Loading...
RF-06-2940 (2)Inspection Worksheet Miami Shores Village 10050 N.E. 2nd Avenue Miami Shores, FL Phone: (305)795 -2204 Fax: (305)756 -8972 Inspection Number: IIP- 34097 Perm Num IMF- 1.2 -09 -2940 Inspection Date: 03/27/2007 Inspector: Grande, Claudio Owner: MANGHAM, MICHAEL AND ALICIA Job Address: 1065 94 Street NE Miami Shores Village, FL Project: <NONE> Contractor: JOHN BUSTA ROOFING INC Block: Permit Type: Roof Inspection Type: Final Roof Work Classification: Roof - New Phone Number Parcel Number 1132050120100 Lot: Phone: (305)757 -7620 Building Department Comments RE -ROOF REAR GARAGE SLOPED AND FLAT ROOF AND HOLE ROOF COLOR THRU TILE CEMENT '4 % AR 2 8 gli Inspector Comments / Dr_____- 0 4(f• ‘,....i.....„____________ Passed v Failed Correction Needed Re- Inspection Fee ($75) No Additional Inspections can be scheduled re- inspection fee is paid. until Monday, March 26, 2007 Page 2 of 2 Miami Shores Village 1 - Building Department jet 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Tel: (305) 795.2204 Fax: (305) 756.8972 BUILDING @ M E �% PERMIT APPLICATION OCT 1 0 2006 kit FBC 2004 BY: M Wk Permit No. Master Permit No. Permit Type (circle): Building Electrical Plumbing Mechanical Owner's Name (Fee Simple Titleholder) ,e/1/f/i7) Phone # 9 4S' s7s-7 Owner's Address 7340 A J q $ - City/ /// /eSWz2legS Tenant/Lessee Name State rf--- Zip 33/3S Phone # Job Address (where the work is being done) 73/' 11 Sr City Miami Shores Village County . Miami -Dade Zip 33/ 3 g FOLIO / PARCEL # Is Building Historically Designated YES NO Contractor's Company Name .291,67.-/ (-N `4% Phone # 3O 75115' 72_ Contractor's Address g AdA) /0l7r 57-- City //f f / xx State - Zip 33/& Qualifier Name Za4 2S Phone # State Certificate or Registration No. 5 7/ 9 0 Certificate of Competency No. Architect/Engineer's Name (if applicable) Phone # Value of Work For this Permit $ 2.167)-- Square / Linear Footage Of Work:«' Type of Work: ['Addition ['Alteration ❑New Repair/Replace ❑ Demolition Describe Work•. , E4i 1 t VW 6 -rut', r ` /,O 'LfC /X 1267-401)6 /0 77_t /,_ RAS '-' LE. W/1 € e64nOVW Val/1,0K, i p2o)c -n LE . iz.el°la`tc bap `cUum6 ,1'A-Ti-CL- UN eLA- jm C/4 ,—. Submittal Fee $ Permit Fee $ i OD �� 4. CCF $ I - /SO CO /CC Notary $ 5 f-- Training/Education Fee $ o 0 Technology Fee $ Z.• 5 Scanning $ ta ,C,0 Radon $ DPBR $ Zoning $ Bond $ Code Enforcement $ Double Fee $ Structural Review. $ Total Fee Now Due $ See Reverse side -3 cd14.,AA Bonding Company's Name (if applicable) Bonding Company's Address City State Zip Mortgage Lender's Name (if applicable) Mortgage Lender's Address City State Zip Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet the standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. I understand that a separate permit must be secured for ELECTRICAL WORK, PLUMBING, SIGNS, WELLS, POOLS, FURNACES, BOILERS, HEATERS, TANKS and AIR CONDITIONERS, ETC OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all the foregoing information is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning. "WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT." Notice to Applicant: As a condition to the issuance of a building permit with an estimated value exceeding $2500, the applicant must promise in good faith that a copy of the notice of commencement and construction lien law brochure will be delivered to the person whose property is subject to attachment. Also, a certified copy of the recorded notice of commencement must be posted -at the job site for the first inspection which occurs seven (7) days after the building permit is issued. In the absence of such posted notice, the inspection will not be approved and a reinspection fee will be charged. Owner or Agent The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 22. day of tivho is personally'known to me or who has prod is // As identification and who did take an oath. 'NOTARY) PUBLI : Sign: Print: My Co 11 It Signature _s D Contractor The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 16 rtlax of Q T ,20® by C11,11ffl 'emu (t who is own to me or who has produced as identification and who did take an oath. ission Expires: NOTARY PUBLIC: Sign: 9 Print: 0`K' (.6( 9 Expires: Jui 13,20 My Commission Expir, Fionded y,', ,rgrit sr fir* * * * * * *li * * * * * * * * * * * * ** APPLICATION APPROVED BY: (Revised 02/08/06) Gva Plans Examiner Engineer Zoning Reileh Engineering Corp. (Consulting Engineer) P.O. Box 22011 Hialeah, Florida 33002 Tel : 305-823-8008 Fax: 305-823-3300 March 15, 2007 John Busta Roofing 300 Northeast 91 Street Miami Shores, Florida Project: Dear Sirs; ROOF TILE UPLIFT TEST REPORT Residential Home 1065 Northeast 94 Street North Miami, Florida Information provided by client. Permit Number: RF062940 Date Completion: March 07, 2007 Roofing Contractor: John Busta Roofing Project Number: 07 -0851 (Testing Laboratory Certificate #06- 0501.15) In accordance with your request and authorization, a representative of Reileh Engineering Corporation completed the Roof Tile Uplift Test at the above referenced project. This testing was performed in general accordance with Roofing Application Standard TAS No.106 -- Standard procedure for field verification of the bonding of mortar or adhesive set tile system and mechanically attached, rigid, discontinuous roof systems. The total of the tested roof surface area was less than 10000 square feet, and the mean height of the roof is less than 40 feet above ground surface. The type of tile used for this project was reported to be Cement/Clay Roof Tile. This tile was reported to have been foamed in place. At the time of our inspection, the entire area of the roof was examined for loose tiles. Not less than one (1) tile in ten (10) of all components in the field area and one (1) tile in five (5) of all tiles in the perimeter and comer areas were physically examined. A minimum of one (1) test per every two (2) squares in the field, one (1) test per square in the perimeter area and (1) in the comer areas were conducted. Based on our test results, we conclude that the installation of the roof tile at the above referenced project meets the test requirement outlined in the above - mentioned protocol. Attached please find a copy of our test report for your review. Reileh Engineering Corporation appreciates the opportunity of assisting you in this project. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted; Reileh Engineering Corporation Moh., ad Sonny Salleh, P.E.49014 Project Manager TILE UPLIFT TEST Residential Home 1065 Northeast 94 Street North Miami, Florida Reileh Engineering Corporation -- Project Number - 07 -0851 — Page 2 of 6 Report of TILE UPLIFT TEST for Residential Home 1065 Northeast 94 Street North Miami, Florida Project Number: 07 -0851 Test Number Test Load (lbf) Test Status 1 35 Pass 2 35 Pass 3 35 Pass 4 35 Pass 5 35 Pass 6 35 Pass 7 35 Pass 8 35 Pass 9 35 Pass 10 35 Pass 11 35 Pass 12 35 Pass 13 35 Pass 14 35 Pass 15 35 Pass 16 35 Pass 17 35 Pass 18 35 Pass 19 35 Pass 20 35 Pass 21 35 Pass 22 35 Pass 23 35 Pass 24 35 Pass Reileh Engineering Corporation -- Project Number - 07 -0851 — Page 3 of 6 Test Number Test Load (lbf) Test Status, 25 35 Pass 26 35 Pass 27 35 Pass 28 35 Pass 29 35 Pass 30 35 Pass 31 35 Pass 32 35 Pass 33 35 Pass 34 35 Pass 35 35 Pass 36 35 Pass 37 35 Pass 38 35 Pass 39 35 Pass 40 35 Pass 41 35 Pass 42 35 Pass 43 35 Pass 44 35 Pass 45 35 Pass 46 35 Pass 47 35 Pass 48 35 Pass 49 35 Pass 50 35 Pass 51 35 Pass 52 35 Pass 53 35 Pass 54 35 Pass Reileh Engineering Corporation -- Project Number - 07 -0851 — Page 4 of 6 Test Number Test Load Obi) Test Status 55 35 Pass 56 35 Pass 57 35 Pass 58 35 Pass 59 35 Pass 60 35 Pass 61 35 Pass 62 35 Pass 63 35 Pass 64 35 Pass 65 35 Pass 66 35 Pass 67 35 Pass 68 35 Pass 69 35 Pass 70 35 Pass 71 35 Pass 72 35 Pass 73 35 Pass 74 35 Pass 75 35 Pass 76 35 Pass 77 35 Pass 78 35 Pass 79 35 Pass 80 35 Pass 81 35 Pass 82 35 Pass 83 35 Pass 84 35 Pass Reileh Engineering Corporation -- Project Number - 07 -0851 — Page 5 of 6 Test Number Test Load (lbf) Test Status 85 35 Pass 86 35 Pass 87 35 Pass Reileh Engineering Corporation -- Project Number - 07 -0851 — Page 6 of 6 45 83 47 59 60 61 51 56 53 52 84 57 56 55 54 62 85 77 71 81 75 76 B0 14 79 78 72 73 41 42 44 40 45 38 46 37 69 `6 49 62 50 22 25 24 33 20 34 30 29 b 2 19 0 36 17 35 II 12 16 63 64 69 68 67 70 65 66 Z6 27 28 31 87 32 5 0 15 3 14 9 7 8 381 07 -08 APPPDX, t OOF 1151' 1- 0CATION5 ANI717IM510N5 09/29/2886 11:51 3057549852 DLEYROOFING SECTION R4402.13 HIGH VELOCITY HURRICANE ZONES — REQUIRED OWNT FOR ROOFING CONSIDERATIONS R4402.111 Scope. As it pertains to the sermon, it is the responsibility of roofing with the required roofing permit, and to explain to the owner the content of the > t; R4402 govern the minimum requirements and standards of the industry for roofus Additionally, the following items should be addressed as pan of the agreement owner's initial in the designated space indicates that the lam has been explained. Aesthetics- Workmanship: the workmanship provisions of won R4402 are se of providing that the roof system meets the wind resistance and water performance standards. Aesthetics (appearance) are not a consideration with workmanship provisions. Aesthetic issues such as color or architectural ce, that are not part of a zoning code, should be addressed as part of the agreement the owner and the contractor. Renailing wood decks: When replacing roofing, the existing wood roof deck ve to be renailed in accordance with the current provisions of Section R4403. (The k is usually concealed prior to removing the existing roof system). Common roofs: Common roofs are those which have no visible delineation neighboring units (i.e., townhouses, condominiums, etc.) In buildings with on roofs, the roofing contractor and/or owner should notify the occupants of adjacent f roofing to be performed. 4. Exposed Ceiling Exposed., open beam ceilings are where the underside of the roof decking can be viewed from below. The owner may wish to maintain the architectural appearance; therefore, roofing nail penetration of the underside of the decking may not be acceptable. The provides the option of maintaining the appearance. co 5. Pointing water The current roof system and/or deck of the building may not drain well and may cruse wad to pond (accumulate) in low-lying areas of the roof. Ponding can be an indication of structural distress and may rcquica the review of a professional structural engineer. Pending may shorten the life expectancy and performance -=1 of the new roofing system_ Ponding conditions may not be evident until the original roofing ® 51 system is removed. Ponding conditions should be corrected. 1-, 6. Overflow scuppers (wall outlets): It is required that rainwater flow off so that ® the roof is not, overloaded from a buildup of water. Perimeter /edge wall or other roof extension may block this discharge if overflow scuppers (wall outlets) are not provided. It may be necessary to install overflow scuppers in accordance with the requirements of Sections R4402, R4403 and R4413. .. ... • • • • • .. 7. .Yent j 1 tioq: Kai itof gtructures should have some ability to vent natural airflow througb tbst idteiids,8f the staictu re assembly (the building itself). The existing amount of attic ventilation shall not be reduced. It may be beneficial to consider additional venting which rest* it t xteitnding due service life of the roof. • .P.J‘ F0 . • : : 7 Voko Wilt fb • Owner /Agent s tgnature Date .... ....... • • • . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ...... • • • • • .... • • ••• • • Contractor Signature Date 4 Page High Velocity Hurricane Zone Uniform Roofing Permit Application Form IMAO® -DADS COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT ELECTRONIC APPUCATION Section A (General Information) Master Permit Na Process No. I VO Contractor's Name: Job Address: I 1914.01 itoo h 1 -7340 iv '9 s I— Low Slope ✓ Asphaltic Shingles ✓ Prescriptive BUR -RAS 150 Roof Category ✓ Mechanically Fastened The ✓ Metal Panel/Shingles ✓ Other:I Roof Type I— New Roof r Re-Roofing r Recovering , Repair r Maintenance Are there Gas Vent Stacks located on the roof? r Yes r No If yes, what type? r Natural F LPGX Roof System Information Steep Sloped area (ft ?) I / 0 0 r Mortar/Adhesive Set Tile r Wood Shingles/Shakes Low slope roof area (ft.2) 1 Section B (Roof Plan) Total (ft.2) 1 /Od Sketch Roof Plate Illustrate a0 Levels and sections, roof drains, scuppers, overfow scuppers end overflow drains. Inctude dimensions of sections and levels, dearly identify dimensions of etevated pressure zones and Location of parapets. Perimeter Width pit 1 Comer Size (a' 4 • • • ••.. ,.. • • ••• • ▪ . •• • •• ••• •e4, • • ••• • • • ••• • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • •• •• • ••• • • • • ••• •P • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • • • fits . /ivxp A tron ,mTlnemtritontc\irrn•40A•af r, 1t' i • • • i .•• • • • • ononnn'