REV-19-1609l
1
A�r�CAL R�V��w
AF,FR�V�G
i
ff�:7
1
A�r�CAL R�V��w
AF,FR�V�G
i
ff�:7
Bonding Company's Name (if applicable) N/A
Bonding Company's Address
City
State
Mortgage Lender's Name (if applicable) N/A
Mortgage Lender's Address
City
State
Zip
Zip
Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installations as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has
commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet the standards of all laws regulating
construction in this jurisdiction. I understand that a separate permit must be secured for ELECTRIC, PLUMBING, SIGNS, POOLS,
FURNACES, BOILERS, HEATERS, TANKS, AIR CONDITIONERS, ETC.....
OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT: I certify that all the foregoing information is accurate and that all work will be done in compliance with all
applicable laws regulating construction and zoning.
"WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY
RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND
TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING
YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT."
Notice to Applicant: As a condition to the issuance of a building permit with an estimated value exceeding $2500, the applicant must
promise in good faith that a copy of the notice of commencement and construction lien law brochure will be delivered to the person
whose property is subject to attachment. Also, a certified copy of the recorded notice of commencement must be posted at the job site
for the first inspection which occurs seven (7) days after the building permit is issued. In the absence of such posted notice, the
inspection will not be approved and a reinspection fee will be charged.
`�.� i�,V 0 �
`L
OWNER or AGENT
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of �e mk ile20 )', by
Sj�c$Q•,1 who is personally known to
me or who has produced
identification and who did take an oath.
NOTA BLIC:
Sign &I�Iddtl
Print: 11 C I
Seal: GI ETTE-MELCMIOR1tE
NOWY PWk • s196 of Fbrla
CE416S aP 10, 2�0�R�
APPROVED BY URI I,
as
-.� -% .—
Signature
\ CONTRACTOR
The foregoing instrumnnent was acknowledged before me this
I % da of /LPu 20 t� by
BUTT 1�♦ ATMNSON
. who ij(5-ersonally known
c5br who has produced gA- as
identification and who did take an oath.
NOTARY PUBLIC:
Sign:
I V Print: %awtiaOlya H-Fg A
Seal: -o . d #Gc181025 ; *�
�i'••2 0
i �. ' a �ded thN •per:' �•
//C STATE � 0\\
***************************************PUM1X*****************
Plans Examiner Zoning
Structural Review Clerk
(Revised02/24/2014)
i
T,31ZP(
CANNONDESIGN
AUG
l
August 01, 2019
Ismael Naranio
Building Director
Miami Shores Village
10050 NE 2 Ave
Miami Shores, Florida, 33138
Re: Barry University — Weber Hall Renovation Permit #CC-12-18-3721: Code Conformance Statement
Dear Mr. Naranjo:
Per your request, refer to the below statement, in the event that it is determined that an automatic sprinkler system is required
for the above -mentioned project, under section 804.2.2 of the 2017 Florida Building Code, Existing Building:
It is of CannonDesign's opinion that the plans and amended construction documents for the project conform to the technical
codes, the laws of egress, type of construction and general arrangement.
We thank you for your consideration on this matter.
Sincerely,
Roland Lemke, AIA, LEED AP
Principal
1560 WILSON BOULEVARD, SUITE 200, ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22200
..•.
. ••
.. •.
000*90
0000
Miami Shores Village
Building Department
10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138
Tel: (305) 795-2204 Fax: (305) 756-8972
INSPECTION LINE PHONE NUMBER: (305) 762-4949
BUILDING
PERMIT APPLICATION
BUILDING ❑ ELECTRIC ❑ ROOFING
PLUMBING ❑ MECHANICAL ❑ PUBLIC WORKS
JOB ADDRESS: 11300 NE 2nd Avenue, Weber Hall
RECEIVED
Jhate
BY:
FBC 20 1-1
Master Permit No.G-
Sub Permit No. TMV 0:�- (q' j e co
E' REVISION ❑ EXTENSION ❑ RENEWAL
CHANGE OF ❑ CANCELLATION ❑ SHOP
CONTRACTOR DRAWINGS
City: Miami Shores County: Miami Dade Zip:
Folio/Parcel#:
Occupancy Type: Load: Construction Type
OWNER: Name (Fee Simple Titleholder): Barry University
Address: 11300 NE 2nd Avenue
City: Miami Shores State: Florida
Tenant/Lessee Name:
Email
CONTRACTOR: Company Name: Moss & Associates, LLC
Address: 2101 N. Andrews Avenue
City: Ft. Lauderdale State: Florida
the Building Historically Designated: Yes NO
Flood Zone: BFE: FFE:
Phone#: 305-981-1157
Zip: 33161
Phone#:
Phone#: 954-524-5678
Zip: 33311
Qualifier Name: Brett Atkinson Phone#: 954-524-5678
State Certification or Registration #: CGC 1510924 Certificate of Competency #:
DESIGNER: Architect/Engineer: Cannon Design Phone#: 703-907-2339
Address: 1560 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 200 4, � City: Arlington State: VA Zip: 22209
Value of Work for this Permit: $ sMi,ZInt_T re/Linear Footage of Work:_ �%<�; Sl-
Type of Work: ❑ Addition ❑■ Alteration ❑ New ❑ lace Re air Re p / p ❑Demolition
Description of Work: Renovations to Weber Hall
Cl,"qe... 470 hffU N, T- -
Specify color of color thru tile:
Submittal Fee Permit Fee $ 3 - -00
CCF $ S • W CO/CC $
Scanning Fee $ 00 Radon Fee $ 5 DBPR $ S l0 25 Notary $
Technology Fee $ 6 3 •ems Training/Education Fee $ 2• p Double Fee $
Structural Reviews $ Q Bond $
�ru f-1 1 N"cQ - p0 TOTAL FEE NOW DUE $ Tt 13 Lj
(Revised02/24/2014)
CANNONDESIGN
August 02, 2019
Ismael Naranjo
Building Director
Miami Shores Village
10050 NE 2 Ave
Miami Shores, Florida, 33138 `
Re: Barry University— Weber Hall Renovation Permit #CC-12-18-372f:'Addendum`#4 Permit Review Responses
Dear Mr. Naranjo:
The following are our responses to the Addendum #4 Permit Review Comments:
1. --Fire Department approval required.,
Response: Fire. Department approval has been obtained by the Contractor. }
2. -Provide rovide affidavit from the architect of record stating that the plans and amended construction documents for the
project conform to the technical codes. For buildings and, structures; the affidavit shall state that the plans conform to
the laws as to egress, type of construction and general arrangement.
Response: Refer to separately provided Code Conformance Statement.
3. According to note 4 on sheet A0002 of the, original approved plans, the fire rating requirements for the existing
demising walls and ceilings must be maintained. Clearly reflect the location of all required demising walls and
ceilings. FBC 2017, ,Existing Building Chapter 7 and 8.
Response: Note 4 on sheet A0002 is a General Note thatis meant to maintain the characteristics of the
existing demising walls and ceilings. If the existing,demising walls and ceilings were not fire rated, then
there is no requirement to fire rate them. Given the original permitted 2012 Weber Hall Restroom Renovations
#CC12-811 project,,and the 2014.Weber Hall Common Area Renovation (Phase 1) #CC14-2030 project,
classified the Construction Type as 11-B, the current renovation project has been re-classified as
Construction Typell-B. According toIConsiruction Type II-B, along with other provisions of the code as they
pertain to this project, a fire rating,is not required for existing demising *walls and ceilings.
4. According to the original plans, sheet G0200,' Me existing building was classified as type 11-A. Please explain why the
construction type being changes and what additional level of protection is provided.
Response: As mentioned in response #3 above, given the original permitted 2012,Weber Hall Restroom
Renovations #CC12-811 project, and the 2014 Weber Hall Common.Area Renovation (Phase 1) #CC14-2030
project, classified the Construction Type as II-B, the current renovation project has been, re-classified as
Construction Type II-B.. Refer to additional information below:
;a. The, actual largest floor plate is, less than the allowable area,�equiremenf for Construction Type 1113
per Chapter 6:
i. The allowable area requirement fogy Construction Type IIB fora non-sprinklered R-2
Occupancy Type per Table 606.2 is 16,000 SF.
ii. The largest floor plateof Weber Hall is Level 01 (minus planterst& covered porches) at
18,872 SF. " ,
1. With planters & covered porches the'SF is 21,011� ,,,
iii.. Using the Allowable Area Factor equation 6.3, in section 606.2.4, and the Frontage Jperease
equation 6.6,in section'606.3, the Allowable Area Factor for Weber Hall s 28,00ij�F.' .... �•
iv.� Therefore 18,872 is less than 28,000..,. , •
b. Per section 602.2, all of Weller Hall's Building Elements listed in Table 601 &V non-combListible, ....:.
;excepting the wood roof trusses. However, the wood roof trusses are suppbtWby concrete beams,
and are protected on the'underside by a Gypsum Board Thermal Barrier. •
c., Additional, protection includes: ,"'' • , • .....
L Fire alarm system,with horns and strobes has been maintained. ! 0000*
ii. Smoke detectors in the HVAC System, Corridors, and Dorm Rooms • r • ; . 0 0 * 0 , 0
.. •• •• " •
• • • • • • • •
1560 WILSON BOULEVARD, SUITE 200, ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22209 . • 000
i000 •
CANNIUDESIGN
r
iil. 1 hour fire rated and fire sealed openings between the basement to first floor, and the first
floor to second floor.
iv. 1 hour fire rated shafts to the underside of the Gypsum Board Thermal Barrier on the
underside of the wood trusses.
5. According to the onginal plans, sheet G0200, the existing building had an existing standpipe system. Please explain
why the system is no longer there.
Response: The Architect assumed the existing Fire Hose Cabinets were the equivalent to a Stand -Pipe
System. The Owner, Contractor, and Engineer of Record subsequently confirmed that the Fire Hose
Cabinets are supplied by a• domestic water supply, and do not have the same function as a Stand -Pipe
system. ' ' `
6. Sheet G0200, General Information. According to the information provided this project should be classified as level 2.
Please reflect compliance with all applicable sections of Chapter 8 of the 2017 Florida Building Code, Existing
Building.
Response: The initial Permit Set dated 12/14/18 lists the project as Alteration Level 1 and Level 2, under
General information. The Addendum 91 - Permit Revisions set dated 03106/19, clarified that 48% of the
project is Alteration Level 1 and 11.3% is Alteration Level 2, under General Information.
• Regarding the requirement for sprinklers:
o It our stance that based on the percentage of reconfiguration being less than 60%, sprinklers
are not required by the FBC-EB Chapter 8 or NFPA 101. f
■ See below for additional information.
• For the FBC — Existing Building code, the definition of "Work Area" comes into
play as to whether a sprinkler system is required in an existing R-2 Occupancy
Group building with "Alteration Level 2".
• Section 804.2.2 states that sprinklers shall be provided when items 1 and 2
occur. Per item2, the "work area" does not exceed 60 percent of the floor area,
so item 2 does' not occur. See screenshot below.
• ' In NFPA 101 Chapter 43 the term "Modification" is similar to FBC-
EB's "Alteration Level 2", basically "reconfiguration" versus "replacement".
• Section 43.6.4.1 and 43.6.4.1 both state that a sprinkler system is required if
over b0% of the aggregate_ building area and over 50% of any story be
rehabilitated work area. r
• As stated on G0200, the percentage of the building that is actually to be
reconfigured, falls under the classifications of "Alteration Level 2" and
"'Modification", is far less than 60%.
7. According to the original plans, sheet D0101, General Notes #2, the'contractor was supposed to provide the engineer
with dimensions for duct penetrations prior to performing the work. Please provide copy of the shop drawing along
with details and specification for the fire rated assemblies. '
Response: A shop drawing was submitted by the Contractor and Reviewed by the A/E. A site visit by the
Structural Engineer was then conducted to review the conditions with the Contractor., Subsequent direction
was provided by the Structural Engineer. Requested documentation is to be provided by the Contractor.
8. According to the field conditions the existing walls between the units and corridor are of CMU with a new metal frame
on both sides and 518" drywall. Please revise wall details to reflect the actual field conditions. Make sure to clearly
reflect on the plans the location of the required fire rated wall and ceiling assemblies. Please refer to chapter 7 and 8
of 2017 FBC, Existing Building for requirements.
•Response: The Contractor has confirmed that all of the existing walls between the units and corridor are 4
itich•GMU. The neyv furring wall types that are clearly keyed on the floor plans and detailed on sheet A1001,
• • •h dielte thai 04%Are built over existing partitions, both graphically and by notation.
• . 9. Additional nW4pq1onts may follow. Architect of record should provide plans with details and specifications based on
• the sompliancp gVIhod, and level of alteration for ihe`project.
• • •; • • "pbnse: t"p lsif additional documentation is required as a result of the review of the these responses, it
• • • • • . will.pe provjftJ at that time.
00
6:0609• • • 00 • R t
•
• •
• • •• •
• • •
• 00
3
Sincerely,
Roland Lemke, AIA, LEED AP
Principal
•
• :
�� .
••
..
•..•..
0000
.. •
• •
•• ••
••••••
•• ••
• • •
•
• • • • • •
0 0 •
• • •
0 •
CANNONDESIGN
August 01, 2019
Ismael Naranjo
Buildina rhremm-
Miami Shores Village
10050 NE 2 Ave
Miami Shores, Florida, 33138
Re: Barry University— Weber Hall Renovation Permit #CC-12-18-3721: Code Conformance Statement
Dear Mr. Naranjo:
Per your request, refer to the below statement, in the event that it is determined that an automatic sprinkler system is required
for the above -mentioned project, under section 804.2.2 of the 2017 Florida Building Code, Existing Building:
It is of CannonDesign's opinion that the plans and amended construction documents for the project conform to the technical
codes, the laws of egress, type of construction and general arrangement.
We thank you for your consideration on this matter.
-ii-ncerely,
Roland Lemke, AIA, LEED AP
Principal
1560 WILSON BOULEVARD, SUITE 200, ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22209
•...
.....•
•
. ...
......
•
......
•
......
....
•• •
00
....
0
. .
......
. .
•
•
0000 •
•
0 0
0000
CANNONDESIGN
August 02, 2019 '
Ismael Naranjo r
Building Director
Miami Shores Village
10050 NE 2 Ave
Miami Shores, Florida, 33138
Re: Barry University- Weber Hall Renovation Permit #CC-12-18-3721: Addendum #4 Permit Review Responses
Dear Mr. Naranjo"
The following are our responses to the Addendum #4 Permit Review Comments: +
1. Fire Department approval required. i
Response: Fire Department approval has been obtained by the..Contractor. w
2. Provide affidavit from the architect of record stating that the plans and amended construction, documents for the
project conform to the technical codes. For buildings,and structures, the affidavit shall state that the plans conform to
the laws as to egress, type of construction and general arrangement.) 0-
- , .
Response: Refer to separately provided Code Conformance Statement.
3. According to note 4 on sheet A0002 of the original, approved plans, the fire Ating requirements for the existing
;zdemssing ,walls and ceilings must be maintained. Cleariy reflect the, location of all required demising walls and
ceilings. FBC 2017, Existing Building Chapter 7 and 8.
Response: Note 4 on sheet A0002 is a General Note that is meant to maintain the characteristics of the
existing demising walls and ceilings. If the•existing.demising walls and ceilings were not fire rated, then
there is no requirement to fire, rate them. Given the original permitted 2012 Weber Hall Restroom Renovations
#CC12-811 project, and the 2014 Weber. Hall Common Area Renovation .(Phase 1) #CC14-2030 project,
classifed,the,Construction Type as II-B,�the current renovation project has been re-classified as
Construction Type II-B. According to Construction Type II-B, along with other provisions of the code as they
pertain,to this project, a fire rating is not required ;for existing demising walls and ceilings.
4. According to the original plans, sheet G0200, the existingbuilding was classified as type 11A_ Please explain why the
construction type being changes and what additional level of protection is"provided.
Response: As mentioned in response #3 above, given the original permitted 2012 Weber HaII.Restroom
Renovations #CC12-811 project, and the 2014 Weber. Hall Common Area.Renovation (Phase 1.) #CC14-2030
project, classified the Construction Type as II-B, the current renovation project has been re-classified as
Construction Type !I-B. Refer to additional information below:;,, 7.. t.
The actual largest floor plate is less than the ailowable areairequirement for Constriction Type 11B
peF Chapter 5 .. ,
1. The allowable area requirement for Construction Type 118 for a non-sprinklered R-2
Occupancy, Type per Table 506.2 is 16,000 SF.
•ii. The largest floor, plate of Weber Hall is Level 01 (minus planters & covered porches) at
18,872 SF.
1. With planters $ covered porches the SF is 211011.
III.. Using the Allowable Area, Factor equation 6.3 in section 506.2.4, and the Frontage Increase
..equation 5.5 in.section,506.3, the Allowable Area Factor for Weber Hall is 28,00i013f'.
IV. Therefore 18,872 is. less than 28,000. . , . . , •
b. Per section 602.2, all of Weber Hall's Building Elements listed in Table 601•are•non-combt%ttF;le, •.
excepting the wood roof trusses. However, the wood roof trusses are supppdted.by concrete beams"' • •
and are protected on the underside by a Gypsum Board Thermal Barrier. •..;. • . • ; •...:
c., Additional protection includes: ., •
i. Fire alarm system -with horns and strobes has been maintained., ., • .... .., , • • • • ; • • .
ii. Smoke detectors in the HVAC System, Corridors, and Dorn Rooml • .... . • • • • • •
1560 WILSON BOULEVARD, SUITE 200, ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22209
CAN\10NDESIGN
iii. 1 hour fire rated and fire sealed openings between the basement to first floor, and the first
floor to second floor.
iv. 1 hour fire rated shafts to the underside of the Gypsum Board Thermal Barrier on the
underside of the wood trusses.
5. According to the original plans, sheet G0200, the existing building had an existing standpipe system. Please explain
why the system is no longer there.
Response: The Architect assumed the existing Fire Hose Cabinets were the equivalent to a Stand -Pipe
System. The Owner, Contractor, and Engineer of Record subsequently confirmed that the Fire Hose
Cabinets are supplied by a domestic;water supply, and do not have the same function as a Stand -Pipe
system. ' .
6. Sheet G0200, General Information. According to the information provided this project should be classified as level 2.
Please reflect compliance with all applicable sections of Chapter 8 of the 2017 Florida Building Code, Existing
Building.
Response: The initial Permit Set dated 12/14/18 lists the project as Alteration Level 1 and Level 2, under
General Information. The Addendum #1 - Permit Revisions set dated 03106119, clarified that 48% of the
project is Alteration Level 1 and 11.3% is Alteration Level 2, under General Information.
• Regarding the requirement for sprinklers:
o It our stance that based on the percentage of reconfiguration being less than 60%, sprinklers
are not required by the FBC-EB Chapter 8 or NFPA 101.
■ See below for additional information.
• For the FBC — Existing Building code, the definition of "Work Area" comes into
play as to whether a sprinkler system is required in an existing R-2 Occupancy
Group building with "Alteration Level 2". 1 -
• Section 804.2.2 states that sprinklers shall be provided when items 1 and 2
occur. Per item2, the "work area" does not exceed 50 percent of the floor area,
so item 2 does not occur. See screenshot below.
• In NFPA 101 Chapter 43 the term "Modification" is similar to FBC-
' EB's "Alteration Level 2"; basically "reconfiguration"versus "replacement".
• Section 43.6.4.1 and 43.6.4.1 both state that a sprinkler system is required if
over 50% of the aggregate building area and over 50% of any story be
' rehabilitated work area.
• As stated on G0200, the percentage of the building that is actually to be
reconfigured, falls under the classifications of "Alteration Level 2" and
"Modification", is far less than 60%. '
7. According to the original plans, sheet D0101, General Notes #2, the contractor was supposed to provide the engineer
with dimensions for duct penetrations prior to penorming the work: Please provide copy of the shop`drawing along
with details and sp ecification for the fire rated assemblies. ' I . ' '
Response: A shop drawing was submitted by the Contractor and Reviewed by the AIE. A site visit by the
Structural Engineer was then conducted to review the'conditions witii the Contractor. Subsequent direction
was provided by the Structural Engineer. Requested documentation is to be provided by the Contractor.
8. According to the field conditions the existing walls between the units and corridor are of CMU with a new metal frame
on both sides and 5/8• drywall. Please revise wall details to reflect the actual field'conditions. Make sure to clearly
reflect on the plans the location of the required fire rated wall and ceiling assemblies. Please refer to chapter 7 and 8
of 2017 FBC, Existing Building for requirements. '
gteonse: The Contractor has'confirmed that all of the existing walls between the units and corridor are 4
...... •irate GMU. The new furring wall types that are clearly keyed on the floor plans and detailed on sheet A1001,
• • indicate that They Ire built over existing partitions, both graphically and by notation.
• 9. AdMonal ragW?mnts may follow. Architect of record should provide plans with details and specifications based on
• • • • A comp/ia►Wirotiod, and level of alteration for the project.
. Res*nse: rkitedLif additional documentation is required as a result of the review of the these responses, it
• • •: • • Will tft providedet that time. '
3
Sincerely,
Roland Lemke, AIA, LEED AP
Principal
• •
••
•
•
• •
• •
•• ••
••••••
••.•••
•
CANNONMESIGN
July 01, 2019
Ismael Naranjo
Building Director
Miami Shores Village
10050 NE 2 Ave
Miami Shores, Florida, 33138
Re: Barry University — Weber Hall Renovation Permit #CC-12-18-3721
Dear Mr. Naranjo:
Thank you for your additional input and time regarding this matter.
Please consider the following with regard to our Addendum #4 Permit Revisions submission:
1) Weber Hall is non-sprinklered.
a. This was clarified by the submission and review of the Addendum #1 — Permit Revisions dated March, 5th
2019. Weber Hall is currently permitted based on Addendum #1 and the subsequent Addendum #2 dated
April 10th, 2019.
b. Weber Hall does have a Fire Alarm System and Fire Hose Cabinets.
2) Construction Type = IIB per Chapter 6.
a. Previous Weber Hall renovation projects set the precedent that the Construction Type is IIB. It is also
CannonDesign's assessment that the Construction Type is IIB.
i. Previous Weber Hall permit submission projects that set the Construction Type as IIB:
1. The 2012 Weber Hall Restroom Renovations #CC12-811
2. The 2014 Weber Hall Common Area Renovation (Phase 1) #CC14-2030
ii. The actual largest floor plate is less than the allowable area requirement for Construction Type IIB
per Chapter 5:
1. The allowable area requirement for Construction Type IIB for a non-sprinklered R-2
Occupancy Type per Table 506.2 is 16,000 SF.
2. The largest floor plate of Weber Hall is Level 01 at 21,011 SF.
3. Using the Allowable Area Factor equation 5.3 in section 506.2.4, and the Frontage
Increase equation 5.5 in section 506.3, the Allowable Area Factor for Weber Hall is 28,000
SF.
4. Therefore 21,011 is less than 28,000.
iii. Per section 602.2, all of Weber Hall's Building Elements listed in Table 601 are non-combustible,
excepting the wood roof trusses. However, the wood roof trusses are supported by concrete
beams, and have a non -fire rated Gypsum Board Thermal Barrier on the underside.
3) Section 803 of FBC Existing Building - Building Elements and Materials
a. Per Exception 11 for R-2 Occupancies, Existing Vertical Openings not exceeding (3) stories are only
required to have a 30-minute fire rated enclosure. The project is exceeding this requirement by providing 1-
hour enclosures from the basement through the 1 st floor, and from the 1 st floor through the 2nd floor.
b. The roof of Weber Hall is non -occupied and not considered a story. Since the project is Construction Type
IIB and the roof is not fire rated, the penetrations to the interstitial space through the 2nd floor gypsum board
thermal barrier ceiling, are not fire rated.
1560 WILSON BOULEVARD, SUITE 200, ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22209
CANNONDESIGN
We thank you again for your time and input on this matter.
Sincerely,
Roland Lemke, AIA, LEED AP
Principal