PLC-13-930Miami Shores Village
Building Department
10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138
Tel: (305) 795.2204 Fax: (305) 756.8972
INSPECTION'S PHONE NUMBER: (305) 762.4949
BUILDING
PERMIT APPLICATION
Permit Type: PLUMBING
Itta, ►v 11 n � �<9`'
♦ .e.e
ey: a o®ao®ooaooa000000
FBC 20 �I
Permit No. i %n
Master Permit No. C� 15-- 9 � S -
JOB ADDRESS: ! L3 o O lei E 2 Ave, b` d.G C M -
City: Miami Shores County: Miami Dade Zip: 3 // 32�.
Folio/Parcel#:
Is the Building Historically Designated: Yes
NO X Flood Zone:
OWNER: Name (Fee Simple Titleholder): &4r f 4 Qq Phone#: 305 - Rf3 - / 2
Address: H-600 6DO N & Z. AYP
City: m i ct YL t_ i Jho res State: FL
Tenant/Lessee Name: Phone#:
Email:
CONTRACTOR: Company Name: P4"Ii n f l U m b i viG of AA e a A4 ► 1r,e_Phone#: ,3115-652.303 !
Address: 42,D ! ys A/ /I
. P/a Ce_. -
City: 004h A;a "► &ach State: EL Zip: 3317
Qualifier Name: EJW" a 5 WCL U C e r Phone#: 305 -&SZ - 3431
State Certification or Registration #: C FC 0 4 $a rl' a. Certificate of Competency #:
Contact Phone#: 30$" Co52 - 30 31 Email Address: M Q- i i A T 1 V 1t b 1 n� P— C,o L Xo &i
DESIGNER: Architect/Engineer: Phone#:
Value of Work for this Permit: $ 3 C?M .lam Square/Linear Footage of Work:
Type of Work: ❑Address ❑Alteration 9<ew ORepair/Replace
ODemolition
Description of Work: ? U n A n jP (01C 150 ' off' Ne LJ bX 4e4v l i fy— 4-o Ta` 4,- 61- un d -C .
11
Submittal Fee
Scanning Fee $
Permit Fee $ /S CCF $ CO/CC $
Radon Fee $ DBPR $ Bond
Notary $ Training/Education Fee $
Double Fee $ Structural Review $
Technology Fee $
TOTAL FEE NOW DUE $ 1 EtgC -
Inspection Worksheet
Miami Shores Village
10050 N.E. 2nd Avenue Miami Shores, FL
Phone: (305)795-2204 Fax: (305)756-8972
Inspection Number: INSP-190521 Permit Numt F' PLC -5-13-930
Scheduled Inspection Date: September 11, 2013 Permit Type' Plumbing - Commercial
Inspector: Diaz, Osvaldo Inspection Type: Final
Owner: , BARRY UNIVERSITY Work Classification: Addition/Alteration
Job Address: 320 NW 115 Street
Miami Shores, FL 33138-0000
Project: BARRY UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCIENCE
01 nr_1
Contractor: MARLIN PLUMBING OF MIAMI INC
Bu
comments
RUN APPROX 150' OF NEW WATERLINE TO PORTABLE
UNITS
a
Passed
Failed
Correction ❑
Needed
Re -Inspection ❑
Fee
No Additional Inspections can be scheduled until
re -inspection fee is paid.
Phone Number
Parcel Number 11213600000600
INSPECTOR COMMENTS False
Inspector Comments
-1 l -t D
Phone: 305-652-6108
September 10, 2013 For Inspections please call: (305)762-4949 Page 7 of 28
ENERGY EFFICIENCY CODE FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
Florida Department of Community Affairs
EnergyGaugeNaCom v1.22 FORM 40OB-2001
Component Performance Method for Commercial Buildings
Jurisdiction: DADE COUNTY, DADE COUNTY, FL (231000)
ShortDesc: MDS007357
Project: MOD SPACE
Owner. MOD SPACE
34.32 81.72 PASSES
Other Envelope Requirements - B
Address: UNKNOWN
LIGHTING POWER
700.00 3,115.62 PASSES
UNKNOWN
PASSES
EXTERNAL LIGHTING
City: UNKNOWN
HVAC SYSTEM
PASSES
State: FLORIDA
PermitNo:
0 --
Zip: 0
Storeys:
1
Type: Office (Business)
GrossAren:
1640
Closs: New Finished building
Net Area:
1640
May Tonnage:
4 (if different, write in)
Compliance Summary
Component
Design Criteria Result
ENVM-O- PE
34.32 81.72 PASSES
Other Envelope Requirements - B
PASSES
LIGHTING POWER
700.00 3,115.62 PASSES
LIGHTING CONTROLS
PASSES
EXTERNAL LIGHTING
PASSES
HVAC SYSTEM
PASSES
PLANT
PASSES
WATER HEATING SYSTEMS
PASSES
PIPING SYSTEMS
PASSES
Met all required compliance from Check List?
YeslNo(NA
IMPORTANT NOTE: An input report Print -Out from EnergyGauge MaCom of
this design building must be submitted along with tkis Compliance Report.
2/19/13
FnerlyGange FiaCom FT.(': ." 0.22
1
I hereby certify that the plans and
Review of the plans and specifications covered by this
sperlficatinns cnvered by this ralr:rdaiinn are
ralrulatinn indicans~ rmrnplianm with the Florida Fnerey
in compliance with the Florida Energy
Code. Before construction is completed, this building will be
Efficiency Code.
inspect for compliance in accordance with Section
553.908, F.S.
PREPARED B
OFFICIAL:
OFFICIAL:
� " �
Puilding
7BING
DATE:
1 hereby that thiss incompli
with the Flori ciency Code.
OWNER AGENT•
DATE:
If required by Florida law, I hereby certify
r) that the system design is in
compliance with the Florida Energy Code.REGISTRATION
No.
ARCHITECT:
` '
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM DESIG
LIGHTING SYSTEM DESIG
MECHANICAL SYSTEM DESIG
PLUMBING SYSTEM DFMCNER:
(') Signature is required where Florida Law requires design to be performed by registered design professionals.
Typed names and registration numbers may be used where all relevant information is contained on signedlsealed
fans.
Project: MDS007357
Title: MOD SPACE
Type: Office (Business)
Locatloe: DADE COUNTY, DADE COUNTY, FL (2310
File: Miamitm
Envelope Compliance
Design Load Criteria
zone Heating Coolies Heating Cooling
OFFICE AREAS (CONDMONED) -1.51 32.81 -7.22 74.50
Total Loads: Deslen 34.324 Criteria 81.722 PASSES
2119/13 FnertwC.anFe FlaCam Vr CCRR v1.22
Project: MI WM7357
Title: MOD SPACE
Type: office (Business)
Location: VADE I:UUA-fY, DADE COUNTY, Ft (1319M)
(WEA File: Miamitmy)
Other Envelope Requirements
Item Zone Description Design Limit Meet Req.
OFFICE ARES % Skylight - Max % Limit 0.00 6.70 Yes
OFFICE ARE OFFICE AREt Exterior Roof - Max Uo Limit 0.05 0.08 Yes
Meets Other Envelope Requirements
Project M .%M3lq7
Title: MOD SPACE
Type: Office {Business)
Location: DADE COUNTY,
DADE COUNTY, FL (231000)
(WEA File: Miamitmy)
External Lighting
Compliance
DC -3'1t Uun
Category
AUuwuavv Amu VlLvugth ELPA CLP
(W/Unit) or No. of Units (W) (W)
(Sqft
or ft
Ext Light 1
Exit (with or without Canopy)
23.00
3.0 73 60
Ext Light 2
Exit (with or without Canopy)
25.00
3.0 75 60
Ext Light 3
Exit (with or without Canopy)
25.00
3.0 75 60
Desig,1:180
PASSES
AIlowance: 225
Project: MDSM357
MOD SPACE
Office (Business)
ion: DADE COUNTY, DADE COUNTY, FL (231000)
Space Ashrae Description Area Height No. of AF Design Effective Allowance
lD (sgft) (ft) Spaces (W) (W) (W)
DFFICE 29 Offices (Partitions 3.5-4.5 ft 1.640 8.0 1 1.00 1000 700 3.116
A nn A e below ceiling) Operi plan
offices 900 ft or Iarger with
partitions 3.
1000 (W) ' PASSES
700 (W)
3115.62 M
2/19/13 FnerpsGsupe MaCom Vi.CC .%R v1.22 3
Project: NIDSM357
Title: MOD SPACE
Type: Oince (Business)
Location: DAM CUUNTT, DADS COUNTY, FL ('MIUM)
(WEA File: Miamitmy)
Lighting Controls Compliance
Acronym Ashrae Description Area No. of Design Min Compli-
ID (sgft) Tasks CP CP ante
OFFICE AREAS 29 Offices (Partitions 3.5-4.5 ft below 1.640 8 20 9 PASSES
ceiling) Open plan offices 900 ft or
larger with partitions 3.
PASSES
Project: NOSM357
Title: MOD SPACE
Type: Once (Business)
Location: DADE COUNTY, DADE COUNTY, FL (23100
(WEA File: Miami.tmy)
System Report Compliance
FLOOR B System 2 Packaged Terminal Systems No. of Units
1
Component Category Capacity Design Eff Design ]PLV Comp-
Eff Criteria ]PLV Criteria fiance
Cooling System PTAC > 15000 Buvh 10.00 7.60 PASSES
(Cooling Mode)
11ceting Sydm TslednG rwnacc 1.00 1.00 PASSER
AN Handling system Air handler (Supply) - 0.80 0.80 PASSES
-Supply Constant Volume
C PASSES
Plant Compliance
Description Installed Size Design Mn Design Min Category Comp
No Eff Eff 1PLV IPL fiance
None
2119/13 Rnerprt nnpe MaC:am FLMSTI v1.22
Project: AIDSM357
Title: MOD SPACE
Type: Office (Business)
Location: DADE COUNTY, JUADE COUNTY, YL (731000)
OVEA File: Miamitm
Category
Water Heater Compliance
Description Type Category Design
Min Design Max Comp
Eff
Eff Loss Loss fiance
Water Heater 1 Storage Water Heater - <=120 [gal] & <— 1.00
0.92 PASSES
Electric 12 [kW]
r PASSES
Project: MDSM357
Title: MOD SPACE
Type: Office (Business)
Location: DADE COUNTY, DADE COUNTY, F
Piping System Compliance
Category
Pipe Dia Is Operating Ins Cond Ins Req Ins Compliance
[inches] Runout? Temp [Btu-in/hr Thick [in] Thick [in]
[F] .SF.Fj
Heating System (Steam, Steam
0.25 True 105.00 0.28 1.00 0.69 PASSES
Condensate, & Hot Water)
PASSES
2/19/13 F.nerpsGanpe FfaC:om FT.C'C'.CR v1.22
Project: MDS007357
Tine: MOD SPACE
Type: Office (Business)
Location: DAUK LUUNIY,DADE UOUNI'Y, F
Other Required Compliance
Category
Section
Requirement (write NIA in box if not applicable) Check
Infilltion
406.1
Infiltration Cntem }mvo boar mot
System
407.1
HVAC Load sizing has been performed
Ventilation
409.1
Ventilation criteria have been met
ADS
410.1
Duct sizing and Design have been performed
T & B
410.1
Testing and Balancing will be performed.
Electrical
413.1
Metering criteria have been met
Motors
414.1
Motor efficiency criteria have been met
Lighting
415.1
Lighting criteria have been met
O & M
102.1
Operation/maintenance manual will be provided to owner
KoaflUeff
404.1
K 19 for Koof beck with supply plenums beneath it
Report
101
Input Report Print -Out from EneWGauge F1aCom attached?
2/19/13 F.ner"Gatme FInCom W CONK A.22
2
ENERGY EFFICIENCY CODE FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
Florida Department of Communit!v Affoirs
EnergyGaugeFlaCom v1.22 FORM 40OB-2001
Component Performance Method for Commercial Bufldhig
Jurisdiction: DADE COUNTY, DADE COUNTY, FL (231000)
Short Desi U DSOM56
Prosect: MOD SPACE
Owner: MOD SPACE
34.32 91.72 PASSES
Other Envelope Requirements - B
Address: UNKNOWN
LIGHTING POWER
700.00 3,115.62 PASSES
UNKNOWN
PASSES
EXTERNAL LIGHTING
City: UNKNOWN
HVAC SYSTEM
PASSES
State: FLORIDA
PermitNo:
0—
Zip: 0
Storeys:
1
Type. Office (Business)
GrossArea:
1640
Class: New Finished building
Net Area:
1640
Max Tonnape:
4 (if diffexmt, write, in)
Compliance Summary
Component
Design Criteria Result
ENVELCIPE
34.32 91.72 PASSES
Other Envelope Requirements - B
PASSES
LIGHTING POWER
700.00 3,115.62 PASSES
LIGHTING CONTROLS
PASSES
EXTERNAL LIGHTING
PASSES
HVAC SYSTEM
PASSES
PLANT
PASSES
WATER HEATING SYSTEMS
PASSES
PIPING SYSTEMS
PASSES
Met all required compliance from Check List?
YestNo/NA
IMPORTANT NOTE: An input report Print --Out from Energ yGauge BaCom of
this design building must be submitted along with this Compliance Report.
2/19/13
Fnerpy acme MaCom FT CCSA A.22
1
_ t
CUM- PL1ANCL CN.'.K'1 WWATION:
I hereby certify that the plans and
Review of the plans and specifications cared by this
spArifiratinns rnvered by this mlrulsatinn are
ralmilatinn indiratA.s nnmplianre with the Finita Fnerpy
in compliance with the Florida Energy
Code. Before construction is completed, this building will be
Efficiency Code.
inspected for compliance in accordance with Section
Location: DADE COUNTY, DADE COUNTY, FL (231000)
553.908, F.S.
PREPARED B
BUILDING OFFICIAL:
DA A 4
DATE:
I hereby ce that this ' ing is in compliance
Zone Heating
with the Florida Energy Efficiency Code.
OFFICE AREAS (CONDMONED) -1.51
OWNER AGENT-
GENT•DATE:If
LZow7a,Loads: Design =34324 Criteria =81.722
DATE-
Ifrequired by Florida law, I hereby certify t7 that the system design is in
compliance with the Florida Energy Code.
REGISTRATION
No.
ARCHITECT:
®O (�(�
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM DESIGNER
LIGHTING SYSTEM DESIGNER
MECHANICAL SYSTEM DESIG
PLUA4RWG SYSTEM DFSIGNER:
(•) Signature is required where Florida Law requires design to be performed by registered design professionals.
Typed names and registration numbers may be used where all relevant information is contained on signedisealed
ans.
Project: NOS007356
Title: MOD SPACE
Type: Office (Business)
Location: DADE COUNTY, DADE COUNTY, FL (231000)
(WEA File: MWn tmy)
Envelope Compliance
Design Load Cnitelis
Zone Heating
Cooling Heating Cooling
OFFICE AREAS (CONDMONED) -1.51
32.81 -7.22 74.50
LZow7a,Loads: Design =34324 Criteria =81.722
1 PASSES
2/19/13 FnerpyGanrre FMCnm Fi.0 C,%R 0.22 2
Project: MDS007356
Title: MOD SPACE
Type: Of (Business)
LOCRUen: DADE COVINTY,DADE WUXIY, FL (L319M)
(WEA File: Miami.tmy)
Other Envelope Requirements
Item Zone Description Design Limit Meet Req.
OFFICE ARES % Skylight - Marc % Limit 0.00 6.70 Yes
OFFICE ARE OFFICE AREt Exterior Roof - Max UO Limit 0.05 0.08 Yes
Meda Other Envelope RegWrements
Project= MD.73.4Ci
Title: MOD SPACE
Type: Office (Business)
Location: DADE COUNTY, DADE COUNTY, FL (231000)
(WEA. File: Nbmi tmv)
D— ip iun
Catcguiy
AHuwance Area ur Lcugth ELPA
CLP
Type: Office (Business)
(W/(Jnk)
or No. of Units (Vi)
(R)
Lighting Power Compliance
(Sgft or ft)
ID (sq -ft) (ft) Spaces
Ext. Light. l
Exit (with or withom Canopy)
25.00
3.0 75
60
Ext Light 2
Exit (with or without Canopy)
25.00
3.0 75
60
Ext Light 3
Exit (with or without Canopy)
25.00
3.0 75
60
IDesign: 180 M IPASSES
AIlowance: 225 M
Project: MMM356
Title: MOD SPACE
Type: Office (Business)
Location: DADE COUNTY, DADE COUNTY, FL (231000)
(WEA File: M inni.4py)
Lighting Power Compliance
Space Ashrae Description Area Height No. of AF Design Effective Allowance
ID (sq -ft) (ft) Spaces
(W) (W) (W)
OFFICE 29 Offices (Partitions 3.5-4.5 ft LW 8.0 1 1.00
1000 700 3.116
A nT. AV below ceilings Open plan
offices 900 ft or larger with
partitions 3.
Design 1000 (VV)
PASSES
Effective: 700 (W)
Allowance: 3115.62 (V)
2/19/13 Fnerm Gane FlaC am FT.CC %R A.22 3
Project MDW356
Title: MOD SPACE
Type: Olflce (Business)
Location: LADE COU1VTY, VADJK; CUWN'1'Y, YL (MIUM)
(WEA File: MiamitmY)
Lighting Controls Compliance
Acronym Ashrae Description Area No. of Design Min Complt-
ID (sq.ft) Tasks CP CP ante
OFFICE AREAS 29 Offices (Partitions 3.54.5 ft below 1.640 8 20 9 PASSES
ceiling) Open plan offices 900 ft or
larger with partitions 3.
PASSES ` I
Project: MDS007356
Title: MOD SPACE
Type: 0mcc ('Business)
Location: DADE COUNTY, DADE COUNTY, FL (23 1000)
(WEA File: Miamttmy)
System Report Compliance
FLOOR B System 2 Packaged Terminal Systems No. of Units
1
Component Category Capacity Design Eff Design IPLV Comp-
Eff Criteria 1PLV Criteria fiance
Cooling System PTAC > 15000 Btu/h 10.00 7.60 PASSES
(Cooling Mode)
II -fang Syatom zsrcGhic Fumam 1.00 1.00 PASSES
Air Handling System Air Handler (Supply) - 0.80 0.80 PASSES
-Supply Constant Volume
PASSES
Plant Compliance
Description Installed Size Design Min Design Min Category Comp
No Eff Eff 1PLV IPL fiance
(`Tone
2/19!13 F.nevvyGnnpe MzCam FT C ". R v1.22
Project: MDS007356
Title: MOD SPACE
Type: Office (Business)
Location: DADE COUNTY, DALE COUNTY, r'L (2jiu m)
(VEA File: Miamitmy)
System Compliance
Water Heater Compliance
Operating his Cond Ins Rey Ins Compliance
Description Type Category Design
Eff
Min Design Max Comp
Efi Loss Lags fiance
Water Heater 1 Storage Water Heater - <=120 [gal] & <= 1.00
0.92 PASSES
Electric 12 [kW]
Condensate, & Hot Water)
PASSES
Project: MDSM356
Tide: MOI] SPACE
Type: Office (Business)
Location: DADE COUNTY, DADE COUNTY, F
Piping
System Compliance
Category Pipe Dia Is
Operating his Cond Ins Rey Ins Compliance
[inches] Runout? Temp [Btu-h><hr Thick [in] Thick [in]
[F] .SF.Fj
Heating System (Steam, Steffi 0.25 True
105.00 0.28 1.00 0.69 PASSES
Condensate, & Hot Water)
PASSES --�
2/19/13 Fnerm Ctanpe FlaCom FI.CCCR vi.22 5
Project: NDS007356
Title: MOD SPACE
Type: Office (Business)
Location: DADS LUUNTY, DADE LUUATY, F
Other Required Compliance
Category
Section
Requirement (write N/A in box if not applicable) Check
Infiiltn9ion
406.1
Infiltution Critoria havo boon mat
System
407.1
HVAC Load sizing has been performed
Ventilation
409.1
Ventilation criteria have been met
ADS
410.1
Duct sizing and Design have been performed
T & B
410.1
Testing and Balancing will be performed
Electrical
413.1
Metering criteria have been met
Motors
414.1
Motor efficiency criteria have been met
Lighting
415.1
Lighting criteria have been met
O & M
102.1
Operation/maintenance manual will be provided to owner
KooflUeii
404.1
R-19 for Roof Deck with supply plenums beneath it
Report
101
Input Report Print Out from EnergyGauge F1aCom attached?
2/19!13 FnerP-vG9npe FlsCom FT C'C'CR 0.22 6
y 1
Regulatory and Economic Resources
' Environmental Plan Review
MIAMI.11805 S.W. 26 Street (Coral way) Room 124
MiaMI, Florida 33175-2474
T786-315-2800 F:78&315-2919
June 17,2013
rniamtdade.gov/development
Jeffery J. Yao
Barry University
11300 NE 2 AVE - -
Miami Shores, FL 33161
RE: Application for Minor Departmental Review
Plans Process #M2013008122
Temporary Office Trailer
11300 NE 2 AVE
Miami Shores, FL 33161
Legal
Description: 36 52 4140 AC SEI/4 OF NEI/4 LESS E35FT & LESS W40FT LOT SIZE
1740400 SQUARE FEET
f OLIO(s): 11-2136-000-0060
Minor, Departmental Approval No.: 2013-131
The Miami -Dade County Department of Regulatory & Economic Resources (RER)
Environmental Plan Review section has reviewed the temporary office/sales/storage trailer
submitted : under M2013008122 for the above -referenced property. Based on the information
submitted your proposed temporary trailer complies with the Environmental Quality Control
Board variance approved February 12, 2009. Said variance allows for the approval of temporary
trailers to be served by holding tanks as a means of temporary storage of domestic sewage
even if and when public sanitary sewer lines are abutting the property.
Therefore. the use of a temporary holding tank can be approved subject to the following
conditions::
1. The EQCB variance only applies to the following types of temporary trailers used
in conjunction with construction activities:
a. Office trailers
b. Sales trailers
c. Storage trailers
2. The only liquid waste which may be handled, stored, or generated on the
temporary construction trailer shall be domestic sewage which shall be stored in
the holding tank(s).
3. The temporary holding tank(s) shall not cause a nuisance or sanitary nuisance as
defined in Chapter 24, or any other violation of any local, state or federal
environmental law, rule or regulation.
4. The temporary holding tank(s) shall be operated with an appropriate valid
operating permit to be issued by the agency with such jurisdiction.
If you require additional information or have any questions about the information provided,
please contact Cristian Guerrero, P.E. at (786) 315-2805.
Sincerely,
Cristian Guerrero, P.E.
Chief, Environmental Plan Review
Department of Regulatory & Economic Resources
a
lJoense T7gy tf R
May 06, 2013
George Britton
McdSpete-Miaml
5000 N.W. 72nd Avenue
Miaml, FL 33166
RE: Manufacturer Certification, W MFT -6709; Expiration Data: May 31, 2016
it is my pleasure to Inform you filet Miami, located at 5000 N.W. 72nd Avenue, Miami,
FL 33166, has been approved under the Manufactured Buildings Program, as provided for under
Chapter 553, Part I, Florida Statutes, to markdacture Manufactured Buildings for Installation in
Florida.
Construction or modification on a manufactured building cannot begin until the Third Party Agcy
has approved On plans in accords= with tate current Florida Building Code. Your Third Party
Agency Is a contractor for the Deparbnent and has statutory authority and responsibilities that
must be met to maintain approved state. You may expect and demand quality plans review and
Inspections.
Each Cain change will make yow pions obsolete until flay have been MWead, approved alai
awficapea arils imp till pY rrpaa elr rain ry!q- mr . +. A
for plans review. Please ensure that your plans are M compliance and aro property posted on our
website. An sale -related Installation Issues are subject to the local authority having Jurisdiction.
The Department's contractor will make unannounced monitmring vests at least once each year. You
must grant complete access to your manufacturing facility and records to remain In compliance with
the rubs and regulations of tills program.
Your certification Is approved for tures years from this date. You will receive a renewal notice by
Email generated by the Baa for online renewal. V you have questions
you may contact me or Leola Baldwin at 850.921-0956 or our FAX at 850.414-0436.
Please visit our website at to see valuable Worrnation on the Florida
Manufactured Buildings Program. A copy of this letter must accompany applications Por local
building permits.
Robert Lorenao
Manufactured Buildings Program
cc: Quality Approvals and inspections LLC
28456 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD ♦ TALLAHASSEE. FL 32399-218e
860.486-8488 (p) ♦ 00-621-0781 (f) a We b s i t e: wwdaLsIsbLfLys
;CONNUMMPLAMM8 IW4N4WW M#
NOVICE OF COMMENCEMENT
A RECORDER COPY MUST
,B.EPWTEO ON THE JOB SITE AT TME OF FIRST INSPECTION
PERMIT N0. i _ / ! NO.� 1
STATE OF FLORI P
COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE:
THE UNDERSIGNED hereby gives notice that Improvements will be made to certain real
property, and In accordance with Chapter 713, Florida Statutes, the following Information
Is provided In this Notice of Commencement.
CIFN 2013RO630 10
OR irk. 28766 I''s 31741 t 1ps )
RECORDED 08/09/2013 15>48:27
HARVEY RUVINY CLERK OF COURT
MIAMI—DADE COUNTYB FLORIDA
LAST F"AGE
1. Legal -description of property and streetladdress: Facilities Modular Trailer, 11300 NE 2nd Ave
-a-mi Shores, F1 3-3181
2. Description of improvement:offia
3.Owner(s) name and address: Barry t Iniyersity 11300 NF L 33161
Interest iii property:
Name and address of fee simple titleholder:
4. Contractor's name and .address:
5. Surety: (Payment bond required by owner from contractor, if any)
Name and address• a/ TO
Amount of bond $
6. Lender's name and address:
7. Persons within the state of Florida designated by OvAe&`'u n r c urbents rn -110
D.0
provided by Section 713.13(1)(a)7., Florida Statutes, —
_ --�
Name and address: __.__.__..__ _
8. in addition to himself, Owners designates the following .person(s) to receive a copy of the Lienor's Notice as provided
in Section 713.13(1)(b), Florida Statute$.
Name and
9. Expiration date of this Notice of Commencement: (the expiration date is 1 year from the date of recording unless a
different date ' )
Signature o Owner
Print Owner's Name �C° A=r'7r�'°al'
Sworn to and subscribed before me this - day, of Q 20 l3
Notary Publi
Print Notary's Name /
My commission expires: • i2 • Q''r
EXPSM Novi M X14
129.01-92 PAGE 8/02 � Cly eo Pl.NdM A CO,
9
Prepared by
Address:
PERMIT # C q2YL
CONTRACTOR:
SUBMITTAL DATE: 02 1 -
Zr)�.?
ADDRESS. \
NAME:
RESUBMITAL DATES:
PROJECT TYPE:
ZONING_ - = -- - _-
FIRE
• STRUCTURAL
IMPACT FEES
ELECTRICAL
HRSIDERM
NOC
MECHANICAL
q �
BLDG
1:21171 E s, .
� N
UOP . Y UNIVERSAL
ENGINEERING SCIENCES C�f �32-9
GEOTECHNICAL LETTER REPORT
PROPOSED MODULARS
BARRY UNIVERSITY
11300 NE 2ND AVENUE
MIAMI SHORES, FLORIDA
UES PROJECT NO. 2130.1300006
UES REPORT NO. G00006
Prepared For:
Mr. Jeffrey J. Yao
Construction Manager
Barry University
11300 NE 2nd Avenue
Miami Shores, FL 33161
Prepared By:
Universal Engineering Sciences
451 N.E. 189th Street
Miami, Florida 33179
(305) 249-8434
Consultants in: Geotechnical Engineering - Environmental Engineering • Construction Materials Testing - Threshold Inspection • Private Provider Inspection
Offices in: Atlanta • Daytona Beach • Fort Myers •Fort Pierce • Gainesville • Jacksonville • Kissimmee • Leesburg • Miami • Ocala • Orlando
Palm Coast • Panama City • Pensacola • Rockledge • Sarasota • Tampa • West Palm Beach
UNIVERSAL
tuENGINEERING SCIENCES
Consultants In: Geotechnical Engineering • Environmental Sciences
Geophysical Services ■ Construction Materials Testing • Threshold Inspection
Building Inspection ■ Plan Review • Building Code Administration
April 24, 2013
Mr. Jeffrey J. Yao
Construction Manager
Barry University
11300 NE 2nd Avenue
Miami Shores, FL 33161
Reference: Geotechnical Letter Report
Proposed Modulars at Barry University
11300 NE 2nd Avenue
Miami Shores, Florida
UES Proiect No. 2130.1300006 (Report No. G00006)
Dear Mr. Yao:
LOCATIONS:
■ Atlanta
■ Daytona Beach
• Fort Myers
■ Fort Pierce
■ Gainesville
■ Jacksonville
■ Kissimmee
■ Leesburg
■ Miami
■ Ocala
■ Orlando (Headquarters)
• Palm Coast
• Panama City
■ Pensacola
■ Rockledge
■ Sarasota
■ Tampa
■ West Palm Beach
Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES) has completed a geotechnical engineering letter
report for the above -referenced project in Miami Shores, Florida. The scope of this exploration
was conducted in general accordance with UES Opportunity No. 2130.0313.00006 dated March
21, 2013. You provided authorization for our services by means of Purchase Order No. P0146501
dated April 18, 2013. This exploration was performed in accordance with generally accepted soil
and foundation engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
The following letter report presents the results of the field exploration, and our interpretation of
those results with respect to the proposed improvements. Evaluations and recommendations
have been included for the proposed modulars.
INTRODUCTION
Based on plans you provided to us, we understand that two (2) modular units are to be placed on
the main campus of Bary University in Miami Shores, Florida. Sheet 1 attached to this letter
presents a Site Vicinity Map. The modular units will have dimensions of 28 feet by 70 feet or 28
feet by 76 feet. The proposed modulars will be supported by concrete masonry unit (CMU) block
piers resting on concrete pads with widths ranging from 16 to 32 inches. We understand that the
foundations will be embedded at least 12 inches below grade. At this time, Universal Engineering
Sciences, Inc. (UES) has been retained to perform a geotechnical study to explore the
subsurface conditions in order to confirm the allowable bearing capacity of 2,000 pounds per
square foot (psf) used for foundation design for the proposed modulars.
451 N.E. 189th Street • Miami, Florida 33179 • (305) 249-8434 . Fax (305) 249-8479
www.UniversalEngineerina.com
i
e
Geotechnical Letter Report
i
Proposed Modulars at Barry University
11300 NE 2"d Avenue; Miami Shores, FL
UES Proiect No.: 2130.1300006 (Report No.: G00006)
e
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The purpose of this geotechnical exploration was to explore and evaluate the subsurface
i conditions at the site by performing Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings with special
attention to potential geotechnical considerations that may affect future development at the
. site.
This letter report presents an evaluation of site conditions on the basis of traditional
geotechnical procedures for site characterization. The recovered samples were not examined,
either visually or analytically, for chemical composition or environmental hazards. UES would
be pleased to perform these services, if you desire.
•
FIELD EXPLORATION
e
The subsurface conditions at the site were explored with a total of three (3) Standard
Penetration Test (SPT) borings (13-1 through B-3). The approximate locations of the borings
are presented in Sheet 2 attached to this letter report.
The test locations were marked in the field utilizing standard taping procedures, existing land
i marks, and the locations of the proposed modulars you provided to us in the field on April 18,
2013. Consider the indicated locations and depths to be approximate.
The SPT borings were advanced to depths of 15 feet below existing grade using the rotary
wash method; samples were collected while performing the SPT at regular intervals. We
i completed the SPT borings in general accordance with ASTM D-1586 guidelines, with
continuous sampling from 1 to 10 feet, and additional samples at intervals of 5 feet. The SPT
test consists of driving a standard split -barrel sampler (split -spoon) into the subsurface using a
140 -pound hammer free -falling 30 inches. The number of hammer blows required to drive the
sampler 12 inches, after first seating it 6 inches, is designated the penetration resistance, or
SPT -N value. This value is used as an index to soil strength and consistency. All borings were
e performed with the use of an automatic hammer. The results of the test borings are attached to
. this letter.
i Samples collected during the SPT were placed in clean sample containers and transported to
i our laboratory where they were visually classified by a Geotechnical Engineer in accordance
with ASTM D-2488. These soil samples will be held in our laboratory for your inspection for
90 days, after which time they will be discarded unless we are otherwise notified.
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e 3of7
e
0
• Geotechnical Letter Report
Proposed Modulars at Barry University
11300 NE 2nd Avenue; Miami Shores, FL
. UES Project No.: 2130.1300006 (Report No.: G00006)
•
. LABORATORY TESTING
• The soil samples recovered from the soil test borings were returned to the laboratory where a
• Geotechnical Engineer visually classified them and reviewed the field descriptions. The
• soil/rock samples were classified without the use of laboratory classification testing.
•
FOUNDATION EVALUATIONS
• GENERAL
•
• The following recommendations are made based upon the boring information presented as
attachments to this letter, our stated understanding of the proposed construction, and our
• experience with similar projects and subsurface conditions. In this section of the report,
• evaluations and recommendations are presented for groundwater considerations, structure
• foundations, and construction related services.
•
• GROUNDWATER CONSIDERATIONS
• The groundwater table will fluctuate seasonally depending upon local rainfall. The rainy
season in South Florida is normally between May and October. The groundwater table was
encountered at depths ranging from 10.4 to 11.1 feet below existing grades. It should be noted
• that the groundwater levels were measured during the dry season. It is not anticipated that the
groundwater table will be encountered during excavation for the proposed foundations. If
groundwater is encountered for any reason, we recommend that positive drainage be
established and maintained on the site during construction. UES further recommends that
• permanent measures be implemented to maintain positive drainage throughout the life of the
• project.
4 of 7
Geotechnical Letter Report
Proposed Modulars at Barry University
11300 NE 2nd Avenue; Miami Shores, FL
UES Project No.: 2130.1300006 (Report No.: G00006)
• FOUNDATIONS DESIGN
Shallow Foundations
. After successful completion of the recommendations included in the Site Preparation section of
this report, including complete removal of all roots, trees and vegetation, and replacement with
clean, compacted granular fill, the proposed structures can be supported on shallow
foundations after the site has been prepared as outlined in our site preparation
• recommendations found in the next section of this report. Upon successful completion of the
recommended site preparation procedures, the subsurface materials can safely provide an
allowable bearing capacity of 2,000 psf.
Post -construction settlements of the structures will be influenced by several interrelated
factors, including: (1) strength and compressibility characteristics of the subsurface; (2) footing
size, bearing level, applied loads, and resulting bearing pressures beneath the foundations;
• and (3) site preparation and earthwork construction techniques used by the contractor. Our
settlement estimates for the structures are based on the use of site preparation/earthwork
construction techniques as recommended above and in the "Site Preparation" section of this
report. Any deviation from these recommendations could result in an increase in the estimated
post -construction settlements of the structure.
Assuming all soils are properly prepared and using the recommended maximum bearing
pressure and the field data (which were correlated to geotechnical strength and compressibility
characteristics of the subsurface soils), we estimate that total post construction settlements of
the structure will be 1 inch or less.
Differential settlements result from differences in applied bearing pressures and variations in
the compressibility characteristics of the subsurface soils. If the recommended site preparation
and earthwork construction techniques outlined above and in the "Site Preparation" section are
• followed, differential settlements of inch or less should be anticipated.
5of7
Geotechnical Letter Report
Proposed Modulars at Barry University
• 11300 NE 2nd Avenue; Miami Shores, FL
UES Project No.: 2130.1300006 (Report No.: G000061
•
SITE PREPARATION
i We recommend normal, good practice site preparation procedures for the structure areas.
• These procedures include: stripping the site of vegetation, topsoil, grass, deleterious material,
• removal of all roots within the subsurface materials, proof -rolling, and proof -compacting the
subgrade, and filling to grade with engineered fill. A general outline of the anticipated
• earthwork is as follows:
• 1. Any existing underground utility lines within the construction areas should be relocated.
2. The proposed construction limits should be stripped of the existing grass and topsoil,
i and any roots or other deleterious materials within and 5 feet beyond the perimeter of
the proposed structure area.
•
3. Place fill material, as required. The fill should consist of "clean," fine sand with less
• than 5 percent passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve and an organic content less than 5
percent. Additionally, any fill materials should not have roots or debris. You may use fill
materials with 5 to 10 percent passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve, but strict moisture control
. may be required. Place fill in uniform 10 to 12 -inch loose lifts and compact each lift to a
minimum density of 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density.
•
4. Test all footing cuts for compaction to a depth of 1 foot. If organic soils or other
• deleterious materials are encountered during the footing excavation, excavate and
replace them with fill material. All in-place density tests shall meet a minimum of 95% of
the modified Proctor maximum dry density.
• Using vibratory compaction equipment at this site may disturb the nearby structures. UES
recommends that all nearby structures be monitored before and during proof -compaction. If
disturbance is noted, halt vibratory compaction and inform UES immediately. We will review
the compaction procedures and evaluate if the compactive effort results in a satisfactory
subgrade, complying with our original design assumptions.
•
• Construction Related Services
•
Since UES has been closely associated with the geotechnical component of the project, we
recommend that we be retained to perform the materials testing component during
construction. The geotechnical engineering design does not end with the advertisement of the
construction documents. The design is an on-going process throughout construction.
• Because of our familiarity with the site conditions and the intent of the engineering design, we
are most qualified to address problems that might arise during construction in a timely and
cost-effective manner.
•
i
•
• 6 of 7
i
0
Geotechnical Letter Report
Proposed Modulars at Barry University
11300 NE 2"d Avenue; Miami Shores, FL
UES Project No.: 2130.1300006 (Report No.: G00006)
LIMITATIONS
Our field exploration did not find unsuitable or unexpected materials within the depth explored
at the time of occurrence. The test borings completed for this report are not considered
sufficient for reliably detecting the presence of isolated, anomalous surface or subsurface
conditions, or reliably estimating unsuitable or suitable material quantities. Accordingly, UES
does not recommend relying on our boring information to negate the presence of anomalous
materials or for estimation of material quantities. Therefore, UES will not be responsible for
any extrapolation or use of our data by others beyond the purpose(s) for which it is applicable
or intended.
During the early stages of this construction project, geotechnical issues not addressed in this
report may arise. Because of the natural limitations inherent in working with the subsurface, it
is not possible for a geotechnical engineer to predict and address all possible problems. An
(ASFE) publication titled 'Important Information About Your Geotechnical Engineering Report"
is attached to this letter report, and will help explain the nature of geotechnical issues.
Further, we present documents attached to this letter report: Constraints and Restrictions, to
bring to your attention the potential concerns and the basic limitations of a typical geotechnical
report.
We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project and look forward to a continued
association. If you have any questions, or when preliminary or final project design plans are
available for our recommended review, please contact the undersQVW-„!8qq,_
Respectfully submitted,
UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC.
Certificate Authorization No. 549
Peter G. Read, P.E.
Regional Manager
FL Professional Engineer No. 35604
ATTACHMENTS
Sheet 1: Site Vicinity Map
Sheet 2: Boring Location Plan
Test Boring Records
Key to Boring Logs
Important Information About Your Geotechnical Report
Constraints and Restrictions
General Conditions
Dist: Client (3); File (1)
7 of 7
242
U
•.....•0000•!••00••0•000•r0•000000•••0•••0o
BORING LOCATION PLAN
LEGEND
0 APPROXIMATE TEST BORING LOCATION
ED
PROJECT:
CLIENT:
LOCATION:
REMARKS:
UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES PROJECT NO.: 2130.1300006
BORING LOG REPORT NO.: G00006
PAGE: 1
Proposed Modulars at Barry University
11300 NE 2nd Avenue
Miami Shores, Florida
Barry University
Refer to Boring Location Plan
CME -75 (Automatic Hammer)
BORING DESIGNATION: B-1 SHEET: I Of I
SECTION: TOWNSHIP. RANGE:
G.S. ELEVATION (ft): N/A DATE STARTED: 4/23/13
WATER TABLE (ft): 10.4 DATE FINISHED: 4/23113
DATE OF READING: 4/23t2013 DRILLED BY: JA / P.G.
EST. W.S.W.T. (ft): TYPE OF SAMPLING: SPT
DEPTH
(FT.)
S
A
M
P
L
E
BLOWS
PER 6-
INCREMENT
N
LOWS/
(BFT.)
W.T.
S
Y
M
B
0
L
DESCRIPTION
-200
MC
N
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
K
DAY)
ORG.
CONT.
N
LL
PI
Dark Brown Organic Silty Fine SAND with Grass
(TOPSOIL; OL)
Brown Fine to Medium SAND with Trace
of Limerock Fragments (FILL; SP)
r
4_' )_4
9
x5-6-6
12
Brown Fine to Medium SAND (FILL; SP)
5 —
x
...............
...... ....................•
..............................................................................
....................
........
.......................
4-3-3
6
X2-1-1
2
-X
Light Brown to Brown Fine to Medium SAND
2-34
7
(SP)
10 —
3.3r2 ....
.... 5 ....
.......
......................................................................
...........
...........
.......
. ...
............
...........
15 -X
1,2-3 ....
.... 5 ....
.....
............
.............................
............
...........
SPT Boring Terminated at Depth of 15 Feet.
Borehole Backfilled.
91
PROJECT:
CLIENT:
LOCATION:
REMARKS:
UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES PROJECT NO.: 2130.1300005
BORING LOG REPORT NO.: GOWN
PAGE: 2
Proposed Modulars at Barry University
11300 NE 2nd Avenue
Miami Shores, Florida
Barry University
Refer to Boring Location Plan
CME -75 (Automatic Hammer)
BORING DESIGNATION: B-2 SHEET: 1 Of 1
SECTION: TOWNSHIP RANGE:
G.S. ELEVATION (ft): N/A DATE STARTED: 4/23/13
WATER TABLE (ft): 11.1 DATE FINISHED: 4/23113
DATE OF READING: 4/2312013 DRILLED BY: J.A. / P.G.
EST. W.S.W.T. (ft): TYPE OF SAMPLING: SPT
DEPTH
(FT.)
S
A
M
P
L
E
BLOWS
PER 6'
INCREMENT
N
(B POT)
FT.)
W.T.
b
Y
M
B
0
L
DESCRIPTION
-200
(0/4)
MC
NLL
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
K
(FTJ
DAY)
ORG.
CONT.
N
PI
Dark Brown Organic Silty Fine SAND with Grass
\(TOPSOIL; OL)
Brown Fine to Medium SAND (FILL; SP)
5-&5
11
Brown Fine to Medium SAND with Little
x
Limerock Fragments (FILL; SP)
44-5
9
5 —
x
...............
..........
.......
.........................................................
...............................
............
.......
........
............
...........
6-4-5
9
X4-3-3
6
Light Brown to Brown Fine to Medium SAND
x
(SP)
3-2-3
6
10 —
3-2r3 ....
.... 5 ....
.......
................................................................
..........
...........
............
.......
.......
............
...........
V
15 -X
.... 2-172 ...
.... 3 ....
.....
............
....................
........
............
......
SPT Boring Terminated at Depth of 15 Feet.
Borehole Backfilled.
ED
PROJECT:
CLIENT:
LOCATION:
REMARKS.
UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES PROJECT NO.: 2130.1=06
BORING LOG REPORT NO.: GOO=
PAGE: 3
Proposed Modulars at Barry University
11300 NE 2nd Avenue
Miami Shores, Florida
Barry University
Refer to Boring Location Plan
GME -75 (Automatic Hammer)
BORING DESIGNATION: B-3 SHEET: I Of I
SECTION: TOWNSHIP' RANGE:
G.S. ELEVATION (ft): WA
DATE STARTED:
4/23/13
WATER TABLE (ft): 11
DATE FINISHED:
4/23/13
DATE OF READING: 4/23/2013
DRILLED BY:
JA I P.G.
EST. W.S.W.T. (ft):
TYPE OF SAMPLING:
SPT
DEPTH
(FT.)
b
A
MM
p
L
E
BLOWS
'
INCREMENT PER S
N
(BLOWS/
Fr.)
W.T.
S
Y
B0
L
DESCRIPTION
-200
N
NIC
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
K
DAY)
ORG.
CONT.
N
LL
Pi
Dark Brown Organic Silty Fine SAND with Grass
A(TOPSOIL; OL)
Brown Fine to Medium SAND (FILL; SP)
X
6-8-7
15
Brown Fine to Medium SAND With Little
x
Limerock Fragments (FILL; SP)
6-7-6
13
5 —
x
.
............................................. ................................
....................
........
............
...........
4-5-5
10
X
4-"
12
Light Brown to Brown Fine to Medium SAND
x
(SP)
4-4-3
7
10 —
.... 2-27.2 ....
.... 4 ....
.......
... ........................................
..........................
...........
............
.......
........
............
...........
15 -X
....22-2.........4...........
............
..... .......................
............
...........
SPT Boring Terminated at Depth of 15 Feet.
Borehole Backfilled.
W
W
U)
0
o .
N
O
Z
z
ca
U)
IL
e
0
5
12
so
70
85
100
KEY TO BORING LOGS
SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART*
Sand or Gravel [SP,SW,GP,GW]
Sand or Gravel with Slit
or Clay [SP-SM,SP-SC]
ora CIEyeySCGM,GC]
or Gravel SM
............... .y.. ......... . .. .. ... .
[ML,ICi MII_CLv,MH Siltay
Silt or Clay with Sand or Gravel
[ML,CL-ML,C L,MH,CH,OL,OH]
Silt or C[ayy
[ML,CL-ML,C L,MH,CH,OL,OH]
UNIVERSAL
ENGINEERING
SCIENCES, INC.
■■■■' mm,.■
I .■m, . o.■■
.1000=0200 ■0
GROUP NAME AND SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM.
-LOCALLY MAY BE KNOWN AS MUCK.
NOTE: DUAL SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
COARSE GRAINED SOILS
FINE GRAINED SOILS
SANDS [SNI]
WELL-GRADEDOsll
WELL -GRADED
GRAVELS IGWI
INORGANIC SILTS
Z LI'HTPLASTICIT Y
ML
MEDIUM TO HIGH
POORLY -GRADED
SANDS [SP]
• i•'
. ,
POORLY -GRADED
GRAVELS [GP]
INORGANIC SILTY CLAY
L PLIASTIC11TY
m
EmPOORLY
-GRADED
SANDS WITH SILT
ISP -SMI
POORLY -GRADED
GRAVELS WITH SILT
IGP-GM]
INORGANIC CLAYS
LOW TO MEDIUM
Im PLASTICITY ICL]
EmPOORLY
-GRADED
SANDS WITH CLAY
ISP -SCI
' •
•
POORLY GRADED
GRAVELS WITH CLAY
[GP -GC]
INORGANIC SILTS HIGH
PLASTICITY [MH]
-
SILTY SANDS
ISMI
• •
NOT
SILTY GRAVELS
IGM]
INORGANIC CLAYS HIGH
® PLASTICITY [CHI
CLAYEY SANDS
ISCI
®[GC]
CLAYEY GRAVELS
SILTY CLAYEY SANDS
ISC-SM)
RELATIVE DENSITY
(SAND AND GRAVEL)
• IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 2487
-UNIFIED SOIL
VERY LOOSE - 0 to 4 Stowsift.
LOOSE - 5 to 10 Blowant.
MEDIUM DENSE - 11 to 30 Slowsfh.
DENSE - 31 to 50 Slowstft.
VERY DENSE - more than 50 Slowsllt.
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM.
-LOCALLY MAY BE KNOWN AS MUCK.
NOTE: DUAL SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
ORGANIC SILTSCLAYS
LOW PLASTICITY [OL]•'
ORGANIC SILTSICLAYS
MEDIUM TO HIGH
PLASTICITY (OH]••
IC SOILS
®PEAT,SNf
WITH HIGHIGH ORGANIC GANIC
CONTENTS IPTp•
CONSISTENCY
(SILT AND CLAY)
VERY SOFT - 0 to 2 Blowsitt.
SOFT - 3 to 4 Blowsift.
FIRM - 5 to 8 BIowsift.
STIFF - 8 to tS Slowsfh.
VERY STIFF -17 to 30 Stowslft.
HARD - more than 30 Blowsflt.
SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART
NOTE: DUAL SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS
SYMBOLS
TYPICAL
MAJOR DIVISIONS
GRAPH
LETTER
DESCRIPTIONS
0
WELL -GRADED GRAVELS, GRAVEL -
CLEAN
o O�o 4
GW
SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO
GRAVEL
GRAVELS
O C) a0 d
FINES
AND
+
GRAVELLY
(LITTLE OR NO FINES)•
a� • S�
GP
POORLY -GRADED GRAVELS,
GRAVEL SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE
SOILS
• ►%•
S ++�
. .
-
OR NO FINES
GRAVELS WITH
GM
SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND -
COARSE
GRAINED
MORE THAN 50%
FINES
SILT MIXTURES
SOILS
OF COARSE
FRACTION
RETAINED ON NO.
APPRECIABLE AMOUNT
GC
CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL- SAND -
4 SIEVE
OF FINES)
CLAY MIXTURES
S. W
WELL -GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY
CLEAN SANDS
SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES
SAND
MORE THAN 50%
OF MATERIAL IS
AND
(LITTLE OR NO FINES)
LARGER THAN NO.
SANDY
SP
POORLY -GRADED SANDS,
GRAVELLY SAND, LITTLE OR NO
20Q SIEVE SIZE
SOILS
FINES
MORE THAN 50%
SANDS WITH
SM
SILTY SANDS, SAND- SILT
OF COARSE
FINES
MIXTURES
FRACTION
PASSING ON NO.4
SIEVE
(APPRECIABLE AMOUNT
SC
CLAYEY SANDS, SAND - CLAY
OF FINES)
a7
MIXTURES
INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE
ML
SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR
CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY
SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY
INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO
SILTS
LIQUID
CL
MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY
FINE
LIMIT
AND
CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY
GRAINED
LESS THAN 50
CLAYS
CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS
SOILS
— --
O L
ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC
—_
SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY
INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR
MH
DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR
MORE THAN 50%
SILTY SOILS
OF MATERIAL IS
SMALLER THAN
NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE
SILTS
LIQUIDLIMIT
CH
INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH
AND GREEATERATER THAN 50
PLASTICITY
CLAYS
OH
ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO
HIGH PLASTICITY. ORGANIC SILTS
/I
/i//nklcl
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
LV
PT
PEAT. HUMUS. SWAMP SOILS WITH
HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS
NOTE: DUAL SYMBOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERLINE SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS
C_`.Geolechnicel Engineeping Report
�
Geotechnical Services Are Performed for
Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects
Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of
their clients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a civil engi-
rar may not fulfill ft needs of a construction contractor or even another
civil engineer. Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each
geotechnical engineering report is unique, prepared solelyfor the client. No
one except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report without
first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one
— not every you ---should apply ft report for any purpose or project
except the one originally contemplated.
Read the M Report
Serious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical
engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely on an executive summary.
Do not read selected elements only.
A Geotech*al 80eering Re rt Is Based on
A Unhlae Set of Prefect-Specinc Factors
Geotachnic al engineers consider a number of unique, project -specific fac-
tors when establishing the scope of a study. Typical factors include: the
client's goals, objectives, and risk management pmferent es; the general
nature of the structure involved, Its sire, and configuration; the location of
the structure on the site; arid other planned or existing site improvements,
such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the
geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates oth-
erwise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was:
• not prepared for you,
• not prepared for your project,
• not prepared for the specific site explored, or
• completed before important project changes were made.
Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical
engineering retort include those that affect:
• the function of the proposed structure, as when it's changed from a
parking garage to an office building, or from a light industrial plant
to a refrigerated warehouse,
elevation, configuration, location, orierbtion, or weight of the
proposed stnicture,
composition of the design team, or
project ownership.
As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project
changes—even minor ones—and request an assessment of their impact.
Geotechnical engirreers cannot acceptrespmnsibifilyor- fiabif&for problems
that ocaur bewim got repods do not consfderdevelopments of which
they ware not informed.
Sulsarface Conditions Can Change
A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at
the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a geot Mnical engineer-
ing reportwhose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of
time; by man-made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site;
or by natural- events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctua-
tions. Always ccntacCthe geotechnical engineer before applying the report
to determine if it is stili reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or
analysis could prevent major problems.
Wlost Gootechnical Faits Are Professional
Ophiolite
Site exploration identifies subsurfane conditions only at.those points who
subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engi-
neers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional
judgment to render an opinion about subsuriacesonddions throughout -tie=
site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ—sometimes significantly—
from-those indicated in your reporl. Retaining the geotechnical engineer
who developed your report to provide construction observation is the
most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated
conditions.
A Report's Recomme>Inlations Are AYiij"Final
Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included in your
report. Those recommendations are not timet, because geotechnical engi-
neers develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical
engineers can finalize their recommendations only by observing actual
subsurface conditions revealed during construction. Me geotechnical
engineer who developed yourrepod Cannot assume responsibiltly or
liabflityfor-Uiereporl's recommendations tf that engineer does not perform
construction obseri�tton..
A Geotecltfiticai Engineeflsing Report Is Subject to
Misinterpretation,
Other design team members' misinterpretation of geotechnical engineering
reports has resulted in costly problems. Lower that risk by ironing your geo-
technical engineer confer with apprcpriale members of the design team after
submitting the report. Also main your geotechnical engineer to review perti-
nent'Vementsaf the design liar's plans and specifiations.- Contractors an
also nlisinterpret'a g6decmical engineering report. Reduce that risk by
having your geotechnical engineer participate in prebid and preconstruction
coriferenees, and by providing construction observation.
ft Not Redraw the Engineer's Lop
Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon
their interpretation of field fogs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or
omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering report should
neverbe redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings.
Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, butrecognize
that separating logs from the report can elevate risk
GN
G COVIrOtters a Complete Report and
Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they an make
contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what
they provide for bid proration. To help prevent costly problems, give con-
tractors the complete geotechnical engineering report, but prelace it with a
clearly written letter of transmilhal. In that letter, advise contractors that the
report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the
report`s accuracy is. limited; encourage them to confer with.the geotechnical
engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee may be required) and/or to
conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information they
need or prefer. A prebid conference can also be valuable. Be swe contrac-
tors have suf(rdent tim to perform additional'study. Only then might you
be in a position to give conUdors the best information available to you,
white requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsfbiCdies
str;mming from unanticipated conditions.
Read 8011111111111111011111". Provisions Closely
Some dients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that
Technical engineering is far fess exact than other engineering disci-
plines. This fack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that
have led to disappointments, claims, and disputes. To help reduce the risk
of such outcomes, geotechnical engineers commonly include a variety of
explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled'llmhatiore
marry Of (hese provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers' res
ponsl-
bilitfes begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilipes
and risks. Read these proldsions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnicaf
engineer should respond fully and frankly.
Geoenvironmental Contras Are Not Covered
The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform a gemviron-
menW study differ significantly from those used to perform a gmtechnical
study. For that reason, a geolectuiical engineering report does not usually
relate any gmenvfronmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations:
e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or .
regulated cmnhamfnants. Unanticipated enidronmental problems have led
to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own gmen-
vironmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk man-
agement guidance. Do not rely on an environmental report prepared for
someone else:
Obtain Professional MUM= To Deal with Old
Diverse strategies an be applied during building design, constriction,
operation, and maintenance to prevent significant amounts of mold from
growing on indoor surfaces. To be effective, all such strategies should be
devised for the express puiposeof mold prevention, integrated into a com-
prehensive plan, and executed with diligent oversight by a professional
mold prevention consultant Because just a small amount of water or
moisture can lead to the development of severe mold infestations, a num-
ber of mold prevention strategies focus on keeping building surfaces dry.
While groundwater, water infiltration, and similar issues may have been
address as part of the geotechnical engineering study whose findings
are conveyed in -this report, the geotechnical engineer in charge of this
project is not a mold prevention consultant; none of lire services per -
famed in connection with the geotechnical engineer's study
were designed or conducted for the purpose of mold prenw-
tion. Proper Implementation of the recommendations conveyed
in this report velli not of itself lie -saffdent to prevent mold from
growing in or on the stiuchan Involved.
Rft ou Yom' ASF- iV tuber Geotecldal
eer for A*MInal Assintalnee
Membership in ASFE/rhe Bast People on EaM exposes geotechnical
engire;ers to a wide array of risk management techniques that an be of
genuine tart for everyone involved with a construction project. Confer
with you ASFE member geotechnical engineer for mon; information.
ASFE
The lost realle e: Earth
8811 Colesvilie RpadfSuke 6106, Silver Spring, MI) 20910
Telephone: 30IM-2733 Facsimile: 3011589-2017
e-mail: thio@aMe.org wwwaasfeorg
UWr!W 2404 by ASFE, Inc. AupAcaft, reproduction,• orcopying of this dmemig in whale opm pari by any means whatsoever, IS srfW pmhlNW, &apt MM Mfr's
specirrc whM peraftwo. Excerpting quoting, orotherw/se admcting waift from this deownt is permitted only with the express written pffamon of ASFE, arrd only for
purposes ofsehorary research or boort review. Only members UAW nw use ttds document as a complement to oras an element of a georechnkal engbAesdng report Any other
Ann; in wdwl, or other entity that so uses this document wdhout being an ASFE member could be committing tAegligard or i daftnal (fraudulent) ndsrepresentatma.
11GERD6D45,0M
CONSTRAINTS AND RESTRICTIONS
WARRANTY
UES has prepared this report for our client for his exclusive use, in accordance with generally
accepted soil and foundation engineering practices, and makes no other warranty either
expressed or implied as to the professional advice provided in the report.
UNANTICIPATED SOIL CONDITIONS
The analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained
from soil borings performed at the locations indicated on the Boring Location Plan. This report
does not reflect any variations which may occur between these borings.
The nature and extent of variations between borings may not become known until excavation
begins. If variations appear, we may have to re-evaluate our recommendations after performing
on-site observations and noting the characteristics of any variations.
CHANGED CONDITIONS
We recommend that the specifications for the project require that the contractor immediately
notify Universal Engineering Sciences, as well as the owner, when subsurface conditions are
encountered that are different from those present in this report.
No claim by the contractor for any conditions differing from those anticipated in the plans,
specifications, and those found in this report, should be allowed unless the contractor notifies
the owner and UES of such changed conditions. Further, we recommend that all foundation
work and site improvements be observed by a representative of UES to monitor field conditions
and changes, to verify design assumptions and to evaluate and recommend any appropriate
modifications to this report.
MISINTERPRETATION OF SOIL ENGINEERING REPORT
UES is responsible for the conclusions and opinions contained within this report based upon the
data relating only to the specific project and location discussed herein. If the conclusions or
recommendations based upon .the data presented are made by others, those conclusions or
recommendations are not the responsibility of UES.
CHANGED STRUCTURE OR LOCATION
This report was prepared in order to aid in the evaluation of this project and to assist the
architect or engineer in the design of this project. If any changes in the design or location of the
structure as outlined in this report are planned, or if any structures are included or added that
are not discussed in the report, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report
shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and the conclusions modified or
approved by UES.
C-2
. USE OF REPORT BY BIDDERS
Bidders who are examining the report prior to submission of a bid are cautioned that this report
0 discussed within the text of this report.
was prepared as an aid to the designers of the project and it may affect actual construction
operations. Bidders are urged to make their own soil borings, test pits, test caissons or other
investigations to determine those conditions that may affect construction operations. UES
cannot be responsible for any interpretations made from this report or the attached boring logs
with regard to their adequacy in reflecting subsurface conditions which will affect construction
operations.
•
STRATA CHANGES
Strata changes are indicated by a definite line on the boring logs which accompany this report.
•
However, the actual change in the ground may be more gradual. Where changes occur
between soil samples, the location of the change must necessarily be estimated using all
available information and may not be shown at the exact depth.
OBSERVATIONS DURING DRILLING
•
Attempts are made to detect and/or identify occurrences during drilling and sampling, such as:
water level, boulders, zones of lost circulation, relative ease or resistance to drilling progress,
unusual sample recovery, variation of driving resistance, obstructions, etc.; however, lack of
•
mention does not preclude their presence.
WATER LEVELS
•
Water level readings have been made in the drill holes during drilling and they indicate normally
occurring conditions. Water levels may not have been stabilized at the last reading. This data
has been reviewed and interpretations made in this report. However, it must be noted that
fluctuations in the level of the groundwater may occur due to variations in rainfall, temperature,
tides, and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made and reported. Since
the probability of such variations is anticipated, design drawings and specifications should
i
accommodate such possibilities and construction planning should be based upon such
assumptions of variations.
•
LOCATION OF BURIED OBJECTS
All users of this report are cautioned that there was no requirement for UES to attempt to locate
.
any man-made buried objects during the course of this exploration and that no attempt was
made by UES to locate any such buried objects. UES cannot be responsible for any buried
man-made objects which are subsequently encountered during construction that are not
0 discussed within the text of this report.
TIME
This report reflects the soil conditions at the time of investigation. If the report is not used in a
reasonable amount of time, significant changes to the site may occur and additional reviews
may be required.
.
C-3
•
Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
•
SECTION 1: RESPONSIBILITIES
1.1
Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc., heretofore referred to as the Consultant, has the responsibility for providing the services described under the
•
Scope of Services section. The work is to be performed according to accepted standards of care and is to be completed in a timely manner. The
"Consultant"
term as used herein includes all of Universal Engineering Sciences, Incs agents, employees, professional staff, and subcontractors.
1.2
The Client or a duly authorized representative is responsible for providing the Consultant with a clear understanding of the project nature and
•
scope. The Client shall supply the Consultant with sufficient and adequate information, including, but not limited to, maps, site plans, reports,
surveys and designs, to allow the Consultant to properly complete the specified services. The Client shall also communicate changes in the nature
•
and scope of the project as soon as possible during performance of the work so that the changes can be incorporated into the work product.
•
SECTION 2: STANDARD OF CARE
•
2.1
Services performed by the Consultant under this Agreement are expected by the Client to be conducted in a manner consistent with the level of
care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the Consultant's profession practicing contemporaneously under similar conditions in the locality
•
of the project. No other warranty, express or implied, is made.
•
2.2
The Client recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those observed at locations where borings, surveys, or other explorations are
made, and that site conditions may change with time. Data, interpretations, and recommendations by the Consultant will be based solely on
•
information available to the Consultant at the time of service. The Consultant is responsible for those data, interpretations, and recommendations,
but will not be responsible for other parties' interpretations or use of the information developed.
SECTION 3: SITE ACCESS AND SITE CONDITIONS
3.1
Client will grant or obtain free access to the site for all equipment and personnel necessary for the Consultant to perform the work set forth in this
Agreement. The Client will notify any and all possessors of the project site that Client has granted Consultant free access to the site. The
Consultant will take reasonable precautions to minimize damage to the site, but it is understood by Client that, in the normal course of work, some
•
damage may occur, and the correction of such damage is not part of this Agreement unless so specified in the Proposal.
•
3.2
The Client is responsible for the accuracy of locations for all subterranean structures and utilities. The Consultant will take reasonable precautions
to avoid known subterranean structures, and the Client waives any claim against Consultant, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold Consultant
•
harmless from any claim or liability for injury or loss, including costs of defense, arising from damage done to subterranean structures and utilities
not identified or accurately located. In addition, Client agrees to compensate Consultant for any time spent or expenses incurred by Consultant in
.
defense of any such claim with compensation to be based upon Consultant's prevailing fee schedule and expense reimbursement policy.
.
SECTION 4: SAMPLE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSAL
4.1
Soil or water samples obtained from the project during performance of the work shall remain the property of the Client.
•
4.2
The Consultant will dispose of or return to Client all remaining soils and rock samples 60 days after submission of report covering those samples.
Further
storage or transfer of samples can be made at Client's expense upon Client's prior written request.
•
4.3
Samples which are contaminated by petroleum products or other chemical waste will be returned to Client for treatment or disposal, consistent with
all appropriate federal, state, or local regulations.
•
SECTIONS: BILLING AND PAYMENT
5.1
Consultant will submit invoices to Client monthly or upon completion of services. Invoices will show charges for different personnel and expense
•
classifications.
5.2
Payment is due 30 days after presentation of invoice and is past due 31 days from invoice date. Client agrees to pay a finance charge of one and
•
one-half percent (1 'h %) per month, or the maximum rate allowed by law, on past due accounts.
5.3
If the Consultant incurs any expenses to collect overdue billings on invoices, the sums paid by the Consultant for reasonable attorneys' fees, court
•
costs, Consultant's time, Consultant's expenses, and interest will be due and owing by the Client.
•
SECTION 6: OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
•
6.1
All reports, boring logs, field data, field notes, laboratory test data, calculations, estimates, and other documents prepared by the Consultant, as
.
instruments of service, shall remain the property of the Consultant.
6.2
Client agrees that all reports and other work furnished to the Client or his agents, which are not paid for, will be returned upon demand and will not
be by the Client for
used any purpose.
6.3
The Consultant will retain all pertinent records relating to the services performed for a period of five years following submission of the report, during
which period the records will be made available to the Client at all reasonable times.
•
SECTION 7: DISCOVERY OF UNANTICIPATED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
•
7.1
Client warrants that a reasonable effort has been made to inform Consultant of known or suspected hazardous materials on or near the project
•
site.
•
7.2
Under this agreement, the term hazardous materials include hazardous materials (40 CFR 172.01), hazardous wastes (40 CFR 261.2), hazardous
substances (40 CFR 300.6), petroleum products, polychlorinated biphenyls, and asbestos.
7.3
Hazardous materials may exist at a site where there is no reason to believe they could or should be present. Consultant and Client agree that the
0
• discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials constitutes a changed condition mandating a renegotiation of the scope of work. Consultant and
• Client also agree that the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials may make it necessary for Consultant to take immediate measures to
protect health and safety. Client agrees to compensate Consultant for any equipment decontamination or other costs incident to the discovery of
• unanticipated hazardous waste.
• 7.4 Consultant agrees to notify Client when unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials are encountered. Client agrees to
make any disclosures required by law to the appropriate governing agencies. Client also agrees to hold Consultant harmless for any and all
• consequences of disclosures made by Consultant which are required by governing law. In the event the project site is not owned by Client, Client
recognizes that It is the Client's responsibility to inform the property owner of the discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected
• hazardous materials.
• 7.5 Notwithstanding any other provision of the Agreement, Client waives any claim against Consultant, and to the maximum extent permitted by law,
agrees to defend, indemnify, and save Consultant harmless from any claim, liability, and/or defense costs for Injury or loss arising from
• Consultant's discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials Including any costs created by delay of the project
and any cost associated with possible reduction of the property's value. Client will be responsible for ultimate disposal of any samples secured by
• the Consultant which are found to be contaminated.
• SECTION 8: RISK ALLOCATION
• 8.1 Client agrees that Consultant's liability for any damage on account of any error, omission or other professional negligence will be limited to a sum
not to exceed $50,000 or Consultant's fee, whichever is greater. Client agrees that the foregoing limits of liability extend to all of consultant's
• employees and professionals who perform any services for Client. If Client prefers to have higher limits on professional liability, Consultant
agrees to increase the limits up to a maximum of $1,000,000.00 upon Clients' written request at the time of accepting our proposal provided that
• Client agrees to pay an additional consideration of four percent of the total fee, or $400.00, whichever is greater. The additional charge for the
higher liability limits is because of the greater risk assumed and is not strictly a charge for additional professional liability insurance.
SECTION 9: INSURANCE
9.1 The Consultant represents and warrants that it and its agents, staff and Consultants employed by it, is and are protected by worker's compensation
. insurance and that Consultant has such coverage under public liability and property damage insurance policies which the Consultant deems to be
adequate. Certificates for all such policies of insurance shall be provided to Client upon request in writing. Within the limits and conditions of such
• insurance, Consultant agrees to indemnify and save Client harmless from and against loss, damage, or liability arising from negligent acts by
Consultant, its agents, staff, and consultants employed by it. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any loss, damage or liability beyond the
• amounts, limits, and conditions of such insurance or the limits described in Section 8, whichever is less. The Client agrees to defend, indemnify
and save Consultant harmless for loss, damage or liability arising from acts by Client, Client's agent, staff, and other consultants employed by
• Client.
• SECTION 10: DISPUTE RESOLUTION
• 10.1 All claims, disputes, and other matters in controversy between Consultant and Client arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement will be
submitted to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) such as mediation and/or arbitration, before and as a condition precedent to other remedies
• provided by law.
• 10.2 If a dispute at law arises related to the services provided under this Agreement and that dispute requires litigation instead of ADR as provided
above, then:
• (a) the claim will be brought and tried in judicial jurisdiction of the court of the county where Consultant's principal place of business is
located and Client waives the right to remove the action to any other county or judicial jurisdiction, and
• (b) The prevailing party will be entitled to recovery of all reasonable costs incurred, including staff time, court costs, attorneys' fees, and
other claim related expenses.
is SECTION 11: TERMINATION
11.1
This agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven (7) days written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other parry to
perform in accordance with the terms hereof. Such termination shall not be effective if that substantial failure has been remedied before expiration
•
of the period specified in the written notice. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid for services performed to the termination notice
•
date plus reasonable termination expenses.
•
11.2
In the event of termination, or suspension for more than three (3) months, prior to completion of all reports contemplated by the Agreement,
Consultant may complete such analyses and records as are necessary to complete his files and may also complete a report on the services
.
performed to the date of notice of termination or suspension. The expense of termination or suspension shall include all direct costs of Consultant
in
completing such analyses, records and reports.
•
SECTION 12: ASSIGNS
•
12.1
Neither the Client nor the Consultant may delegate, assign, sublet or transfer his duties or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of
•
the other party.
•
SECTION 13. GOVERNING LAW AND SURVIVAL
•
13.1
The laws of the State of Florida will govern the validity of these Terms, their interpretation and performance.
13.2
If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the enforceability of the remaining provisions will not
•
be impaired. Limitations of liability and indemnities will survive termination of this Agreement for any cause.
•
Rev. 03/10/11
•
•