1238 NE 96 St (2)PLANNING BOARD AGENDA OF kqN7-- M0at : 1 4 t ITEM NO.
4 6 of Owner /Applicant 5 \_i LL / Phone No.
Address of Property, and /or Legal Description 1%/3 NS C i b 6
Nature of Request PWROV AL 'O VOIDRa
Present Zoning V
Area of Present Building
Area with Proposed Addition
Parking Spaces Provided
Parking Spaces Required with Addition
Setbacks as per Code gX ,
i
Setbacks Provided X!1
Variances/
aiami jhorergllage
F L OR ID A
UPPGR- IN Ca COt,W S V.leczoikuk 4-‘ ) u`To
Council Action Required \It5
Date of Applicant Notification
Planning Board Action
Council Action
it6rimv
Director of Building and Zoning
DATE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
10/30/85
$50.00
(MW ` t . .S
W4
cr
w
w
I— c0
Ne
Zc
CO ▪ 0 "
O Y �
a a ° PAY Fifty Dollars and 00 /100 Cents
CO u_ TO THE ORDER OF
N.1 0
Q ¢
O w g
0
0
r
L
DETACH AND RETAIN THIS STATEMENT
H. T. WHITEHEAD, INC.
PHONE 305- 751 -0343
9822 NE 2ND AVENUE, SUITE 6
MIAMI SHORES, FL 33138
Miami Shores Village
J
11'000L32 406700 23974 OLO
October 301,9 85
3811'0 6
N° 132
63- 239/670
$ 50.00
THE ATTACHED CHECK 18 IN PAYMENT OF ITEMS DESCRIBED BELOW IF NOT CORRECT PLEASE NOTIFY U8 PROMPTLY. NO RECEIPT DESIRED
H. T. WHITEHEAD, INC.
•
RECEIPT Date
i73
19
Received From 7 T Li; .ce,', j r
For
ACCOUNT
HOW PAID
CHECK
MONEY
ORDER
AMT. OF
ACCOUNT
AMT. PAID
BALA
CASH
iami cfiioreslla
V F L . O R ID A
PLANNING BOARD AGENDA OF OC,`r I ) 10 ITEM NO. t'Y
tti'r. Wkrr .0 (CE3 !C) 1St ' - C34 4 0
Name of Owner /Applicant W — IMAViit.. Phone No.
Address of Property, and /or Legal Description Ma Ma' KS 4b 9''
Nature of Request APP :vas. C.V etAi4S FOR, \4C A ac t4
Present Zoning 11.
Area of Present Building
Area with Proposed Addition
Parking Spaces Provided
Parking Spaces Required with Addition
Setbacks as per Code
Setbacks Provided
Variances /Exceptions /Zoning Change
A% v etdy Ct-
Council Action Required
Date of Applicant Notification
Planning Board Action
Council Action
10 144
Director of Building and Zoning
E
Christopher P. Kelley
Attorney at Law
8801 Biscayne Blvd Suite 101
Miami, Fl. 33138
Dear Mr. Kelley:
Sincerely,
Frank LuBien, Director
Building & Zoning
FL :jc
Encl (2Z
A ia,tru*/
ate
Re; 1238 NE 96th St,
10050 N. E. SECOND AVENUE
MIAMI SHORES, FLORIDA 33138
(305) 758 -8000
November 15, 1989
I am enclosing your check for $50,00 for a variance which
was not required. I am also enclosing a copy of the minutes
of the Planning & Zoning Board meeting of November 12, 1989.
Mr. Keller agreed to make certain modifications to the
vegetation on his property. Please advise him to proceed
in all haste to make these adjustments, and to advise this
office when his work is complete,
Please don't hesitate to call if you or your client have any
questions.
MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE
OCTOBER 12, 1989
A regular meeting of the Miami Shores Village Planning & Zoning Board
was held on October 12, 1989 at the Miami Shores Village Hall. The meeting
was called to order at 7:35 P.M. by Chairman Fernandez, with the following
members present: Richard M. Fernandez, Chairman
Terrell F. Chambers, Jr.
Robert E. Cook
Thomas Laubenthal
Absent: Larry T. McClure
Also present: Frank LuBien, Director of Building & Zoning
1. MINUTES - September 28, 1989
Corrections were called for in the minutes, under #2 - next to last
sentence plans was scratched. #4 - Mr. McClure not Mr. Cook inquired
as to building materials. #5 - Mr. McClure's calculations should be
included. Mr. Cook's comments for the record: This approval is not
granted for setting a precedent, but because of the 1956 approval.
The presentation was complete and included all four criteria for a
variance request. This is a unique circumstance. #8 - Blue Book
printed by Downtown Revitalization Board, submitted by Ms. Witte.
410 - 51 % of and two rescinded signatures not petitions. Mr. Cook
also commented he does not recall being the person to second a motion,
or make inquiry in a couple of instances.
Mr. Laubenthal moved to accept the minutes as corrected, seconded by
Mr. Cook, and passed unanimously.
2. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF VARIANCE TO HEDGE HEIGHT
Margaret Keller
1238 NE 98th ST
Mr. LuBien introduced the request. He noted this is a request for a
variance for a hedge in violation, and non conforming. It comes to the
Board as a result of a citation issued by the Code Enforcement Officer.
Mr. Christopher Kelley, Attorney representing the Keller's, outlined the
letter he wrote and each Member received a copy of. He states they are
requesting a hardship variance from 31/2' hedge height limit in the front
yard. The row of Australian Pine trees in the front, planted 3 to 5 feet
apart were in place when the property was purchased in 1958. Pictures
were attached to the letter and additional pictures were reviewed by the
Members. He read from the Miami Shores Village Code of Ordinances, Sec 219,
definition of hedge, and questioned if the Australian Pine Trees could be
identified as a hedge. Further, Mr. Kelley stated the trees enhance the
appearance of the neighborhood, the situation is unique and the Keller's
want to continue to maintain the property as for the past 30 odd years.
The trees if cut would certainly harm landscaping and forgo the intent of
the Ordinance for safety and site level. Mr. Kelley also addressed the
four criteria for a hardship variance. Mr. Kelley was asked, and again
outlined Sec 702 (c).
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
-2- October 12, 1989
Bruce Keller, son who lives on the property outlined his request, stating
gardening advise was sought for a solution to their unique situation. To
remove the Casurina planting (Australian Pines) is unreasonable. He presented
a drawing of the proposed landscaping plan. The property has always been
well kept and it is hoped shaping the trees will add to the landscape appear-
ance. The permit to build was taken in 1935, and it is expected these trees
were seedlings at that time.
Mr. Laubenthal stated this planting may have started as a hedge, but is a
series of trees, and it is clear from the photographs that if cut they will
not recover foilage. The specisies has much potential, and if properly
shaped it would not require a variance.
It was agreed, this is a unique situation, different from other hedge height
requests. Members were also advised that if tabled it will not significantly
affect the Code Enforcement procedure, since 60 days was granted for com-
pliance. The item could be tabled and the applicant could return with an-
other proposal. As presented, Mr. Fernandez felt he could not approve a
variance and that with some work a variance may not be required.
Mr. Laubenthal moved to table the request, as submitted, to allow the
applicant the opportunity to do some trimming and develope his landscape plan.
Mr. Chambers seconded the motion which passed unanimously.
3. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SIGN REFURBISHING
Viking Motel
88th Terrace & Biscayne Blvd.
Mr. John Militana was the Attorney representing Mr. Thomas Lynn the prospec-
tive purchaser of the Viking Motel. Mr. Militana noted this property has
been in disrepair, eyesore, and seedy, and an embarrassment to Miami Shores
Village. Mr. Lynn has the finances and the experience to improve and to
maintain the Motel so as to conform. He is requesting that the formerly
existing sign be refurbished to match the sign on the South. As clarifi-
cation for Mr. LuBien it was explained the intent is for the two pylon signs
on Biscayne Blvd, (one at the north and one at the south of the building)
to be illuminated. The sign at the motel office will be painted, it already
is illuminated. Mr. Militana further stated one of the purchase contract
conditions is that the signs on Biscayne Blvd be visible. The request con-
forms with the code and is consistant with the neighborhood.
Mr. Laubenthal inquired, is the sign attached to the building, and is all the
tract of land being purchased? Mr. Militana advised him it is. Mr. Fernandez
mentioned the sign clutter on Biscayne Blvd, and asked Members to consider
this.
Mr. Lynn explained the signage is important to the survival of the Motel.
It attracted undesirable element and died because the signage and motel had
been neglected so. Mr. Lynn expects to spend about $200,000. to refurbish
and attract a desirable clientele to contribute to the image of Miami Shores.
Mr. LuBien noted, nothing in the code prohibits the signage and it is in
compliance with the square footage.
4
_ 411111
2-*k.
Planning Board Action
Council Action
aiami
F L OR 0 A
Director of Building and Zoning
hliami cfhores 'X llage
F L OR ID A
PLANNING BOARD AGENDA OF otP e ) i 1 ITEM NO. 2.
Name of Owner /Appl i cant PiPAGA M1 Phone No. 7
Address of Property, and /or Legal Description /Pd
Nature of Request .AWPRON'kL' 0f- v KA Cie `5
1:11 VAG 1 tG rr cep - fl 1A-1A
Present Zoning SZ —
Area of Present Building
Area with Proposed Addition
Parking Spaces Provided
Parking Spaces Required with Addition
Setbacks as per Code
Setbacks Provided
Variances /Exceptions /Zoning Change
Counci l Action Requi red
Date of Applicant Notification
Planning Board Action
Council Action
Director of Building and Zoning
TELEPHONE
(305) 754 -1617
October 2, 1989
Miami Shores Village
Planning & Zoning Board
10050 N.E. 2nd Avenue
Miami Shores, Florida 33138
Dear Board Members:
CHRISTOPHER P. KELLEY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
Re: Case # 000651
Keller Residence
1238 N.E. 96th Street
8801 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD
SUITE 101
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33138
Please be advised that I represent the above referenced
property owners who received the above referenced notice of
violation. My clients are requesting a hardship variance from
the 3 1/2 feet fence and hedge limit in the front yard of their
property based upon the following:
The subject property is set on three lots with the building
on the western portion of the property and vacant land on the
eastern portion. This property is in similar condition as to
when it was purchased by the owners in 1958. The vacant lot
adjacent to the Keller's home is enclosed by a five foot fence.
The hedges in the rear and side yards are five foot, but in the
front yard there are Australian Pine Trees which are planted
three to five feet apart.
Attached to this letter are pictures of the front yard
including the fence, the Australian Pines and hedge. It is
questionable whether or not the series of Australian Pines
constitute a hedge and thus fall within the 3 1/2 feet height
limitation.
Section 219 of Appendix A - Zoning defines hedge as a
planting of vegetation with or without opening and regardless of
width, that constitutes a barrier more than six (6) feet in
length. As shown by the attached pictures, but for the fence and
the 3 1/2 foot hedge inside the fence on the other side from the
Australian Pine Trees, a person could easily pass through the
Pine trees thus not constituting a barrier.
The pictures clearly show that visibility is not prevented
Letter to Miami Shores Village
Planning & Zoning Board
Re: Case #000651, Keller Residence
October 2, 1989, Page 2
by the Australian Pines as an average person is clearly visible
along with table, chairs, volleyball net and ladder. To require
the Australian Pines to be cut to 3 1/2 feet would be below the
vegetation line thus leaving only stumps in the ground every
three to five feet. It is unknown whether the trees would
survive if cut, to say nothing about the appearance.
As stated previously, the fence encompassing the lot is five
foot and to require the front yard fence to be reduced to three
and one -half foot is effectively requesting the fences that has
been in place over thirty years to be removed and replaced. The
cost of this procedure is unknown at this time. Another problem
exists with the 3 1/2 foot fence limitation in the front yard
because of the definition of front yard. Front yard includes any
part of a hedge or fence between the front wall of your house and
the street. Therefore, the fence and hedge in what most people
consider the side yard bordering their neighbors would be two
heights - 1) three and one half feet before the front door then
seven foot from the front door step to the rear of the property.
The cost of this additional expense for the front -side yard for
approximately ten to twelve feet on both sides is also unknown.
All that my clients are requesting is that the property be
permitted to continue in its present state which is the same
state as it has for the past thirty odd years with the five foot
fence and the Australian Pine Trees in their front yard. This
continued use is not detrimental to their neighborhood and more
than likely enhances the appearance of the neighborhood. My
clients situation is unique in that this was how the property was
when it was purchased and no changes or alterations have been or
are being requested. To require the fences and Australian Pines
to be cut to 3 1/2 feet is tantamount to the removal of the Trees
and replacement of the fence. My clients thank you for
consideration given this matter.
CPK:sdm
Encls.
cc: Mr. and Mrs. Keller
Very truly yours,
Christopher P. Kelley, Esquire
TinaRqaRiEZ
kcS.61_c,0 FSLA,0,
& tAnct, t L-ebo Q:A/u(k
6-) orY1 -ynk,
\&
k
o
Y)"1Q1,
(
\ • •
.�•. .
- f
l
G.4/%0P-.7Y
•
INVERT OF ^' ^''" TO x ,N^T LESS
c : -.1101
•
Ito c' qn
c112. mac. vex.7
- 1X . 1\1 ?(:), •
5`T
T ..
•
•
•
1.erk rstf�/.af.IY •
.,
! T
OUT Lille •
]'fE L tX - .
TILE TO MAX •
ESCITT - ' .
< , \ < v). \,
see
■
. f yy► •
f :'
\
T° 4,,
INVERT �� ^,.sir•r -,
NOT; C S
SYS J_R E PIC
A Cz
TANS
BY CHAPT�s. CODS
iV1ET 9? - =•�-•
THE DAD' " ^ -,- -- '• • v HT? ALTH
DEPT..: -- 'D
FOR A'" .T- ' :
.,r 3 ILD
OEPARTME tut
WIDE ur'ry:,, T.: ..
SAS
, Ri g r`� f h
ONSl7Ee L WAG
Serial No
-
;
•
- THE DADE 'ATT'
F'S
HEALTH
5irD
7 IIS
•
?' 4L
3
•
DOOR HEIGHT
C0N3ISTS OF
6' -6'
'2 SECTIONS 16"
2 SECTIONS 21"
6' -9"
1 SECTION 18-
3 SECTIONS 21'
7'
4 SECTIONS 21"
-
7' -3'
-
-
7' -6"
5 SECTIONS 18"
-
7' -9"
4 SECTIONS 18'
1 SECTION 21'
8'
3 SECTIONS 18"
2 SECTIONS 21'
8' -3'
2 SECTIONS 18'
3 SECTIONS 21'
8' -6'
1 SECTION 18"
4 SECTIONS 21'
8' -9"
5 SECTIONS 21"
-
9'
6 SECTIONS 18"
-
9' -3"
5 SECTIONS 18"
1 SECTION 21"
9' -6"
4 SECTIONS 18"
2 SECTIONS 21'
9' -9"
3 SECTIONS 18"
3 SECTIONS 21'
10'
2 SECTIONS 18"
4 SECTIONS 21"
10' -3'
1 SECTION 18"
5 SECTIONS 21"
10' -6"
6 SECTIONS 21'
-
10' -9'
6 SECTIONS 18'
1 SECTION 21"
11'
5 SECTIONS 18"
2 SECTIONS 21"
11' -3
4 SECTIONS 18"
3 SECTIONS 21'
t 1' -6"
3 SECTIONS 18"
4 SECTIONS 21'
11' -9'
2 SECTIONS 18"
5 SECTIONS 21"
12'
1 SECTIONS 18"
6 SECTIONS 21"
12' -3'
7 SECTIONS 21"
-
12' -6'
6 SECTIONS 18"
2 SECTIONS 21"
12' -9
5 SECTIONS 18"
3 SECTIONS 21"
13'
4 SECTIONS 18"
4 SECTIONS 21"
13' -3"
3 SECTIONS 18'
5 SECTIONS 21'
13' -6'
2 SECTIONS 18"
6 SECTIONS 21"
13' -9'
1 SECTION 18"
7 SECTIONS 21"
14'
8 SECTIONS 21"
-
1 4' -3"
6 SECTIONS 18"
3 SECTIONS 21'
1 4' - 6"
5 SECTIONS 18"
4 SECTIONS 21"
14' -9"
4 SECTIONS 18"
5 SECTIONS 21"
15'
3 SECTIWS 18"
6 SECTIONS 21"
15' -3"
2 SECTIONS 18"
7 SECTIONS 21'
15' -6"
1 SECTION 18" '
8 SECTIONS 21"
15' -9
9 SECTIONS 21"
-
16'
6 SEC IOIG 18"
4 SECTIONS 21"
•
•
•.• ••I
I
11111111111
AMOIMUMMMIMMIL
••• •• • . i . •
•- a _ •
• •
. . • •i
•
I. �i
- --
i I
/
I ) („,.
/
I
I
�, , i
■
I
/
ti I
i
• • . • . .071; X 7.- V GALV. STEEL
• • • • • • • • • • 'EMI ROLLER HINGE
• • • •.• IV°(2) .9 X 5/8 SMS •
• • • • • • • •
• • .•• • • • • •••
•
•• • • •.
• • •
• • •
• •
..• .•• •
. •..
• • • •
• •.• •
• • • •
••
• • •
3" X T-1 /2" X 6 -1/2' X _1 STEEL
Wait (2) 914 X 3/4' SELF DRIWNC SCREWS
OUTSIDE HANDLE
• ..
• • •
• • • •
• • •
• • •
• • •
.
• ••
2/ DOOR
7 X 7 GALV_ AIRCRAFT TYPE
CABLE & NICO -PRESS SLEEVE
12/ MIN. 5 TO 1 SAFETY FACTOR
CENTER STILE
OU''SIDE KEYED LOCK
LOCK BAR LOCKING SHOWN
• .2)71 X 7 -1/r GAUL STEEL
• ENTER HINGE
it/ (4) 914 X 1/2" SMS
SPRING LOADED SLIDE BOLT LOCK (BOTH SIDES)
FASTENED W/ (4) 114 X 1/2" S.M.S.
5/8" MIN. LOCK ENGAGEMENT CONFORMS TO
SFBC 3603.2 REGARDING GARAGE DOORS
LOCK BAR GUIDES
INSTALLED ON END STILE
.16T X .6W LOCK BAR
ENGAGES RI TRACK
ON EACH SIDE OF DOOR
3
/
• • • •• • •
.•. • • •. • ..
•
••• •
CENTER STILE
•••
/
OPTIONAL VENT
MAXIMUM OPENING AREA
120 SQ. IN.
•
•
•
•
•
MAX. DOOR WIDTH
9' -4"
• • • • •• '•
INSIDE ELEVATION
RAISED PANEL EMBOSSED DOOR
GENERAL NOTES
1. THIS STRUCK JRE IS DESIGNED AS PER THE SOUTH FLORIDA
BUILDING COE.: 1994 EDMON FOR DADE COUNTY. ALSO FOR WIND
LOADS AS PEF ;. 7 -88 USING CORRESPONDING LOADS.
2. ANCHORS SHALL BE AS UST ED. SPACED AS SHOWN ON DETAILS.
ANCHOR EMB;.MENT TO BASE MATERIAL SHALL BE BEYOND WALL
DRESSING OR iTUCCO.
3. ALL BOLTS. NUT.; AND WASHERS SHALL BE ZINC PLATED CARBON STEEL
4. ANCHORING OR LOADING CONDITIONS OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN IN
THESE DETAILS NOT PART OF THIS APPROVAL
r — ` A
L A
OPTIONAL FLUSH FACE
WOOD GRAIN DESIGN
Engr. DR. HUAIAYOUN FAR000
STRUCTURES
FLA. PE / 16557
O U 0
0 =
rn N
z cr z
O 00
O 0 o
w W
V) • V)
w I z
tL �
�
DAB DOOR MODEL 824
MAX. SIZE 9' -4" WIDE X 16' -0" HIGH
DESIGN PRESSURE RATING = + 50.0 PSF
- 60.0 PSF
CODE IIIE
E
,.• AUG 2005_
JUL .
::z;.01—
:, :. .03
O
w
0
C
cr ,
0
O
w
0
J
z
w
0
w
J
z
0
1=
U
w
N
N
c
0
N
cu
C
0
0
0
0
v
l
CO
0
Li Pe)
Q J
U =
vi
z
cow
N0) o
O 3�
0 Z 2
in 6
0 a J
-_
c
0
0.
0
( 4.1
v
41
0
'
0
,c
W
0
U
0
0
0
cc
a
c
0
0
0
7
C
drawing no.
01 -09
sheet 1 of 3
.� •. �'�'
. :.`.��,�„�- �.•�el� —�; s�:.�'o;:.::y..;�.;.ay►
:1:
STEEL TRACK EIRAC9cET FASTENED
TO W000 JAMB WITH
007TE 5/16" X 1 -5/$' LAG SCREW
SOUTHERN PINE
0.55 S.G.
OPTIONAL STOP MOULDING
BY DOOR INSTALLER
1-S' X 2.19" X 3.3" X _102"
SILLL TRACK BRACKETS
STxE SHEET 3 FOR SPACING
3/4 MAX.
2 -D,18" X .078" GALV. SILEL TRACK
FASTENED TO TRACK PLATES
',W/ 1/4-20 .X 5/ TRUSS HD.
SLOTTED M.S. do LOCK NUT
• • ••• • • • 000
•• •• • • • •• •• •
• • • • • • • • • •
• • • ••• • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • •.• • • • • •
• • • • • •
•• • • •• • •
• •
• • . •
•. ••
4646 ... ••• •.•
• • • •
• •
•• • •
#14 X 5/8" SMS
6 PER HINGE
7/16" PUSHNUT
INSTALLED ON ROLLER SHAFT
• •••
• • •
•
•• •
• • • •
• •
• •. 0.• ••
• • •
•
• • • 0460 ••
1/2" X 11 -3/4" X J159" FORMED STEEL
-GLUED TO PANEL mo SECURED TO
END STILE WITH 3f16" POP RIVETS 0 12" O.C.
-
7 -1/2" IS .050" GALV. STEEL
CENTER HINGE
SECTION B -B
INTERIOR SIDE
1 -7/8" X 2 -5/8" X .045" STE:_L
CENTER STILE. GLUED AND ,<NETT_D
TO PANEL W/ (4) 3/16" F.•VETS
- #14 X 5/8' S: M.S.
4/ HINGE
J
POP RIVETS
7-1/2" X .071
END ROLLER HINGE
46.46 • • • ••• • _ •
•
•
• ••
• •• •• • • • • • •
• • • • • •
• • • •4646 • • • •
00* • • • • 000 • •
••• •
• • •
•
. ..
• ••
• • • •
• •
••
•••
• . • • • • •
•
• •
• • •
•
0• •0 • •
•
•• •
• •
• •
• •
3 -3/4" MIN.
EDGE DIST. 1
•••
• • .••
• •
• • •
• •
• • ••
• •
• • •
• •
•••
r. ..11 " 1/4
.••
• •
3/16" ALUM RIVETS
FLAPS BENT OVER PANEL
1/2" PUNCHED HOLES
0 4 O.C.
3/4" X 2" X 2 -1/2' X 18 GA. SILEL (.0.04`1' )
_END STILE. CONNECT TO PANELS WITH
FLAPS AND 3/16" ALUM RIVETS
SEE DETAIL ABOVE
5/16" HILT! SLEEVE ANCHORS OR EQUAL
- 1 -1/2" MIN. EMBED INTO MASONRY
1 PER BRACKET
1/4 -20 SS BOLT & NUT
1.82" DIA. X .50" ROLLERS
W/ .44 DIA_ X 4-1/4" STEM
Engr DR: ! FAR000
STRUC'URES
F.A. PE J 16557
JUL 1. 2 2001
24 GA. S I ELL PANEL
END STILE
P.Pi `.9•i CD
CC ?!PU i:'iG WITH THE
F.na,!; FORM @'•!1 CODE
e'.T: _AUG .2001 _ --
Si6.o3
z
Z (1 '
O�
d�
ao
O a.
a �
0,
V ▪ 0
W r) 0
z ,,)
o < a ° 1
0 C N
— v i 0
-c4 ct Cx4 3 in in
W N
M v
J
0
O
w
0
J
1-
z
w
0
(1)
w
J
z
0
U
w
(/)
(
r-.
0
c
0
0
0
(.1
0
v
v
co
0
N)
W
Q
tL
z_ I-
a0 w
N rno
O 3
O z
=
� J
c
0
0.
0
N
a
.0
ar
0
0
0
O
•
.
0
drawing no.
0 1 —09
sheet 2 of 3 1
DOOR
HEIGHT
LSECTION
15T
HEIGHTS t' • • • • • • _ • • • €RACKP t PLACEMENTS
2ND 3R014THI5TH'
81
• 9f :I: Eta • 1 • 84
85
86 i 87
B
6 -0"
18"
18"
18"118' IN /A
• • 1" •
1 1 -3/4'1 23" 34"
45'
56"
67"
-
6 -6'
21'
18"
18"
21"
N/A
1"
1"
11 -3/4'1 23" 1
11-3/4 23'
34"
34"
45"
45"
56"
.56'
67"
67"
-
7' -0"
21"
21"
21'
21'
N/A
78-1/4
7' -6"
18"
18"
18'118
18"
1"
11 -3/4 "1 23"
1 34'
45"
56"
67'
78-1/4
78-1/4"
8 -0"
21"
18"
18118
1 111 -3/41 23" ( 34"
45
56" 67'
SLEEVE ANCHOR SPACING
ANCHOR! STRUCTURE
EMBED I SPACING
BL OCK
1 -1/
1 1'
5/16' I
CONK.
1 -1
1 1 "
BLOCK
1 -
1 4"
3/8" I
CONC.
1 -1 /4 1
17
POP RNE15
n
ce
0
SEC=TION A —A
.089" GALV. STEfL ADJUSTABLE • • •
W / FASTENED D5 5/16-18 X 3 / / 4 BRACKET
D( 6 H HEAR •
IA. SC REWS & NUi
• •
•• • •
• • •
HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT
1/2" X 1 -3/4" X .059' FORMED STEEL
GLUED TO PAND. AND FASTENED JQ • •
VERTICAL STILES METH •
(2) 3/16" POP RIVETS • •
5/16" MEETING RIB
OPT10NA1 INS13LA1IDHS
BY . APACHF PRODUCTS CET
EPS- EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE
DENSITY - 1.07 PCF
N.OA 8 98- 0904.04
OR
ISO -25 POLY- ISIIx.YANURCIE
DENSITY = 2.0 PCF
N.OA >9 98- 0904.03
14 GA GALV. STEEL
ROLLER HINGES FASTENED
W/ (4) 14 X 5/8" Sib
12 CA. GALV. STEM .
BOTTOM BRACKET FASTENED
W/ (4) 1914 X 5/8 SAS
BOTTOM SEAL
.058 ALUM PLATE
WITH 1/8" X 1' S.M.S. 0 48" O.C.
AND RUBBER WEATHERSTIOPPING
•• • •
\ 2 -7/8' X 5-1/2" X 3' X .1
\ GALV. STEEL
TOP ROLLER BRACKET (DOUBLE)
FASTENED w/ (6) ! 14 X 5/8' 5.14.5.
HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT
1/2' X 1 - 3/4' X -059' FORMED STEEL
GLUED TO PANEL AND FASIENED TO
VERTICAL STILES 1f1TH
(2) 3/16" POP RNETS
7/16' DIA X 3-3/4" ROSIER SHAFT
MIN. .024' ROLL FORMED STEEL PANEL
DRAWING OUAUIY G-40
MIN. YIELD STRENGTH = 39 KSI
WITH PRIMER AND BAKED -ON
POLYSTER PAINTED TOP COAT
APPUED TO EOM SIDES OF STEEL
• • • 51 16" X • 5 LAC SCREWS INTO WOOD OR
• • • •• •• • 5/16" SLEEVE ANCHORS
• • • • •
• • • • • • 1-1/4' EMBED INTO MASONRY
• • • • • • 3 PER BRACKET
••• • • • • •••
• wEi'DEO / • -1 /4" x .1" STEEL. PLATES
• • • • • • 1 ' • 1 ./2 X 1-1/2 X .089 ANGLE
• • • • • FASTENED TD TRACK
i ••• • • I() 1/4-20 SS. BOLT & NUTS
• •• ••• ••
• • • • •
•
• • • ••• ••
1-
x
0
w
O
Z
Z
W
a
0
TRACK CONFIGURATION
CAST ALUM.
CABLE DRUM
14 GA. GALV. STEEL TRACK
2' X 3-1/2" X 12 GA. TRACK BRACKETS
2 -3/16" HIGH
CONNECTED TO TRACK WITH ONE
1/4' BOLTS & NUTS.
1 -1/2"
WOOD FRAME RUII DING
STUD WALLS OR DOOR OPENIi'C SHALL BE FRAMED SOUD
BY NOT LESS THAN (3) 2X6 'RESSURE TREATED GRADE 2
OR BETTER WOOD STUDS.
STUD WALLS TO BE CONT. FR N4 FOOTING TO TIE BEAM.
wOQD BUCK CONNECTION TO MASONRY
-
TRACK SHALL BE SECURED W:TH TRACK BRACKETS TO
PRESSURE TREATED 2X6 WOOD JAMBS WHICH SHALL
BE ANCHORED TO GROUTED FEINFORCED MASONRY
BLOCC WALL OR CONC. COU.I4N W/ 1/4' TAPCONS
WITH 1 -3/4' EMBED AND A ';PACING OF 10" 0.C.
OR 3/8' DUL HILT] S-F-EVE AN CHORS, 1 -3/4" MIN.
EMBED AND A SPACING OF 11. O.C.
THE BLOCK WALL CELLS SHALL BE GROUT FILLED AND
REINFORCED WITH FOUR f9 5 BARS EXTENDING INTO
FOOTNG AND INTO TIE BEAMS, ALL BARS SHALL BE
CONTINUOUS FROM TIE SEW TO FOOTING.
PREPARATION OF B'
BY OTHERS
STEEL STRUCTURE BY OTHERS
r MUST SUPPORT THE LOADS IMPOSED
EY DOOR SYSTEM
• - • ••• • •
H 0Rl , TRAC]$'=UaPK32T .S gfOd:
EA( ODOR INSUj.LER •
• • • • • •
• • • •••
•
•
•
• •
• • • . •
HOW. TRACK LENGTH = OPENING FIEI6HT P Z • • • • •
•- SECTIONS ARE NUMBERED STARTING AT THE BOTTOM
FOR DOORS MORE THAN 8 FT. HIGH. USE ADORIONAL TOP BRACKETS AT 10' O.C.
1/4" 0 HEX HEAD
M.S. & LOCK NUT 0 12' 0.C.
1 1/4" X 2 -1/2" X 14 GA
CONT STEEL ANGLE
.102' CA CALV. STEEL FLAT
BRACKET ± 3" LONG 0 ±12" 0.C.
CONNECTED TO CONT. ANGLE
W/ (3) SPOT WELDS AT EACH SIDE
ALTERNATE TRACK INSTALLATION
•
MIN. EDGE
DISTANCE
3 .3/4" ---I
n'PIQN- -
1 -1/2'
14 GA GALV. STEEL TRACK
FASTENED TO TRACK PLATES
W/ (2) 1 /4- 20X5/8" TRUSS HD.
SLOTTED M.S. & LOCK NUT
Engr. OR. HUMAYOUN FAROOQ
STRUCTURES
FLAT PE 16557
-r
JuC
/,!'.`;firEJ .IS COI.(PLYI G :ILIA LIE
:00I F(Or!D.1 I3UItD1116 CODE
AUG 2OQt_
I. ; GLACE
• I E ,. /
/:1.1,1 111•C 11.0—os16. Q3_ 1
Z
z W
0
a
0 tx
a. a-
1./)
U o:
W M
Of r-3
04 _co cc
IX 3 O
G>, wv1 on
J
• W - -
CO
0
e
N
t0
N '
N
0
r)
0
O
t
co
N
O
O
0
W
c
-
0
1
0
0
0
0
•0
w
a
O
Q J
L.
~ Z
S1 O 0
ce
O 3�
O z =
in 6
M
0
S
0
0
o+
0
0
a
N
CD
m
T
.0
0
0
0
,c
c
1
drawing no.
01 -09
(sheet 3 of 3 )j