Loading...
1100 NE 91 Terr (8)PERMIT APPLICATION FOR MUNICIPALITIES OF DADE COUNTY (OWNER TO RETAIN COPY) Job Address / /''d Legal Description / 54 pit ij Master Permit # jo /f (Y Lessee / Tenant /47 Owner's Address hao /4 9/ , e_ , Contracting Co. Col-4/(4' WORK DESCRIPTION A -?- - Square Ft. Signa ra of 0 r and /or Condo President Date: AtfizzA Address Estimated Cost Tax Folio /1 f,1 /I V` / phone 4'S , `)S /r oe , ,4 " l 737P /7 Qualifier �� /0fi SS# �� phone -� State# Competency# Ins.Co. Architect /Engineer Address Bonding Company Address Mortgagor Address Permit Type (circle one): BUILDING ELECTRICAL PLUMBING MECHANICAL PAVING FENCE SIGN Signature of Contractor or Owner- Builder Date: WARNING TO OWNER: YOU MUST RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AND YOUR FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY (IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT). Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do work and installation as indicated. I certify that all work will be performed to meet the standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. I understand that separate permits are required for ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, SIGNS, POOLS, ROOFING, and MECHANICAL work. OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all the foregoing information is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning. Furthermore, I authorize the above -named contractor to do the work stated. e.', AvIii /7 Notar s to"Owner and o / 6 Notary as to Contractor or Owner - Builder My Commission Expires: AP COMMISSION EXPI S APRIL W. 1992 My Commission Expires: �k �k �1r * eor,DED . tiu sTEr.�8t .49 5 r: c:,,,,, * * * * * * * PERMIT FEE: APPROVED: Fire Other Zoning Building 1 C / ` 4 , Electrical echanical Plumbing Engineering S / 2 4 c i if PLANNING BOARD AGENDA OF December 8, 1994 Architect: Franklin E, Grau Name of Owner /Applicant aad Mahmnnd Council Action Required Yes c?/ Liruni cJ holes J 1IIage F {. 0 R 1 0 Address of Property, and /or Legal Description 1100 N.E. 9lth Terrace Nature of Request Request for ap•roval of variance to •ermit furtrier construction to main building and the installation of a swimming pool with CJ3S wail. Present Zoning R - 20 Area of Present Building Area with Proposed Addition Parking Spaces Provided Parking Spaces Required with Addition Setbacks as per Code Side 10', Rear 15' Setbacks Provided Side 7'l ", Rear 10 °2" variances/Zgadzwetuumm To setbacks. Property is non - conforming, Date of Applicant Notification 140PRoVab 12-08° Planning Board Action M?av 4 //7S Council Action 4 ITEM NO. 5 Phone No 751N -8796 Phone No. Director of Building and Zoning 30 November 1994 Mr. Francis J. Lubien, Director Building & Zoning Department Miami Shores Village 10050 NE 2 Avenue Miami Shores, FL 33138 -2382 FRANKLIN E. GRAU & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR DESIGN • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 9822 NORTHEAST 2ND AVENUE • SUITE 11 MIAMI SHORES, FLORIDA 33138 -2347 Telephone: 305 -751 -8796 • Fax, E Mail & Modem: 305 -751 -8777 RE: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO ALLOW A SWIMMING POOL IN THE FRONT YARD Mahmoud Residence Balcony and Pool Addition PROJECT: 942 Owners: Saad & Catherine S. Mahmoud Address: 1100 NE 91 Terrace, Miami Shores, FL 33138 Legal: Lot 13 and the West 1/2 of Lot 14, Block 2, Watersedge, PB 9, Pg 141, Dade County, Florida. Dear Mr. Lubien: Mr. and Mrs. Mahmoud have retained our firm to provide them with Architectural and Engineering Services for the proposed Balcony, Terrace and Pool Addition to their home. We have also been retained to represent them in this request for a variance in accordance with Appendix A - Zoning, Section 702 of the Miami Shores Village Code of Ordinances. We are requesting a variance from the existing Zoning Ordinance to permit the location of a proposed Swimming Pool and Pool Deck in what is now the Front Yard of the above referenced property. In accordance with Section 702. Hardship Variance of the Ordinance we submit the following four points: (a) THE ALLEGED PECULIAR AND UNUSUAL CONDITION AFFECTING THE PROPERTY. This property was built in the 1920s. When the structure was built, the front of the building faced the South and fronted on what is now NE 91st Street. At that time the property was located in unincorporated Dade County. As originally situated the building enjoyed a large Front Yard to the South and a large Rear Yard to the North. At some point in time what is now NE 91st Street became a dedicated Public Right of Way, it was a dirt road, and was used in that condition for many years. In its present configuration this portion of NE 91st Street is paved and the Right of Way is 10.3 feet south from the building's South facade. (See attached Drawing A -1). The Village of Miami Shores was incorporated in 1932, and adopted its Code of Ordinances sometime after that date. Over the years a number of amendments have been added making changes and improvements to the original Code. Sometime after the Village was incorporated, it annexed a portion of unincorporated Dade County on its then southern boundary, which included the property in question. Thus, this building was situated and built In accordance with the then current Dade County Building and Zoning Codes, long before Miami Shores Village or Its Code of Ordinances existed and much before, once Incorporated, the Village decided that the property in question and Its adjacent area was to be annexed. 29 November 1994 Mr. Francis J. Lubien, Director Miami Shores Village RE: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO ALLOW A SWIMMING POOL IN THE FRONT YARD Mahmoud Residence Balcony and Pool Addition Page 2 PROJECT: 9424 (b) THE ALLEGED REASONS WHY SUCH CONDITIONS MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE STRICTLY TO APPLY SPECIFIED PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE TO THE PROPERTY. According to the Miami Shores Village Code, Pools are allowed in residential areas but they are not allowed in the Front Yard, they must be located in the Rear Yard. When the Village annexed the property, it also caused its address to change from a NE 91st Street address to a NE 91st Terrace address. As a result of the initial conditions under which this property was developed and the historical changes in Zoning and Planning that have taken place around it, we find today that what was once the rear of the building is now the front, and what was once the front of the building is now the rear. This forced the front of the building to change its orientation from south to north, What was once a large Rear Yard is today an 84 foot deep Front Yard and what used to be a large Front Yard is today a 10 foot 3 inches deep Rear Yard. This is clearly an existing peculiar and unusual physical condition affecting this property. It is impossible to provide a Swimming Pool in a Rear Yard that is only 10 foot 3 Inches deep. (C) THE VARIANCE IN SUCH STRICT APPLICATION THAT THE APPLICANT BELIEVES TO BE NECESSARY IN ORDER TO ENABLE HIM TO MAKE A REASONABLE USE OF THE PROPERTY. The Miami Shores Village Code allows and considers "a reasonable use" to be a Swimming Pool on a Residentially Zoned lot. The applicant wishes to construct a standard size Swimming Pool on his Residentially Zoned lot. No other variances, such as for Side Setbacks are being requested. The only variance being requested is that which will permit the construction of a Swimming Pool in the Front Yard. All other ordinance requirements are met in the design submitted with this application. The strict application of the Code would not allow the construction of a Swimming Pool on this lot, thus depriving the applicant of the reasonable use of his property, which all other residential property owners can enjoy. (d) THE REASONS WHY THE APPLICANT IS OF THE OPINION THAT SUCH VARIANCE WOULD BE IN HARMONY WITH THE INTENT AND PURPOSE OF THE ORDINANCE, WOULD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE EXISTING USE OR PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY IN THE VICINITY, AND WOULD NOT GIVE TO THE APPLICANT AN ADVANTAGE WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF HIS PROPERTY THAT IS NOT ENJOYED BY THE OWNERS OF SIMILAR SITUATED PROPERTY. Miami Shores Village since its incorporation has been attracting and accommodating families with children and others, providing ordinances that would protect and provide for the safe and full enjoyment of their property. A private residential Swimming Pools is clearly seen and accepted as a reasonable use in this community and it is considered to be in harmony with the intent of the ordinance, since the ordinance FRANKLIN E. GRAU & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 9822 NE 2 AVENUE, MIAMI SHORES, FL 33138 (305) 751 -8798 29 November 1994 Mr. Francis J. Lubien, Director Miami Shores Village RE: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO ALLOW A SWIMMING POOL IN THE FRONT YARD Mahmoud Residence Balcony and Pool Addition Sincerely, makes specific accommodations to allow Swimming Pools. Many of the neighbors on NE 91st Terrace have Swimming Pools. In fact, a number of other properties in the Village, that have been found to have insufficiently large Rear Yards, similar to the applicant's, have in the past been granted similar variances to allow the reasonable use of a Swimming Pool in their Front Yards. Therefore, the granting of a variance to allow a Swimming Pool in the Front Yard of this property, based on Its peculiar and unusual physical and historical conditions affecting this property, would be in harmony with the Intent and purpose of the ordinance, would not be detrimental In any way and would not provide to the applicant an advantage but merely affirm his right to an established reasonable use of his property. We humbly submit this request along with the attached Site Drawing and the two sets of three sheets each of signed and sealed Architectural Drawings (A -1 to A -3) in blueline print media dated 14 November 1994, prepared by our office, for your consideration. FRANKLI E. G U ASSOCIATES Franklin E. Grau, A FEG:cp enc: cc: S & C Mahmoud E: \WP6O \DOGSWP\ARC-DOC AR- 94J08\9424- VAR.LTA PROJECT: Page 3 Ct FRANKLIN E. GRAU & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 9822 NE 2 AVENUE, MIAMI SHORES, FL 33138 (305) 959 -8798 24 trite NY •tW �1 WALL ISEMIL61 ecN0. 17 • t0 W v uJ 1u uJ LEGAL DESCRIPTION eemms� 1i7n'Pfdl Ei'IS ar, YA P 1 a \ wGt.2 [NDEX OF DRAWINGS 6t@ MOW MST * =goo MIDI Yaao • Z O w 9 1;4 e we Z .a 632 a 0 14 2 sw 10/10/91 AS ralISSI A -1 • N. E. IOth COURT 4 . LOT 8 LOT 11 LOT 12 LOT 9 t 10 Adrier LOT 15 LOCATION PLAN SCALE: I' -O" 10' -0" PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVER WALK TO MATCH EXISTING. 6° -0° WIDE WROUGHT IRON SERVICE GATE 3a-o- 125 25' -O• SETBACK NEW 5' -O° HIGH CBS. WALL. POOL DECK TO HATCH EXISTING CONCRETE PAVER. 5' O' HIGH WROUGHT IRON FENCE t GATES • • TO MATCH EXIST. • EXISTING CONCRETE PAVER DRIVEWAT7 NEW 5 -O° HIGH CBS. WALL. 41 Ae 4 ___ ,::, - I _____ 0 ii A /I, ) iii /WI.I�����Ir I 0 TERRACE 15 3 6 -1° r 1 FOUNDATION PLAN SCALE: I/1° a I'-O° (PARTIAL) —EXIST PAVE WALK SCALE: 1/4° ® I' -O° 15' -9" 0 SECOND FLOOR PLAN IIIIiiiiiiiiiIIIIIIIIII II I1191III illllllllllllllll EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 0/4' NO' The regular meeting of the Miami Shores Planning & Zoning Board was held on Thursday, December 8, 1994 at the Village Hall commencing at 7:40 P.M. with the following members present: Present: Absent: Also Present: ITEM #1 MINUTES Cliff Walters Charles Smith Robert Blum Louis Imburgia Mark Ulmer Frank LuBien William Fann Miami Shores Village Planning & Zoning Board Regular Meeting December 8, 1994 Mr. Blum moved approval of the November 10, 1994 Planning & Zoning Board minutes as submitted. Mr. Smith seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous in favor. Due to the number of homeowners in attendance wishing to present their requests, Chairman Walters deferred this item until a later point in the meeting. ITEM #3 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF FLAT ROOF ADDITION MARK CARPENTER 1400 N.E. 101 Street ITEM #2 DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING PROPOSED POLICY GUIDELINES FOR ROOFING MATERIAL VARIANCES. MR. SMITH/MR. LUBIEN - MR. KNEZEVICH Mr. LuBien outlined the particulars of the request, indicating that the requested flat roof addition was well below the structural allowance. Mr. LuBien also indicated that there is no need for a variance approval. Chairman Walters stated that it is helpful to the Board when elevation drawings are included in the agenda packets to more clearly define the request. He asked that Mr. LuBien attempt to provide elevation drawings for all requests. Mr. Smith moved approval of the flat roof addition. Mr. Blum seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous in favor. ITEM #4 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF WHITE PAINT FOR GRAY ROOF TOYA & ANDREW DUBIN 374 N.E. 95th Street Mr. LuBien stated the reason for the request to paint the roof white. Ms. Toya Dubin addressed the Board as the homeowner. She indicated that in order to restore the roof to its original style, she must paint the color -thru grey barrel tile. Ms. Dubin stated that when the roof was replaced last year, she was unable to purchase the exact tile which had been previously installed, as it was no longer available. Other manufacturer's color -thru white tile did not meet the specifications of the previous roofing tiles. Mr. Smith detailed past conversations with Mr. LuBien regarding the probability of the homeowner wanting to paint the grey tiles at a later date. It was the consensus of the Board that the roof should be painted, however they were concerned about setting a precedent if they moved approval. Chairman Walters suggested that due to the architectural design of the home, the Historic Preservation Board could be asked to make a recommendation and declaring the home an historical landmark. Ms. Dubin stated that she wanted to restore the home to its original art-deco styling and will take the necessary steps to ensure its integrity. Mr. Smith was asked to act as liaison between Ms. Dubin and the Historic Preservation Board. This item was tabled until such time as the Historic Preservation Board can make a recommendation. ITEM #5 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF VARIANCE TO PERMIT FURTHER CONSTRUCTION TO MAIN BUILDING AND THE INSTALLATION OF A SWIMMING POOL SAAD MAHMOUD 1100 N.E. 91st Terrace Mr. LuBien indicated this item was before the Board due to existing non - conforming set -backs and the homeowners request to build a swimming pool and an addition to the home which would further the non - conforming status and require a variance. Mr. Franklin Grau, Architect, was present representing the homeowner. Mr. Mahmoud was also present. The question arose regarding Code requirements for front -yard swimming pools. Mr. LuBien and Mr. Grau both indicated that the Village Code does not specifically address the issue of front -yard swimming pools. Mr. Grau pointed out a number of peculiarities with regard to this home. The home was built prior to the Village's incorporation. The front yard was previously the rear yard, and the rear yard, previously the front yard. When the home was constructed there had not been a road to the rear of the house. In addition, only a portion of the property is within the current Miami Shores Village limits. The other portion of the property is situated in Unincorporated Dade County. Due to these circumstances, the required set -back limits are non - conforming to the Village Code. Mr. Fann stated that he did not see a problem with expanding the non- conformance of the property. Mr. Smith asked to review the property file which Mr. LuBien supplied. Mr. Smith pointed out that the house is a duplex property with a shingle roof and voiced his concerns regarding the number of non - conforming items related to this property. Mr. Smith asked the homeowner if the property had one or two kitchens. The homeowner indicated that the house has two kitchens but only one family resides in the residence. Mr. Smith was reminded that the issue at hand was a set -back variance. Mr. Fann suggested that a covenant be used to require the homeowner to remove one kitchen and to state the property's use as single family. Mr. Smith moved to grant the set -back variance with the proviso that an affidavit is obtained from the homeowner indicating single family use and that he will remove one of the kitchens. Mr. Blum seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous in favor. ITEM # 2 PREVIOUSLY DEFERRED DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING PROPOSED POLICY GUIDELINES FOR ROOFING MATERIAL VARIANCES. MR. SMITH/MR. LUBIEN - MR. KNEZEVICH Mr. LuBien introduced Mr. Knezevich who is a local engineer and who was invited to attend the meeting to address the Board regarding roofing guidelines. Mr. Knezevich reviewed his comments regarding the draft of the proposed policy guidelines which had previously been submitted by Mr. Smith. Mr. Knezevich indicated that a number of issues raised in the draft policy would be satisfied by the submission of the Notice of Acceptance at the time a roofing permit was applied for. This Notice of Acceptance states that the roofing material maintains product approval through the South Florida Building Code. He suggested that Mr. LuBien obtain a list of approved roofing materials from Dade County for reference. Chairman Walters asked how engineers determine the load capacity of a structure. Mr. Knezevich stated that in many homes it is difficult to determine without destructive testing, which is not feasible. Mr. Knezevich indicated that many times the engineers must make assumptions as to the timber, trusses and fastening systems used, formulate the weight load originally intended, factor in age, and then down -grade the newly calculated load capacity. It is not an exact measurement. Mr. Blum indicated that the Board is looking for documentation or references from the engineer stating how the conclusion of "this structure cannot hold any roofing material other than asphalt shingle" is reached. Mr. Knezevich stated that there is no reference guide to speak of, but the engineer could be requested to state the formula used to determine the load capacity. The consensus of the Board was to request that Mr. Knezevich draft proposed policy guidelines for roofing material variances to be reviewed upon completion. Mr. Knezevich stated that he would draft a policy for the Board using tonight's discussions and the previously submitted draft. Chairman Walters reminded the Board that the policy will be used as a guideline only for requests that come before the Board to re -roof with a material other than tile. ITEM #5A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF VARIANCE TO ALLOW RE -ROOF WITH ASPHALT SHINGLES EGERY NELSON, JR. 9339 N.E. 10th Court Mr. LuBien explained that this item is back before the Planning & Zoning Board having been deferred from the Village Council Agenda due to there currently not being Dade County approval on file for cementious fibre roofing shingles. Christopher Kelley, attorney for Mr. Nelson detailed his conversations with the Dade County Code official regarding the product approval procedures. Mr. -Smith indicated that during an afternoon conversation with the same Dade County Code official, the official indicated to him that product approval is due in approximately 30 days. Mr. Smith suggested deferring a decision until such time as product approval of the cementious fibre material is obtained. Attorney Kelley stated that the roof is now leaking, whereas the prior request was made for non - repair reasons. Chairman Walters outlined the variance approval procedures for Attorney Kelley, stating that this item still needs to go before the Village Council for ultimate approval and the next Council meeting is not scheduled until January. Mr. Smith moved to grant the variance with first preference to re -roof with cementious fibre roofing material if it has received Dade County product approval by the time the request reaches the Village Council. If there are no products approved that are cementious fibre, that the homeowner use a dimensional fiberglass shingle with an approved color by Mr. LuBien. Mr. Imburgia seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous in favor. ITEM #6 DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING DOCUMENTATION OF EXISTING USES. MR. SMITH Mr. Smith explained the past practice of the Village requiring the filing of an affidavit outlining the specific use of property when a building permit for improvements was applied for. This practice is no longer in use. Mr. Smith has requested that the Village once again require these affidavits in order to determine and hold accountable, multi- family dwelling property owners. Discussion ensued regarding the feasibility of having this information contained on the building permit application versus an affidavit. In addition, the question of whether the information contained in the affidavit would be enforceable was raised. Mr. Smith indicated that similar affidavits were found in property files recently and the homes will be restored to single family status based on the affidavit and Code Enforcement involvement. There was further discussion regarding the mechanism for obtaining and the filing of the present zoning/present use information. Mr. Imburgia moved to forward the affidavit to the Village Manager for approval. Mr. Blum seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous in favor. Mr. LuBien reminded the Board that there will not be a Planning & Zoning Board meeting held on Thursday, December 22, 1994. He also reminded the Board to respond to the invitation for the Volunteer Recognition Reception. ITEM #7 ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:40 P.M. Barbara Fugazzi, Recording Secretary Cliff Walters, Chairman Present: Also Present: Absent: PRESENTATIONS CONSIDERATIONS ITEM #1 CONSENT AGENDA MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 17, 1995 The regular meeting of the Miami Shores Village Council was held on January 17, 1995 at the Brockway Memorial Library, commencing at 7:30 p.m. with the following members present: Mayor Heffernan Michael Boyle Richard Fernandez Steven Johnson Michael R. Couzzo, Jr. Scott W. Davis William F. Fann Robert Cook Mayor Heffernan presented Patricia Varney, Miami Shores Finance Director, with the Certificate of Achievement in Financial Reporting an award from the Government Finance Officers Association. Mayor Heffernan read a proclamation for Flora Curtis on her 105th Birthday. Mayor Heffernan presented a proclamation to the Staff of the Brockway Memorial Library. A. MINUTES 1. Regular Council Meeting 1/3/95 2. Planning and Zoning Board 12/8/95 Mr. Johnson moved approval of the minutes from the regular Council meeting of 1/3/95. Mr. Boyle seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous in favor. Due to Mr. Chiocha having to catch a flight, Item #3 was heard at this time. ITEM #3 FINANCE DEPARTMENT: Ms. Patricia Varney A. PRESENTATION OF THE MIAMI SHORES ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT. Mr. Jerry Chiocha from Rachlin, Cohen and Holtz, presented the report. He reviewed the different sections of the report and answered questions from the Council and the public. Mr. Michael Maguire asked questions of Mr. Chiocha. ITEM #2 VILLAGE MANAGER: Mr. Michael R. Couzzo, Jr. A. PRESENTATION BY THE VILLAGE MANAGER AND ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REGARDING CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSAL TO PURCHASE PROPERTY AT 9990 N.E. 2ND AVENUE FOR POLICE FACIL iiES. Mr. Couzzo and Chief Zoovas delivered the presentation. Chief Zoovas showed a slide presentation of the existing facilities. Mr. Couzzo suggested a workshop to discuss the details of the proposed purchase. Ms. Patricia Varney spoke about the financial options for the purchase of the building. She gave the following three options: 1. Payment of $60,000 or more and finance the difference with the Archdiocese of Miami at 8% for 10 years. 2. Finance the necessary amount from Barnett Bank, at a rate of 6.85% tax - exempt (rate quoted on 1/5/95). However, Barnett will need a legal opinion on the financing and will involve some legal expenses and closing costs. 3. Finance the necessary amount from Summit Capital Asset Funding Inc. at 7.30% (rate quoted on 1/9/95) for seven years with a closing cost of $2,500. Implicit Rate including closing costs is 7.64 %. Summit Capital will only issue a lease agreement with a minimum of $225,000. Mr. Boyle spoke about the legal cost in option #2 and stated that Barnett Bank should share in the costs due to the community aspect of the project. Mr. Fernandez stated that the Archdiocese receives a tremendous amount of service and pays nothing to the Village. He suggested that possibly the Archdiocese could match the best interest rate available. He stated that the appraisal might be a high figure due to a high estimate of comparisons of sales and occupancies on 2nd Avenue. Mr. Tom Benton spoke about future maintenance of the building. He also spoke about offsetting some of the costs by renting space of the vacant Police Department or Fire station. Mr. Couzzo suggested a workshop on January 31, at 6:00 p.m. Mayor Heffernan was unavailable at that time and asked the Clerk to arrange a time for the workshop. Mr. Boyle stated that the presentation was very compelling and that the other Village departments are cramped and could utilize the space. Mr. Couzzo thanked the staff for their efforts in putting together the presentation. B. APPOINTMENT TO THE BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Mr. Benton described the work of the committee. The Village Clerk stated that there were two positions available and two applicants: Ms. Edith Donaldson and Ms. Ann Pincus. Mr. Johnson moved to appoint both applicants. Mr. Boyle seconded the motion and the vote.was unanimous in favor. ITEM #4 BUILDING AND ZONING: Mr. Frank LuBien A. Request for approval of variance to permit further construction to main building and the installation of a swimming pool with CBS wall. Saad Mahmoud Mr. LuBien reviewed the background and spoke about the set back requirements in the Village. Mr. Fernandez stated that this would expand a non conforming situation. The details of the variance were reviewed. Mr. Fernandez moved approval. Mr. Boyle seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous in favor. B. Request for approval of variance to re -roof with asphalt shingles. Egery Nelson Mr. LuBien explained the background. Mr. Johnson asked if the roof was leaking at this time. Mr. LuBien responded that it was. Mr. Fernandez stated that the house is built and designed for asphalt shingles. He also stated that there is a letter in the packet from an engineer that states that the roof will not support tile. Mr. Boyle moved for acceptance. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous in favor. ITEM #5 DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION CONCERNING FEDERAL FUNDING FOR DOWNTOWN SEWER PROJECT. Mr. Fernandez reviewed the background and stated that this is an opportunity to install sewers on N.E. 2nd Avenue with out the Village paying for the project. He spoke about a letter form Congressman E. Clay Shaw, who serves on the Ways and Means Committee. He suggested directing the Village Manager to put together a proposal for Congressman Shaw for federal funding of sewers on 2nd Avenue. Mr. Couzzo stated that the Congressman is not looking for indepth plans, rather an expression of interest and a rough estimate of costs involved in the projects. Mr. Boyle stated that he would like to look at the project and see if sewers are necessary on 2nd Avenue, no matter who pays for the project. Mr. Johnson stated that the sooner the Village gets its name on the list for appropriations the sooner the Village will get some funds. He stated that if the Village can get assistance from the federal government the Council should pursue the project. Mr. Boyle stated that he would like to have the advantages explained regarding sewers. Mr. Fernandez responded. Mr. Boyle stated that someone else will not pay for the project. He stated that the someone else is still the residents of the Village. Mayor Heffernan stated that he would like to have all of the Federal Tax dollars paid by Shores residents, spent in the Village. He stated that he did not think that the sewer project should be the only project that funds are requested for. He also stated that the Village should line up and ask for funding for sewers because sewers will be forced on the Village from various sources. Mr. Boyle stated that the Council should look at other projects to request funding for. Mr. Couzzo stated that the request must be submitted by February lst. Mr. Fernandez stated that the Village may not have time to work up other projects with the limited time frame. Mr. Boyle stated that he would prefer to have 2 or 3 items presented for funding. Mr. Couzzo suggested that the budget process would be a good time to discuss future needs and desires of the Village for federal funding. ITEM #6 VILLAGE CLERK: Mr. Scott Davis A. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBSECTION (C) OF SECTION 18449 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE; ADDING FORMULA FOR CALCULATING RETIREMENT ANNUITY FOR POLICE OFFICER WHO RETIRES OR TERMINATES EMPLOYMENT SUBSEQUENT TO SEPTEMBER 20, 1994. First Reading The Village Clerk read the caption of the Ordinance and reviewed the background. Ms. Varney explained the ordinance to the Council. Mr. Fernandez moved approval. Mr. Boyle seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous in favor. B. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 516 (C) (2) al; LIMITING LOCATION OF DISH ANTENNAS TO REAR YARD. Second and Final Reading. The Village Clerk read the caption of the ordinance. Mr. Boyle moved approval. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous in favor. C. A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE COUNCIL URGING THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE TO ENACT THE OFFICER EVELYN GORT CAREER CRIMINAL ACT IN THE 1995 LEGISLATIVE SESSION. The Village Clerk read the caption of the resolution and Chief Zoovas reviewed the background. Mr. Boyle moved for acceptance. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous in favor. ITEM #6 ANNOUNCEMENTS The Village Clerk read the announcements. ITEM #7 PUBLIC COMMENTS Ms. Loretta Olsen: Spoke about the flowers around the Village and senior trips. Mr. Ed Harrigan Spoke about sewers in Miami Shores. Mr. Michael Maguire: Spoke about the use of forfeiture funds in the Village and the sewer project. Mr. Rafael Buchelle: Spoke about the Code Enforcement Brochure and the printing of the brochure. ITEM #8 COUNCIL COMMENTS Mr. Fernandez spoke about appropriations in Washington and the sewer project. Mr. Johnson spoke about an article in a magazine and about a home in Miami Shores featured in the magazine Mr. Boyle complemented Chief Zoovas and the Village Staff on their presentation and spoke about the police department. Mayor Heffernan spoke about Unity Day dunk tank and thanked downtown property owners for the improvements that they have made to their properties. I, to re- occupy the single family residence !mown as : (address) / 0 D /A 9 7 / Gfi , Mani Shores, Florida. Legal Description: Lot: l 3 'Is /4 Block PB & PG: 9 I hereby certify that I understand that the zoning of the property is for single - family residential use and that it is unlawful for more than one family to reside therein. I also understand that any Certificate of Re- Occupancy that may be issued by Nfiami Shores Village, certifies only that the referenced property is being used for single -family purposes and that such Certificate does not constitute any representation, warranty or certification as to the condition of the dwelling or other structures on such property. Applicant Print Name * * * * * * * ** * * * ** Contact Name: Buyer Comments: APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF RE OCCUPANCY 1Y i_ lam'- , hereby apply for a certificate Date ****************************** * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * = ffi * * * *a For purposes of conducting the inspection required by Section 902 of the Miami Shores Land Development and Zoning Code, please contact: 6 Seller Realtor -<Company Name Application Fee ($50) paid: Cash Check No. i Inspected bv: F. TJJBTFN approved X Denied ?AGE I OF Telephone: " GAP- 533 Date8 /30/99 CER'T1I ICATE OF RE- OCCUPANCY On behalf of Miami Shores Village, Florida, the undersigned certifies that the proper: described in the above application has bee inspected for purposes of re- occupancy pursuant to Sections 901 and 902 of the Nfiami Shores Land Development and Zoning Code and that such property may be re- occupied by the above applicant for single- family residential purposes. PAGE 2OF2 MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE, FLORIDA Date of ertification: 8/30/ 99 THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES THAT THE REFERENCED PROPERTY HAS BEEN INSPECTED BY MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE AND HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO PRESENTLY COMPLY WITH THE SCHEDULE OF REGULATIONS OF THE MIAMI SHORES LAND AND DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING SOLFT,Y TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT EACH ONE - FAMILY DWELLING IS USED AND INTENDED TO BE USED FOR A ONE - FAMILY DWELLING PURPOSE ONLY; HOWEVER, THIS CER I U- ICATE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ANY REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY AS TO THE CONDITION OF THE DWELLING OR OTHER STRUCTURES ON THE PREMISES DESCRIBED HEREIN, OR ANY ASPECT OF SUCH CONDITION, AND INTERESTED PERSONS ARE ADVISED AND ENCOURAGED TO MAKE THEIR OWN INSPECTION OF THE PREMISES IN ORDER TO DETERMINE THE CONDITION, THEREOF. I. 140 rl-c'ce 4L P) 6L.6.A/, - (l o "+ 8," + 10 1 = 1 p'- g i\AtA 61.07 Ttha.A 0 10,47711411.'4 2 5 1 7, 000 l ?i 600 o0o per; � 7 Pehi G,J Lo,40 or esoLn P5 Lt L- AO - 4•p 1,7 = !o8 p& P .Ao L. o40 �I.nva = 75 , fgF pqv .a 24 r p (to' .ft ) = d X 12/ '2,000 (o Mu e,n e % 4 Q.207N fio. i ii 5 `5 K u - M o/ Fu s 1,%1 i 4 A ¢o-4v s 2.q 5/ .. 0.1 5 dt /Fr �'� @ 8 7�. en; Ir Q�314.50 r e m P. 'rr g.t- p o, DO 16 X 49 "X 12" O, p r' " /Fr `t1 e IO"% i EA 2 1?,EAM CRAWFORD ENGINEERING 1 51 N.E. 55 STREET FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33303 (305) 491 -8844 g9�cl.� = I OVF z 207 P - 1.5)/000 e D, 0 203 NMAl -MOUP REa00..MC.e. 1 1 00 N . ' l rears. MI P 11 oj l4O2F.e7 pi I oF 5 u ‘91.At7 10'4 Ito" I IGLU QI4 6LAR 7, 5 4 'CULT) To eE4ft 614. (@ t) = D, 207' ( F�`'t1 "4-y"� +lo ° -d .I. (10 "XIo ic I. 4 I IL'o 144 %ut U 1000 �b 1.549 4 D.15' o = (.?1 ,"/Fr LILT. PPM I-OAO a ? " Feowt FACE, of GOL. It 0.207 (2.0a'+ 8.6 4.19 w, - 1.49 , /z�/ To 601-01°40 - 15,11; (1.49 =,`) f I S.I ( 1.490_ IL ?+ 11.1•6141° 2 2 � z Ui. Mowe,@ of Purl = 12,'► ( i 5.1�_0,429- 1 2 c►.4Q .2�w I7) ,.% 8lo .lol k -i - 42.5C. `_- 2.11 4 -1 _ 41.94 1= oF= 091 (i2) " � �2ovo 6000 = (1� -3 s 4.1109 I t44 ,41,54 01'e,q = 448.17 sd £ 6/1/4i, &o rlo M) = 441.1544.e.511.10?„ di U's E li eva ?,8y0,$'3‘b @ d'`Frzo. e�rt FALe. 1213v' - � 1� 3 1 ) '� , • °V, � �, Z'14. l o `',� 13 1b - 11.34 p5; Taal UlABt $3 tifaaty {zeal° @ d /2 To '2q ° Fears r - . Gr .'�J 4 4% Q auVti !o" FAIR eA � _0 = ' U4 - - - - -� -�- C°� °/4 fsRn N GO A., MAX LoPV I ..o►& O uLT. '�. CLJ ' Q 2o/4T UAW, ' & TN f. A.v5(•42ALt A'4 GODS. Foe 1'oa4,IA f' Wora IL► LOAD cod 92E 'LAP, I.oAO } PAAM vA16.9 WatvtIr `GYy (pN ApPeox. 5 = to" Feo •4 Q &dQ. Got_. o.ea;c (I 1 p4) 4 101-1119 t�s Z I cT ptf e FV.ot T cot-, - '1.5 x 631 psf) +IO4 4 I 1 •*H coF PILA °Lte.I /iL Lo,4 0 (4.42'f a) 1�9 + 104 = 823 II% CRAWFORD ENGINEERING 1 1 N.E. 55 STREET FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33303 (305) 491 -8844 Mt TTQ',iO IAL IJ Og4 3&x 4.& Ib ¢ " -ill ° r 3 Per." (0 . P>#4 LOA & (4 .t Ai F2ow2 e6A4. A('PRoi Gdav&.0 o,- orl tb4 L, V4. L A4' . � c )" . ,( 1 1 ,0" MA 14 AO +0 REyt044a 1100 t ,E., 4 11 1d MIAMI gtioecei 4" L00-0 (�° C � ' �I 4' -5) Fob! ap,a. GoL g 833 0dg • 682 ,e1 ore Got. �� I �� rse + 10 2 741 "Vs X1 ,711.0111% �� 747 tG82,9a ,4eD. r..o® ") 2 Toeio, M. Molt, to EA. GoL = %2 k44,"Il 1°-11 44)59. 4 DID ToaSi o44L j 2.rc 7 = f " L" 4 ,4 APE elvt, 6: 28" i 7: 4 1 Mt e A 72 5 5.34 b' l. h+(- – I) 1, (to) i (o f 2� ®I) b' Ci© 2I7vime. • pro I(oo01- C4,88.0 ft = ft I AG CRAWFORD ENGINEERING 1951 N.E. 55 STREET FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33303 (305) 491 -8844 QlL 1-E c“EG1L of ro STRESS A Mote. E,c44T Mf.T4old M t 0 /L (b '/'pit) 4-''4 10' rh -t —' /g b' + .79 b' it L 10 ,2+ t M t I /2 (() ' /IA04 V1'101[16, I/ •10 1 tot. 2 _ Al C 1o+eo 4 && -f so 6.4)14-1;4 J 4106 ♦ WA, 74.15 Psi °»5. 6, ' 14 IGAl- ®o..51 &N SµEA2 MIOOLe. GoL, 7. 2 I x d-r,ry 21A I1 '4 '14&5 Ib W ofaca aac. L.DA.01) 710 to 9, . 1112 • lb reA:J1v1;2 t. = �J,lo7 �.o _ 26.40 , p•: ToTAt_ 'M $,o0401f 7:t21q 'x 121' . 6, %So"' QEaaFoest, -l` 604. Toayto4ak INOa. JT' I AANMAu) Ret;iO&4ch MI i% 'Aoqh oo5" MAC, main t U.00.) 40LL 1'oQylo,o4i. 4Yra.6. l4- cof3G2t✓r6. a O.o t ,a `.'o 4"; aa aan.3 M ti t 767 S1,o,4AL. Mow(, '('o f e. 2Egthreo fre or ,'t - 74.15 -u, x1^135.3 Mtn = 43, 081, 44' A, J Acv 'LAMA o f t LI:c s of Noo' g t v •6 X I0 "- 26.15'$ G.5° 4.6 f � $IY, Y : 1(0"- 2(2 ") z !2" /4 , 4,, 081 4Q•,.a- Ib 6 10 4. $ 4 24 000 pd i ,e co.5`'x ttif p� ALf1/ a. 1 ta~w. �I 00946$,IImoatris ) !: "6W /G ®,J� 860141460 L014(i llA d JAL 51 Foe 2s►o..1 = AIL IT Aw C° %2 - roe # VL eon's o. Z41b" Lo•Rotrb&O 1 L. `artEL OF it roe M o 1 g' 0.6 j4 3)z tL -„ ULj. Motu z (4101 ) 14,4014-1z., 4.31 " 44-0 ovens 1 2 4.a o4 c.1� 6 000 Y e Q 038 t o.. 2ty d c .6 4 4'd -c. u 476. 2 t& e-epAJ r, G4.07aso r,4414 -our /S14rla10ao 41 la CRAWFORD ENGINEERING 1951 N.E. 55 STREET FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33303 (305) 491 -8844 IZe 4h5 4, PioNT CoLUMI.I 1e e (5" / � 0 /c, a.1.94/1 y y �y 24 743) ;t �.e�000 p i x J d : Al it a lh il / / 4.79 "= 1 lo7. -6' r 44i4 or V4. `yVA ? wl orH= Ir�.l'� ) 4 (2,c -I t 0 >8 228.6 a. -a) A r' I AL L,oAQ = 2 >< #) 12VP01.rI. ev I 0/4 MoM e fo./L 664 12W 4' Got-IAA/1A) 0 "1,3 ri&1 In 4 �2-g* � 14-1h- 0)&1226.8'1'1k' ¢o'5 /0.2 5 "2 12.4.04/t4c. Axt4t. 1.0AO . Mow, Ii)fo uLrievt PA. = 7,1?1 (11>b I <5 o II,OIog,Cj Ib �I 46 0_ (pool (Lao " -lb MolvigA irn- Aito- �� s 6,bM'Lb (66 % GN ) P _ 1T2 �.t = '1.&'g .2rclo - (4.1/t0 6,` g .1614 2 Pc, e o 1 18.82 %a l® 1ilt; o 65.5 1,15°)5.5L 1. 5 —.og U PEh1(N it40144. _ 4,0 - K2.84 I. oS 7� 3 42.47 s 4A ap®_ z i 11, 0498,ti C9. fQoM co-421 4ANn Doak, I 4-14 F. 2.; -' f'r. 40000rtii A 6a - APC. roo 6jte:k.� 4 . 0 ' 1 w/ e = 8 4 o. Ic • poi. 4' i "- ( 64, c�, a lcoaf'1 ) l5, Q. 9.444- GOL. “1“�lei w/ y As I AL I/.IovLww6 I,Q■0'1 = 12 1 07 , 0 1 4 . (OD y8 01/7 - N , 911 - Ili 06407 ID eat. 4126 .0 I &s •44 ^ kfo{�'r i 4 d � 1.44 �iWi1�1i11Vm46o t u r d yjacl, izo-a1414 f-0 ti 0.01 2.4 " ©F 601. g low ood L c Var. '/4 t67 1 e df'"0!,, Ve. 88) // l 2%9p t�� Fo °.,, .1 fr. t 0.-3 4 m 6Q0,.) Fr Fog Are 4 GoLoit°J4 Ib 2,12�!•�Jg At t AL 1,4040 I / (6,e1`)(.85'$ '1 ° ! I OGG.G7 } 2 145 6a~ _ I'� Ig2 F"2 ,&u -ova•, 60°t- UAL OF t 000 i.SF P(' (140'10 = IO2, lg2 tb /4 -144 e,, 7,1141° '141I° Fn. LP* 4 &'41 it 1'0" FM w/ 13ojr 6. .'WF1Y P ays0g / 4=8" x1.0" Fr'e w/4�5 boa, ga. wity 4 an(' 6r4.4o Fr'' r° rttk 01-144.2_ T L' Wow- J" = Iv" N= to "r 1 c 2 = 01,172.0" G O,J Jestrt ,,b •r 0 IMA-1 a I. 61. 1 31 1 920' '. ' 1 '11, 680 I6,04914 °o ' -4 P F r' - dv -4- 12 *1-12/12000 O.OIo ILK / . 214.85 ct 4.21 0 a t , R 410 T(b O(EE.t.. I $ = a. 4i4 14‘ TOP Perm 74.14°F 46(i414-1C' 1.0,10 90.140 O!L I?l,,q m 6p16 F "A oig et, Fri.= 615°!6/ x12 = 48.71 PD 041.1. aos416.1 8 � °Qdo1�.b V y E G - 0 4 eof, t4. :/ 4I e a % F1�,., ;4 € °F FT. Fr" . . 1, 005 /1414L- 1444 2�t to *80 8.83 14 (lo Ib 14 M0144 : 6.63 .o1 i (9 )( '))° X 12" Fr'` PA t 0 ) 1 tIrac 4° 4 ox 1'2 Fi n A PA it "At "‘ _ 884s1 -± 133.7po r 4/69 > 2000ps : ° 14ips4 o CRAWFORD ENGINEERING 1 1 N.E. 55 STREET FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33303 (305) 491 -8844 IJ',F. 4 4 4c 12'' Fr& w/ en e owes f4»Mi t4D Rji a r1 t ; (P.Oh " IT 1,574 psp 4 1731.1 psi