Tropical Chevrolet, 03-13-23 UES Special Inspection Logcc: 1 – Client, 1 – Job Site Page 1 of 4
Item
No.
UES
Report
No.
Inspection
Date &
Inspector
Description of work inspected Result of
Inspection
Date of Re-
inspection &
Inspector
1 SP#01
(341224)
11/17/2022
Humberto Carvajal,
CWI.
1. Continuous wall footings as per S2.0, S1.1 & S4.0/S4.2:
a) Cont. wall footing (with vertical dowels for CMU wall as per note 8) type WF26 along grids A
between lines 8 thru 11.
b) Cont. wall footing (with vertical dowels for CMU wall & openings as per note 8 & 9/S4.0 and
concrete tie columns type CC2 [x3]) type WF26 with integrated column pads type F40 (x2) along
line 11 between grids A thru E.3.
c) Cont. wall footing (with vertical dowels for CMU wall as per note 8) type WF26 along grids E.2
between lines 8 thru 11.
d) Cont. wall footing (with vertical dowels for CMU wall as per note 9) type WF20 along grids D.1
between lines 11 thru proposed line 12.
e) Cont. wall footing (with vertical dowels for CMU wall as per note 9) type WF20 along proposed line
12 between grids D.1 thru D.6.
f) Cont. wall footing (with vertical dowels for CMU wall as per note 8) type WF26 along grids D.6
between lines 11 thru proposed line 12.
2. Column pad footings as per S2.0, S1.1 & S4.0/S4.2:
g) Column footings type F66 at grid-lines B.8x9 & D.5x9 in progress (*).
h) Column footings type F90 at grid-lines B.8x10 & D.5x10 in progress (*).
Pending
PASS
11/18/22
HC
Partially completed
Pending re-inspection
11/30/22
HC
2
SP#02
(341357)
11/18/2022
Humberto Carvajal,
CWI.
1. Continuous wall footings as per S2.0, S1.1 & S4.0/S4.2:
a) Cont. wall footing (with vertical dowels for CMU wall as per note 8) type WF26 along grids A
between lines 8 thru 11 completed (**).
b) Cont. wall footing (with vertical dowels for CMU wall & openings as per note 8 & 9/S4.0 and
concrete tie columns type CC2 [x3]) type WF26 with integrated column pads type F40 (x2) along
line 11 between grids A thru E.3 completed.
c) Cont. wall footing (with vertical dowels for CMU wall as per note 8) type WF26 along grids E.2
between lines 8 thru 11 completed (**).
Partial
(see 11/23/22)
INSPECTION LOG UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES
PROJECT: Tropical Chevrolet Renovation & Expansion Date: March 13, 2023
PROJECT LOCATION: 8880 Biscayne Blvd., Miami Shores, FL 33138 UES PROJECT. NO.: 2110.2100049
CLIENT: Lebolo Construction Management, Inc. CONTRACTOR: Lebolo Construction
ENG. OF RECORD: Mark Johnson FL-PE#51983 with JSG PERMIT #: CC-12-20-2951
THRESHOLD ENG: n/a UES Certificate of Authorization 000549
cc: 1 – Client, 1 – Job Site Page 2 of 4
Item
No.
UES
Report
No.
Inspection
Date &
Inspector
Description of work inspected Result of
Inspection
Date of Re-
inspection &
Inspector
SP#02
(341357)
11/18/2022
Humberto Carvajal,
CWI
d) Cont. wall footing (with vertical dowels for CMU wall as per note 9) type WF20 along grids D.1
between lines 11 thru proposed line 12 completed.
e) Cont. wall footing (with vertical dowels for CMU wall as per note 9) type WF20 along proposed line
12 between grids D.1 thru D.6 completed.
f) Cont. wall footing (with vertical dowels for CMU wall as per note 8) type WF26 along grids D.6
between lines 11 thru proposed line 12 completed.
2. Column pad footings as per S2.0, S1.1 & S4.0/S4.2:
a) Column footings type F66 at grid-lines B.8x9 & D.5x9 completed (*).
b) Column footings type F90 at grid-lines B.8x10 & D.5x10 completed (*).
The above mentioned reinforcing steel placement was found to be performed in substantial compliance with
the reference documents except (see below ↓↓↓ *, **, ***)
(*) as per S1.1 “column / base plate schedule: the bottom hex nut shall be “tack welded secured”. SUNCOR
did not include a clarification/approval question for omission of the tack weld under dwg. Sheet AB1
“approver note”. As per approver note #2 a plate washer was approved above the previously mentioned hex
nut. This plate was found to be loose (floating) not secured preventing displacement at the time of conc.
placement. GC to provide clarification for the observed AS BUILT conditions. For items 2g & 2h.
(**) required [if applicable] drilled & epoxy dowels missing as per 1/S4.2 for items 1a & 1c.
(**) installation of the additional reinforcing for the proposed “MCJ” was found to be missing at the time of
this site visit as per 1/S1.0 for items 1a thru 1h.
↑↑↑
↓↓↓
←←←
3 SP#03
(341409)
11/23/2022
Humberto Carvajal,
CWI.
ITEMS 1a thru 1f COMPLETED.
ITEMS 2a & 2b pending clarification and/or approval from the SEoR. Partial N/A
4
SP#04 (341925)
SP#06 (342202)
SP#07 (342311)
11/30/2022
12/05/2022
12/06/2022
Gaetano Di Zio, E.I.
1. Visual verification of the reinforcing steel placement at the following locations indicated below:
a) 8”/12” thick CMU stem wall along grids “A” and “E.2” between lines “8” thru ”11”, along line “11”
between grids “A” thru “E.2”, along grids “D.1” and “D.6” between lines “11” thru “12” and along
line “12” between grids “D.1” thru “D.6”, from elevation approx. −2'−0" to 0’−0”.
Failed
Reinspection
Failed
Pass
12/06/22. See Insp.
Rept. #07 for details
G. Di Zio
5 SP#05
(342087)
12/02/2022
Gaetano Di Zio, E.I. Construction Meeting N/A
6 SP#06 (342202)
SP#07 (342311)
12/05/2022
12/06/2022
Gaetano Di Zio, E.I.
1. Visual verification of the reinforcing steel placement at the following locations indicated below:
b) CIP concrete tie column mark CC2 (12"x24") at gridlines B.8x11 and D.5x11, from elevation −2'−0"
(top of footing) to 0'−0".
Failed
Pass
12/06/22. See Insp.
Rept. #07 for details
G. Di Zio
7 SP#07 12/06/2022 1. Visual verification of the reinforcing steel placement at the following locations indicated below: Pass
cc: 1 – Client, 1 – Job Site Page 3 of 4
Item
No.
UES
Report
No.
Inspection
Date &
Inspector
Description of work inspected Result of
Inspection
Date of Re-
inspection &
Inspector
(342311) Gaetano Di Zio, E.I. a) CIP concrete tie column mark CC2 (12"x24") at gridline E.2x11, from elevation −2'−0" (top of
footing) to 0'−0".
8 SP#08
(345306)
01/23/2023
Gaetano Di Zio, E.I.
Adrian Suarez Diaz
1. Visual verification of drilled holes for post-installed rebar dowels by means of approved anchoring
epoxy:
a) Cleanness/depth check (9” min. embedment) and epoxy application for #5 horizontal rebar dowels
into existing two (2) CIP concrete footings.
Failed
Pass
01/25/23. See Insp.
Rept. #09 for details
G. Di Zio
b) Cleanness/depth check (6” min. embedment) and epoxy application for #5 horizontal rebar dowels
into existing CIP concrete slab on grade along gird “E” between lines “5” thru “8”
Failed
Preliminary
Pass
01/27/23. See Insp.
Rept. #10 for details
G. Di Zio
9 SP#09
(345425)
01/25/2023
Gaetano Di Zio, E.I.
Adrian Suarez Diaz
1. Visual verification of drilled holes for post-installed rebar dowels by means of approved anchoring
epoxy:
a) Cleanness/depth check (9” min. embedment) and epoxy application for #5 horizontal rebar dowels
into existing CIP concrete footings at gridlines B.8x9 and B.8x10.
Pass
b) Cleanness/depth check (9” min. embedment) and epoxy application for #5 horizontal rebar dowels
into existing CIP concrete footings at gridlines D.3x9 and D.3x10.
Preliminary
Pass
01/27/23. See Insp.
Rept. #10 for details
G. Di Zio
10 SP#10
(345761)
01/27/2023
Gaetano Di Zio, E.I.
Adrian Suarez Diaz
1) Visual verification of the reinforcing steel placement at the following locations indicated below:
a) 8” thick interior slab on grade between grids “C.5” thru “C.8” and lines “2.8” thru “3.1” at the alignment
pit, top of slab elevation approx. −0’−9”.
Preliminary
Pass
02/02/23. See Insp.
Rpt. #11 for details
G. Di Zio
b) New CIP concrete column footings extension (6’-0x6’-0”x1’-0”) at two (2) existing interior column
footings (S1.0R).
c) New CIP concrete column footings extension at existing column footings located at gridlines B.8x9,
B.8x10, D.3x9 and D.3x10.
Pass
11
SP#11 (346032
- 346245)
SP#12 (346033)
02/02/2023
02/03/2023
Gaetano Di Zio, E.I.
Adrian Suarez Diaz
1) Visual verification of the reinforcing steel placement at the following locations indicated below:
a) Proposed new 6” thick interior slab on grade between grids “A” thru “J” and lines “1” thru “8” at the
Service Building, between grids “A” thru “E.2” and lines “8” thru “11” at the Service Building Addition
and between grids “D.1” thru “D.6” and lines “11” thru “12” at the Oil Storage, top of slab elevation
0’−0”.
Preliminary
Pass
02/03/23. See Insp.
Rpt. #12 for details
G. Di Zio
12 SP#13
(347405)
02/21/2023
Gaetano Di Zio, E.I.
1) Visual verification of drilled holes for post-installed rebar dowels by means of approved anchoring
epoxy:
a) Cleanness/depth check (5” min. embedment) for #5 vertical rebar dowels into existing CMU bond
beam (windows sills) and concrete lintels between grids “A” thru “E” and lines “1” thru “8” for existing
ribbon window openings infill at the existing service building.
b) Cleanness/depth check (6” min. embedment) for #5 vertical rebar dowels into existing CMU parapet
bond beam between grids “A” thru “E” and lines “1” thru “8” along the existing parapet walls at the
existing service building.
Pass
13 SP#14
(348219)
03/06/2023
Gaetano Di Zio, E.I.
1) Visual verification of the reinforcing steel placement at the following locations indicated below:
a) 8” thick CMU parapet wall extension between grids “A” and “J” and lines “1” thru ”8”, single lift from
elevation approx. +20'−0" to +22’−8”.
Pass
cc: 1 – Client, 1 – Job Site Page 4 of 4
Item
No.
UES
Report
No.
Inspection
Date &
Inspector
Description of work inspected Result of
Inspection
Date of Re-
inspection &
Inspector
14 SP#15
(348488)
03/07/2023
Gaetano Di Zio, E.I.
1) Visual verification of the reinforcing steel placement at the following locations indicated below:
a) 8” thick CMU wall infill for existing ribbon window openings at the existing service building between
grids “A” thru “J” and lines “1” thru “8”.
Pass
15 SP#16
(348639)
03/09/2023
Gaetano Di Zio, E.I. Inspection Cancelled N/A
16 SP#17
(348753)
03/10/2023
Gaetano Di Zio, E.I.
1) Visual verification of the reinforcing steel placement at the following locations indicated below:
a) 8” thick interior CMU non-load bearing wall between grids “A” thru “J” and lines “1” thru “8”, single
lift from elevation approx. 0’-0” to +8’-8” at the existing service building.
b) 12” thick exterior CMU load bearing along grid “E.4” between lines “8” thru “11”, 1st lift from elevation
approx. 0’-0” to +12’-0” at the service building expansion.
c) CIP concrete column mark CC2 at gridlines Cx5 and E.5x11, 1st lift from elevation 0'−0" to +12'−0"
at the service building expansion.
Pass
17 SP#18
(348944)
03/13/2023
Gaetano Di Zio, E.I.
1) Visual verification of the reinforcing steel placement at the following locations indicated below:
a) 12” thick exterior CMU load bearing along grid “A” between lines “8” thru “11”, along line “11”
between grids “A” thru “C.3” and along line “11” between grids “C.7” thru “D.3, 1st lift from elevation
approx. 0’-0” to +12’-0” at the service building expansion.
b) 12” thick exterior CMU load bearing along line “11” between grids “D.3” thru “E.2”, 1st lift from
elevation approx. 0’-0” to +10’-8” at the service building expansion.
c) CIP concrete column mark CC2 (12"x24") at gridline D.5x11, 1st lift from elevation 0'−0" (top of
footing) to +10'−8" at the service building expansion.
Pass