Loading...
1500 NE 101 St (3)} Miami, Florida. NOTICE OF Pit !,IC HEARING ON i1 CLASS I COASTAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT BY MR. BEN PUMO FOR THE PLACEMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 349 LINEAR FEET OF RIPRAP IN FRONT OF AN EXISTING SEAWALL ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1, DUNNINGS WATERWAY, VILLAGE OF MIAMI SHORES, DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to Section 24 -58 of the Dade County Code that the Board of County Commissioners of'Dade County will hold and conduct a public hearing on an application by Mr. Ben Pumo for the placement of approx- imately 349 linear feet of riprap in front of an existing seawall on Lot 1, Block 1, Dunnings Waterway, Miami Shores Village, Dade County, Florida. Such public hearing will be held on the ;15th day of Sentcmhcr , 1981, at 9 :00 o'clock, in the morning in the County Courthouse in Plans and details concerning the work requested by the application may be reviewed by interested persons at the office of the Dade County Environ- mental Resources Management Department, Room 494 Brickell Plaza, 909 S.E. First Avenue, Miami, Florida. Oral statements will be heard and appropriate records made. For ac- curacy of record all important facts and arguments should be prepared in writing in triplicate, with two copies being submitted to the Deputy Clerk of the County Commission at the hearing or mailed to him.beforehand (Raymond Reed, Deputy Clerk, Room 240 Courthouse); and with one copy being submitted beforehand to the Dade County Environmental Resources Management Department, 494 Brickell Plaza, 909 S.E. First Avenue, Miami, F1orieh 33131. SOUTH FLORIDA SUBDISTR ICT 3301 GUN CLUB ROAD P.O. BOX 3858 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 July 23, 1981 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Ben Pumo 1500 Northeast 101 Street Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Dear Mr. Pumo: Dade County DF - Ben Pumo BOB GRAHAM GOVERNOR VICTORIA J. TSCHINKEL SECRETARY WARREN G. STRAHM SUBDISTRICT MANAGER Re: Application #DF 13- 43625 -6E; Riprap at Toe of Seawall, Biscayne Bay Pursuant to Sections 403.087, 258.165 and 253.123, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Sections 17 -4.07 and 17- 4.242, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), the Department of Environmental Regulation hereby gives notice of its intent to issue a permit for the following: To place 450 cubic yards of boulder riprap (2 -5 feet in diameter) along 300± feet of existing seawall. The riprap would extend from one foot above mean high water on the face of the seawall to the natural bottom on a minimum 2:1 (_horizontal:vertical) slope. The project is located in Biscayne Bay at 1500 Northeast 101 Street, Miami Shores, Dade County, Florida. This project was reviewed at the Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve hearings on June 17, 1981. An on -site inspection was conducted on June 8, 1981. No significant long- or short -term adverse impact on water quality or biological resources is expected to result from the placement of the riprap. Furthermore, the placement of riprap is expected to have a beneficial impact on Biscayne Bay by providing additional marine habitat and improving water quality. Several objections to this project were reviewed by the Department and were found to have no substance in law for recommending denial of this application. This permit shall be issued with the following conditions: 1. If turbidity exceeds 50 J.C.U.s beyond a 50 -foot radius of the work area, which would be in violation of Section 24 -11 of the Metro Dade County Code, turbidity controls, such as but not limited to turbidity curtains, shall Page 1 of 2 Protecting F" and Your Quality of Life Page 2 Mr. Ben Pumo July 23, 1981 be implemented at the construction site and Metropolitan Dade County Environmental Resources Management (MDCERM) shall be notified immediately. If turbidity levels do not drop below 50 J.C.U.s within one hour after implementation of the controls, all construction shall be halted. Construction shall not be resumed until the contractor has implemented additional control methods and has received authorization from MDCER1.5. 2. Written notification shall be provided to the DER South. Florida Subdistrict office in West Palm Beach and MDCERM a minimum of forty -eight (48) hours prior to commencement of construction and a maximum of forty -eight (48) hours after completion of construction. This Department shall issue- -the subject permit unless an appropriate petition is filed for a hearing pursuant to the provisions of Section 120.57, F.S. At such formal hearing all parties shall have an opportunity to present evidence and argument on all issues involved, to conduct cross - examination and submit rebuttal evidence, to submit proposed findings of fact and orders, to file exceptions to any order and to be represented by counsel. Any petition for a hearing must comply with the requirements of Section 28- 5.201, F.A.C., (copy enclosed) and be filed with the General Counsel of the Department of Environmental Regulation at 2600 Blair Stone Road, Twin Towers Office Building, Tallahassee, Florida 32301, with a copy to this office within fourteen (14) days from receipt of this letter. Petitions which are not filed in accordance with the above provisions may be subject to dismissal. Sincerely; r1 Warren G. Strahm Subdistrict Manager WGS :rws Enclosure cc: Office of General Counsel, DER - Tallahassee Metropolitan Dade County Environmental Resources Management U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Miami Beach John E. Fitzgerald J. Andrew Burnam, M.D. Dr. Ignatius W. Adams Charles F. DelVecchio P.G. Hewitt Thomas R. Kokenge Jack Poffenbarger George B. Storer III Mr. Richard Walesky State of Florida Department of Environmental Regulation South Florida Subdistrict 3301 Gun Club Road P.O. Box 3858 West Palm Beach, Florida 33402 Dear Mr. Walesky: George B. Storer, III 1491 N.E. 102nd St. Miami Shores, FL 33138 June 20, 1981 Re: File Number: DF -13- 43625 -6E Applicant: Ben Pumo These are my preliminary comments and possible objections to the above captioned project. First, let me state that I am the owner of the property adjoining Mr. Pumo's at 1491 N.E. 102nd Street. I have three immediate matters of concern regarding Mr. Pumo's proposal to place riprap along his currently existing seawall. They are as follows: 1. Navigability of the Canal: As a yachtsman and as an owner of property fronting a navigable waterway (the canal), I must state that I would totally oppose any project which would impair access to the canal by boat from Biscayne Bay. I do not necessarily view this project as having this effect, but make the statement as a matter of record. Other property owners along the canal have expressed this concern to me. 2. Engineering: I question the cross - sectional drawing labelled Section A -A included in Mr. Pumo's application as being a valid representation of the contour of the bottom from the seawall outward inside the mouth of the canal. The canal is quite deep - approximately thirteen to eighteen feet. As I know the canal, once you move three to five feet away from the base of the seawall the bottom drops away quite precipitously. Given this contour, I do not believe that boulders could be placed on this "shelf" so as to give the intended 2 -to -1 slope and still reach a height at the seawall of one foot above mean high water. A rough sketch is attached to demonstrate my point. If my assumption is correct, then I want to know what alternative method of engineering would be used to place the riprap. 3. Increased Hazards to Navigation: In this project, I see two potential instances of increased hazards to navigation. First, consider a situation where a vessel is navigating the entrance to the canal, loses power and is being blown down upon Mr. Pumo's property. With the seawall as it currently exists, this would generally not present a dangerous situation in that members of the crew could fend the boat off the seawall. If the riprap were in place, the vessel's hull would likely strike the rocks before members of the crew could reach the seawall either by hand or with a boathook. The potential for damage to the hull in this case is obvious. Secondly, I am concerned about boulders of the size proposed for the project ending up in the shallow waters outside the entrance to the canal. The waters in this area are shallow. I frequently run with a foot or less 04 water under my keel when entering or leaving the canal. However, the composition of the bottom in this area is mostly sand and silt and grazing the bottom with ; y k or ever ; .,.ii.il_j g o;_:nd u.. . r.o present a o i y ` r o .. situation. I F F a 5 :. - sway f o rl i the immediate project site during to "pe•acl o riprap, the risk of seric.u:: to a boat would be quite high. On the positive side, the riprap would be a very attractive addition to Mr. Pumo's property, would indeed be beneficial to aquatic life in the area and would likely reduce wave action in the canal in addition to solving the problem that wE' all have in the area of maintaining the structural integrity of our seawalls. Thank you for the opportunity to make my concerns known, and I look forward to hearing from you or Mr. Pumo regarding the questions I have raised. Very truly yours, George B. Storer, III cc: Mr. Ben Pumo South Florida Regional Planning Commission Metro Dade County Environmental Resources Management Florida Garne & Frash Water Fish Commission Mr. William B. Ewers, Esquire • InterThinkinc 9628 N.E. 2nd Avenue - Suite 2C Miami Shores, Florida 33138 (305) 758 -0004 o 2 ‘Pc 7,..r • /`Eqr • ,fir 77AR eiSNOr 1/ 8 /0 • C P(Ltfy O 1.1 26 June 1981 George B. Storer, III 1491 N.E. 102nd Street Miami Shores, FL 33138 Dear Mr. Storer: In response to your comments and possible objections concerning the sea wall repair at the property known as 1500 N.E. 101st Street, we state that the three matters of your concern can be rectified. 111 "The Restriction of the Canal /Bay Access" The waterway access would not be impaired. The canal waterway maintains an 80 foot width to the bay. The crane -barge that will place the boulders has a beam width of only 24 feet. The navigability of the wa will remain navigable during and after completion. lit The submitted plan - "Representation of the Bottom Contour" Your cross - section reflects the bottom contour several yards within the canal beyond the dogleg entrance. This area reflected by your sketch is of no concern within this permit application. X63 A. Engine Failure and being blown upon the Riprap B. Having a boulder get away from the placement crew in shallow water and hitting it with a boat With the development of any project various conditions may occur. There are numerous conditions in many areas of our Bay that may become hazard- ous in an emergency. The responsiblity of coping with emergency situa- tions lie with the vessel's captain. With respect to losing a boulder during placement of the Riprap, the boulders will weigh upwards of three tones each - a boulder of that size you just don't lose. The firm be- ing employed to place the Riprap is one of the best in our state. In- spections throughout the project will be made below the surface as well as above by the proper authority. In conclusion, I `eel your stated concerns ahve been resolved. I do appre- ciate your input into this project. IF you have any Future concerns ;eel free to call us at 757-1823. Ben Purno cc: R. Wai_eskv Depi . i.il`. _i r oamE'r. :.l! Regu1at en 7327 N.W. MIAMI COURT MIAMI, FLORIDA 33150 TELEPHONE 757 -1823 Mr. Richard Waleskv Department of Environmental Regulation 3301 Gun Club Road P.O. Box 3858 West Palm Beach, Florida 33402 Dear Sir: Applicant Name: 3en ?umo File Number: 0713- 43625 -0E June 23, 1931 I wish to lodge a 7rotest concerning the proposed project b7 :.; neighbor Mr. Ben ?umo. He is proposin, to ?lace 450 cubic yards of boulder Rip Rap . linear feet extending from his seawall into a portion of the canal along which I reside. I have two possible prime objections :o such 3 project: T reside at h. ;end of the canal which runs approximately one block from 3isca•.•ne 3ay. Nv location i..s normally a cul -de -sac or resting place for seaweed, much residue which floats down to a:; area, propelled 'ov either tidal craters or South East winds. I have learned to live with this ;natural happening which becomes rather constant during the Spring and Summer months when South East or Easterly winds prevail. Fortunately, tidal waters carry all of thi debris out of _. ^.a canal l in tine before the stench becomes unbearable. Any obstruction such as Rip Rap boulders placed at the en- trance of the canal, which is not this project would involve, might cause a severe tidal change which could impede the outgoing tide, which in turn would delay the normal outgoing or the large quantities of debris that comes and goes. This debris when floating in and becoming inert covers a canal area wherein eight houses on the canal are affected. We have learned to live with Mother Nature as such, but we cert- ainly do not need additional human help to .add to our discomfor- ture . 2- I own a pleasure boat wherein the canal is my only acc- ess to the Bay and the ocean. I feel that any obstruction in the mouth of the canal could ca a possible exit and entrance prob- lem in difficult weather. / livi.ng on the canal any of us have had seawall problems twenty five ears can ed after all, l ich have had co be rectified, rim;- about normal V tea? erosion plus other problems. made ,Ho�•wever, in all cases wherein repairs have had to be ,- have performed their necessary re- On C'.._r canal, 311 homeowners y neighborhood problems. This proposed project could o O pairs without causing an" '' v exception, which could turn out to be. the onl e . m , n :, if allowed to progress. possibly be unfortunate tci r more fzorou�: wilt consider my plea and have survey �ade of the "proposed project before arriVin'� a: •3 deciS _ S'•1 _ � - -- ion or approval. T ? / L S ?age 2 RespecttL Jac'.c °offenbargar 1351 N. 109nd ;tr2er Miami Shores , Florida 33 _3 3 cc: South 71 crida 2e Tonal D1_anning Council _Metro Dade Count:-; Environmental Resources Management Florida Game and Fresh Water Commission Robert Lodge, Mayor - Village of Miami Shores Mr. Richard Walesky Department of Enviromental Regulation 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, Florida 33402 Re: File Number DF -13- 43625 -6E Applicant Name: Ben Pumo Gentlemen: P. G. Hewitt 1391 N. E. 102nd Street Miami Shores, F1. 33138 June 22, 1981 I am in receipt of a copy of an application for the placement of rip -rap as noted above. I live on and use the canal where this material would be placed, therefore, I have a vital and rightful interest in any changes that are made to this canal. I view any changes to the approach enterance of this waterway as a change to my property and to its value. The drawing, as submitted with the application, states that it is not drawn to scale. Obviously it is not. If you will check the indicated water depths, I believe you will find them much deeper at the seawall and in the canal than shown. If this is so, the rip -rap must be extended much farther than indicated on the drawings. The West shore of Biscayne Bay from Coconut Grove to North of Keystone Point has been bulkheaded for years. The seawall construction is mainly concrete piling with precast slabs between the pilings and secured with a tieback system. This system has been adequate for miles of waterfront property as noted, others have not seen a need to change it. As you are well aware, the placement of breakwaters, groins, or any other protrusion into water where there is a tidal flow effects the depth of the water adjacent to the protrusion. Historically, a build up or washout area will follow. Have you considered the possibility of causing a washout under the existing seawalls to the West? As you can see from the enclosed copy of NOAA chart 11467, water depths at the enterance of this canal are critical to anyone operating a vessel that draws more than 2'. At extreme low tide all but the most shallow draft vessel must enter from the intercoastal at Marker 21 and then proceed along the seawall to the canal enterance. Are you sure that rip -rap at the bay side enterance and the effects of tidal current will not change this all ready limited access? The seawalls in this area are twenty five years old. The current and water flow is established. There are twenty -six homes located on this waterway other than this applicant. None of them have seen a need to change from the existing and - 2 - conventional type of seawall construction. I suggest that you carefully consider the effects on all of the home owners who live on this waterway. Yours very truly, i P. G. Hewitt 1391 N. E. 102nd Street Miami Shores, Florida 3313 cc: South Florida Regional Planning Council Metro Dade County Enviormental Resources Management Fla. Game and Fresh Water Commission Robert Lodge, Mayor - Village of Miami Shores Mr. Richard Walesky Department of Enviromental Regulation 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, Florida 331102 Re: Your Notice of 6 -9 -81, File Number DF 13 -43625 -6E, Applicant Name Ben Pumo (copy attached) Dear Mr. Walesky: The referenced notice has Just come to my attention. The proposed protect is of concern to me because I am a canal resident, one house removed from the applicant, on the same side of the canal and use the canal for my boat. The proposed project should be held in abeyance until further evaluations are made. Specifically: If common Florida boulders are used, will they he displaced into the canal in the event of a hurricane? This type of boulder is very porous and light in the water. I have seen them moved considerable distance after hurricanes. The canal, at my property line, is about.28 feet deep in the center and the bottom slopes approximately li5 degrees from my seawall to the canal center. If the same situation exists at the applicants property, will the boulders slio into the canal and create a navigation problem? The boulders will create some obstruction to the normal tide flow. Will the tide diversion create undermining at adjacent locations? There is a serious problem with flotsam at the west terminus of the canal. This garbage is pushed into the canal by strong easterly winds and pushed out by weaker westerly winds and tide flow. The boulders will create little obstruction to the in- coming flotsam because of the superior driving force, however, the boulders may entrap the outgoing trash because of the weaker propelling forces. Mr. Richard Walesky Page 2 Further consideration should be given to the proposed project and all canal residents should he offically notified. Sincerely, Thomas R. Kokenge Thomas R Kokenge i01 N E 102 St. Miami Shores, Fl 33138 June 211, 1981 Encl: as stated cc: South Florida Regional Planning Council Metro Dade County Enviormental Resources Management Florida Game 8 Fresh Water Commission Robert Lodge, Mayor of Miami Shores Village CLINICAL AUDIOLOGY JOHN W. HEFFERNAN, M.S. SUITE 248 AMERIFIRST FEDERAL BLDG. 8340 N.E. 2ND AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33138 (305) 751-6591 J. ANDREW BURNAM, M. D., F.A.C.S. DIPLOMATE, AMERICAN BOARD OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY - HEAD AND NECK SURGERY June 25, 1981 Mr. Richard Walesky Dept. 'of Environmental Regulation 330] Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, F1. 33402 Dear Mr. Walesky: Sincerely yours, Re: File #DF -13- 43625 -6E Applicant: Ben Pumo As a property owner on the canal in question, I would like to register a strong objection to the proposal as stated. The placing of tons of rocks or "rip -rap" along the sea wall would pose needless real and potential hazards to boating. It would create problems of egress of the large amounts of trash which already is a nuisance during several months of the year. It would be an eye -sore at low tide. It would also set a bad precedent for others who might also consider the same project. As you know, property values on a canal are greatly influenced by its access to deep water, polution factors, esthetics, etc. It is my opinion, and that of many of my neighbors, that the placement of these tons of rocks is a real and potential threat to not only our best interests hut the boating public at large. Thank you for your consideration of this urgent request that approval of this project be denied. �C.ztic.rxti��� Andrew Burnam, M. D. cc: South Florida Regional Planning Council Metro Dade County Environmental Resources Management Robert Lodge, Mayor Village of Miami Shores Frank Lubien, Inspector Village of Miami Shores OTOLARNGOLOGY - HEAD AND NECK SURGERY FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY SUITE 234 550 BRICKELL AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 (305) 374 -6334 � �� and j/[rs. lynalius 0 �dante JZrleen 9orly �� J17orb eael One ?? X ndred and Jhird Vlreel J/liami (J/orea, Jlorida 33138: Mr Richard Walesky iiu rtrnent lub road of nvircc entai Regulation ;t, 4uz C West Palm Beach, `'tbrida 33402 Rd; File L i7mber BF-13-43625..6B Applicant Name= Ben E umo Gentlemen, AS a property owner of 180 feet on the dead end Canal at 103r4 Street, X am opposed to Mr Pumo• s request. (a) a rip rap would narrow the canal and make a boat hazzard. (b) A rip rap would slow water movement in in the canal and create sand shifts. (c) Why not lave well enough alone and not jepodize our property values. Thanking you in advance for your cooperation. Sinc , ely yours, T ,,f'tius W Adams. ccs South Florida Regional planning Council Metro Dade County Bnv!►ronomental Resources Management Florida Game and Fresh Water Commission Robert Lodge, Mayor - Village of Miami Shores Frank Lubien, Inspector - Village of Miami Shores. Gentlemen: Mr. Richard Walesky Department of Enviromental Regulation 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, Florida 33402 Re: File Number DF -13- 43625 -6E Applicant Name: Ben Pumo Charles F. Del Vecchio 1330 N. E. 103 Street Miami Shores, Florida 33138 With reference to the work requested on File #DF13- 43625u -6E I question the following: 1 -The effect of this work on the flow of sewage that frequently gathers at the inland west side of the canal. Will this prevent the sewage from - leaving the canal on a tide change? 2 -Will this ultimately cause a buildup of sand in the canal which will become a hazard to navigation? The values of the houses on this canal are largely based on the accessibility to the bay by boat. 3 -How can some one,be allowed to block off and restrict the use of a public waterway? This'certa:inly would limit the usable width of the canal. How would this be indicated to boat traffic in order that they not incur considerable damage by hitting the rocks? 4 -What guarantees can be made that the rocks will not shift with a strong tide change? This could certainly cause a definite hazard to navigation. 5- Assuming a twelve foot water depth and the riprap exceeding the water level by one foot, a five foot depth clearance would not be available unitl approximately twelve foot from the sea- wall in the canal area. Would this not be dangerous? As both a property owner on the subject canal, and an active boater, I would like to have answers to the above questions. Please advise me of any action that is being taken on this matter. CFD:ams cc: South Florida Regional Planning Council Metro Dade County Environmental Resources Management Florida Game and Fresh Water. Commission Robert Lodge, Mayor - Village of Miami Shores Frank Lubien, Inspector - Village df Miami Shores Very Truly Yours, Charles F. Del Vecchio 2) Applicant: The Palace PUBLIC NOTICE Date: June 22, 1981 The: Metr.opoli'tan, Dade County .Department of Envi- ronmental.Resources Management (DERM), has received applications for the coastal permit and outfall permits ,listed Permit requests filed on Coastal Short Form applications and all outfall permit requests can be issued by DERM unless an appeal is made with this Department within ten (10) days of the date of this.notice. Appeals,will result in a public hearing. Parties filing a• Coastal Standard Form applica- tion require a public hearing. The date and time of all public hearings will be advertised in a newspaper..of gener,al. cir.culation. For further information about these applications, please contact the Coastal Permitting or Water Control Sections (outfall applications) at 579 -2760. COASTAL SHORT FORM APPLICATIONS 1) Applicant: Ben Pumo Work Proposal: The placement of 450 Cubic yards of riprap beginning one foot above mean high water along the toe of a portion of a seaiaall at 1500 N.E. 101 Street,'Miami Shores Florida on Biscayne Bay. Work Proposal: The placement of 230 + cubic yards of riprap along 384 feet of shoreline at 1541 Brickell Avenue, Miami, Florida on Biscayne Bay. 3) Applicant: Raymond M. Gore, c/o Gonzalez Brothers Marine Construction, Incorporated. Work Proposal: Emergency replacement of a dilapidated wooden dock with a 10 by 16 foot wooden dock and three timber mooring I rj I . ••• 1 rrl - .t- It to 1144 144 0 • T ..1 , - •-•.---,-5? . , , ?!..ar 1 .! I r .. ,,. ; ::1 •I •,I• • ; • : ..:1" •:',..: i ''', : l' ---':- .:1,.. ' ' ' • ..• .,,,,. r • .... •-:1 • i.: r‘,'-'7,i-i---4-_ •.‘ •=. ! - ,Ii .'" ',;,',, .,; -1"v•::-.V9)4,$ Ji I ' l LT '17' . 7.i viVel $, • LR' . p ol 0 t l 0 t „...21, 10 I_ _TA 1 "•. °au. s, ; .44lta— 001.,WritY fun 7„3 ALM. Pre KY 1,6•11 . , • 0 ti piles on Biscayne Bay at 13155 Biscayne Bay Drive, North • Miami, Florida. 4) Applicant: Kiriati c/o Max Larson, Dock and Marine Con - struction, Incorporated. Work Proposal: Repair of 99.5 feet of concrete seawall and placement of.associated riprap on:a.private canal. tidally connected to Arch Creek at 12990 Biscayne Island Terrace, North Miami, Florida. t . : • 'P . METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY NVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION 1 39 S. E. 1st AVENUE 4th FLOOR MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 • • JUN22'81 ,, 41 1 Th- 667326 t CI i7rA. t v,i4 0 /o0,5- /VE 2 4v . e 4-06. 3 3138 METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA Dear Mr. Strahm: June 981 Mr. Warren G. Strahm, P.E. Florida Department of Environmental Regulation P. 0. 'Box 3858 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, Florida 33402 ENVIIRONMENTAi RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 909 S.E. FIRST AVENUE BRtCKELL PLAZA BUILDING —RM. 402 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 (305) 579 -2760 This Department has reviewed permit. application No. 13- 43625 -6E by Ben Pumo. The proposed project, which is located at 1500 NE 101 Street, Miami Shores, Florida involves the placement of 450 Cubic yards of riprap beginning at least one foot above mean high water, along the toe of a portion of a seawall. A permit application for this project has been filed with this Department. An inspection of the land and water areas adjacent to the proposed . site was conducted by this Department on June 9, 1981 at 9:40 a.m. The shoreline is presently bulkheaded with a concrete seawall. There is a break in the seawall on the northeast side of the property. From a point 15 feet southeast of the break in the wall to the west end of the wall, the canal bottom.appears to be too steep to support riprap as proposed. The water depth was approximately four feet at the seawall on the northeast side, three feet on the east side, and two and one half feet on the southeast side of the property at the time of inspection (low tide). The substrate is sand -silt with rocks scattered on top of it. Black Tunicates (Ascidia Nigra); orange sponges and a red alga'(Aconthop hora'Spicifera) have colonized the seawall. Schoolmaster (Lutjanus'A odus)'and gray snappers (Li.Itjanus Griseus), sergeant majors' udefduf. Saxatilis) and a bluehead wrasse (Thala.ssoma'Bifaseiatum) were observed in the area. Dade County Environmental Resources Management has no objection to the issuance of a permit for this project to the following stipulations: 1. If turbidity exceeds 50 J.C.U.'s beyond a 50 foot radius of the - work area, which would be in violation of Section 24 -11 of the Metro Dade County Code, turbidity controls, such as but not ' limited to turbidity curtains, should be implemented at the con- struction site and Dade County Environmental Resources Management should be notified immediately. If turbidity levels do not drop below 50 J.C.U.'s within one hour after implementation of the controls, all construction should be halted. Construction should not be resumed until the contractor has implemented additional control methods and has received authorization from Dade County Environmental Resources Management. AJC:cLm 2. During construction the contactor should take all necessary precautions to prevent debris from falling into the waterway. All material which may fall into the canal should be removed immediately: 3. Written notification should be provided to Dade County Environ- mental Resources Management and the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, a minimum of forty -eight (48) hours prior to the commence- ment of construction. We believe that if these conditions are made a part of this perTnit and adhered to by the applicant, this project should not have an adverse effect upon the water quality or aquatic organisms in this canal or Biscayne Bay. Sincerely, thony J. Clemente, P.E. Assistant Director Environmental Resources Management cc: Mike Slayton, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Max 'arson, Contractor Ben Pumo;, Applicant Miami Shores Village METRODADE.: Endr METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA Mr. Bennet Pumo 1500 N.E. 101 Street Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Dear Mr. Pumo: We have received and processed your Coastal Permit application CC-374 for the placement of 300 feet of riprap along your exis- ting bulkhead at 1500 N.E. 101 Street, Miami Shore, on Biscaym., Bay. Please be advised that this office has received 'several written objections to your proposed project. . Pursuant to Section 2:4-58.",- of the Dade County Code , your application must be ;unit t to •he County Commission tor a public hearing. As your a.1 : has now becul,le a L,andard Form App.i:LcaL:i1 information will be needed for its completion (sec attached Jist) If we can be of further assistance , please contact Joe Martinez ot' John C. Farina at 579-2760. ENViVONLIENTAL nr.so WAGES MANAGEMENT 009 S.E AVENUE BRICKELL :"LAZA BUILDING—RM. 402 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 • (305) 79-2760 July 1, • 1981. Sincere CC : w aren S r a 11 m D . E 11. , Wust Palm Beacl Mike Slayton , U.S. .Army Corps of' Engineer.; Vi 1 1 age of Miami. ShoresV Max Larsen , Dock and Marine Construction. i ," •• • ,.• •, Robert F. Hsim, Head, Coastal ad Wetlands Section, MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Application is hereby u►ndc for the approval of the detailed state...cnt 01 the plans and specifications herewith submitted for the build • ine or other structure herein described. This application Is made in compliance and conformity with the Building Ordinance of Miami Shores Village, Florida, and all provisions of the Laws of the State of Florida, all ordinances of Miami Shores Village and all rules and regulations of the Building Division of Miami Shores Village shall be complied with, whether herein specified or not. A copy of approved plans and specifications must be kept at building during progress of the work. Date••._:._.•.... ._._......•__...•..___......... ,19.aQ— Owner's Name and Address ./..Limo / � L / No. ./ . D c57 ' Registered Architect and /or Engineer.•u f./.iih1 / se nt" //o/ Ao e � Name and addres of licensed contrctor.. Location and legal description of lot to be built on: Lot Block Subdivision Street and Number where. work is to be done _ _ _ 1 . r State work to be done and purpose of building (by floors)._ . 82 ___....»..__..._ ......_._..__._.._.._.._ _.... :......and for no other purpose. New Building Remodeling Addition Repairi No. of Stories To be constructed of Kind of foss dation ILj R°f Covering Estimated Total cost of improvements $ Amount of Permit 5 ...f.!. Zone cubage required Plan Cubage Distance .to next nearest building Size of Building Lot Maximum live load to be borne by each floor I hereby submit all the plans and specifications for said building. All notices with reference to the building and its construction may be sent to. The undersigned applicant for this building permit does hereby certify that he understands and accepts his obligations as an employer of labor under the Florida Workmen's Compensation Act, being Section 5966, Compiled General Laws of Florida, Permanent Supplement, and has complied with the provisions thereof, and will require similar compliance from all contractors or sub - contractors employed by him in the work to be performed tinder this permit; and will post or cause to be posted for inspection on the site of •the work such public notice ntractors, ; on work to be performed under this or notices as arc required by the Act. The undersigned agrees to employ only such su permit, as are licensed by Miami Shores Village. Remuks (Signed).- STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF DADE. ss. Disapproved (Signed) Before me, the undersigned authority, a notary public, duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally ap- peared and who, being by me first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says that he is the. of the above described construction, that he has carefully read the foregoing application, and that he did sign the same, and that all facts thcrcin by him stated are true. Permit No 11 1 1 t1 _ Date P .)) D 9 Read, Sworn to and Subscribed before me. Building Inspector BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT to me well known, Notary Public, State of Florida My Commission Expires ...._..._. _ ..� _ PLANNING BOARD DATE Chairman Member Ucrr,ber Member Member .. ... Member __.._....._ Council Approved Date Disapproved Date NOTE: A charge of $1.00 will be made for making corrections or changes to this application after approval has been obtained from the Pl.tnnir.g hoard. A re fee of 51.00 will be charged when such re- inspection is made necessary by improper notice for inspection or faulty materials anu /or workmanship. Application is hereby umdc for the approval of the detailed statement or the plans and specifications herewith submitted for the build ing or other structure herein described. This application is made in compliance and conformity with the Building Ordinance of Miami Shores Village, Florida. and all provisions of the Laws of the State of Florida, all ordinances of Miami Shores Village and all rules and regulations of the Building Divisinn of Miami Shores Village shall be complied with, whether herein specified or not. A copy of approved plans and specifications must be kept at building during progress of the work. �i R./fie Date..._ ._....___. __. 7 ..L� _ 19.7f. O•ner's Name and Address ........C1 -/� 2 — No./5 .0...._... StreetA ,.r .1U / ^ Registered Architect and /or Engineer . • •., Name and address of licensed contractor e /1/ 1/.!i 0 23 � - ' ' / ' C7 ` Location and legal description of lot to be built on: Lot/.. — /s Block / Subdivision... .6 44 .( s 'Y c 2• -C 6 AX P'4 K tSric cS Street and Number where work is to be done /',S — ei N L / C/ -S State work to be done and purpose of building (by floors) / 141-7- " f 0 '. / 24- 4 r r/ "-'s — l ee d N' IreL-°C0"..7 e MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT and for no other purpose. New Building Remodeling L r Addition Repairs No. of Stories To be constructed of Kind of foundation Roof Covering Estimated Total cost of improvements $ 200 a • Amount of Permit $....lV Zone cubage required .Plan Cubage Distance to next nearest building.. Size of Building Lot Maximum live load to be borne by each floor I hereby submit all the plans and specifications for said building. All notices with reference to the building and its construction may be sent to.. .....(7.4s.idcg The undersigned applicant for this building perinit does hereby certify that he understands and accepts his obligations as an employer of labor under the Honda Workmen's Compensation Act, being Section 5966, Compiled General Laws of Florida, Permanent Snp clement, and has complied ss ith the provisions thereof, and will require similar compliance from all contractors or sub - contractors employed by him in the work to be performed sunder this permit; and will post or cause to be posted for inspection on the site of the work such public notice or notices as arc required by the Act. The undersigned agrees to employ only such suJevtftractors, on i wor to be performed under this permit, as are licensed by Miami Shores Village. Remarks (Signed) to me well known, and who, being by me first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says that he is the. of the above described construction, that he has carefully read the foregoing application, and that he did sign the same, and that all facts therein by him statedar ee. Permit No /Z/ 1 ` `L" l Date 1/411 °) 1 9 Read, Sworn to and Subscribed before me. Disapproved I Date Notary Public, State of Florida (Signed) Building Inspector My Commission Expires STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF DADE. ss. Before me, the undersigned authority, a notary public, duly authorizcd to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally ap- peared PLANNING BOARD DATE Chairman Member Member Member :Member .. .. Member �_._._... Council Approved Date Disapproved Date NOTE: A charge of $1.00 will be made for making corrections or changes to this application after approval has been obtained from the PLuuuir.;; hoard. A re•in fee of $1.00 will be charged when such re- inspection is made necessary by improper notice for inspection or faulty materials and /or workmanship. MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Application is hereby made for the approval of the detailed statement of the plans and specifications herewith submitted for the build- ing or other structure herein described. This application is made in compliance and conformity with the Building Ordinance of Miami Shores Village, Florida, and all provisions of the Laws of the State of Florida, all ordinances of Miami Shores Village and all rules and regulations of the Building Division of Miami Shores Village shall be complied with, wheth rov plans and specifications must be kept at budding during progress of the work. Owner's Name and Address Disapproved Date (Signed) Building Inspector Date.. 0 /4 / /J-- ,1 9 . 7 � i 00._... Str eet . /s./.. �... / Registered Architect and /or Engineer Name and address of licensed contractor © Location and legal description of lot to be built on: Lot Block Subdivision �y Street and Number where work is to be done 96' 0 Q .1:.1., - State woe to be done and purpose of budding (by floors).... and for no other purpose. New Building Remodeling 7/"."-- Addition Repairs No. of Stories To be constructed of Kind of foundation Roof Cpri�►g Estimated Total cost of improvements $..._._...... / � ._ 7 . . 6 l (-5 Amount of Permit S. Zone cubage required plan Cubage Distance to next nearest building Size of Building Lot Maximum live load to be borne by each floor I hereby submit all the plans and - specifications for said building. All notices with- reference to the building and .its_construction may be sent to The undersigned applicant for this building permit does hereby certify that he understands and accepts his obligations as an employer of labor under theFlorida Workmen's Compensation Act, being Section 5966, Compiled General Laws of Florida, Permanent Supplement, and has complied with the provisions thereof, and will require similar compliance from all contractors or sub - contractors employed by him in the work to be performed under this permit; and will post or cause to be posted for inspection on the site of the work such public notice or notices as are required by the Act. The undersigned agrees to employ only sufh_stbcontractors, oy work to be performed under this pennit, as are licensed by Miami Shores Village. --f' Remarks (Signed) "aw STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF DADE. j ss Before me, the undersigned authority, a notary public, duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally ap- peared to me well known, and who, being by me first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says that he is the. of the above described construction, that he has carefully read the foregoing application, and that he did sign the same, and that all facts therein by him s edearre true. Permit No.____ / ! Date /49'/ 76"- Read, Sworn to and Subscribed before me. Notary Public, State of Florida My Commission Expires PLANNING BOARD DATE Chairnan - Member Member Member Member ..... -. .. Member Council Approved Date Disapproved Date NOTE: A charge of $1.00 will be made for making corrections or changes to this application after approval has been obtained from the Planning Board. A re inspection fee of $1.00 will be charged when such re- inspection is made necessary by improper notice for inspection or faulty materials and /or workmanship. MARK 26 26 26 SAMPLE PROJECT LOCATION OF POUR CLASS OF CONCRETE SLUMP OF CONCRETE CONTRACTOR ADMIXTURE SUPPLIER PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY ST / 3901 N.W. 29th AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33142 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS. AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS, CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. SECTIONAL AREA SQ. INCH 28027 2847 28 REPORT OF TEST OF 6" x122'-- C-ONCRETE CYL FOR Laurence ObIeet tie a 1? 0 .st 656 Miami " 1oeea Fla, • COMPRES CRUSHING LOAD LBS. 93,250 93,500 106,000 : 3 concrete cylinders cast on 11 -25-69 by VII tzencec ntative at 12:10 ,FPM at job and g in hborato y on 11 -26-99 'Harbor Club Villas, 1M0 105th St, Floor slab 2nd floor West end 30001 • 3-1/2" Laurence Cons:„ ,A®1 Ooncrete yE cc: 2 Client 1 Miami gnome Vi1lcage, 10050 NR E. 2nd Ave. © Mir 1f Shores LABORATORY NO. 361 JOB NO. tiA -3667 CUSTOMER'S ORDER DATE CRUSHING STRENGTH LBS. PER SQ. INCH 3300 3310 5750 QUANTITY TRUCK NO. TICKET NO. MIXING TIME BLDG. PERMIT NO. Cyl.s5 cast by .e 3. W. PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY AVER. DISTRICT MANAGER FORM 1221 -MA November 28„ 1960 = 3 Oacember 2, 1969 -• 7 December 23, 1969 0 28 AG E DAYS 3 7 28 : 10 : 506 24968 1 hr, 19 min, MARK SAMPLE PROJECT LOCATION OF POUR CLASS OF CONCRETE SLUMP OF CONCRETE CONTRACTOR ADMIXT URE SUPPLIER PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY SECTIONAL AREA SQ. INCH 3901 N.W. 29th AVENUE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33142 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS. THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES. ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS. AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS, CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS 1S RESERVED PENDING OUR • WRITTEN APPROVAL. LABORATORY NO. 360 REPORT OF TEST OF 6" x 12" CONCRETE CYLINDERS A-1 Concrete FOR Laurence Construction P, O, Box 646 Miami Shores, Pia, COMPRESSION TEST CRUSHING LOAD CRUSHING STRENGTH LBS., LBS. PER SQ. INCH 25 28.27 84 2970 25 28027 88,250 3130 25 28,27 801 3590 3 concrete cylinders cast on 11-25 -69 by PTL representative at 8;i0 M at lob and received in laboratory aaa 11 -26 -69 Harbor. Club Villas 1500 N;, E. 105th Sts Tie Beams & Slab 2nd floor West end 3000 P I : 4_1/2" .L .aurenco COnst, YE Icc: 2 Client 1 Miami Shores Village, 10050 N. E. 2nd Ave:, Miami Shore PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY Cyls , cast by J. W. JOB No. MA -3667 CUSTOMER'S ORDER DATE November 28 1969 - 3 December 2, 1969 - 7 December 23, 1969 - 28 AVER. DISTRICT MANAGER FORM 1221 -MA AG E DAYS 7 28: QUANTITY 10 TRUCK NO. 501 TICKET NO. : 35113 MIXING TIME 1 hr, 6. min, BLDG. PERMIT NO. . ninA Pipit Mark Sectional Area Sq. Inch 341-C 28.27 341 -C 28.27 341 =C 28027 341 -C 28027 341-C 2»27 341 -C 28027 Admixture Pozz r,2 cc: 5 Client 1 E. Bo Streat 1 Mr, R. Belsham Engr, 1 Peterson & Shurlin, Arch, Crushing Load Lbs. 43 459000 459250 729750 71,000 71,500 . PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY 3281 N.W. 7th STREET MIAMI 35, FLORIDA r AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES. ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS. AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. REPORT OF TEST OF 6" x 12" CONCRETE CYLINDERS FOR MAULii Industries, Inc, 9 5220 Bisc0 B ivd0 �d' c. r!' _ '1 •_: � COMPRESSION TEST DATE Crushing Strength Lbs. Per Sq. Inch 1520 1590 1600 2570 2510 2530 Sample Concrete cylinders cast on 7-27=55 by P T L Repro @ Jobsite L 11:10 A. M. Job & Location Residence - 1500 N. E. 101 St., Miami Florida Location of Pour Footing S. E. Corner Class of Concrete 3000 Lbs./ Sqa IN. 28 days (Ponce) Slump of Concrete 5 1/2 Inches (cone a temp. 980F�Truck No. :550 (Drum) Ticket No. :523959 Contractor Dunning Prop Inc. Mixing Time : 50 Mins o Bldg. Permit No. : 2165 Above cylinders ware made without prior notice to Batcher or Plant concerned. Note:. Ahovs reported strongth of concrete 0 2C days, doba not :moot the requiromants sot forth by tho Buildin` - W:ficiais Comm, of South Florida, Policy on Handling and Testing Concreted PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY Ckh,Q ., Q Q J W. Har'i1ee. % LABORATORY NO. JOB No. FILE No. CUSTOMER•S ORDER August 4, 1955 Aver. 1570 'DISTRICT MANAGER FORM 1221 -MA 3 DJLAA -1117 Age Days 7 7 28 28 28 Mark 341 -c 341 -c 341 =C 341-0 341 -C 3t1 =C Sample Job & Location Location of Pour Class of Concrete Slump of Concrete Contractor Admixture 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 2.27 28.27 cc: 5 Client 1 E. B. Streat Sectional Area Sq. Inch FOR MAULL Industries, Inc. . 522.0 Bisce Blvd. Mi nmi , F'! orid a COMPRESSION TEST Crushing Load Lbs. 439000 4. 59000 459250 5 1/2 (conc. Dunning Prop Inc. Pozz ;l2 a PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY 3281 N.W. 7th STREET MIAMI 35, FLORIDA AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES. ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS. AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. REPORT OF TEST OF 6" x 12" CONCRETE CYLINDERS LABORATORY NO. 30075 JOB No. MA-117 FILE No. CUSTOMER'S DATE ORDER August 39 1955 Nun Plea' Crushing Strength Lbs. Per Sq. Inch 1520 1590 1600 temp. 98 No. Ticket No. Mixing Time Bldg. Permit No. Aver. 1570 Concrete cylinders cast on 7- -27 -55 by P T L Repr. L Jobsite @ 11:10 A. MO Residence 1500 N. ED 101 St. Miami Florida Footing; a S. Ea Corner .3000 Lbs./ Sq. IN. 28 days (Ponce) PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY ��T ' CL 1'7 H ar7.lee 9 I (STRICT MANAGER FORM 1221 -MA Age Days 7 28 28 28 55 (Drum) 523959 50 Mins. 2165 Above cylinders were made without prior notice to Batcher or Plant concerned. Note: Above seven day results give indication of possible compressive strength failure of concrete at twenty -eight days for 3000 psi. LI 1 • " • 1 ORDER No. MA -443 CLIENT'S No. REPORT TO PROJECT q D G Core No0 Diameter of Core Capped Height of Cora Area Square Inches Total Load in Lbso Po So I. - to) , /O; /J/'/-7 /, PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY 3281 N.W. .7th STREET MIAMI 35, FLORIDA AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES. ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS, CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. LABORATORY No. Cs G. SECURING & T1TING OF FOUR HARDENED CONCR 1'E CORES REPORT ON CONTRACTOR o Dunning Properties Inco LOCATION OF CORING : Footings So E0 Corner & Side co: 6 Client 1 :Mro R0 Belsham Engr0 1 Peterson & Shuflin Arch0 2 /yr. fl o� auhhi FILE No. August 24 1955 Mauls Industries Inc° - 5220 Biscayne Blvd0 Muni Florida ATTa Mro Ho Lo3ey Residence @ 1500. No E0 101st Street Miami Flao • Q P O C p b p O 1 2 .3 4 40 4o0 400 400" 800" 800" 800 800 12o57 12057 12057 32057 23 24 28 38 1830 1950 2300 3020 Age in Days @ Testing - Cores No0 3, & 2 - 26 days = Average = 1890 Cores Noo 3 & 4 - 28 days o Average o 2660 Above Cores were drilled on 8/20/55 at locations designated by Concrete Test Cylinder report° Cores were tested in accordance with A, S, T o M. Designation C 42490 PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY JJ o Harllee District M ro * g FORM 407 -MA ft4119 3:11 rare Mark Sample Job & Location Location of Pour Class of Concrete Slump of Concrete Contractor -Admixture Sectional Area Sq. Inch 341 -C 28.27 341-0 28.27 341 °C 28.27 341 °C 28.27 3421 -C 2 D27 341= -C 28027 cc: 5 Client PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY 3281 N.W. 7th STREET MIAMI 35, FLORIDA AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES. ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS. AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. REPORT OF TEST OF 6" x 12" CONCRETE CYLINDERS FOR MAUhl:, indu s trie s 9 Inc 0 a 5220 Bisce Blvd. on d COMPRESSION TEST Crushing Load Crushing Strength Lbs. Lbs. Per Sq. Inch FORM 1221 -MA LABORATORY No. 30075 JOB NO. MA -117 FILE No. CUSTOMER'S ORDER DATE August 22 9 19 5r Aver. Concrete cylinders cart on 7. by P T L Repr @ Jobsite @ 11:10 A. M Age Days 43 1520 7 459 1590 7 45925 1600 1570 7. 728750 2570 28 71,000 2510 28 71,500 2530 2540 28 Residence G 1500 N. E. 101 St., Miami Florida Footing - S0 E. Corner 3000 Lbs./ Sq. IN, 28 days (Ponce) 5 1/2 Inches (conc. temp. 9$o No. : 550 (Drum) Ticket No. '523959 Mixing Time : Dunning Prop Inc D 0 Mine, Bldg. Permit No. : 216 2165 Pozz ,/2 Above cylinders •ware made without prior notice to Batcher or Plant concerne Note: .Above roportod strongth of concroto C; 2C days, does not moot the requirements as sot forth by the Building, - 0Lficials Comm. of South Florida, Policy on Handling and Testing Concrete. PITTSBURGH TESTING LABORATORY 1 E. B. Streat 1 Mr, R. Belsham Engr. 1 Peterson & �5hu Arch-, Z AA". ge4 o e7)V�fr�� -iC11 t?' W. Harllee9 U 0 bISTRICT MANAGER 0 illage of Miami Shores N° 3376 JOB ADDRESS t©,� INSPECTION ?nal - x:%411 1 (,?-) TIME READY REMARKS 'f- a , cam.. INSPECTOR DATE (C17,-C1(,/r) 64 ° r G ,/1,h Y /sue //v t . a dk ,}& 4 2-hz,