The URL can be used to link to this page

RCRT-3-09-436MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE Building Department 10050 NE 2 Ave, Miami Shores Fl, 33138 Tel: 305-795-2204- Fax: 305-756-8972 4/3/2009 Certified Mail # 7007 2680 0001 3276 5002 Property located at: Address: 9050 NE 8 Avenue Miami Shores, Florida, 33138-3283 Permit Number: RCRT-3-09-436 Folio # 1132060110020 Notice of Reg uired Ins ection/Certification Dear Owner: The Village has been notified by Metro -Dade Building & Zoning Department that the above referenced property has a building or structure that is forty (40) years old or older. In accordance with Miami -Dade County Chapter 8 Section 8-11, the subject property must be inspected by a Florida Registered Architect or Engineer and a report furnished to this office. A report and a fee of two -hundred fifty dollars must be submitted to this office within ninety (90) days of receiving this Notice of Required Inspection/Certification. If you would like a copy of Minimum Inspection Procedural Guidelines for Structural and Electrical Recertification, or if you have any questions, please Gall my office at 305- 795-2204. Sincerely, Norman Bruhn, Building Official 305-795-2204 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Miami Shores Village Building Department JiAR zoos 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138 A Tel: (305) 795-2204 Fax: (305) 756-8972 INSPECTION LINE PHONE NUMBER: (305) 762-4949 V->rk FBC 20 Master Permit No. PLUA-6so ❑BUILDING ❑ ELECTRIC ❑ ROOFING Sub Permit No. ❑ REVISION ❑ EXTENSION ❑RENEWAL ❑PLUMBING ❑ MECHANICAL ❑PUBLIC WORKS ❑ CHANGE OF ❑ CANCELLATION ❑ SHOP CONTRACTOR DRAWINGS JOB ADDRESS: 2 © v Folio/Parcel#: © 0 0 Is the Building Historically Designated: Yes NO_ Occupancy Type: Load: Construction Type: Flood Zone: _ BFE: FFE: OWNER: Name (Fee Simple Titleholder): ��1 S IA l _ i L Phone#: � � P Address: 0 a 0 rz:r City: Aj In � '� State: Zip: r Tenant/Lessee Name: Phone#: Email; CONTRACTOR: Company Name: { Ad City: State: Qualifier Name: State Certification or Registration #: DESIGNER: Architect/Engineer: Value of Work for this Permit: $ Type of Work: ❑ Addition Description of Work: Phone#: yip: Phone#: Certificate of Competency #: Phone#: City: State: Zip: Square/Linear Footage of Work: ❑ Alteration ❑ New ❑ Repair/Replace ❑ Demolition Specify color of color thru tile: N r-'e C'F A-i �-- l Chi �'\ on Submittal Fee $ Zrap Permit Fee $ i CCF $ CO/CC $ Scanning Fee $ Radon Fee $ DBPR $ Notary $ Technology Fee $ Training/Education Fee $ Double Fee $ �c Structural Reviews $ Bond $ u� TOTAL FEE NOW DUE $ (Revised02/24/2014) Property Information Map Page 1 of 1 My Home Miami -Dade County, Florida MIAMI•DAI?E Property Information Map Digital Orthophotography - 2007 0 129 ft This map was created on 4/3/2009 2:10:38 PM for reference purposes only. Web Site © 2002 Miami -Dade County. All rights reserved. Summary Details: ollo No.: 11-3206-011.0020 r0 ert 50 NE 8 AVE ERONA APARTMENTS dress: MGMT INC failing kCRISTOBAL GIL 50 NE 8 AVE #18 MIAMI HORES FL 138-3283 Property Information- Zone: 0fJ0 MULTIPLE PARTMENTS 003 MULTIFAMILY- PARTMENTS ths: 16116 inits: pUnits: 1600la e: 797 1.697 SO FT lt: 1957 SBURY PARK PB 4- 110 LOT 3 LOT SIZE on: 109.300 X 290 OR i 197-1186 04031 Sale Information: ftaleO/R: 1197-1186 Dale: /2003 Amount: IS700.000 Assessment Information- 2008 2007 alue: $fi92,590 $600.000 Value: E.n $488.658 $400.000 Value: 1,151.248 1,000,00ed Value: 1,151,248 1,000.00 Taxable Value Information: Year: 2008 2007 Applied Applied Taxing Authority: Exemption/ Exemption/ Taxable Taxable Value: Value: (Regional: $0/ $0/ $1,151,248 $1,000,000 County: $0/ $0/ $1,151,248 $1,000,000 City: $0/ $0/ $1,151.248 $1,000.000 School Board: $0/ $0/ $1,151,248 $1,000.000 http://gisims2.miamidade.gov/myhome/pa intmap.asp?mapurl=http://gisims2.miamidade.gov... 4/3/2009 RC R t- 18, 6so Certification of Compliance with Parking Lot Csaardrails Requirements in Chapter 8C of the Code of Miami -Dade County Date: 3-5-18 Building Official CITY OF Miami Shores Village Building Department 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Building Department/40 Year Re -Certification LIAR 1nD18.Property Address: Q050 Nk 8 AVI:. N11AM1SI IORI:S, 1:1. 33138-3283Folio No.: 11-3?06-011-0020 i+�� Building Description Multifamily Building, Bldg 91, with 10 apartiricilts (total Of UI11tS 10, building 1), CBS building , 1 story, w/ s(ucco f inish, tie beams and tic columns, Slab on Grade Concrete Slab 4", w/ cast terrazzo finish lloor, hip roof, slope 3/12, w/ tiles Total Area 7,235 scIft. Building # 1, 10 units, Total Area (Building 1+2) = 9,797 sgft. Bldg. No.: 1 The undersigned states the following: I am a Florida registered professional engineer or architect with an active license. On 3-5-18 , I inspected the parking lot(s) serving the above referenced building for compliance with Section §8C-6 and determined the following (check only one): (X) The parking lot(s) is/are not adjacent to or abutting a canal, lake or other body of water. The parking lot(s) is/are adjacent to or abutting a canal, lake or other body of water and parked vehicles are protected by a guardrail that complies with Section §8C-6 of the Miami -Dade County Code. The parking lot(s) is/are adjacent to or abutting a canal, lake or other body of water and parked vehicles are not protected by a guardrail tnat complies with Section §8C-6 of the Miami - Dade County Code. I have advised the property owner that he/sue must obtain a permit for the installation of the guardrail and obtain required inspection approvals to avoid enforcement Lion. I_,EANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E Signature and Sell of Print Name Professional EiigineerorArchitect Revised June 2014 Certification of Compliance with Parking Lot Illumination Standards in Chapter 8C of the Code of Miami -Dade County Date: 3-5-18 Building Official CITY OF Miami Shores Village Building Department 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Building Department/40 Year Re -Certification Property Address: 9050 NE 8 AVE', MIAMI SI-IORLS, FL 3 3138-3283 Folio No.: 11-3206-011-0020 Building Description: Multil'amily Building, Bldg 41, with 10 apartments (total of units 10, building 1), CBS building , 1 story, w/ stucco finish, tie beams and tie columns, Slab on Grade Concrete Slab 4", w/ cast terrazzo finish floor, hip roof , slope 3/12, w/ tiles Total Area 7,235 sqft. Building 4 1, 10 units, Total Area (Building 1+2) = 9,797 sgft. Bldg.: 1 The undersigned states the following: 1. 1 am a Florida registered professional engineer or architect with an active license. 2. On 3-5-18 , 2018, I measured the level of illumination in the parking lot(s) serving the above referenced building. 3. Maximum 58.71 _foot candle per SF, Minimum 4.94 foot candle per SF, Maximum to Minimum ratio 58.71 . 4.94 ., foot candle 25.67 average per SF. 4. The level of illumination provided in the parking lot (X)_meets does not meet the minimum standards for the occupancy classification of the building as established in Section 58C-3 of the Code of Miami -Dade County. (4 sig .. r. Seal of Professional Engineer or Architect _ LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E. Print Name Revised August2014 Miami Shores Village Building Department 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Tel: (305) 795.2204 Fax: (305) 756.8972 INSPECTION'S PHONE NUMBER: (305) 762.4949 40 YEARS BUILDING'S ELECTRICAL CERTIFACATION INSPECTION COMMENCED INSPECTION MADE BY: L d ESPINOSA, P.E DATE: 3/1/18 SIGNATURE: _ INSPECTION COMPLETED PRINT NAME. LEANDR SA DATE 3/5/18 TITLE: PROFFESSIONAL ENGINEER. P.E. 60066 ADDRESS: 459 EAST 56 STREET, HIALEAH, FLORIDA, 33013 a. Name of Title: VE,RONA. APARTMENTS MGMT INC- % CRISTOBAL GIL b Street Address: 9050 NT F-5 AV M LA.M1 SI JORI•.S. 1 1_i 138-i�` � c. Legal Description: .�SllURY 11.1RK 11B 4-1 10 1.0'1• ; 1.01 SI Z F 1[]9.300 X 29{} [7[Z 1197-1180 .d. Owners Name.:. VERONA APARTMENTS-MGM.T I-N.C.--%_CRISTO_I3A .-GIL _ e,. Owner's Mail_i_nq-Address _9(1, 0,1\III._H.. �'1-.�E-15-N�11!1i Ill SIJ(,:>1:1?. , 1.1..:.,331-38-3283 Building No.: 1 f. Folio Number of Building: 11-3206-011-0020 g. Building Code Occupancy Classification: Commercial/Multifamily RESIDENTIAL h. Present Use: Commercial/Multifamily RESIDENTIAL Apartment Building-10 units i. General Description, Type of Construction, Size, Number of Stories, and Special Features: Multifamily Building, Bldg #1, with 10 apartments (total of units 10, building 1), CBS building , 1 story, w/ stucco finish, tie beams and tie columns, Slab on Grade Concrete Slab 4", w/ cast terrazzo finish floor, hip roof, slope 3/12, w/ tiles Total Area 7,235 sqft. Building # 1, 10 units, Total Area (Building 1+2) = 9,797 sqft. Building # 1 Original Structure. 7,235 sqft., No Addittions Total Area of Building # 1 = 7,235 sqft R(21)')"- f0, nl3? at Id fi'xi based UI'::i?E.l!lty/ YOT'SSIGIIaIS offs j3$Fl il�� :L'-'. •Cii� niay use •J J'.:t: is �;t2': ;is land -I k: r::l -1,;,; . • ' �!i :: ,`. , i! ritlrai !�[ >igr. td zInrl :sealleo OIS7fC'SSIGna::i --- .. ` 1f<:; RegIsteled i"IlGlfli'.cr .. ,;�_il!lieCl fU (;r>_,'.)61'ci gill �_i�-'�:iflCai I1CCrltlflCc'tlOri for :I late) v 1-lore On rusidlential projeiZL5- ar serviCes of Cr�ti ^f i ';:r 4• I• :�� V•]II'� ,•�fi��i ..�.!'^•1SC ( f)iii;rif C �'i 7 �^,•_ _�113 projects �:�. v�'hicl-i �:c, . more, ii�rm -� �J 0010 c�$Pei rur,at5- 41 i ,)_(!':� 1`i01id:'! Str:lLuLc` vC'if1FICc _ cic:'l-::;f(;!i!� -tf. and pinfessional engineers rnusl have ,:proven r_=ualitica!ions by training and experience r•i iIhc sr)crific technical field r,-_;vered in till= inspckaion report ;stri.ic�fur;�l or ele(;�Jcal) a:; per Section Y I I(1) of the Code of MiLinn•Dad; t;County. N GUIDELINES AND INFORMATION FOR RECERTIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS OF FORTY (40) YEAR STRUCTURES 1. ELECTRIC SERVICE 1. Size: Amperage (800 AMP) Fuses () Breakers (X) 2. Phase: Three Phase ( ) Single Phase (X) 3. Condition: Good (X) Fair () Needs Repair ( ) 4. Comments: ELECTRIC SERVICE IS IN GOOD CONDITIONS. THERE IS ONE 800AMP MAIN BREAKER. TIIEREARE 10 METERS AND 10 (100AMP) MAIN BREAICERS (ONE FOR EACH UNIT) AND ONE HOUSE PANEL METER WIT II 60 AMP MAIN BREAICER. 2. METER AND ELECTRIC ROOM 1. Clearances: Good (X) Fair_() _ Requires Correction,( t 2. Comments: ELECTRIC SER VICE IS 1N GOOD CONDITIONS. METER IELECTRIC) ROOM IS LOCATED AT TIIE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. IT IS IN CLEAN AND GOOD CONDITIONS. SER VICE EQUIPMENT GOOD CONDITION 3. GUTTERS N/A 1. Location: 2. Taps and Fill: N/A 3. 3. Comments: 4. ELECTRICAL PANELS 1. Panel # 1 TO 10 Location: UNITS KITCHEN Good { } Requires Repair ( } Good () Requires Repair { ) _ _ I Good (X ) Needs Repair ( ) 2. Panel # HP Location: ELECTRIC ROOM Good ( X ) Needs Repair ( ) 3. Panel # Location- Good () Needs Repair ----- -------- 4. Panel # Location. Good () Needs Repair () 5. Panel # () Location Good () Needs Repair ( ) 6. Comments ALL ELECTRICAL PANELS ARE /N GOOD CONDITIONS AND LABELED 5. BRANCH CIRCUITS 1. Identified: Yes (X) Must be identified ( ) 2. Conductors: Good (X) Deteriorated ( ) Must be replaced ( ) 3. Comments: IN GOOD CONDITIONS i 6. GROUNDING OF SERVICE Condition: Good (X) Repairs Required Comments: GROUNDING SYSTEM /S /N GOOD CONDITIONS 7. GROUNDING OF EQUIPMENT Condition: Goo_ d (X) Repairs Required { Comments: IN GOOD CONDITIONS 8. SERVICE CONDUITS/RACEWAYS Condition: Good (_X) Repairs Required Comments: IN GOOD CONDITIONS 9. SERVICE CONDUCTORS AND CABLES Condition: Good (X) Repairs Required ( ) Comments: ELECTRIC SERVICE IS /N GOOD CONDITIONS 10. TYPES OF WIRING METHODS Condition: Conduit Raceways: EMT(BRANCH CIRCUITS) Good (X) Repairs Required ( ) Conduit RMT: SUBFEEDERS Good (X) Repairs Required ( ) NM Cable: Good () Repairs Required ( ) BX Cable: Good () Repairs Required () } 11. FEEDER CONDUCTORS Condition: Good (X) Repairs Required ( } Comments: FEEDERS CONDUCTORS ARE /N GOOD CONDITIONS 12. EMERGENCY LIGHTING N/A Condition: Good (} Repairs Required ( } Comments: ALL UNITS OPEN DIRECTLY TO THE OUTSIDE I 13. BUILDING EGRESS ILLUMINATION Condition: Good (X) Repairs Required ( ) Comments: EGRESS ILUMINATION /S /N GOOD CONDITIONS 14. FIRE ALARM SYSTEM N/A Condition: Good () Repairs Required () _ Comments: i 15. SMOKE DETECTORS Condition: Good (X) Required ( ) Comments: _Repairs SMOKE DETECTORS ARE IN GOOD CONDITIONS T1��1 16. EXIT LIGHTS N/A Condition: Good () Repairs Required Comments: APARTMENTS UNITS OPENS DIRECTLY TO THE OUTSIDE 17. EMERGENCY GENERATOR N/A Condition: Good (} Repairs Required ( ) Comments: 18. WIRING IN OPEN OR UNDER COVER PARKING GARAGE AREAS Condition Good (X) Repairs Required ( } Comments IN GOOD CONDITIONS 19. OPEN OR UNDERCOVER PARKING SURFACE AND SECURITY LIGHTING Condition Good :Xj Illumination Required [. j Comments: IN GOOD CONDITIONS 20. SWIMMING POOL WIRING N/A Condition: Good () Repairs Required ? Comments. 21. WIRING OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT Condition: Good �X) Repairs Required [ j Comments IN GOOD CONDITIONS 22. GENERAL ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IS IN GOOD CONDITION. NO REPAIRS NEEDED. IN GENERAL BUILDING ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IS WELL MAINTAINED. Certification of Compliance with Parking Lot ill,;mination Standards in Chapter 8C of the Code of Miami -Dade County Date 3 — 5 2018 Building Official CITY OF Miami Shores Village Building Department 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Building Department140 Year Re -Certification Property Address. 9O5U Nt�. 8 AV1=.. MIAMI SI IURI:S. FL 3 3138-3283 i=olln 1'Jo 11-3206-011-0020 al r;rrrltlrnr� D(_?S .frf}<<c,1Y Multifamily Building, Blams andrth t e1 columns, Slabartments (on Gradunits 10, e Conccreterlding 1), Slab 4", CBS building , 1 story, wl stucco finish, tie be wl cast terrazzo finish floor, hip roof , slope 3M2, wl tiles Total Area 7,235 agft. Building # 1, 10 units, Total Area (Building 1+2) = 9,797 sgft. f !d9 No 1 r1e ,,racers geed states the following! ani a Florida registered professional engineer or architect with an active license. On 3 5_-_a.._-_ !measured the level of illumination in the parking lot(s) serving the above referenced building the level of ill�=mination provided in the parking roi(s. meet., the minimum standards for the orc�!p,:7ncy classiiicat!on of the building as established in Section §8C-3 of the fVleti orolitr�i (--nolle of iV!iami- Dude Coulity LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E. 5�:�ai of �rrchltc;ct nr engineer executing tl)e B i a As indicated by the attached report the building is electrically safe for continued used and occupancy, as noted in the report. "As a routine matter, in the order to avoid possible misunderstanding, nothing in the report should be construed directly or indirectly as a guarantee for any portion of this structure. To the best of my knowledge and abiiity, this report represents an accurate evaluation of observed conditions, to the extent reasonably possible" Sincerely, Leandro Espinosa, P.E. Flor' P.E. NO. 60066 Certification of Compliance with Parking Lot Illumination Standards in Chapter 8C of the Code of Miami -Dade County Date 3-5-18 Building Official CITY OF Miami Shores Village Building Department 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Building Department/40 Year Re -Certification Property Address: _9050 NE 8 AVE, MIAMI SI IORES, Ft, 331 38-3283 =olio No : 11-3206-011-0020 Building Description: Multifamily Building, Bldg #1, with 10 apartments (total of units 10, building 1), CBS building , 1 story, w/ stucco finish, tie beams and tie columns, Slab on Grade Concrete Slab 4", w/ cast terrazzo finish floor, hip roof, slope 3/12, w/ tiles Total Area 7,235 sqft. Building # 1, 10 units, Total Area (Building 1+2) = 9,797 sgft. Bldg. No : 1 The undersigned states the following: I. I am a Florida registered professional engineer or architect with an active license. Can 3-5-118 1 measured the level of illumination in the parking lot(s) serving the above referenced building. he level of Illurnination provided in the parking lot(s) meets the. minimum standards fcr the occupancy classification of the building as established in Section' §8C-3 of the Metropolitan Code of Miami -Dade County LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E. Namc meal of architect or engineer executing the ��ignature Certification LEANDRO ESPINOSA, RE ENGINEERING, RG No 60066 459 EAST 56"' STREET, HIALEAH, FLO, 33013 Office: 786-553-5611 Fax: 305-687-5408 BUILDING 40 YEAR RECERTIFICATION REPORT ba BUILDING 1 V3 1 r BUILDING 2 CBS MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING 9050 NE 8 AVE, BLDG #1, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33138 9050 NE 8 AVE, MIAMI, FL, 33138 FOLIO #: 1 1-3206-0I1-0020 REPORT PREP',RED BY: LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E. f, kv BUILDING 1 �� F0110;1 W206-011-0020 5flh msiofl, f ASSURY Property Address 9050 NE 8 AVE Miami Shores, FL 33138.3283 owner VERONAAPARTNlENTS MGMT INC %CRISTOBAL GIL Mailing Address 11;4ll KRES. 1:; 3283 PA Primary Zone ukk TI-Fgkv • GEIRAL Primary Land Use 0303 MULTIFAMILY 10 UNITS PLUS 4 II TIC,M9ll V Q no I.Y)N: I IAIITC t; zoom �j 11 f i ` r l.V �.F, 1h y e • ! � � j9� l � I • 9(Ier I MINIMUN INSPECTION PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR BUILDING STRUCTURE CERTIFICATION INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/18 INSPECTION COMPLETED: 3/5/18 PRINT NAME: LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E. TITLE: FLORIDA LIC. P.E. 60066 ADDRESS: 459 EAST 56 STREET, HIALEAH, FLORIDA, 33013 TELEPHONE: 786-553-561 1 SCOPE OF STRUCTURAL INSPECT The Fundamental purpose of the required inspection and report is to confirm in reasonable fashion that the building or structure under consideration is safe for continued use under present occupancy. As implied by the title of this document, this is a recommended procedure, and under no circumstances are these minimum recommendations intended to supplant proper professional judgment. In general, unless there is obvious overloading, or significant deterioration of important structure elements, there is little need to verify the original design. It will rarely be possible to visually examine all concealed construction, nor should such be generally necessary. However, a sufficient number of typical structure members should be examined to permit reasonable conclusions to be drawn. Visual Examination will, in most cases, be considered adequate when executed systematically. Surface imperfections such as, cracks, distortion, sagging, excessive deflections, significant misalignment, signs of leakage, and peeling of finishes should be viewed critically as indications of possible difficulty. Testing Procedures and quantitative analysis will not generally be required for structural members or systems except for such cases where visual examination has revealed such need or where apparent loading conditions may be critical. Manual Procedures such as chipping small areas of concrete and surface finishes for closer examinations are encouraged in preference to sampling and/or testing where visual examination alone is deemed insufficient. Generally, unfinished areas of buildings such as utility spaces, maintenance areas, stairwells and elevator shafts should be utilized for such purposes. In some cases, to be held to a minimum, ceilings or other construction finishes may have to be opened for selective examination of critical structural elements. In that event, such locations should be carefully located to be least disruptive, most easily repaired and held to a minimum. In any event, a sufficient number of structural members Foundation movements will frequently be of importance, usually settlement, although upward movements due to expansive soils actually may occur, it is infrequently in this area. Older buildings on spread footings may exhibit continual, even recent settlements if founded on deep unconsolidated fine grained or cohesive soils or fi•om subterraneous losses or movements fi•om several possible causes Foundation If all of the supporting subterranean materials were completely uniform beneath a structure, with no significant variations in grain size, density, moisture content or other mechanical properties; and if dead load pressures were completely uniform, settlements would probably be uniform and of little practical consequence. In the real world, however, neither is likely. Significant deviations from either of these two idealisms are likely to result in unequal vertical moyenlents. Monolithic masonry, generally incapable of accepting Such movements will crack. Such cracks are most likely to occur at corners, and large openings. Since, in most cases, differential shears are involved, cracks will typically be diagonal. Small movements, in themselves, are most likely to be structurally important only if long term leakage through fine cracks may have resulted in deterioration. In the event of large movements, continuous structural elements Such as floor and roof systems must he evaluated for possible fi-acture Or loss of bearing Pile foundations are, in general, less likely to exhibit such difficulties. Where such does occur, special investigation will be required. Roofs Sloping roofs, usually having clay Or cement tiles are of concern in tile event that the covered membrane may have deteriorated. or that the tiles may have become loose. Large deflections, if merely resulting from deteriorated rafters or joists will be of greater import. Valley Flashing, and Base Flashing at roof penetration will also be matters of concern. Flat roofs with built up membrane roofs will be similarly critical with respect to deflection considerations, Additionally, since they will generally be approaching expected life limits at the age when building recertification is required careful examination is important. Blisters, wrinkling. aligatoring, and loss of gravel are usual signs of difficulty, Punctures or loss of adhesion Of base flashings, coupled with loose counter -flashing will also signify possible problems. Masonry Walls Random cracking, or if discernible, definitive patterns of cracking, will Of course, be of interest. Masonry walls where commonly constructed of either concrete masonry units, or scored clay tile, may have been constructed with either reinforced concrete columns and tie bears, or lintels. Of most probable importance will be the vertical and horizontal cracks where masonry units abut tie COI1111111S, or other frame elements such as floor slabs, Of interest here is the observation that although the raw materials Of which these masonry materials are Made may have mUCh the Sallie mechanical properties as the reinforced concrete framing, their aCtUal behavior in the StrUCtUre, however, 1s likely to differ with respect to volume change resulting fi-om moisture content, and variations in ambient thermal conditions. Moisture vapor penetration, sometimes abetted by salt laden aggregate and corroding rebars, will usually be the most common cause of deterioration Tie COlunlns are rarely structurally sensitive, and a fair amount of deterioration may be tolerated before structura I; impairment becomes important. Usually, if rebar loss is such that the remaining steel area is still about 0.0075% of the concrete area, Strucctural repair will not be necessary. Cosmetic type repair involving cleaning, and patching to effectively seal the member, may often suffice. A similar approach may not be Unreasonable for tie bears, provided they are not also serving as lintels. In that event, a rudimentary analysis of load capability using the remaining actual rebar area, may be required. FLOOR AND ROOF SYSTEMS Cast in place reinforced concrete slabs and/or bears and joists may often show problems due to corroding rebars resulting fi-Onl Cracks or merely inadequate protecting covet- of concrete. Patching procedures will usually suffice where such damage has not been extensive. . Steel bar joists are, of course, sensitive to corrosion. Most critical locations will be web member welds, especially near supports, where shear stresses arc high possible failure may be sudden, and w thorn warning. Cold formed joists, usually of relatively light gage steel, are likely to be critically sensitive in corrosion, and are highly dependent upon at least normal lateral support to carry designed loads. Wood joists and rafters are most often in difficulty from dry rot or the presence of termites. The former (a misnomer) is most often prevalent in the presence of sustained moisture or lack of adequate ventilation. A member may usually be deemed I acceptable condition if a sharp pointed tool will penetrate no more than about one eighth of an inch under moderate hard pressure. Sagging floors will most often indicate problem areas. Gypsum roof decks will usually perform satisfactorily except in the presence of moisture. Disintegration of the material and the foam -board may result from sustained leakage. Floor and roof systems of case in place concrete with self centering reinforcing, such as paper backed mesh and rib -lath, may be critical with respect to corrosion of the unprotected reinforcing. Loss of uplift anchorage on roof decks will a'so be important if significant deterioration has taken place, in the event that dead loads are otherwise inadequate for that purpose. STEEL FRAMING SYSTEM Corrosion, obviously enough, will be the determining factor in the deterioration of structural steel. Most likely suspect areas will be fasteners, welds, and the interface area where bearings are embedded in masonry. Column bases may often be suspect in areas where flooding has been experienced, especially if salt water has been involved. Concrete fireproofing will, if exists, be the best clue indicating the condition of the steel. Thin cracks usually indicate only minor corrosion, requiring minor patching. Extensive spalling may indicate a much more serious condition requiring further investigation. CONCRETE FRAMING SYSTEM Concrete deterioration will in most cases similarly be related to rebar corrosion possibly abetted by the presence of salt water aggregate or excessively permeable concrete. In this respect, honeycomb areas may contribute adversely to the rate of deterioration. Columns are frequently most suspect. Extensive honeycomb is most prevalent at the base of columns, where fresh concrete was permitted to segregate, dropping into form boxes. This type of problem has been known to be compounded in areas where flooding has occurred, especially involving salt water. In spall areas, chipping away a few small loose samples of concrete may he very revealing. Especially, since loose material will have to he removed even for cosmetic type repairs, anyway. WINDOWS Window condition is of considerable importance with respect to two considerations. Continued leakage may have resulted in other adjacent damage and deteriorating anchorage may result in loss of the entire unit in the event of severe wind storms short of hurricane velocity. Perimeter sealants, glazing, seals, and latches should be examined with a view toward deterioration of materials and anchorage of units for inward as well as outward (section) pressures, most importantly in high buildings. WOOD FRAMING Older wood framed structures, especially of the industrial type, are of concern in that long term deflections may have opened important joints, even in the absence of deterioration. Corrosion of ferrous fasteners will in most cases be obvious enough. Dry rot must be considered suspect in all sealed areas where ventilation has been inhibited, and at bearings and at fasteners. Here too, penetration with a pointed tool greater than about one eighth inch with moderate ]land pressure, will indicate the possibility of further difficulty SCOPE Or ELECTRICAL INSPECTION The purpose of the required inspection and report is to confirm with reasonable fashion that the building or structure under consideration is safe for continued use under present occupancy. .ELECTRIC SERVICE A description of the type of service supplying he building or structure must be provided, stating the size of amperage, if three (3) phase or single (1 ) phase, and if the system is protected by fuses or breakers. Proper grounding of the service should also be in good standing. The meter and electric rooms should have sufficient clearance for equipment and for the serviceman to perform both work and inspections. Gutters and electrical panels should all be in good condition throughout the entire building or structure. BRANCH CIRCUITS Branch circuits in the building must all be identified and an evaluation of the conductors must be performed. There should also exist proper grounding for equipment used in the building, such as an emergency generator or elevator motor. CONDUITS All types oi"wiring methods present in the building must be detailed and individually inspected. The evaluation of each type of conduit and cable, if applicable, must be done individually. The conduits in the building should be free from erosion, and checked for considerable dents i,, the conduits that may be prone to cause a shon. The conductors arid cables in these conduits should be chafe free, and their currents not over the rated amount. EMERGENCY LIGHTING Exit sign lights and emergency lighting, along with a functional fire alarm system must all be in good working condition. INSPECTION PROCEDURE FOR BUILDING STRUCTURE INSPECTION 1. Description Structure: Multifamily Building, Bldg #1, with 10 apartments (total of units 10, building 1), CBS building, I story, w/ stucco finish, tie beams and tie columns, Slab on Grade Concrete Slab 4", w/ cast terrazzo finish floor, hip roof, slope 3/12, w/ tiles Total Area 7,235 sgft. Building # 1, 10 units, Total Area 7,235 sqft. (Total Area Building 1+131.1ilding 2) = 9,797 sqft. a. Name of title: VI_:RONA APARTMENTS MGMT INC: % CRISTOBAL Gli- b. Street address: 9050 NL�; 8 AVI MIAMI SI IORL;S, FL 33138-3283 C. Building No.: 1 d. Legal description: Folio: 1 1-3206-01 1-0020 e• Square Footage: Total Area 7,235 sq[t. Building # I, (Total Area Building 1+2) = 9,797 sqft. f. Legal description: ASBURY PARK PI3 4-1 10 LOT 3 LOT SIZE 109.300 X 290 OR 21 197-1 186 0403 1 Or. Owner's name: VFRONA APAR"L'MEN"fS M(_;M I' INC �% CRIS"I'O[3AL GIL h. Owners mailing address: 9050 NE 8 AVE 918 MIA1V11 SHORTS, FL 331 38-3283 i. Building Official Folio Number: Folio: 1 1-3206-01 1-0020 j. Building Code Occupancy Classification: MULTI -FAMILY/ APARTMENTS I. Present use: MULTIFAMILY Building 10 units m. General Description: Multifamily Building, Bldg #1, with 10 apartments (total of units 10, building 1), CBS building , I story, w/ stucco finish, tie beams and tie columns, Slab on Grade Concrete Slab 4", N-v/ cast terrazzo finish floor, hip roof, slope 3/12, w/ tiles Total Area 7,235 sqft. Building # 1, 10 units, Total Area (Building 1+2) = 9,797 sqft. n . Additions to original structure: NONE, Building # 1 Original Structure. 7,235 sqft., No Addittions Total Area of Building # I = 7,2:35 sqft. 2. Present Condition of Structure: a. General alignment (note good. fair, poor.) GOOD l . Bulging: NONE OBSERVED, GOOD CONDITIONS 2 Settlement: NONE, GOOD CONDITIONS 3. Deflection: NONE, GOOD CONDITIONS 4. Expansion: NONE, GOOD CONDITIONS 5. Contraction: NONE, GOOD CONDITIONS b. Portions showing distress (note, beams, columns, structural walls, floors, roofs, other) NONE OBSERVED, THLS BUILDING IS WELL MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER C. Surface conditions - describe general conditions of finishes, noting cracking, spilling, peeling, signs Of moisture penetration & stains. GOOD, NO CRACKING OR SPALLING OBSERVED. d Cracks - note location in significant members: Identify crack size as HAIRLINE if bare discernible, FINE if less than I mm in width, MEDIUM if between 1 and 2 mm in width, WIDE if over 2 mm. NONE OBSERVED, THIS BUILDING IS WELL NIAINT41NED BY THE OWNER e. General extent of deterioration - cracking or spalling of concrete or masons j ; oxidation of metals, rot or borer attack in wood. NONE OBSERVED BUILDING IS WELL MAINTAINED 1'. Patching or repairs: NONE OBSERVED BUILDING IS WELL MAINTAINED AND IN GOOD CONDITIONS. g. Nature of present loading - indicate residential, commercial, other estimate magnitude RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILYAPARTMENTS. , RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS, CBS BUILDING ON GRADE CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB, RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS. APPROXIMATELY (200 PSF) LOADING IS CONSISTENT WITH ORIGINAL LOADING INTENT FOR THIS TYPE OF COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL USE OF STRUCTURE. 3. Inspection: Date of notice of required inspection: 1123118 h. Date(s) of actual inspection: 311118-3/S/18 c. Name and qualification of individual submitting inspection report: LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E.-STATE OF FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER d. Description of any laboratory or other formal testing if required, rather than manual or visual procedures. BUILDING IS WELL MAINTAINED INSPECTION DID NOT REVEAL ANY CONCERN THAT WARRANTS FURTHER TESTING OR LAB INVESTIGATIONS .NONE, VISUAL PROCEDURES WERE USED. e. Structural repair — note appropriate line: NONE REQUIRED. BUILDING IS IN GOOD CONDITIONS. OWNER MAINTAINS WELL THE BUILDING AND NO DETERIORATED OR DAMAGED CONDITIONS WERE OBSERVED. Required: N/A 2. Required (describe and indicate acceptance) Supporting data a. WRITTEN DATA 17 sheets written data b. Photographs WERE TAKEN. c. NONE drawings or sketches 5. Masonry Bearing Walls — indicate good, fair, poor. GOOD a. Concrete masonry units: GOOD b. Clay the or terra Gotta units: NONE c. Reinforced concrete tie columns: GOOD d. Reinforced concrete tie beams: GOOD e. Lintels GOOD f. Other type bond beams: N/A g, Masonry finishes —exterior: 1. Stucco: GOOD CONDITIONS 2. Veneer: N/A 3. Paint only: GOOD CONDITIONS 4. Other (describe): N/A h. Masonry finishes — interior I , Vapor barrier: N/A 2, Furring and plaster: PLASTER IN GOOD CONDITIONS 3. Panelling: N/A 4, Paint only: GOOD CONDITIONS 5. Other (describe): N/A i. CRC S a. Location - note beams. eolui'1ri$, other: b. Description: NONE. NU CRAC1eS WERE OBSERVED j, Spalling: a, Location -note beams, columns, other: OBSERVED b. Description NONE. NO SP k. Rebar corrosion -check appropriate line I, None visible: NONE 2 Minor - patching will suffice: N/A 3 Significant - but patching will suffice: N/A 4. Significant — structural repairs required: N/A (Describe) NONE I. Samples chipped put for examination in spall areas uired, as no spelled areas were encountered. Building is well maintained 1. No. Not re g 2, Yes - describe color texture, aggregate, general quality: b. Floor atnd ltoof Systems " good conditions. ool': Fri 1 � jtvr+l, Ps'�'jrtG Trusses, avI rvvord pl{rrr1,}dcckdrtg and tiles, slope 3 f '-r2 u� a. R =food Conditi (I►rsidatiori and r,;ecri• r.•urrrsc are in., Good Conditions Building is well rrrrrinraiued Describe (flat. slope. Type roofing, type roof deck, condition) Hip Rogf, Prefab Trusses, w/wood plank decking and tiles, slope 3"-12" in good conditions. (Insulation and wear course are in good conditions) Good Conditions Building is well maintained 2. Note water tanks, cooling towers, air conditioning equipment, signs, other heavy equipment and condition of supports: No roof mounted equipment 3. Note type of drains and scuppers and conditions: Hip Roof has a 3"-12" slope No scuppers or drains needed. Building drains naturally. In good condition Floor Systems Describe (type of system fi-aming, materials, spans, condition) Existing floors are: (First Story) Slab on grade Concrete Slab 4", with cast terrazzo finish. Good Conditions e. Inspection - note exposed areas available for inspection, and where it was found necessary to open ceilings, etc. for inspection of typical framing members. Roof and Walls are exposed to view and Attic access scuttles were used to oh,+erve existing huilding components. 7. Steel Framing Systems NONE APPLICABLE a. Description: N/A b. Exposed Steel - describe condition of paint & degree of corrosion: N/A NONE APPLICABLE c. Concrete or other fireproofing - note any cracking or spalling, and note where any covering was removed for inspection: N/A N/A d. Elevator: N/A CONCRETE FRAMING SYSTEM a. Full Description Load Bearing CBS walls with Concrete Tie Beams, Concrete Tie Columns in Good Conditions I Cracking: NONE 1. Not significant: N/A 2. Location of description of members affected and type cracking: N/A No cracking or Spalling was observed. c. General condition: GOOD Good. Building is well maintained by owner. Concrete Tie Beams, Columns and walls are in Good conditions. d. Rebar corrosion: NONE VISIBLE 1. None Visible (X) 2. Location and description of affected members: N/A 3. Significant but patching will suffice: NONE: N/A 4. Significant - structural repairs required (describe): NONE: N/A e. Samples chipped out in spall areas: 1. No. X 2. Yes: describe color, texture, and aggregate, general quality Not required, as no spelled areas or condition were encountered. Building is ivell maintained 9. WINDOWS a. Type (Wood, steel, aluminum, single hung, double hung, casement, awning, pivoted, fixed, other) Aluminum and Glass Awning type b. Anchorage - type & condition of fasteners and latches: GOOD: Concrete Sere vs/Origin al fastene►s are in fair 10 good conditions, windows are operable from the inside of'fhe unit. Sealants - type & condition of perimeter sealants & at mullions: GOOD. CA ULKING IS IN GOOD CONDITIONS d. Interior Seals: GOOD. GOOD CONDITIONS e. General condition: Existing Windows and doors ere in good conditions and (rhpear to be weather" tight 10. WOOD FRAMING a. Type - fully describe ifmill construction, light construction, major spans, trusses: Interior Partitions Lire wood, existing roof is flamed w1 prc'f(rb WO(I!1 trusses W/Sl)(rll 25 ft. El'istmg framing, Trusses are in Good Conditions. Existing stucco and plaster" walls finish is in good conditions. Walls are well painted and there are no visible cracks. Interior partitions tare wood. Existing framing is in good conditions. Existing plaster walls are well painted and there are no cracks or exposure to moisture. Good Conditions b. Note metal fittings i.e., angles, plates, bolts, other, and note condition: Metal fasteners observed are in good conditions c. Joints - note if well flitted and still closed: No damage joints were observed d. Drainage - note accumulations ol'moisUn•e: No accumulation of moisture was observed e. Ventilation - note any concealed spaces not ventilated: Attic Spaces are well ventilated, vents are properly screened arefree of obstruction. f. Note any concealed spaces opened for inspection: N/A 0 M i1 ""; "AN rxO[: LDURC FOR BUILDING ELECTRICAL INSPECTION I. ELECTRICAL SERVICE I. SIZE, AMPERAGE: 800AMPS 2. PHASE: SINGLE 3. CONDITION: GOOD FUSES — BREAKER YES NEEDS REPAIR: NONE, SERVICE: IN GOOD CONDITION,V 4. Co117mcilts. ELECTRIC SERVICE 1S IN GOOD CONDITIONS. THERE ARE 10 METERS AND 10 (100 AMP) MAIN BREAKERS (ONE FOR EACH UNIT) AND ONE HOUSE PANEL ME.TI:R Vt/1TI-I 60 AMP MAIN BREAKER. 2. METER AND ELECTRIC ROOMS I. CLEARANCES: GOOD COMMENTS: ELECTRICSERI</ICE IS IN GOOD CONDITIONS METER (ELECTRIC) ROO�IIS LQCA TED ,� T THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING IT IS IN CLEAN.4ND GOOD CONDITIONS SERVICE EQUIPMENT GOOD Co,,,'DITION 3. GUTTERS: N/A 1. LOCATION: N/A 2. CONDITION: N/A 3. REQUIRES CORRECTION: NONE 4. TAP AND FILLS: N/A 5. CONDITION: N/A 6. REQUIRES CORRECTION: NONE 4. ELECTRICAL PANELS 1. LOCATION: ALL ARE LOCATED (1-10) IN THE KITCHEN AREA. HOUSE PANEL IN THE ELECTRIC ROOM 2. CONDITION: ELECTRICAL PANELS ARE IN GOOD CONDITIONS AND LABELED 3. NEEDS REPAIR: NONE 5. BRANCH CIRCUITS: 1. IDENTIFIED: YES 2. CONDUCTORS: GOOD 3. COMMENTS: IN GOOD CONDITIONS 4. MUST BE REPLACED: NONE 6. GROUNDING OF SERVICE: GOOD CONDITIONS REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 7. GROUNDING OF EQUIPMENT: GOOD CONDITIONS REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 8. SERVICE CONDUIT RACEWAYS: GOOD CONDITIONS REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 9. SERVICE CONDUCTORS AND CABLES CONDITION: GOOD. ELECTRICAL SERVICE IS IN GOOD CONDITIONS. REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 10. TYPES OF WIRING METHODS CONDUIT RACEWAYS: (EMT BRANCH CIRCUITS) GOOD CONDITIONS REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE CONDUIT RMT: SUBFEEDERS. CONDITION: GOOD CONDITIONS REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 11. FEEDER CONDUCTORS: GOOD CONDITIONS REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 12. EMERGENCY LIGTHS: NIA FIRST STORY: NONE, APT. UNITS OPENDIRECTLY TO THE OUTSIDE CONDITION: NIA REPAIRS REQUIRED: NIA I l BUILDING EGRESS ILLUMINATION: GOOD CONDITIONS REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 14: FIRE ALARM SYSTEM: NIA CONDITION: NIA REPAIRS REQUIRED: NIA i 5. SMOKE DETECTORS: YES CONDITION: GOOD REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE THERE ARE SMOKE DETECTORS IN THE BEDROOMAND OUTSIDE BEDROOM. IN GOOD CONDITIONS 16. EXIT LIGHT: N/A CONDITION: N/A REPAIRS REQUIRED: N/A NONE, APT. UNITS OPEN DIRECTL Y TO THE OUTSIDE 17. EMERGENCY GENERATOR: NONE CONDITION: N/A REPAIRS REQUIRED: N/A 18. WIRING OPENED OR UNDERCOVER PARKING GARAGE AREAS: YES CONDITION: GOOD CONDITIONS REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 19. OPEN OR UNDERCOVER PARKING SURFACE AND SECURITY LIGHTING: YES CONDITION: GOOD CONDITIONS ILLUMINATION REQUIRED: NONE 20, SWIMMING POOL WIRING: N/A CONDITION: NA REPAIRS REQUIRED: NA 21. WIRING OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT: GOOD CONDITIONS CONDITION: GOOD REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 22, GENERAL ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IS IN GOOD CONDITION. NO REPAIRS NEEDED. BUILDING ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IS WELL MAINTAINED. As indicatted by the attached report the building is structuratlly. cIcctricnil}' and mechanically safe; lbr cantinued used quid Occupancy, as noteel in the report. "As a routinC ilaattcr, in the order to avoid possible misunderstanding. nothln.- in the report should be Construed directly or indirectly ats a guarantee 1br any portion ot'this structure. To the best ol'ill y 1tinowledge and ability, this report represents an accurate evaluation ❑l'observed conditions. to the extent reasonably possible. Sincerely, Leandro EspinoskL P.C. Flo-c '.C. NO.600CG LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E ENGINEERING, RG No 60066 459 EAST 56" STREET, SUITE 101 Office: 786-553-5611 Fax: 305-687-5408 Letter of Cojupliance for the 40-Year or Older Recertification Date: 3/5/18 Building Official CITY OF Miami Shores Village Building Department 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Building Department/40 Year Re -Certification Dear Building Official: In accordance with Section §8-11 !f) of the Code of Miami -Dade County, I have iperformed an inspection of the building located 9050 NF, 8 AVE, MIAMI SHORES, FI, 331 38-3283 and determined the building is structurally and electrically safe for continued use under present occupancy. Bldg No : 1 The findings of my inspection are summarized in this written report that follows the MlninlUrll Inspection Procedural Guidelines for Building Recertification. This report does riot preclude the building from subsegUent inspections as deemed necessary by the building Official. To avoid possible misunderstanding, nothing in this report should be construed directly or indirectly as a guarantee for any portion of the structure. To the best of my knowledge and ability, this report represents an accurate appraisal of the present condition of the building based upon careful evaluation of observed conditions, to the extent reasonably possible. Should you have any questions concerning this report, please contact LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E RG No 60066 Tel: 786-553-5611 Respectflully, Lear' Esp;nosa LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E. Fax: 305-687-5408 March. 5, 2018 Office: 786-553-5611 Building Official CITY OF Miami Shores Village Building Department 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33 13 8 Building Department/40 Year Re -Certification Owner: VI RONA APAR1'MEN'1'S MGNfI' INC % CRISTOBAL Gil, RE: Recertification of Building and Structures in existence for 40 years or longer. Ordinance 8-11 Dear Building official: The undersigned has been commissioned by the owner to inspect for the Recertification of a building at: OWNER: VERONA APARTMENTS MGMT INC `%, CRISTOBAL GIL ADDRESS: 9050 Nl- 8 AVI,,, MIAMI SHORT S, FL 331 38-328 3 FOLIO #: 1 1-3206-01 1-0020 PRIMARY ZONE: 3000 1Ml `I."1'1-FAN/III.Y - GI NI'RAI, CLUC: 0303 MUI,'I'II'AMILY 10 UNITS PLUS: Mlll,"1 I AMIl,Y 3 OR MORE IJNI"I,S BUILDING #: 1 USE: Commercial/Multifamily RESIDENTIAL .Apartment Building-10 units LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ASBURY PARK PB 4-1 10 LOT 3 LOT SIZE 109.300 X 290 OR 21 197-1 186 Legal: See attached report. As indicated by the attached report the building is structurally and electrically safe for continued used and occupancy, as noted in the report. "As a routine matter, in the order to avoid possible misunderstanding, nothing in the report should be construed directly or indirectly as a guarantee for an}, portion of this structure. To the best of my knowledge and ability, this report represents an accurate evaluation of observed conditions, to the extent reasonably possible. Sincerely, Leandro Espinosa, P.E. Flon -1� ENO. 60066 Miami Shores Village Building Department 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Tel: (305) 795.2204 Fax: (305) 756.8972 INSPECTION'S PHONE NUMBER: (305) 762.4949 rain INSPECTION COMMENCED DATE: 3/1118 INSPECTION COMPLETED DATE 315J18 INSPECTION MADE BY: SIGNATURE. PRINT NAME LEANDRO ESPINGS6. P.E TITLE: PROFFESSIONAL ENGINEER. RE. 60066 ADDRESS: 459 EAST 56 STREET, HIALEAH, FLORIDA, 33013 DESCRIPTION OFSTRUCTURE a. Name of Title: VERONA APARTMENTS MGMT INC % CRISTOBAL GEL lo— c. Legal Description: ASBURY PARK PB 4-110 LOT 3 LOT SIZE 109.300 X 290 OR 21197-1186 0403 1 e,, 9050NE.8. AVE_#1.8 MIAMJ.$HQRES_F.L_,3_3,1 Building No.: 1 f. Folio Numberof Building: 11-3206-011-0020 9� Building Code Occupancy Classification: Commercial/Multifamily RESIDENTIAL h. Present Use: Commercial/Multifamily RESIDENTIAL Apartment Building-10 units I. General Description, Type of Construction, Size, Number of Stories. and Special Features Add onal'Comment: " J Multifamily Building, Bldg #1, with 10 apartments (total of units 10, building CBS building , 1 story, wl stucco finish, tie beams and tie columns, Slab on Grade Concrete Slab 4", w/ cast terrazzo finish floor, hip roof , slope 3/12, w/ tiles Total Area 7,235 sqft. Building # 1, 10 units, Total Area (Building 1+2) = 9,797 sqft. j- Additions to original structure: NONE Building # I Original Structure. 7,235 sqft., No Addittions Total Area of Building # 1 = 7,235 sqft. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS SCOPE OF STRUCTURAL INSPECTION The fundamental purpose of the required inspection and report is to confirm in reasonable fashion that the building or structure under consideration is safe for continued use under the present occupancy. As implied by the title of this document, this is a recommended procedure, and under no circumstances are these minimum recommendations intended to supplant proper professional judgment. In general, unless there is obvious overloading, or significant deterioration of important structure elements there is little need to verify the original design. It is obvious that this has been "time tested' if still offering satisfactory performance. Rather, it is of importance that the effects of time with respect to deterioration of the original construction materials be evaluated. It will rarely be possible to visually examine all concealed construction, nor should such be generally necessary, However, a sufficient number of typical structure members should be examined to permit reasonable conclusions to be drawn. Visual Examination will, in most cases, be considered adequate when executed systematically. Surface imperfections such as cracks, distortion, sagging, excessive deflections, significant misalignment, signs of leakage, and peeling of finishes should be viewed critically as indications of possible difficulty. Testing Procedures and quantitative analysis will not generally be required for five (5) structural members or systems except for such cases where visual examination has revealed such need, or where apparent loading conditions may be critical. Manual Procedures such as chipping small areas of concrete and surface finishes for closer examinations are encouraged in preference to sampling and/or testing where visual examination alone is deemed insufficient. Generally, unfinished areas of buildings such as utility spaces, maintenance areas, stairwells and elevator shafts should be utilized for such purposes. In some cases, to be held to a minimum, ceilings or other construction finishes may have to be opened for selective examination of critical structural elements. In that event, such locations should be carefully located to be least disruptive most easily repaired, and held to a minimum. In an event, a sufficient number of structural members must be examined to afford reasonable assurance that such are representative of the total structure. Evaluating an existing structure for the effect of time, must take into account two, basic considerations; movement of structural components with respect to each other, and deterioration of materials. With respect to the former, volume change considerations, principally from ambient temperature changes, and possible long time deflections, are likely to be most significant. Foundation movements will frequently be of importance, usually settlement, although upward movement due to expansive soils actually may occur. However, it is infrequent in this area. Older buildings on spread footings may exhibit continual, even recent settlements if founded on deep unconsolidated fine grained or cohesive soils or from subterraneous losses or movements from several possible causes. With very little qualification, such as rather rare chemically reactive conditions, deterioration of building materials can only occur in the presence of moisture, largely to metals and their natural tendency to return to the oxide state in the corrosive process. In this marine climate, highly aggressive conditions exist year round. For most of the year, outside relative humidity may frequently be about 90 or 95%, while within air-conditioned buildings, relative humidity will normally be about 35 to 60%. Under these conditions moisture vapor pressures ranging from about 1/3 to 1/2 pounds per square inch will exist much of the time. Moisture vapor will migrate to lower pressure areas. Common building materials such as stucco, masonry and even concrete, are permeable even with these slight pressures. Since most of our local construction does not use vapor barriers, condensation will take place within the enclosed walls of the building. As a result, deterioration is most likely adjacent to exterior walls, or wherever else moisture or direct leakage has been permitted to penetrate the building shell. Structural deterioration will always require repair. The type of repair, however, will depend on the importance of the member in the structural system and degree of deterioration. Cosmetic type repairs may suffice in certain non -sensitive members such as tie beams and columns, provided that the remaining sound material is sufficient for the required function. For members carrying assigned gravity or other loads, cosmetic type repairs will only be permitted if it can be demonstrated by rational analysis that the remaining material, if protected from further deterioration can still perform its assigned function at acceptable stress levels. Failing that, adequate repairs or reinforcement will be considered mandatory. Written Reports shall be required attesting to each required inspection. Each such report shall note the location of the structure, description of type of construction, and general magnitude of the structure, the existence of drawings and location thereof, history of the structure to the extent reasonably known, and description of the type and manner of the inspection, noting problem areas and recommending repairs, if required to maintain structural integrity, EVALUATION: Each report shall include a statement to the effect that the building is structurally safe, unsafe, safe with qualifications, or has been deemed safe by restrictive interpretation of such statements. It is suggested that each report also include the following information indicating the actual scope of the report and limits of liability. This paragraph may be used: " As a routine matter, in order to avoid possible misunderstanding, nothing in this report should be construed directly or indirectly as a guarantee for any portion of the structure. To the best of my knowledge and ability, this report represents and accurate appraisal of the present condition of the building based upon careful evaluation of observed conditions, to the extent reasonably possible." FOUNDATION If all of the supporting subterranean materials were completely uniform beneath a structure, with no significant variations in grain size, density, moisture content or other mechanical properties; and if dead load pressures were completely uniform, settlements would probably be uniform and of little practical consequence. In the real world, however, neither is likely. Significant deviations from either of these two idealism are likely to result in unequal vertical movements. Monolithic masonry, generally incapable of accepting such movements will crack. Such cracks are most likely to occur at corners, and large openings. Since, in most cases, differential shears are involved, cracks will typically be diagonal. Small movements, in themselves, are most likely to be structurally important only if long term leakage through fine cracks may have resulted in deterioration. In the event of large movements, continuous structural elements such as floor and roof systems must be evaluated for possible fracture or loss of bearing. Pile foundations are, in general, less likely to exhibit such difficulties. Where such does occur, special investigation will be required. ROOFING SYSTEMS Sloping roofs, usually having clay or cement tiles, are of concern in the event that the covered membrane may have deteriorated, or that the tiles may have become loose. Large deflections, if merely resulting from deteriorated rafters or joists will be of greater importance. Valley Flashing, and Base Flashing at roof penetration will also be matters of concern. Flat roofs with built up membrane roofs will be similarly critical with respect to deflection considerations. Additionally, since the will generally be approaching expected life limits at the age when building recertification is required, careful examination is important. Blisters, wrinkling, alligatoring, and loss of gravel are usually signs of difficulty. Punctures or loss of adhesion of base flashing, coupled with loose counterflashing will also signify possible problems. Wind blown gravel, if excessive, and the possibility of other debris, may result in pounding, which if permitted, may become critical. MASONRY BEARING WALLS Random cracking, or if discernible, definitive patterns of cracking, will of course, be of interest. Bulging, sagging, or other signs of misalignment may also indicate related problems in other structural elements. Masonry walls where commonly constructed of either concrete masonry remits or scored clay tile, may have been constructed with either reinforced concrete columns tie beams, or lintels. Steel bar joists are, of course, sensitive to corrosion. Most critical locations will be web member welds, especially near supports, where shear stresses are high possible failure may be sudden, and without warning. Cold formed steel joists, usually of relatively light gage steel, are likely to be critically sensitive to corrosion, and are highly dependent upon at least normal lateral support to carry designed loads, Bridging and the floor or roof system itself, if in good condition, will serve the purpose. Wood joists and rafters.are most often in difficult from "dry rot", or the presence of termites. The former (a misnomer) is most often prevalent in the presence of sustained moisture or lack of adequate ventilation. A member may usually be deemed in acceptable condition if a sharp pointed tool will penetrate no more than about one eight of an inch under moderate hand pressure. Sagging floors will most often indicate problem areas. Gypsum roof decks will usually perform satisfactorily except in the presence of moisture. Disintegration of the material and the foam -board may result from sustained leakage. Anchorage of the supporting bulb tees against uplift may also be of importance, with significant deterioration. Floor and roof systems of case in place concrete with self centering reinforcing, such as paper backed mess, and rib -lath, may be critical with respect to corrosion of the unprotected reinforcing. Loss of uplift anchorage on roof decks will also be important if significant deterioration has taken place, in the event that dead loads are otherwise inadequate for that purpose. STEEL FRAMING SYSTEM Corrosion, obviously enough, will be the determining factor in the deterioration of structural steel. Most likely suspect areas will be fasteners, welds, and the interface area where bearings are embedded in masonry. Column bases may often be suspect in areas where flooding has been experienced, especially if salt water has been involved, Thin cracks usually indicate only minor corrosion, requiring minor patching. Extensive spalling may indicate a much more serious condition requiring further investigation. Of most probable importance will be the vertical and horizontal cracks where masonry units abut tie columns, or other frame elements such as floor slabs. Of interest here is the observation that although the raw materials of which these masonry materials are made may have much the same mechanical properties as the reinforced concrete framing, their actual behavior in the structure, however, is likely to differ with respect to volume change resulting from moisture content, and variations in ambient thermal conditions. Moisture vapor penetration, sometimes abetted by salt laden aggregate and corroding rebars, will usually be the most common cause of deterioration. Tie columns are rarely structurally sensitive, and a fair amount of deterioration may be tolerated before structural impairment becomes important. Usually, if rebar loss is such that the remaining steel area is still about 0.0075 of the concrete area, structural repair will not be necessary. Cosmetic type repair involving cleaning, and patching to effectively seal the member, may often suffice. A similar approach may not be unreasonable for tie beams, provided they are not also serving as lintels. In that event, a rudimentary analysis of load capability using the remaining actual rebar area, may be required. FLOOR AND ROOF SYSTEMS Cast in place reinforced concrete slabs and/or beams and joists may often show problem due to corroding rebars resulting from cracks or merely inadequate protecting cover of concrete. Patching procedures will usually suffice where such damage has not been extensive. Where corrosion and spalling has been extensive in structurally critical areas, competent analysis with respect to remaining structural capacity, relative to actual supported loads, will be necessary. Type and extent or repair will be dependent upon the results of such investigation. Precast members may present similar deterioration conditions. End support conditions may be important. Adequacy of bearing, indications of end shear problems, and restraint conditions are important, and should be evaluated in at least a few typical locations. CONCRETE FRAMING SYSTEMS Concrete deterioration will, in most cases similarly to related to rebar corrosion possibly abetted by the presence of salt -water aggregate or excessively permeable concrete. In this respect, honeycomb areas may contribute adversely to the rate of deterioration. Columns are frequently most suspect. Extensive honeycomb is most prevalent at the base of columns, where fresh concrete was permitted to segregate, dropping into form boxes. This type of problem has been known to be compounded in areas where flooding has occurred, especially involving saltwater. In spall areas, chipping away a few small loose samples of concrete may be very revealing. Especially, since loose material will have to be removed even for cosmetic type repairs, anyway. Fairly reliable quantitative conclusions may be drawn with respect to the quality of the concrete. Even though our cement and local aggregate are essentially derived frc:n the same sources, cement will have a characteristically dark grayish brown color in contrast to the almost white aggregate. A typically white, almost alabaster like coloration will usually indicate reasonably good overall strength. The original gradation of aggregate can be seen through a magnifying glass. Depending upon the structural importance of the specific location, this type of examination may obviate the need for further testing if a value of 2000 psi to 2500 psi is sufficient for required strength, in the event that visual inspection indicates good quality for the factors mentioned. WINDOWS Window condition is of considerable importance with respect to two considerations. Continued leakage may have resulted in other adjacent damage and deteriorating anchorage may result in loss of the entire unit in the event of severe wind storms short of hurricane velocity. Perimeter sealant, glazing, seals, and latches should be examined with a view toward deterioration of materials and anchorage of units for inward as well as outward (section) pressures, most importantly in high buildings. WOOD FRAMING Older wood framed structures, especially of the industrial type, are of concern in that long term deflections may have opened important joints, even in the absence of deterioration. Corrosion of ferrous fasteners will in most cases be obvious enough. Dry rot must be considered suspect in all sealed areas where ventilation has been inhibited, and at bearings and at fasteners. Here too, penetration with a pointed tool greater than about one eight inch with moderate hand pressure, will indicate the possibility of further difficulty. LOADING It is of importance to note that even in the absence of any observable deterioration, loading conditions must be viewed with caution. Recognizing that there will generally be no need to verify the original design, since it will have already been "time tested", this premise has validity only if loading patterns and conditions remain unchanged. Any material change in type and/or magnitude or loading in older buildings should be viewed as sufficient jurisdiction to examine load carrying capability of the affected structural system. SCOPE OF ELECTRICAL INSPECTION The purpose of the required inspection and report is to confirm with reasonable fashion that the building or structure under consideration is safe for continued use under present occupancy. As mentioned before, it is a recommendation procedure, and under no circumstances are these minimum recommendations intended to supplant proper professional judgment. ELECTRIC SERVICE A description of the type of service supplying the building or structure must be provided, stating the size of amperage, if three (3) phase or single (1) phase, and if the system is protected by fuses or breakers. Proper grounding of the service should also be in good standing. The meter and electric rooms should have sufficient clearance for equipment and for the serviceman to perform both work and inspections. Gutters and electrical panels should all be in good condition throughout the entire building or structure. BRANCH CIRCUITS Branch circuits in the building must all be identified and an evaluation of the conductors must be performed. There should also exist proper grounding for equipment used in the building, such as an emergency generator, or elevator motor. CONDUIT RACEWAYS All types of wiring methods present in the building must be detailed and individually inspected. The evaluation of each type of conduit and cable, if applicable, must be done individually. The conduits in the building should be free from erosion, and checked for considerable dents in the conduits that may be prone to cause a short. The conductors and cables in `hese conduits should be chafe free, and their currents not over the rated amount. EMERGENCY LIGHTING Exit signs lighting and emergency lighting, along with a functional fire alarm system must all be in good working condition. 0 3?Jn1On�J1S dO 3Sn 7b'11Nd01S3L117V10?JdWW00 d0 3d�11 SIHl �JOd 1N31N1 JNI(7VO7 7VNI0IN0 H11M 1N313I3NOO SI ON10d07 (dSd OOz) A731 HINIXOaddv 'SIN-9nIH 6V 7b71N3OI33L1 '9b'7S L1007d 313b'ON00.9GVd0 NO 5NI071n9 S90 51NgPV18b'db 7b'11N3OIS3d ' 'S1N3Wlclb'dV A71Wb'd-117nn 7HI1N301S3LJ17v1od3NWOO -apn;!u6ew a;ew!;se jay;o 'le!ojawwoo 'le!;uap!saj a;eo!pu! 6u!peol;uasajd;o ajn;eN '6 _ 03NIb'1NIb'UV 773M SI 9N107/n9 03AL13S9O 3NON :sj!edaa ao BUILIa;ed snolnaJd '; 03NIb1Nlb'W 773M SI JNI07In9 (7311Ll3S9O.gNQN -poom ul roe;;e jejoq jo ;oj'sle;aw ;o uo!;ep!xo'Ajuosew jo a;ajouoo;o bu!lleds jo 6ui�oejo — uo!;ejoua;ap;o;ua;xa lejaua0 'a __--__- _ 03NIb'1NIVIN 773M Sl ONI071ne 03/1LG390 3NON �ww Z Jana 1! 301M'y;p!nn ul ww Z pue uGemlaq p INniciEm :ylp!M ul wLu 6 uey; ssal;! 3N13 'alquJass!p — �(lajeq;! 3NMJIVH se ez!s �oejo Ap;uapl -sjagwaw;urol;!ufirs ul uol;eoal a;ou--s�loejo ,p '03ALI3S90 ON1733d LIO ONITWd3 60 5NINOb'a0 ON 'GOOD sule;s ,p uo!aej;auad ajn;slow 4o su6ls 6u!laad '6ullleds '6u!�oejo 6u!;ou ;says!u!;;o suo!I!puoo lejaua5 agposap — suol;lpuoo Joe;JnS o L13NMO 3H1 AE7 03NIb'1NIb'1/V 773M SI ONI07In9 SIHl 'O3AL13S90 3NON (jay;o 's;ooj' sjool; 'sllenn lejn;onj;s 'suwnloo 'sweaq 'a;oN) ssaj;s!p 6u!m_ _qs uo!;jod q SNOI110NOO 0000 '03n�13SOO 3NON :u0!;eeJ;uo3 -g SNOIlIUNO0 GOOD '(] /A J3S80 3NON :uo!suedx3 .t, SNOUIONOO (1006 '03ADS80 3NON :sijo!Pe;a0 C SNOUICINOO C1 '03n2J3S80 3NON :;uewe a Ill S Z SNOUI0NO0 006E 03n�J3S803NON .'6u!6ing 'b. 0009 Oueol;!u6ls;! u!eldxe 'food 'aiej 'pooh jou) ;uewu6ile lejeuaE) e 36niomjis JO NOIJ_(ONOD INRS3Nd 'Z �}bs SEZ'L = 1 # 6uiplin8 Jo eaay Ieja1 suaFj3lPpd ON '.4bs 9£Z'L 'a.InjonjIS Ieul5po # 6uipl!n8 '3NON :ajn;onj;s lewbuo of suo!l!pP'd #Jbs L6Z'6 = (Z+t 6uipl!no) eeiv le;ol s;!un 01, ' ( # 6u!pl!ng -;;bs g£Z'L eajb le;ol sal!; /m 'Zt /£ adols ';ooj d!y 'Jool; qs!u!; ozzejja; ;seo /m '„t7 gelS a;ajouoo epej0 uo gelS 'suwnloo eq pue sweaq eq 'ys!ul; 000n;s /m 'Ajo;s 1 L 6u!pl!nq SOO '(L 6u!pl!nq '0� s;!un;o �e;o;) s;uaw;jede 0b yj!M't# 6plg '6u!pl!n8 Al!weplInW sajn;eat -lei pue 'sauo;g jo jaqurnN `azl5 'uo!;onj;suo0;o adAl 'uogdijosa❑ lejauaC) ! spn 0( 6ulplln8 /kliN -diii 1W 7b'I1N301S32J AI!we;!jInW/le!ojawwo3 :asn;uasajd y TIVUN301S32J AI!we4!;InW/le!ojawwo0 :uo!;eo!;!sselO Aouedn000 epoo 6u!ppq 6 OZ00-L 60-90Z�-6 � :jagwnN o!lo� le!o!;;p 6u!pl!n8 ; 0506-:ssaappy DUI J!eA s,jaumo a �I0 1-V901SIHO % ONI 1WEJW S1NAW12]ddV `dNO2-JAn GweN s,JaumO -p 9e 6 6-L6 � 2 2JO 06Z X OOE'60 t 3ZIS 1m 9 1m u,6 l--b 8d mvd k. jnosv :uopd!josa0 1e6a7 -o E8ZE-8E! EE �� 'S�?�OHS IW'dIW �nt� 8 �N 0�06 .ssaappy P_GJIs- 'q TO IV8O1SI�:10°/° S1NlW1_8VJV VNb2J�A 'ali!1 Jo bwEN e 3bnlOnbls -4n Nnl I,4iw)can -i. 3. INSPECTIONS a. Date of notice of required inspection: 1123118 b. Date(s) of actual inspection: 311118-315118 c. Name and qualification of individual submitting inspection report: LEANDRO ESPINOSA. P.E.-STATE OF FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER— d. Description of any laboratory or other formal testing, if required, rather than manual or visual procedures BUILDING IS WELL MAINTAINED INSPECTION DID NOT REVEAL ANY CONCERN THAT WARRANTS FURTHER TESTING OR LAB INVESTIGATIONS. NONE, VISUAL PROCEDURES WERE USED. e_-Structural repair note appropriate line: -- — - 1. None required (X) - -� 2. Required (describe and indicate acceptance) NONE REQUIRED BUILDING IS IN GOOD CONDITIONS. OWNER MAINT_A NS WELL THE BUILDING AND NO DETERIORATED OR DAMAGED CONDITIONS WERE OBSERVED. 4. SUPPORTING DATA a. WRITTEN DATA 17 sheet written data b. Photo ra is WERE TAKEN photographs c. NONE drawings or sketches: 5. MASONRY BEARING WALL = Indicate good, fair, poor on appropriate lines: a. Concrete masonry units: GOOD P. Clay tile or terra cot@ units: NONE c. Reinforced concrete tile columns. GOOD d. Reinforced concrete tile beams GOOD e. Lintel: GOOD f. Other type bond beams: N/A_ g. Masonry finishes - exterior 1. Stucco: GOOD 2. Veneer: N/A 3. Paint only: GOOD CONDITIONS _ - 4. Other(describe): N/A h. Masonry finishes _ interior 1. Vapor barrier: N/A 2. Furring and plaster: PLASTER /N GOOD CONDITIONS 3. Paneling: N/A---� 4. Paint only: GOOD _ 5. Other (describe): N/A -�-- i. Cracks: NONE WERE OBSERVED _ — -"- 1._Location - note beams, columns, other - 2. Descon: riptiNONE WERE OBSERVED j. Spalling: NONE WERE OBSERVED 1. Location - note beams, columns, other 2. Description: NONE WERE OBSERVED k. Rebar corrosion -check appropriate line-- 1. None visible: NONE_ 2. Minor -patching will suffice: N/A 3. Significant -but patching will suffice: N/A 4. Significant -structural repairs required: N/A I. Samples chi --- --- ---------1--- _ J p chipped out for examination in spall areas: 1. No. Not required, as no spalled areas were encountered. Building is well maintained 2. Yes -describe color texture, aggregate, general quality 6. FLOOR AND ROOF SYSTEM a. Roof: Good Conditions - - 1: Describe {flat, slope, type roofing, type roof deck, condition. - " -- Hip Roof, Prefab Trusses, w/ wood plank decking and tiles, slope 3"-12" in good conditions. (Insulation and wear course are in good conditions). Good Conditions Building is well maintained 2. Note water tanks, cooling towers, air conditioning equipment, signs, other heavy l equipment and condition of support: No roof mounted equipment - - --- I 3. Note types of drains and scupper and conditionooling towers, air condition: Hip Roof has a 3"42" slope No scuppers or drains needed. Building drains naturally. b. Floor systems(s) 1. Describe (type of system framing, material, spans, condition) (First Story) Slab on grade Concrete Slab 4'; with cast Terrazzo finish. Good Conditions c. Inspection - note exposed areas available for inspection, and where it was found necessar; to or ceilings, etc. for ins ection oftypical framing members. Roof and Walls are exposed to view and Attic access scuttles were used to observe existing building components. 7. STEEL FRAMING SYSTEM -----1 a. Description; NONE APPLICABLE — - --- b- Exposed Steel - describe condition of paint & denree of corrosion; NONE APPLICA13LI= _. - _ C. Concrete or other fireproofing�- - - -note any cracking or spalling, and note where any ~A covering was removed for inspection NONE APPLICABLE d. Elevator sheave beam_ s & connections, and machine floor beams -note condition NONE APPLICABLE - - _- _-- _ 8. CONCRETE FRAMING SYSTEM a. Full description -of structural system - Load Bearing CBS walls with Concrete Tie Beams, Concrete Tie Columns, in Good Conditions b. Cracking: NONE 1. Not significant: N/A - 2. Location and description of members affected and type cracking: N/A c. General condition: Good. Building is well maintained by owner. Concrete Tie Beams, Columns, wall, roof are in Good Condition, 'd.R_ebar corrosion - check appropriate line: None visible 1. Non visible: None visible 2- Location and description of members affected -and type cracki,)g- NONE/N/A 3- Significant but patching will suffice: NONE/N/A 4. Significant - structural repairs required (describe). NONE/N/A e. Samples chipped out in spall areas: N - 1. No. X -- - - - _.__ 2. Yes. describe color, texture, aggregate. general quality: .Not required, as no spalled areas were encountered. Building is well maintained 9. WINDOWS - a. Type (Wood, steel, aluminurn, jalousie, single hung, double hung, casement, awning, pivoted, fixed, other): Aluminum and Glass Awning type b. Anchorage - type & condition of fasteners and latches: GOOD: Co►rcrete 5crewslrlgina! 0 fasteners are good conditions, windows are operable from the inside ❑f the unit c. Sealant - type of condition of perimeter sealant & at mullions: Caulking in GOOD Conditions d. Interiors seals - type & condition at operable vents. GOOD Conditions e. General condition: Existing windows and doors are in good conditions and appear to be weather tight 10. WOOD FRAMING: NIA a. Type -fully describe if mill construciton, light construction, major spans, trusses: - I Interior Partitions are wood, existing roof is framed w/ prefab wood trusses w/ span 25 ft. Existing framing, Trusses are In Good Conditions. Existing stucco and plaster walls finish j is in good conditions. Walls are well painted and there are no visible cracks. Interior partitions are wood, Existing framing is in good conditions. Existing plaster walls are well painted and there are no cracks or exposure to moisture. i b. Note metal fitting i.e., angles, plates, bolts, split pintles, pintles, other, and nose condition: Metal fasteners observed are in good conditions c. Joints - note if well fitted and -still closed: No damaged joints were observed �- d. Drainage - note accumulations of moisture: No accumulation of moisture was observed e. Ventilation -note any concealed spaes not ventilated: Attic Spaces are well ventilated, vents are properly screened are free of obstruction f. Note any concealed spaces opened for inspection NIA - - -� As indicated by the attached report the building is structurally safe for continued used and occupancy, as noted in the report. "As a routine matter, in the order to avoid possible misunderstanding, nothing in the report should be construed directly or indirectly as a guarantee for any portion of this structure. To the best of my knowledge and ability, this report represents an accurate evaluation of observed conditions, to the extent reasonably possible" Sincerely, Leandro Espinosa, RE j,Flop P.E. NO. 60066 I� R^ J 601�_flkNG AQ'RG\JFD Certification of Compliance with Parking Lot Illumination Standards in Chapter SC of the Code of Miami -Dade County Date: 3-5-18 Building Official CITY OF Miami Shores Village Building Department 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Building Department/40 Year Re -Certification Property Address: 9050 NE 8 AVL, MIAMI SI IORES, FL 33138-3283 MAR Z018 Folio No.: _11-3206-011-0020 ' Building Description: Multifamily Building, Bldg #2, with 6 apartments (total -of units 6, building 2), CBS building , 1 story, w/ stucco finish, tie beams and tie columns, Slab on Grade Concrete Slab 4", w/ cast terrazzo finish floor, hip roof , slope 3/12, w/ tiles Total Area 2,562 sgft. Building # 2, 6 units, Total Area (Building 1+2) = 9,797 sgft. Bldg.: 2 "I'lhe undersigned states the following: 1. I am a Florida registered professional engineer or architect with an active license. 2. On 3-5-18 , 2018, I measured the level of illumination in the parking lot(s) serving the above referenced building. 3. Maximum 58.71 foot candle per SF, Minimum 4.94 foot candle per SF, Maximum to Minimum ratio 58.71 4.94 , foot candle 25.67 average per SF. 4. The level of illumination provided in the parking lot (X)_meets does not meet the minimum standards for the occupancy classification of the building as established in Section §8C-3 of the Code of Miami -Dade County. 5 tl Seal of Professional Engineer or Architect LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E. Print Name Revised August2014 Certification of Compliance with Parking Lot Guardrails Requirements in Chapter 8C of the Code of Miami -Dade County Date: 3-5-1 Building Official CITY OF Miami Shores Village Building Department 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Building Department/40 Year Re -Certification Property Address: 9050 NE 8 AVE. MIAMI SHORES. IT 33138-3283 Folio No.: 11-3206-011-0020 Building Description: Multifamily Building, Bldg #2, with 6 apartments (total of units 6, building 2), CBS building, 1 story, w/ stucco finish, tie beams and tie columns, Slab on Grade Concrete Slab 4", w/ cast terrazzo finish floor, hip roof, slope 3/12, w/ tiles Total Area 2,562 sqft. Building # 2, 6 units, Total Area (Building 1 +2) = 9,797 sqft. Bldg. No.: 2 The undersigned states the following: I am a Florida registered professional engineer or architect with an active license. On 3-5-18 , I inspected the parking lot(s) serving the above referenced building for compliance with Section 58C-6 and determined the following (check only one): (X) The parking lot(s) is/are not adjacent to or abutting a canal, lake or other body of water. The parking lot(s) is/are adjacent to or abutting a canal, lake or other body of water and parked vehicles are protected by a guardrail that complies with Section S8C-6 of the Miami -Dade County Code. The parking lot(s) is/are adjacent to or abutting a canal, lake or other body of water and parked vehicles are not protected by a guardrail that complies with Section 58C-6 of the Miami - Dade County Code. I have advised the property owner that he/she must obtain a permit for the installation of the guardrail and obtain all required inspection approvals to avoid enforcement action. e4 LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E Sign�1 Lire and Seal of Print Name Professional Engineer or Architect Revised June 2014 Miami Shores Village Building Department 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Tel: (305) 795.2204 Fax: (305) 756.8972 INSPECTION'S PHONE NUMBER: (305) 762.4949 40 YEARS BUILDING'S FLFCTRICAL CERTIF CATION INSPECTION COMMENCED INSPECTION MADE BY: LEA ESPA. iNOSP.E DATE: 3/1/18 SIGNATURE: INSPECTION COMPLETED PRINT NAME: LEANDRO DATE .3/5/18 _ TITLE, PROFFESSIONAL ENGINEER. P.E. 60066 ADDRESS: 459 EAST 56 STREET, HIALEAH, FLORIDA, 33013 -T- INC../o CRISTOB_AL_ GIL a. Name of Title; VERONA APARTMENTS MGM ° b: 5treetAcldress:,9050 NI; 8_AVI ._MIAM,I_SHORL S 1_�I, 331.38 3283 _� __� c. Legal Description: ,�SBURY PARK PB 4-110 LOT 3 LOT SIZ 109.300 X 290 OR 21197-1186 d. _Owners Name: VERON.A APARTMENTS MGMT_INC %_CRISTOBAL GIL e..__Owner's- Mailina Address;_9050 NI;_8-AVI _#_i 8 MIAM1 SI-IO,RI?5. 1.1, 3.1_ 8- 328 f____-, - Building No.: 2 f. Folio Number of Building11-3206-011-0020 _ I ._ g. Building Code Occupancy Classification: Commercial/Multifamily RESIDENTIAL h. Present Use: Commercial/Multifamily RESIDENTIAL Apartment Building-6 units i. General Description, Type of Construction, Size, Number of Stories, and Special Features: Multifamily Building, Bldg #2, with 6 apartments (total of units 6, building 2), CBS building , 1 story, w/ stucco finish, tie beams and tie columns, Slab on Grade Concrete Slab 4", w/ cast terrazzo finish floor, hip roof, slope 3/12, w/ tiles Total Area 2,562 sqft. Building # 2, 6 units, Total Area (Building 1+2) = 9,797 sgft. Repoli forrom Drid 'ext based on the guidelines produced by 101am1-Dade County Professionals pfeparing-repori May use their own form as long as it contains the same require(; information found in this package Note that each Individual page of professional reports must be signed and sealed by a eglst�rc;i archllect or a professional englneer�� r _ t-iRegistered lngw;l c Is req-,.11red IC prripare c n Electrical R eccirllfl cation for services of 600 ciitll.JCrP.S �L :� VOitS SInC71e phase) 0" 71Gre Cil r 51CfE 11t1 1 j)rOIFICt 01 SerVIC85 of 300 •40 vnit�-single ph_isa) an corrlmefCial projects and which costs more than Sb0 00�0 ?_ ._cr Ch<]Iltel z1 7 c), 0)_ F k)r,ida •ucll i rec!Isl, fed _aichltects and professional engineers Must have proven yuallfications by training and c:,penence in the specific technical field covered In the irlspectiun report (structural or electrical) as per Section §2-1 I(t) of the Code of Miami-Dacle County. cv� GUIDELINES AND INFORMATION FOR RECERTIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS OF FORTY (40) YEAR STRUCTURES 1. ELECTRIC SERVICE 1. Size: Amperage (300 AMPS) Fuses () Breakers ( ) 2. Phase: Three Phase ( ) Single Phase (X) 3. Condition: Good (X) _ Fair () Needs Repair ( ) 4. Comments: ELECTRIC SERVICE IS IN GOOD CONDITIONS. THERE IS NO MAIN BREAKER. TIIEREARE 6 METERS AND 6 (60AMP) MAINDISCONNEC'%' (ONE FOR EACH UNIT IN THE BUILDING). 2. METER AND ELECTRIC ROOM 1. Clearances: Good (X) Fair (] Requires Correction ( ) 2. Comments: ELECTRIC SERVICE IS IN GOOD CONDITIONS. METER (ELECTRIC) ROOM IS LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF WE BUILDING. IT IS IN CLEAN AND GOOD CONDITIONS SERVICE EQUIPMENT GOOD CONDI7 ON 3. GUTTERS 1. Location: ELECTRIC ROOM 2. Taps and Fill: 3. Comments Good (X) Good iX i Requires Repair ( ) Requires Repair ( ) 4. ELECTRICAL PANELS 1. Panel # 1 TO 6 Location: UNITS KITCHEN. Good (X ) Needs Repair ( ) 2. Panel # Location. ~� `Good () Needs Repair 3. Panel # Location Good( Needs Repair ( ) 4. Panel # Location. 5. Panel # () Location. Good () Needs Repair ( ) Good ( ) Needs Repair ( ) 6. Comments: ALL ELECTRICAL PANELS ARE IN GOOD CONDITIONS AND LABELED 5. BRANCH CIRCUITS 1. Identified: Yes (X) Must be identified ( } 2. Conductors: Good (X) Deteriorated ( ) Must be replaced ( ) 3. Comments: IN GOOD CONDITIONS 6. GROUNDING OF SERVICE Condition_ _ Good (X) Repairs Required { Comments: GROUNDING SYSTEM /S /N GOOD CONDITIONS 7. GROUNDING OF EQUIPMENT Condition: Good (X) Repairs Required Comments: IN GOOD CONDITIONS 8. SERVICE CONDUITS/RACEWAYS Condition: Good (X) Repairs Required ( ) Comments: j IN GOOD CONDITIONS 9. SERVICE CONDUCTORS AND CABLES Condition: Good (X) Repairs Required (- ) Comments: SERVICE CONDUCTORS ARE /N GOOD CONDITIONS 10. TYPES OF WIRING METHODS Condition: Conduit Raceways: EMT (BRANCH CIRCUITS) Good (X) Repairs Required ( ) Conduit RMT: SUSFEEDERS Good (X) Repairs Required ( ) NM Cable: Good () Repairs Required ( ) BX Cable: Good () Repairs Required ( ) 11. FEEDER CONDUCTORS Condition: Good (X) _ Repairs Required Comments: FEEDERS CONDUCTORS ARE IN GOOD CONDITIONS i 12. EMERGENCY LIGHTING N/A Condition- Good (} _ Repairs Required ( ) Comments: ALL UNITS OPEN DIRECTLY TO THE OUTSIDE 13. BUILDING EGRESS ILLUMINATION Condition: Good (X) Repairs Required ( ) ----- -------------- Comments: EGRESS /LUMINATION /S /N GOOD CONDITIONS 14. FIRE ALARM SYSTEM N/A Condition: Good {) Repairs Required Comments: - 15. SMOKE DETECTORS Condition: Good (X) Repairs Required ( } Comments: SMOKE DETECTORS ARE /N GOOD CONDITIONS ��, 16. EXIT LIGHTS N/A Condition: Good f :s P epairs Required { } Comments: APARTMENTS UNITS OPENS DIRECTLY TO THE OUTSIDE 17. EMERGENCY GENERATOR N/A Condition: Good () Repairs Required ( ) Comments: 18. WIRING IN OPEN OR UNDER COVER PARKING GARAGE AREAS Condition: Good (X) Repairs Required ( ) Comments: IN GOOD CONDITIONS 19. OPEN OR UNDERCOVER PARKING SURFACE AND SECURITY LIGHTING Condition: Good (XI, Illumination Required (}_ Comments: IN GOOD CONDITIONS 20. SWIMMING POOL WIRING N/A Condition: Good () Repairs Required ( ) Comments: 21. WIRING OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT Condition: Good (.X) Repairs Required i Comments IN GOOD CONDITIONS 22. GENERAL ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IS IN GOOD CONDITION. NO REPA,RS NEEDED. IN GENERAL BUILDING ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IS WELL !MAINTAINED. 3`� Certification of Compliance with Parking Lot Illumination Standards in Chapter 8C of the Code of Miami -Dade County Date: 3 — 5 - 2018 Building Official CITY OF Miami Shores Village Building Department 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Building Department/40 Year Re -Certification Property Address: 9050 NIL: 8 AVI::. MIAMI SIIORF.S. FI. ;; 138-3283 Folio No 11-3206-011-0020 Building Description: Multifamily Building, Bldg #2, with 6 apartments (total of units 6, building 2), CBS building , 1 story, w/ stucco finish, tie beams and tie columns, Slab on Grade Concrete Slab 4", w/ cast terrazzo finish floor, hip roof , slope 3/12, w/ tiles Total Area 2,562 sqft. Building # 2, 6 units, Total Area (Building 1+2) = 9,797 sqft. Bldg. No : 2 The undersigned states the following: l . I am a Florida registered professional engineer or architect with an active license. �. On 3- 5 -18 1 measured the level of illumination in the parki ;g lot(s) serving the above referenced building. The level of illumination provided in the parkins; lot(s) meets the minimum standards for the occupancy classification of the building as established in Section §8C-3 of the Metropolitan Code of Nii_ami-Dacle County, LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E. Print Seal of architect or engineer executing the Certification As indicated by the attached report the building is electrically safe for continued used and occupancy, as noted in the report. "As a routine matter, in the order to avoid possible misunderstanding, nothing in the report should be construed directly or indirectly as a guarantee for any portion of this structure. To the best of my knowledge and ability, this report represents an accurate evaluation of observed conditions, to the extent reasonably possible" Sincerely, Leandro Espinosa, P.E. Florida . NO. 60066 Miami �� '|| nnn��MM� Shores Village --''' '~''-~~ ~~�z~' ��|1'|^�'ylF] Department + :�~�|��..� ��/�� 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Tel: /305\795.2204Fax: /305\756.8972 . INSPECTION'S PHONE NUMBER: (3O5)762.4949 INSPECTION COMMENCED E DATE: 3/1/18 SIGNATURE: A INSPECTION COMPLETED Pp'NTw*MsLEANonOebf�I�SA DATE 3/5/18 TITLE: PROFFESS0NALENGINEER. P.s.0OooO xooREso: 4nsEAST nsSTREsT H|*LE*H.FLORIDA, a�n1n DESCRIPTION OFSTRUCTU�E - _ - - - -_-- - --__ a.'Name o_f_7�l.e:\/ERONA/\ TS.MGMT-lN�C % CR]STO�BAL_G-IL.__ b. 91neQt/4dcl[esa:_9050-k]E B/\\/E. ML4K8j��H�)RF��`_Fl 783 c Legal Description: A8B[]RYPARK PB4-110 LOT 3LOT SIZE 109�O�){��O[)F�211Q7-11�0 � � 04031 / ' - - -- _ -_--- '_'---- -- _ -- ' ----_-__---_----__- -_. diOw[ers Name: VERONA APARTMENTS MGMT INC _%_CR Q_ {JwO�r'o&4aUino.Add[Qsa�QO5ONF84\/E#1��4K�|�� Building No.: 2 t Folio Number ofBuilding: 11-3206-011-0020 _ ��_____ g. Building CodeOcoupanoy Classification". Comn�ern�u�fanni|yRES|DENT|AL ' '__---_----_-_- ---' — h. Present Uu��Commercial/MultifamilyRES|DENT|AL Apartment units / ----_-- -___- - | General Description, Type ofConstruction, Size, Number ofStories, and Special Foahunss___ / Additional Comment: -- -----------------------'--- --- --- - - ---- ---'-- ------------| yWu|tifami|y Bui|ding. Bldg #2. with S apo�monto (b��| ofunitoS. building 2)' CBSbui|ding . 1 / nhory, wYstu000 finieh, tie beams and tie oo|umno. Slab on Grade Concrete Slab 4^. wyoast ! terrazzo finish floor, hip roof. slope 3/12. w/ti|oa Total Area 2.562 sqft. Building # 2. S unite' Total Area (Building 1+2)=Q.7Q7sq�� - -- - ---- '' ----'- j.Additions .hzoriginal structure: NONE Building #2 Original Structure. 2.562aqft. NuAddh±ionsTotal Area of Building #2 = GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS SCOPE OF STRUCTURAL INSPECTION The fundamental purpose of the required inspection and report is to confirm in reasonable fashion that the building or structure under consideration is safe for continued use under the present occupancy. As implied by the title of this document, this is a recommended procedure, and under no circumstances are these minimum recommendations intended to supplant proper professional judgment. In general, unless there is obvious overloading, or significant deterioration of important structure elements there is little need to verify the original design. It is obvious that this has been "time tested' if still offering satisfactory performance. Rather, it is of importance that the effects of time with respect to deterioration of the original construction materials be evaluated. It will rarely be possible to visually examine all concealed construction, nor should such be generally necessary. However, a sufficient number of typical structure members should be examined to permit reasonable conclusions to be drawn. Visual Examination will, in most cases, be considered adequate when e>recuted systematically. Surface imperfections such as cracks, distortion, sagging, excessive deflections, significant misalignment, signs of leakage, and peeling of finishes should be viewed critically as indications of possible difficulty. Testing Procedures and quantitative analysis will not generally be required for five (5) structural members or systems except for such cases where visual examination has revealed such need, or where apparent loading conditions may be critical. Manual Procedures such as chipping small areas of concrete and surface finishes for closer examinations are encouraged in preference to sampling and/or testing where visual examination alone is deemed insufficient. Generally, unfinished areas of buildings such as utility spaces, maintenance areas, stairwells and elevator shafts should be utilized for such purposes. In some cases, to be held to a minimum, ceilings or other construction finishes may have to be opened for selective examination of critical structural elements. In that event, such locations should be carefully located to be least disruptive most easily repaired, and held to a minimum. In an event, a sufficient number of structural members must be examined to afford reas.,Dnable assurance that such are representative of the total structure. Evaluating an existing structure for the effect of time, must take into account two, basic considerations; movement of structural components with respect to each other, and deterioration of materials. With respect to the former, volume change considerations, principally from ambient temperature changes, and possible long time deflections, are likely to be most significant. Foundation movements will frequently be of importance, usually settlement, although upward movement due to expansive soils actually may occur. However, it•;s infrequent in this area. Older buildings on spread footings may exhibit continual, even recent settlements if founded on deep unconsolidated fine grained or cohesive soils or from subterraneous losses or movements from several possible causes. With very little qualification, such as rather rare chemically reactive conditions, deterioration of building materials can only occur in the presence of moisture, largely to metals and their natural tendency to return to the oxide state in the corrosive process. In this marine climate, highly aggressive conditions exist year round. For most of the year, outside relative humidity may frequently be about 90 or 95%, while within air-conditioned buildings, relative humidity will normally be about 35 to 60%. Under these conditions moisture vapor pressures ranging from about 1/3 to 1/2 pounds per square inch will exist much of the time. Moisture vapor will migrate to lower pressure areas. Common building materials such as stucco, masonry and even concrete, are permeable even with these slight pressures. Since most of our local construction does not use vapor barriers, condensation will take place within the enclosed walls of the building. As a result, deterioration is most likely adjacent to exterior walls, or wherever else moisture or direct leakage has been permitted to penetrate the building shell. Structural deterioration will always require repair. The type of repair, however, will depend on the importance of the member in the structural system and degree of deterioration. Cosmetic type repairs may suffice in certain non -sensitive members such as tie beams and columns, provided that the remaining sound material is sufficient for the required function. For members carrying assigned gravity or other loads, cosmetic type repairs will only be permitted if it can be demonstrated by rational analysis that the remaining material, if protected from further deterioration can still perform its assigned function at acceptable stress levels. Failing that, adequate repairs or reinforcement will be considered mandatory. Written Reports shall be required attesting to each required inspection. Each such report shall note the location of the structure, description of type of construction, and general magnitude of the structure, the existence of drawings and location thereof, history of the structure to the extent reasonably known, and description of the type and manner of the inspection, noting problem areas and recommending repairs, if required to maintain structural integrity. EVALUATION: Each report shall include a statement to the effect that the building is structurally safe, unsafe, safe with qualifications, or has been deemed safe by restrictive interpretation of such statements. It is suggested that each report also include the following information indicating the actual scope of the report and limits of liability. This paragraph may be used: " As a routine matter, in order to avoid possible misunderstanding, nothing in this report should be construed directly or indirectly as a guarantee for any portion of the structure. To the best of my knowledge and ability, this report represents and accurate appraisal of the present condition of the building based upon careful evaluation of observed conditions, to the extent reasonably possible," FOUNDATION If all of the supporting subterranean materials were completely uniform beneath a structure, with no significant variations in grain size, density, moisture content or other mechanical properties; and if dead load pressures were completely uniform, settlements would probably be uniform and of little practical consequence. In the real world, however, neither is likely. Significant deviations from either of these two idealism are likely to result in unequal vertical movements. Monolithic masonry, generally incapable of accepting such movements will crack. Such cracks are most likely to occur at corners, and large openings. Since, in most cases, differential shears are involved, cracks will typically bediagonal. Small movements, in themselves, are most likely to be structurally important only if long term leakage through fine cracks may have resulted in deterioration. In the event of large movements, continuous structural elements such as floor and roof systems must be evaluated for possible fracture or loss of bearing. kxp Pile foundations are, in general, less likely to exhibit such difficulties. Where such does occur, special investigation will be required. ROOFING SYSTEMS Sloping roofs, usually having clay or cement tiles, are of concern in the event that the covered membrane may have deteriorated, or that the tiles may have become loose, Large deflections, if merely resulting from deteriorated rafters or joists will be of greater importance. Valley Flashing, and Base Flashing at roof penetration will also be matters of concern. Flat roofs with built up membrane roofs will be similarly critical with respect to deflection considerations. Additionally, since the will generally be approaching expected life limits at the age when building recertification is required. Careful examination is important. Blisters, wrinkling, alligatoring, and loss, of gravel are usually signs of .difficulty. Punctures nr loss of adhesion of base flashing, coupled with loose counterflashing will also signify Possible problems. Wind blown may become critical. gravel, if excessive, and the possibility of other debris, may result in pounding, which if permitted, MASONRY BEARING WALLS Random cracking, or if discernible, definitive patterns of cracking, will of course, be of interest. Bulging, sagging, or other signs of misalignment -lay also indicate related problems in other structural elements. Masonry wails where commonly constructed of either concrete masonry remits or scored clay tile, may have been constructed with either reinforced concrete columns tie beams, or lintels. Steel bar joists are, of course, sensitive to corrosion. Most critical locations will be web member welds, especially near supports, where shear stresses are high possible failure may be sudden, and without warning. Cold formed steel joists, usually of relatively light gage steel, are likely to be critically sensitive to corrosion, and are highly dependent upon at least normal lateral support tc� carry designed loads. Bridging and the floor or roof system itself, if in good condition, will serve the purpose. Wood joists and rafters are most often in difficult from "dry rot", or the presence of termites. The former (a misnomer) is most often prevalent in the presence of sustained moisture or lack of adequate ventilation. A member may usually be deemed in acceptable condition if a sharp pointed tool will penetrate no more than about one eight of an inch under moderate hand pressure. Sagging floors will most often indicate problem areas. Gypsum roof decks will usually perform satisfactorily except in the presence of moisture. Disintegration of the material and the foam -board may result from sustained leakage. Anchorage of the supporting bulb tees against uplift may also be of importance, with significant deterioration. Floor and roof systems of case in Place Concrete with self centering reinforcing, such as paper backed mesh and rib -lath, may be critical with respect to corrosion of the unprotected.. reinforcing, Loss of uplift anchorage on roof decks will also be important if significant deterioration has taken place, in the event that dead Toads are otherwise inadequate for that purpose. STEEL FRAMING SYSTEM Corrosion, obviously enough, will be the determining factor in the deteriors'Flon of structural steel. Most likely suspect areas will be fasteners, welds, and the interface area where bearings are embedded in masonry. Column bases may often be suspect in areas where flooding has been experienced, especially if salt water has been involved. 3t� Thin cracks usually indicate only minor corrosion, requiring minor patching. Extensive spalling may indicate a much more serious condition requiring further investigation. Of most probable importance will be the vertical and horizontal cracks where masonry units abut tie columns, or other frame elements such as floor slabs. Of interest here is the observation that although the raw materials of which these masonry materials are made may have much the same mechanical properties as the reinforced concrete framing, their actual behavior in the structure, however, is likely to differ with respect to volume change resulting from moisture content, and variations in ambient thermal conditions. Moisture vapor penetration, sometimes abetted by salt laden aggregate and corroding rebars, will usually be the most common cause of deterioration. fie columns are rarely structurally sensitive, and a fair amount of deterioration may be tolerated before structural impairment becomes important. Usually, if rebar loss is such that the remaining steel area is still about 0.0075 of the concrete area, structural repair will not be necessary. Cosmetic type repair involving cleaning, and patching to effectively seal the member, may often suffice. A similar approach may not be unreasonable for tie beams, provided they are not also serving as lintels. In that event, a rudimentary analysis of load capability using the remaining actual rebar area, may be required. FLOOR AND ROOF SYSTEMS Cast in place reinforced concrete slabs and/or beams and joists may often show problem due to corroding rebars resulting from cracks or merely inadequate protecting cover of concrete. Patching procedures will usually suffice where such damage has not been extensive. Where corrosion and spalling has been extensive in structurally critical areas, competent analysis with respect to remaining structural capacity, relative to actual supported loads, will be necessary. Type and extent or repair will be dependent upon the results of such investigation. Precast members may present similar deterioration conditions. End support conditions may be important. Adequacy of bearing, indications of end shear problems, and restraint conditions are important, and should be evaluated in at least a few typical locations. CONCRETE FRAMING SYSTEMS Concrete deterioration will, in most cases similarly to related to rebar corrosion possibly abetted by the presence of salt -water aggregate or excessively permeable concrete. In this respect, honeycomb areas may contribute adversely to the rate of deterioration. Columns are frequently most suspect. Extensive honeycomb is most prevalent at the base of columns, where fresh concrete was permitted to segregate, dropping into form boxes. This type of problem has been known to be compounded in areas where flooding has occurred, especially involving saltwater. In spall areas, chipping away a few small loose samples of concrete may be very revealing. Especially, since loose material will have to be removed even for cosmetic type repairs, anyway. Fairly reliable quantitative conclusions may be drawn with respect to the quality of the concrete. Even though our cement and local aggregate are essentially derived from the same sources, cement will have a characteristically dark grayish brown color in contrast to the almost white aggregate. A typically white, almost alabaster like coloration will usually indicate reasonably good overall strength. The original gradation of aggregate can be seen through a magnifying glass. Depending upon the structural importance of the specific location, this type of examination may obviate the need for further testing if a value of 2000 psi to 2500 psi is sufficient for required strength, in the event that visual inspection indicates good quality for the factors mentioned. WINDOWS Window condition is of considerable importance with respect to two considerations. Continued leakage may have resulted in other adjacent damage and deteriorating anchorage may result in loss of the entire unit in the event of severe wind storms short of hurricane velocity. Perimeter sealant, glazing, seals, and latches should be examined with a view toward deterioration of materials and anchorage of units for inward as well as outward (section) pressures, most importantly in high buildings. WOOD FRAMING Older wood framed structures, especially of the industrial type, are of concern in that long term deflections may have opened important joints, even in the absence of deterioration. Corrosion of ferrous fasteners will in most cases be obvious enough. Dry rot must be considered suspect in all sealed areas where ventilation has been inhibited, and at bearings and at fasteners. Here too, penetration with a pointed tool greater than about one eight inch with moderate hand pressure, will indicate the possibility of further difficulty. LOADING It is of importance to note that even in the absence of any observable deterioration, loading conditions must be viewed with caution. Recognizing that there will generally be no need to verify the original design, since it will have already been "time tested", this premise has validity only if loading patterns and conditions remain unchanged. Any material change in type and/or magnitude or loading in older buildings should be viewed as sufficient jurisdiction to examine load carrying capability of the affected structural system. SCOPE OF ELECTRICAL INSPECTION The purpose of the required inspection and report is to confirm with reasonable fashion that the building or structure under consideration is safe for continued use under present occupancy. As mentioned before, it is a recommendation procedure, and under no circumstances are these minimum recommendations intended to supplant proper professional judgment. ELECTRIC SERVICE A description of the type of service supplying the building or structure must be provided, stating the size of amperage, if three (3) phase or single (1) phase, and if the system is protected by fuses or breakers. Proper grounding of the service should also be in good standing. The meter and electric rooms should have sufficient clearance for equipment and for the serviceman to perform both work and inspections. Gutters and electrical panels should all be in good condition throughout the entire building or structure. BRANCH CIRCUITS Branch circuits in the building must all be identified and an evaluation of the conductors must be performed. There should also exist proper grounding for equipment used in the building, such as an emergency generator, or elevator motor. CONDUIT RACEWAYS All types of wiring methods present in the building must be detailed and ;ndividually inspected. The evaluation of each type of conduit and cable, if applicable, must be done individually. The conduits in the building should be free from erosion, and checked for considerable dents in the conduits that may be prone to cause a short. The conductors and cables in these conduits should be chafe free, and their currents not over the rated amount. EMERGENCY LIGHTING Exit signs lighting and emergency lighting, along with a functional fire alarm system must all be in good working condition. ,t� 1. DESCRIPTION OFSTRUCTURE aName of Title: \/ETS MGMTINC% CRI c. Legal Description: ASBURY PARK PB 4-110 LOT 3 LOT SIZE 109.300 X 290 f. Building Official Folio Number: 11-3266-011-o6'20 g. Buil ding Code Occupancy Classification: Commercial/Multifamily RESIDENTIAL h. Present Use: Commercial/Multifamily RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMI LY/3Uilding 6UOitS , i._General Description, Type ofConstruction, Size, Number ofStories, and Special Features Multifamily Building, Bldg #2. with 8 apartments (total ofunits 0. building 2). CBS building . 1 1 story, wl stucco finish, tie beams and tie columns, Slab on Grade Concrete Slab 4", w/ cast � terrazzo finish floor, hip nnof. slope 3/12. wYtiles Total Area 2.562 oqft. Building #2. 8 units, Tota|-/ Area (Building 1+2)=9.797sqft. ' -- - ''---' - - '' - ' ' ------ - -'-- ----- l Additions tooriginal structure: K]{}NE Building 9- 2 Original St[UCfU[8. 2'562 SOft.' No ' AddittionSTOt@l Area of Building #3 = 2.562 Sqff. '- - - - ' -----------1 2. PRESENT CONDITION OFSTRUCTURE - -- _-_ m. Generalalignment (not good, fair, poor, explain if ' ificanUGOOD. t8uhJing-NONE {JBSERVEO.GOOD .CONOD][�NS 2. Settlement: NONE OBSERVED, GOOD CONDITIONS_ 3. Defections: NONE OBSERVED, GOOD CONDITIONS 4. Expansion: NONE OBSERVED, GOOD CONDITIONS 5. Contraction: NONE OBSERVED, GOOD CONDITIONS b. Portion showing distress (Note, beams, columns, structural walls, floors, roofs, othe I N_5TE OBSERVED, THIS BUILDING IS WELL MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER - - ----- - - - -- ----' ---- '' --' --- -- ----- --- - -- ---'---'i c. Surface conditions - describe general conditions of finishes, noting onaoking, opaUing. peeling, . signs of moisture penetration & stains - GOOD, _ .| -- - --- - - '---' - '- \ NOC�ACK0V��RSPALL0USO��EEL0VGOB3ER '-- - - d. Cnaoks- note location in significant members. Identify crack size as barely / dissemble', FINE if less than 1 mm in width: K1EO|UN1 if between 1 and 2 mm in width; VV|UE if over mm,_- ' ' I - NONE OBSERVED BUILDING ISWELL 'MAINTAINED _ e. General extent of deterioration - cracking oropaUing of concrete or masonry; oxidation of 3. INSPECTIONS a. Date of notice of required inspection: 1123118 b. Date(s) of actual inspection: 311118-315118 c. Name and qualification of individual submitting inspection report: �� LEAN ORO-ES.PINOSA.-P.E.-STATE OF FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER d. Description of any laboratory or other formal testing, if required, rather than manual or visual J procedures } BUILDING IS WELL MAINTAINED INSPECTION DID NOT REVEAL ANY CONCERN THAT WARRANTS FURTHER TESTING OR LAB INVESTIGATIONS .NONE, VISUAL PROCEDURES WERE USED. e. Structural repair note appropriate line: 1. None required (.X) 2. Required (describe and indicate acceptance) NONE REQUIRED BUILDING IS IN GOOD CONDITIONS. OWNER MAINTAINS WELL THE �I BUILDING AND NO DETERIORATED OR DAMAGED CONDITIONS WERE OBSERVED. 4. SUPPORTING DATA a. WRITTEN DATA 17 sheet written data b. Photoaral)hs WERE TAKEN photographs c. NONE drawings or sketches: 5. MASONRY BEARING WALL = Indicate good, fair', poor on appropriate lines: a. Concrete masonry units: GOOD b. Clay tile or terra cota units: NONE_ c. Reinforced concrete tile columns: GOOD d. Reinforced concrete tile beams: GOOD e. Lintel: GOOD f. Other type bond beams: N/A g. Masonry finishes - exterior 1 Stucco: GOOD 2. Veneer: NIA 3. Paint only: GOOD CONDITIONS 4. Other(describe). NIA h. Masonry finishes - interior 1. Vapor barrier: NIA 2. Furring an_d plaster: PLASTER IN GOOD CONDITIONS 3. Paneling: NIA 4. Paint only: GOOD 5. Other (describe; N/A i. Cracks: NONE WERE OBSERVED 1. Location - note beams, columns, other _ 2. Description: NONE WERE OBSERVED— j. Spalling NONE WERE OBSERVED 1. Location - note beams, columns, other _ 2. Description: NONE WERE OBSERVED k. Rebar corrosion -check appropriate line _ _ -- 1. None visible: NONE 2. Minor -patching will suffice: N/A� _ — 3. Significant -but patching will suffice: N/A 4. Significant -structural repairs required: NIA Samples chipped out for examination in spall areas No. Not required, as no spalled areas were encountered. Building is well maintained 2. Yes - describe color texture, aggregate, general qua i + y 6. FLOOR AND ROOF SYSTEM a. Roof: Good Conditions 1. Describe (flat, slope, type roofing :y; e roof deck, condition Hip Roof, Prefab Trusses, w/ wood plank decking and tiles, slope 3"-12" in good conditions. (Insulation and wear course are in good conditions). Good Conditions Building is well maintained 2. Note water tanks, cooling towers, air conditioning equipment, signs, other heavy equipment and condition of support: No roof mounted equipment _ 3. Note types of drains and scw)per and conditionooling towers, air condition. Hip Roof has a 3"-12" slope No scuppers or drains needed. Building drains naturally. b. Floor systems(s) _1 1. Describe (type of system framing, material, spans, condition) J (First Story) Slab on grade Concrete Slab 4", with cast terrazzo finish. Good Conditions c. Inspection — note exposed areas available for inspection, and where it was found necessary_ to open ceilings. eic for inspection of typical framing members - Roof and Walls are exposed to view and Attic access scuttles were used to observe existing building components. 7. STEEL FRAMING SYSTEM a Description: NONE APPLICABLE b Exposed Steel - describe condition of paint & degree of corrosion - NONE APPLICABLE _-- c. Concrete or other fireproofing — note any cracking or spalling, and note where any covering was removed for insrection NONE APPLICABLE d.Elevator sheave beams & connections and machine floor beams — note condition NONE APPLICABLE 8. CONCRETE FRAMING SYSTEM a. Full description of structural system Load Bearing CBS walls with Concrete Tie Beams, Concrete Tie Columns, in Good Conditions b. Cracking: NONE 1. Not significant: N/A 2. Location and description of members affected and type cracking: N/A c General condition: Good. Building is well maintained by owner. Concrete Tie Beams, Columns, wall, roof are in Good Condition. d, RebaT corrosion -_check appropriate line- None visible 1. Non visible: None visible 2. Location and description of members affected and type cracking NONE/N/A 3. Significant but patching will suffice: NONEINIA —4— _Significant --stru-c-tu"ral repairs required (describe',- NONE/N/A e- Samples chipped out in spall areas: NO 1. No. X 2. Yes, d-e—scri-be —col'o-'r—,texture, aggregate. general quality: Not required, as no spalled areas were encountered. Building is well maintained 9. WINDOWS a. Type (Wood, steel, aluminum, jalousie, single hung, double hung, casement, awning, pivoted, fixed, other): Aluminum and Glass Awning type b. Anchorage - type & condition of fasteners and latches: GOOD: Concrete Screws/Original fasteners are good conditions, windows are operable from the inside of the unit c. Sealant - type of condition of perimeter sealant & at mullions: Caulking in GOOD Conditions d. Interiors seals - typp, & condition at ooerable vents: GOOD Conditions e. General condition: Existing windows and doors are in good conditions and appear to be weather tight 10. WOOD FRAMING: NIA a. Type - fully describe if mill construciton, light construction, major spans, trusses: Interior Partitions are wood, existing roof is framed wl prefab wood trusses wl span 25 ft. Existing framing, Trusses are In Good Conditions. Existing stucco and plaster walls finish is in good conditions. Walls are well painted and there are no visible cracks. Interior partitions are wood. Existing framing is in good conditions. Existing plaster walls are well painted and there are no cracks or exposure to moisture. b. Note metal fitting i.e., angles, plates, bolts, split pintles, pintles, other, and ;iote condition: Metal fasteners observed are in good conditions c. Joints - note if well fitted and still- closed: No damagedloints were observed__ d. Drainage - note accumulations of moisture: No accumulation of moisture was observed e. Ventilation -note any concealed spaes not ventilated: Attic Spaces are well ventilated, vents are properly screened are free of obstruction f. Note any concealed spaces opened for inspection: N/A As indicated by the attached report the building is structurally safe for continued used and occupancy, as noted in the report. "As a routine matter, in the order to avoid possible misunderstanding, nothing in the report should be construed directly or indirectly as a guarantee for any portion of this structure. To the best of my knowledge and ability, this report represents an accurate evaluation of observed conditions, to the extent reasonably possible" Sincerely, Leandro Espinosa, P.E. F id P.E. NO. 60066to G�1L ��8 Date Certification of Compliance with Parking Lot Illumination Standards in Chapter 8C of the Code of Miami -Dade County 3-5-18 Building Official CITY OF Miami Shores Village Building Department 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Building Department/40 Year Re -Certification Property Address 9050 NE 8 AVE., MIAMI SI IORLS, 1=L 33138-3283 Folio No : 11-3206-011-0020 Building Description: Multifamily Building, Bldg #2, with 6 apartments (total of units 6, building 2), CBS building , 1 story, w/ stucco finish, tie beams and tie columns, Slab on Grade Concrete Slab 4", w/ cast terrazzo finish floor, hip roof , slope 3/12, w/ tiles Total Area 2,562 sqft. Building # 2, 6 units, Total Area (Building 1+2) = 9,797 sgft. Bldg No : 2 The undersigned states the following: I . I am a Florida registered professional engineer or architect with an active license. On 3-5-18 1 measured the level of illumination in the parking lot(s) serving the above reverenced building. The level of illumination provided in the parking lot(s) meets the minimum standards for the occupancy classification of the building as established in Section §8C-3 of the Metropolitan Code of Miami -Dade County LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P,E.. e. Seal of architect or engineer executing the Signature Certification m LEANDRO ESPINOSA, RE ENGINEERING, RG No 60066 459 EAST 56"' STREET, HIALEAH, FLO, 33013 Office: 786-553-5611 Fax:305-687-5408 BUILDING 40 YEAR RECERTIFICATION REPORT a , :._r UILDING 2 E CBS MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING 9050 NE 8 AVE, BLDG #2, MIAMI, FLORIDA, 33138 9050 NE 8 AVE, MIAMI, FL, 33138 FOLIO #: 1 1-3206-01 1-0020 REPORT PREPARED BY: LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E, 1\ \� BUILDING I + . 1 � ,, � C 'q zoom Folio:11-320G-011-0020 sibmwal: Pr4p2r� Address Owner VERONA APARTMENTS 64GIdT INC %CRISTOBAL GIL Mailing Addrus Ky: �I $ -VE --7 i11XII Sn;RS. E_ K 11� •3 PA Primary Zone 3000 MULTI -FAMILY - GENERAL Primary Land Use 0303 MULTIFAMILY 10 UNITS PLUS 14 li'PH11 V o')D 1.00: 1W'Q Map View. Layers. MINIMUN INSPECTION PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR BUILDING STRUCTURE CERTIFICATION INSPECTION DATE: 3/1/18 INSPECTION COMPLETED: 3/5/18 PRINT NAME: LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E. TITLE: FLORIDA LIC. P.E. 60066 ADDRESS: 459 EAST 56 STREET, HIALEAH, FLORIDA, 33013 TELEPHONE: 786-553-561 1 SCOPE OF STRUCTURAL INSPECT The Fundamental purpose of the required inspection and report is to confirm in reasonable fashion that the building or structure under consideration is safe for Continued use under present occupancy. As implied by the title of this document, this is a recommended procedure, and under no circumstances are these nlininlunl recommendations intended to Supplant proper professional judgment. In general, unless there is obvious overloading, or significant deterioration of important structure elements, there is little need to verify the original design. It will rarely be possible to visually examine all concealed construction, nor should such be generally necessary. However, a sufficient number of typical Structure members should be examined to permit reasonable C0nClusi01,s to be drawn. Visual Examination will, in most cases, be considered adequate when executed systematically. Surface imperfections such as, cracks, distortion, sagging, excessive deflections, significant misalignment, signs of leakage, and peeling of finishes should be viewed critically as indications of possible difficulty. Testing Procedures and quantitative analysis will not generally be required for structural members or systems except for such cases where visual examination has revealed such need or where apparent loading conditions may be critical. Manual Procedures such as chipping small areas of concrete and surface finishes for closer examinations are encouraged in preference to sampling and/or testing where visual examination alone is deemed insufficient. Generally, unfinished areas of buildings such as utility spaces, maintenance areas, stairwells and elevator shafts should be utilized for such purposes. In sore cases, to be held to a minimum, ceilings or other construction finishes may have to be opened for selective examination of critical Structural elements. In that event, such locations should be carefully located to be least disruptive, most easily repaired and held to a minimum. In any event, a sufficient number of st-tictural members Foundation movements will frequently be of importance, usually settlement, although upward movements due to expansive soils actually may occur, it is infrequently in this -area. Older buildings on spread footings may exhibit continual, even recent settlements if founded on deep unconsolidated fine grained or cohesive soils or from subterraneous losses or movements from several possible causes Foundation If all ofthe supporting subterranean materials were completely uniform beneath a structure, with no significant variations in grain size, density, moisture content or other mechanical properties; and if dead load preSSUres were COnlpletely Uniform, settlements w�-.Jld probably be uniform and of little practical consequence. In the real world, however, neither is likely. Significant deviations from either of these two idealisms are likely to result in unequal vertical movements. Monolithic masonry, generally incapable of accepting such movements will crack. Such cracks are most likely to occur at corners, and large openings. Since, in most cases, differential shears are involved, cracks will typically be diagonal. Small movements, in themselves, are most likely to be structurally important only if long term leakage through fine cracks may have resulted in deterioration. In the event of large movements, continuous structural elements such as floor and roof systems must he evaluated for possible fracture or loss of bearing Pile foundations are, in general, less likely to exhibit such difficulties. Where such does occur, special investigation will be required. Roofs Sloping roofs, usually having clay or cement tiles are of concern in tile event that the covered membrane may have deteriorated. or that the tiles may have become loose. Large deflections, if merely resulting from deteriorated rafters or joists will be of greater import. Valley Flashing, and Base Flashing at roof penetration will also be matters of concern. Flat roofs with built up membrane roofs will be similarly critical with respect to deflection considerations, Additionally, since they will generally be approaching expected life limits at the age when building recertification is required careful examination is important. Blisters, wrinkling, aligatoring, and loss of gravel are usual signs of difficulty, Punctures or loss of adhesion of base flashings, coupled with loose counter -flashing will also signify possible problems. Masonry Walls Random cracking, or if discernible, definitive patterns of cracking, will of course, be of interest. Masonry walls where commonly constructed of either concrete masonry units, or scored clay tile, may have been constructed with either reinforced concrete columns and tie beams, or lintels. Of most probable importance will be the vertical and horizontal cracks where „nasonry units abut tie columns, or other frame elements such as floor slabs, Of interest here is the observation that although the raw materials of which these masonry materials are made may have much .he same mechanical properties as the reinforced concrete framing, their actual behavior in the structure, however, is likely to differ with respect to volume change resulting fi-om moisture content, and variations in ambient thermal conditions. Moisture vapor penetration, sometimes abetted by salt laden aggregate and corroding rebars, will usually be the most common cause of deterioration Tie columns are rarely structurally sensitive, and a fair amount of deterioration may be tolerated before structural; impairment becomes important. Usually, if rebar loss is such that the remaining steel area is still about 0.0075% of the concrete area, strucctural repair will not be necessary. Cosmetic type repair involving cleaning, and patching to effectively seal the member, may often suffice. A similar approach may not be unreasonable for tie beams, provided they are not also serving as lintels. In that event, a rudimentary analysis of load capability using the remaining actual rebar area, may be required. FLOOR AND ROOF SYSTEMS Cast in place reinforced concrete slabs and/or beams and joists may often show, problems due to corroding rebars resulting from cracks or merely inadequate protecting covet- of concrete. Patching procedures will usually suffice where such damage has not been extensive. . Steel bar joists are, of course, sensitive to corrosion. Most critical locations will be web member welds, especially near supports, where shear stresses arc high possible failure may be sudden, and w thorn warning. Cold formed joists, usually of relatively light gage steel, are likely to be critically sensitive in corrosion, and are highly dependent upon at least normal lateral support to carry designed loads. n Wood joists and rafters are most often in difficulty from dry rot or the presence of termites. The former (a misnomer) is most often prevalent in the presence of sustained moisture or lack of adequate ventilation. A member may usually be deemed I acceptable condition if a sharp pointed tool will penetrate no more than about one eighth of an inch under moderate hard pressure. Sagging floors will most often indicate problem areas. Gypsum roof decks will usually perform satisfactorily except in the presence of moisture. Disintegration of the material and the foam -board may result from sustained leakage. Floor and roof systems of case in place concrete with self centering reinforcing, such as paper backed mesh and rib -lath, may be critical with respect to corrosion of the unprotected reinforcing. Loss of uplift anchorage on roof decks will a'so be important if significant deterioration has taken place, in the event that dead loads are otherwise inadequate for that purpose. STEEL FRAMING SYSTEM Corrosion, obviously enough, will be the determining factor in the deterioratic:l of structural steel. Most likely suspect areas will be fasteners, welds, and the interface area where bearings are embedded in masonry. Column bases may often be suspect in areas where Flooding has beef, experienced, especially if salt water has been involved. Concrete fireproofing will, if exists, be the best clue indicating the condition of the steel. Thin cracks usually indicate only minor corrosion, requiring minor patching. Extensive spalling may indicate a much more serious condition requiring further investigation. CONCRETE FRAMING SYSTEM Concrete deterioration will in most cases similarly be related to rebar corrosion possibly abetted by the presence of salt water aggregate or excessively permeable concrete. In this respect, honeycomb areas may contribute adversely to the rate of deterioration. Columns are frequently most suspect. Extensive honeycomb is most prevalent at the base of columns, where fi-esh concrete was permitted to segregate, dropping into form boxes. This type of problem has been known to be compounded in areas where flooding has occurred, especially involving salt water. In spall areas, chipping away a few small loose samples of concrete may he very revealing. Especially, since loose material will have to he removed even for cosmetic type repairs, anyway. WINDOWS Window condition is of considerable importance with respect to two considerations. Continued leakage may have resulted in other adjacent damage and deteriorating anchorage may result in loss of the entire unit in the event of severe wind storms short of hurricane velocity. Perimeter sealants, glazing, seals, and latches should be examined with a view toward deterioration of materials and anchorage of units for inward as well as outward (section) pressures, most importantly in high buildings. WOOD FRAMING Older wood framed structures, especially of the industrial type, are of concern in that long term deflections may have opened important joints, even in the absence of deterioration. Corrosion of ferrous fasteners will in most cases be obvious enough. Dry rot must be considered suspect in all sealed areas where ventilation has been inhibited, and at bearings and at fasteners. Here too, penetration with a pointed tool greater than about one eighth inch with moderate hand pressure, will indicate the possibility of further difficulty SCOPE OF ELECTRICAL INSPECTION The purpose of the required inspection and report is to confirm with reasonable fashion that the building or structure under consideration is safe for continued use under present occupancy. ELECTRIC SERVICE A description of the type of service supplying he building or structure must be -provided, stating the size of amperage, if three (3) phase or single (I ) phase, and if the system is protected by fuses or breakers. Proper grounding of the service should also be in good standing. The meter and electric rooms should have sufficient clearance for equipment and for the serviceman to perform both work and inspections. Gutters and electrical panels should all be in good condition throughout the entire building or structure. BRANCH CIRCUITS Branch circuits in the building must all be identified and an evaluation of the conductors must be performed. There should also exist proper grounding for equipment used in the building, such as an emergency generator or elevator motor. CONDUITS All types of wiring methods present in the building must be detailed and individually inspected. The evaluation of each type of conduit and cable, if applicable, must be done individually. The conduits in the building should be free from erosion, and checked for considerable dents in the conduits that may be prone to cause a shon. The conductors arid cables in these conduits should be chafe free, and their currents not over the rated amount. EMERGENCY LIGHTING Exit sign lights and emergency lighting, along with a functional fire alarm syst-;;m must all be in good working condition. INSPECTION PROCEDURE FOR BUILDING STRUCTURE INSPECTION 1. Description Structure: Multifamily Building, Bldg #1, with 6 apartments (total of units 6, building 2), CBS building, 1 story, w/ stucco finish, tie beams and tie columns, Slab on Grade Concrete Slab 4", w/ cast terrazzo finish floor, hip roof, slope 3/12, w/ tiles Total Area 2,562 sqft. Building # 2, 6 units, Total Area 2,562 sqft. (Total Area Building 1+Building 2) = 9,797 sqft. a. Name of title: VERONA APARTMI_;NTS MGMT INC %CRISTOBAL, GIL Street address: 9050 NI 8 AVF 418 MIAMI S1IORF:S, FL 33138-3283 C. Building No.: 2 Legal description: Folio: 1 1-3206-01 1-0020 Square Footage: Total Area 2,562 sqft. Building # 2, (Total Area Building 1+2) = 9,797 sqft. Legal description: ASBURY PARK PB 4-1 10 LOT 3 LOT SIZE 109.300 X 290 OR 21 197-1 186 0403 1 Owner's name: VLRONA APARTMENTS MGMT INC % CRISTOBAL GIL Owners mailing address: 9050 NE 8 AVE 418 MIAMI SHORES, FL 33138-3283 Building"Official Folio Number: Folio: 11-3206-01 1-0020 Building Code Occupancy Classification: MULTI -FAMILY/ APARTMENTS Present use: MULTIFAMILY Building 6 units Ill. General Description: Multifamily Building, Bldg #2, with 6 apartments (total of units 6, building I), CBS building , I story, w/ stucco finish, tie beams and tie columns, Slab on Grade Concrete Slab 4", w/ cast terrazzo finish Ioor, hip roof, slope 3/12, w/ tiles Total Area 2,562 sqft. Building # 2, 6 units, Total Area (Building 1+2) = 9,797 sqft. n . Additions to original structure: NONE, Building # 2 Original Structure. 2,562 sqft., No Addittions Total Area of Building # 2 = 2,562 sqft. 2. Present Condition of Structure: a. General alignment (note good. fair, poor.) GOOD l . Bulging: NONE OBSERVED, GOOD CONDITIONS 2 Settlement: NONE, GOOD CONDITIONS Deflection: NONE, GOOD CONDITIONS 4. Expansion: NONE, GOOD CONDITIONS 5. Contraction: NONE, GOOD CONDITIONS b. Portions showing distress (note, beams, columns, structural walls, floors, roofs, other) NONE OBSERVED, THIS BUILDING IS WELL MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER C. Surface conditions - describe general conditions of finishes, noting cracking, spalling, peeling, signs of moisture penetration & stains. GOOD, NO CRACKING OR SPA LLING OBSERVED. d Cracks - note location in significant members: Identify crack size as I-IAIRLINE if bare discernible, FINE if less than 1 nim in width, MEDIUM if between I and 2 nim in width, WIDE if over 2 nim. NONE OBSERVED, THIS BUILDING IS WELL MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER e. General extent of deterioration - cracking or spalling of concrete or masonry; oxidation of metals. rot or borer attack in wood. NONE OBSER VED B UILDING IS WELL MAINTAINED f. Patching or repairs: NONE OBSERVED BUILDING IS WELL AIM INTAINED AND IN GOOD CONDITIONS. g. Nature of present loading - indicate residential, commercial, other estimate magnitude RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILYAPARTANIENTS. , RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS, CBS BUILDING ON GRADE CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB, RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS. APPROXIMATELY (200 PSF) LOADING IS CONSISTENT WITH ORIGINAL LOADING INTENT FOR THIS TYPE OF COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL USE OF STRUCTURE, 3. Inspection: Date of notice of required inspection: 1123117 h. Date(s) of actual inspection: 311118-3/S/18 c. Name and qualification of individual submitting inspection report: LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E.-STATE OF FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER d. Description of any laboratory or other formal testing if required, rather than manual or visual procedures. BUILDING IS WELL MAINTAINED INSPECTION DID NOT REVEAL ANY CONCERN THAT WARRANTS FURTHER TESTING OR LAB INVESTIGATIONS .NONE, VISUAL PROCEDURES WERE USED. e. Structural repair — note appropriate line: NONE REQUIRED. BUILDING IS IN GOOD CONDITIONS. OWNER MAINTAINS WELL THE BUILDING AND NO DETERIORATED OR DAMAGED CONDITIONS WERE OBSERVED. Required: N/A 2. Required (describe and indicate acceptance) Supporting data a. WRITTEN DATA 17 sheets written data b. Photographs WERE TAKEN. c. NONE drawings or sketches 5. Masonry Bearing Walls — indicate good, fair, poor. GOOD a. Concrete masonry units: GOOD b. Clay the or terra cotta units: NONE c. Reinforced concrete tie columns: GOOD d. Reinforced concrete tie beams: GOOD e. Lintels GOOD 1'. Other type bond beams: N/A g. Masonry finishes ---exterior: 1. Stucco: GOOD CONDITIONS 2. Veneer: N/A 3. Paint only: GOOD CONDITIONS 4. Other (describe): N/A h. Masonry finishes — interior I . Vapor barrier: N/A 2. Furring and plaster: PLASTER IN GOOD CONDITIONS 3. Panelling: N/A 4. Paint only: GOOD CONDITIONS 5. Other (describe): N/A i. CRACKS a. Location - note beams, columns, other: b. Description: NONE. NO CRACKS WERE OBSERVED j. Spalling: a. Location - note beams, columns, other: b. Description NONE. NO SPALLING WERE OBSERVED k. Rebar corrosion -check appropriate line I. None visible: NONE 2. Minor - patching will suffice: N/A 3. Significant - but patching will suffice: N/A 4. Significant— structural repairs required: N/A (Describe) NONE I. Samples chipped put for examination in spall areas 1. No. Not required, as no spalled areas were encountered. Building is well maintained 2. Yes - describe color texture, aggregate, general quality: 6. Floor and Roof Systems a. Roof: Hip Roof, Prefab Trusses, w/ wood plank decking and tiles, slope 3 "-12" in good conditions. (Insulation and wear course are in good conditions) Good Conditions Building is well maintained Describe (flat. slope. Type roofing, type roof deck, condition) Hip Roqf, Prefab Trusses, w/wood plank decking and tiles, slope 3"-12" in good conditions. (Insulation and wear course are in good conditions) Good Conditions Building is well maintained 2. Note water tanks, cooling towers, air conditioning equipment, signs, other heavy equipment and condition of supports: No roof mounted equipment 3. Note type of drains and scuppers and conditions: Hip Roqf has a 3"-12" slope No scuppers or drains needed. Building drains naturally. In good condition Floor Systems Describe (type of system framing, materials, spans, condition) Existing floors are: (First Story) Slab on grade Concrete Slab 4", with cast terrazzo finish. Good Conditions e. Inspection - note exposed areas available for inspection, and where it was found necessary to open ceilings, etc. for inspection of typical fi•aming members. Roof'and Walls are exposed to view and Attic access scuttles were used to observe existing building components. 7. Steel Framing Systems NONE APPLICABLE a. Description: N/A b. Exposed Steel - describe condition of paint & degree of corrosion: N/A NONE APPLICABLE c. Concrete or other fireproofing - note any cracking or spalling, and note where any covering was removed for inspection: N/A N/A d. Elevator: N/A CONCRETE FRAMING SYSTEM a. Full Description Load Bearing CBS walls with Concrete Tie Beams, Concrete Tie Columns in Good Conditions Cracking: NONE l . Not significant: N/A 2. Location of description of members affected and type cracking: N/A No cracking or Spalling was observed. c. General condition: GOOD Good. Building is well maintained by owner. Concrete Tie Beams, Columns and walls are in Good Conditions. d. Rebar corrosion: NONE VISIBLE 1. None Visible (X) 2. Location and description of affected members: N/A 3. Signiticant but patching will suffice: NONE: N/A 4. Significant - structural repairs required (describe): NONE: N/A e. Samples chipped out in spall areas: I. No, X 2. Yes: describe color, texture, and aggregate, general quality Not required, as no sl)alled areas or condition were encountered. Building is well maintained 9. WINDOWS a. Type (Wood, steel, alLlnllnLllll, single hung, double hung, casement, awning, pivoted, fixed, other) Aluminum and Glass awning type b. Anchorage - type & condition of fasteners and latches: GOOD: Concrete Screws/Original fasteners are in fair to good conditions, windows are operable from the inside of the unit. Sealants - type & condition of perimeter sealants & at mullions: GOOD. CA ULKING IS IN GOOD CONDITIONS d. interior Seals: GOOD. GOOD CONDITIONS e. General condition: Existing windows and doors are in good conditions and appear to be weather tight 10. WOOD FRAMING a. Type - fully describe if mill construction, light construction, major spans, trusses: Interior Partitions are wood, existing roof is framed w/pr(fab wood trusses w/s/)an 25 ft. Existing framing, Trusses are In Good Conditions. Existing stucco and plaster walls finish is in good conditions. Walls are well painted and there are no visible cracks. Interior partitions are wood. Existing framing is in good conditions. Existing plaster walls are well painted and there are no cracks or exposure to moisture. Good Conditions b. Note metal fittings i.e., angles, plates, bolts, other, and note condition: Metal fasteners observed are in good conditions c. Joints - note if well fitted and still closed: No damage forms were observed d. Drainage - note accumulations of moisture: No accumulation of moisture was observed e. Ventilation - note any concealed spaces not ventilated: Attic Spaces are well ventilated, vents are properly screened are free of obstruction. f. Note any concealed spaces opened for inspection: N/A INSPECTION PROCEDURE FOR BUILDING ELECTRICAL INSPECTION 1. ELECTRICAL SERVICE I. SIZE, AMPERAGE: 300AMPS 2. PHASE: SINGLE 3. CONDITION: GOOD FUSES BREAKER YES NEEDS REPAIR: NONE, SERVICE IN GOOD CONDITIONS 4. Comments: ELECTRIC SERVICE IS IN GOOD CONDITIONS. THERE ARE 6 METERS AND 6 (60 AMP) MAIN DISCONNECT (ONE FOR EACH UNIT IN THE BUILDING) 2. METER AND ELECTRIC ROOMS 1. CLEARANCES: GOOD COMMENTS: ELECTRIC SERVICE IS IN GOOD CONDITIONS. METER (ELECTRIC) ROOM IS LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. IT IS IN CLEANAND GOOD CONDITIONS SERVICE EQUIPMENT GOOD CONDITION 3. GUTTERS: GOOD 1. LOCATION: ELECTRIC ROOM 2. CONDITION: GOOD 3. REQUIRES CORRECTION: NONE 4. TAP AND FILLS: GOOD 5. CONDITION: GOOD 6. REQUIRES CORRECTION: NONE 4. ELECTRICAL PANELS 1. LOCATION: ALL ARE LOCATED (1-6) IN THE ICITCHENAREA. 2. CONDITION: ELECTRICAL PANELS ARE IN GOOD CONDITIONS AND LABELED 3. NEEDS REPAIR: NONE 5. BRANCH CIRCUITS: 1. IDENTIFIED: YES 2. CONDUCTORS: GOOD 3. COMMENTS: IN GOOD CONDITIONS 4. MUST BE REPLACED: NONE 6. GROUNDING OF SERVICE: GOOD CONDITIONS REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 7. GROUNDING OF EQUIPMENT: GOOD CONDITIONS REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 8. SERVICE CONDUIT RACEWAYS: GOOD CONDITIONS REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 9. SERVICE CONDUCTORS AND CABLES CONDITION: GOOD. ELECTRICAL SERVICE IS IN GOOD CONDITIONS. REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 10. TYPES OF WIRING METHODS CONDUIT RACEWAYS: (EMT BRANCH CIRCUITS) GOOD CONDITIONS REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE CONDUIT RMT: SUBFEEDERS. CONDITION: GOOD CONDITIONS REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 11, FEEDER CONDUCTORS: GOOD CONDITIONS REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 12. EMERGENCY LIGTHS: NIA FIRST STORY: NONE, APT. UNITS OPEN DIRECTLY TO THE OUTSIDE CONDITION: NIA REPAIRS REQUIRED: NIA 13. BUILDING EGRESS ILLUMINATION: GOOD CONDITIONS REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 14: FIRE ALARM SYSTEM: NIA CONDITION: NIA REPAIRS REQUIRED: NIA 15. SMOKE DETECTORS: YES CONDITION: GOOD REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE THERE ARE SMOICE DETECTORS IN THE BEDROOMAND OUTSIDE BEDROOM. IN GOOD CONDITIONS 16. EXIT LIGHT: N/A CONDITION: N/A REPAIRS REQUIRED: N/A NONE, APT. UNITS OPEN DIRECTLY TO THE OUTSIDE 17. EMERGENCY GENERATOR: NONE CONDITION: N/A REPAIRS REQUIRED: N/A 18. WIRING OPENED OR UNDERCOVER PARKING GARAGE AREAS: YES CONDITION: GOOD CONDITIONS REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 19. OPEN OR UNDERCOVER PARKING SURFACE AND SECURITY LIGHTING: YES CONDITION: GOOD CONDITIONS ILLUMINATION REQUIRED: NONE 20, SWIMMING POOL WIRING: N/A CONDITION: NA REPAIRS REQUIRED: NA 21. WIRING OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT: GOOD CONDITIONS CONDITION: GOOD REPAIRS REQUIRED: NONE 22. GENERAL ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IS IN GOOD CONDITION. NO REPAIR S NEEDED. BUILDING ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IS WELL MAINTAINED. I 4rel L . OFF - I , sue• �� As indicated by the attached report the building is structurally, electrically and mechanically safe for continued used and occupancy, as noted in the report. "As a routine matter, in the order to avoid possible misunderstanding, nothing in the report should be construed directly or indirectly as a guarantee for any portion of this structure. To the best of my knowledge and ability, this report represents an accurate evaluation of observed conditions, to the extent reasonably possible. Sincerely, Leandro Espinosa, P.E. Flori`I P.E. NO. 60066 LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E ENGINEERING, RG No 60066 459 EAST 56" STREET, SUITE 101 Office: 786-553-5611 Fax: 305-687-5408 Letter of Compliance t'or the 40-Year or Older Recertification Date: 3/5/18 Building Official CITY OF Miami Shores Village Building Department 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Building Department/40 Year Re -Certification Dear Building Official: V/ In accordance with Section §8-11(f) of the Code of Miami -Dade County, I have performed an inspection of the building located 9050 NE 8 AVE, MIAMI SHORES, Fl, 33138-3283 and determined the building is structurally and electrically safe for continued use under present occupancy. Bldg. No.: 2 The findings of my inspection are surnmarized in this written report that follows the Minimum Inspection Procedural Guidelines for Building Recertification. This report does not preclude the building from subsequent inspections as deemed necessary by the Building Official. To avoid possible misunderstanding, nothing in this report should be construed directly or indirectly as a guarantee for any portion of the structHre. To the best of my knowledge and ability, this report represents an accurate appraisal of the present condition of the building based upon careful evalu?tion of observed conditions, to the extent reasonably possible. Should you have any questions concerning this report, please contact LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E RG No 60066 Tel: 786-553-5611 ResPectfully, Lean(, rc Espinosa �I � LEANDRO ESPINOSA, P.E. Fax: 305-687-5408 Office: 786-553-5611 March. 5, 2018 Building Official CITY OF Miami Shores Village Building Department 10050 N.E.2nd Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33138 Building Department/40 Year Re -Certification Owner: VERONA APARTMENTS MGMT INC `Y0 CRISTOBAL GIL. RE: Recertification of Building and Structures in existence for 40 years or longer. Ordinance 8-1 1 Dear Building official: The undersigned has been commissioned by the owner to inspect for the Recertification of a building at: OWNER: VERONA APARTME.NI'S MGM'1' INC % CRISTOBAL OIL ADDRESS: 9050 NE 8 AVE, MIAMI SHORES, FL 33138-3283 FOLIO #: 11-3206-011-0020 PRIMARY ZONE: 3000 MULTI -FAMILY - GENERAL CLUC: 0303 MULTIFAMILY 10 UNITS PLUS: MULTIFAMILY 3 OR MORE [JNITS BUILDING #: 2 USE: Commercial/Multifamily RESIDENTIAL Apartment Building-10 units LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ASBLIRY PARK PB 4-110 LOT 3 LOTSIZE 109.300 X 290 OR 21 197-1 186 Legal: See attached report. As indicated by the attached report the building is structurally and electrically safe for continued used and occupancy, as noted in the report. "As a routine matter, in the order to avoid possible misunderstanding, nothing in the report should be construed directly or indirectly as a guarantee for any portion of this structure. To the best of my knowledge and ability, this report represents an accurate evaluation of observed conditions, to the extent reasonably possible. Sincerely, Leandro Espinosa, P.E. Florida RE NO. 60066 3 �6