. 84-2159-083
ATILES-FIGUEROA, FELIX, 262 N. E. 103 ST.
ROOF PAINTING INCOMPLETE.
Mr. LuBien stated that the painting was completed the day
following the Hearing, Mrs. Figueroa is now in compliance.
In response to Mr. Rivero's query, Mr. LuB.ien noted that
Mrs. Figueroa has made no arrangements for payment of the
$125.00 Administrative cost which was imposed.
B) HEARING CASE NO. 84-2104-079
JAMES L. SCHAYE, 325 N. E. 95th ST.
SCALING PAINT
Mr. LuBien noted that he had received a call from Mr. Schaye,
from New York, stating that he has no intention of paying the
$110.00 Administrative cost imposed by the Board at it's last
meeting. This, because of the time it took for his mail to
catch up with him, also because of the litigation he was
involved in with the contractor.
The Code Enforcement Board directed Mr. LuBien to communicate
with Mr. Schaye, that if he can provide documentation of the
litigation or negotiation he was involved with, in the
painting process on the house, the Board could consider waiving
the Administrative fee.
The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
etre" ry
•
an os Rivero, Acting airman