59 NE 101 St (8)PERMIT APPLICATION FOR MUNICIPALITIES OF DADE COUNTY
(OWNER TO RETAIN COPY)
Job Address S 9 tir /U/ JT Tax Folio // 3D06 /3 /5 /10
sou( it
Master Permit #
Legal Description 07IAnn, SND/Lth S/Z- / /9M /) Apr" /9 G
Owner / Lessee / Tenant P/14,SGH4v /k `y//,LX
Owner's Address .59 w i g /6 / 57 phone 3 5 3 7 / V
Contracting Co. O c.,, /e4, Address ,SW
Qualifier SS# phone
State# Competency# Ins.Co.
Architect /Engineer Address
Bonding Company Address
Mortgagor Address
Permit Type (circle one): BUILDI. ELECTRICAL PLUMBING MECHANICAL PAVING FENCE SIGN
WORK DESCRIPTION 6A77-f/2o<yn -, eco sir)" ..=7-/J /770 L.
Square Ft. // /90_ O'` )A& Estimated Cost
WARNING TO OWNER: YOU MUST RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AND YOUR FAILURE TO
DO SO MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY (IF YOU
INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE
RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT).
Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do work and installation as indicated. I certify
that all work will be performed to meet the standards of all laws regulating construction in this
jurisdiction. I understand that separate permits are required for ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, SIGNS,
POOLS, ROOFING, and MECHANICAL work.
OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all the foregoing information is accurate and that all work
will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning.
Furthermore, I a o ze the above -named contractor to do the work stated.
Signature of Owner and /or Condo President
Date:
Mechanical Plumbing
Engineering
Signature of Contractor or Owner - Builder
Date:
r y as to Ow and // 0 �Ag � rep �� LORID Notar as to Contractor or w -
N11 p SIN EXPIRES APRIL 16, 1992 y 0 ner Builder
M Commission Expires: gDNUED HRUSiE My Commission Expires:
l 8 SHEET * * * * * * *
PERMIT FEE: APPROVED: Fire t Other
Zoning Building# Jz)i Electrical
b
•
iami cShores9 liage
F L O R 1 D A
PLANNING BOARD AGENDA OF �, 4/ 3 /99 ITEM NO. 4
Name of Owner /Applicant4 4W245 OdV /'hone No.Wcr -32/
Address of Property, and /or Legal Description .5 /fie: / /SST
Nature of Req ues t i907'OL/4 6 T7 ,0 l /T /c,v&II
'Ie/MAW
Present Zoning /e
Area of Present Building •./-1 14 4
Area with Proposed Addition Cif P/ = /3 2 4')
Parking Spaces Provided
Parking Spaces Required with Addition
Setbacks as per Code
Setbacks Provided
VariancesiEMIENINIInemioag f e"j( /$'>%/&t SZ dC7 6 /.s' /1/D/l/
e-e /`OA? i /A)6 . SET B/Y,er Dd Nor 404
Av /rH ,P SF�t/T e29D6
Council Action Required
Date of Applicant Notification }}
Planning Board Action �� • Z/,)Tar
Council Action QC 3)/ gtx/
Director of Building and Zoning
January 28, 1992
Planning and Zoning Board
Miami Shores Village
10050 N.E. 2nd Avenue
Subject:
Request for Hardship Variance
I am requesting this hardship variance per Section 702. It states
there should be four reasons for my request.
The reasons are as follows:
1)The alleged peculiar and unusual condition affecting the
property.
The peculiar and unusual condition is that the property
at time of construction (in 1926) was built 7' from
the property line which at the time was within code.
There is very little I can do about this at this time_
I feel I am being unfairly restrained by this.
2)The alleged reasons why such condition make it impossible
strictly to apply specified provisions of this ordinance
to the property.
The alleged reason why this condition makes it
impossible to comply with this ordinance is that it is
impossible to move the house over the 3' needed to meet
the present setback code.
3)The variance in such strict application that the applicant
believes to be necessary in order to enable him to make a
reasonable use of the property.
This house was built in the 1920's and is inadequate by
today's standards. I am bringing it up to today's
acceptable living standards by adding additional closet
space and bath (presently the house has only one outdated
and small bath). If this house where to be built today it
would not adequately suffice a small family.
4)The reasons why the applicant is of the opinion that such
a variance would be in harmony with the intent and purpose
of this ordinance, would not be detrimental to the
existing use or prospective development of property in
the vicinity, and would not give to the applicant an
advantage with respect to the use of his property that is
not enjoyed by the owners of similarly situated property.
This house has ample property for expansion to the east,
which is where the proposed addition is to be built. I
will in no way change the lines or look of the house from
the street view if fact I am refurbishing the house which
at the present time is in a dilapidated condition. This
addition would in no specific terms distort or obstruct
any neighbor or passerby's view in any direction.
I am only doing what I feel is necessary to make the house
liveable,I have no desire to infringe on anyone's property or to
upset the natural look of the neighborhood on the contrary I
would like to improve it. I would appreciate a vote of approval
in this matter.
Max and Elizabeth Praschnik
Planning & Zoning Board
Village of Miami Shores
10050 N.E. 2nd Avenue
Miami Shores, Florida 33138
Dear Board Member(s):
SUBJECT: Hardship Variance
59 N.E. 101 Street
Miami Shores, Florida 33138
January 23, 1992
It has been brought to our attention that our recently purchased
home, originally built in 1929, does not fall within the current
Miami Shores building guidelines. Apparently, the home does not
comply with the current, 10 foot easement required between
property lines. Unfortunately, there is little we can do about
this situation.
At this time, we are requesting a variance to allow us to make
improvements that are a necessity and not a luxury. The
modifications to our home located at 59 NE 101 Street will not
significantly alter the exterior appearance of the home.
The appearance of the home is significantly outdated. It lacks
many modern day conveniences such as sufficient closet space and
a bathroom accessible to the master bedroom. Our intention is to
update the home to meet the current standards without disturbing
the historic charm of the house.
We request the variance to build the additional bathroom /closet
that will face the east side of the property and will not
interfere with any neighboring property boundaries, nor further
aggravate the existing encroachment.
Thank you for your consideration.
Max and Elizabeth Praschnik
I,'.1ED 12:23 ID: LOAD MGT. DEPT.
t.
•
t
ier
TEL O: Li5•--22 f---= 15
•
14 954 P01
•••••/ ." • ,. • •
00 0
Potted
tso
arowr "kw am.rolo eodw
82.
IL:f
a4rd
WA • g
Ion
1
0 004
•
75'
•
• •
Pz4
•••• . • 1' •
... 111.1
A I-
•••••
• 1
. ' .
P.. • fr
• • !
••.
e■••
'• • • "'
•
•
•-- ■ • - • -- -• .•
.• - • -
t 1 • - 1 ,
. /
30'
• •
f , I 134.11-teetptsei frAl21110K1
/ me4 bfv, m4)(
fP,a1/7 12/1/177011
liUi
tjIiu
hill
/7/4
•
FErri
RFT
rrrr
1 .
1
1
liUi
tjIiu
hill
/7/4
•