2021-05-04 MINUTES1
MEETING MINUTES
MAY 4, 2021 6:30 PM LAWTON MCCALL
COMMUNITY CENTER
1) CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Harris called the meeting to order at 6:34 PM.
2) MOMENT OF SILENCE / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Harris called to mind the passing of Mr. Sid Reese who served as a Planning & Zoning board
member for many years.
3) ROLL CALL
PRESENT: (5)
Councilmember Alice Burch
Councilmember Katia Saint Fleur
Councilmember Crystal Wagar
Vice Mayor Daniel Marinberg
Mayor Sandra Harris
ALSO PRESENT:
Village Attorney Richard Sarafan
Village Manager Tom Benton
Village Clerk Ysabely Rodriguez
4) PRESENTATIONS
4.A INTRODUCTION AND SALUTATIONS FROM THE OFFICE OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY
MAYOR DANIELLA LEVINE CAVA.
Seeing no one present from Mayor Levine Cava's Office, Mayor Harris proceeded to the next item on
the agenda.
Vice Mayor Marinberg requested for Item 10D to be moved to the beginning of the meeting in light of
the item’s relevance to the public comment segment of the agenda.
5) PUBLIC COMMENTS
2
In light of the numerous eComments (81) that were received, the Village Council chose to forgo the
reading of eComments into the record in the interest of time. However, such comments were circulated
to the Village Council prior to the meeting and are attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Mayor Harris opened the floor to in person public comments.
Robert Menge welcomed the newly elected body and spoke about Item 10D.
Ethan Grossman thanked the Village Council for bringing forth the item concerning the menorah at Village
Hall.
Dan Kerr spoke in favor of a hybrid public comment system and suggested the Village Council consider
opening the Police Retirement Pension Board civilian vacancies to qualified residents as opposed to
appointing existing Councilmembers.
Christian Ulvert congratulated the new Village Council and spoke in support of Pride Month and the
placement of a menorah at Village Hall.
Melissa Netkin spoke in support of the placement of a menorah at Village Hall.
Bryan Crawford spoke in support of the placement of a menorah at Village Hall.
Dynise Perry spoke about an incident involving a day worker for the Public Works Department who
allegedly pulled a gun on an employee. Consequently, she asked the Village Council to investigate the
recruitment process for day workers.
Julio Martinez spoke in support of Item 10A.
Rabbi Asher Sossonko thanked the newly elected body and spoke in support of Item 10A.
Dennis Leyva thanked Councilmember Burch for reminding residents to provide comments regarding the
various agenda items. He further thanked Councilmember Wagar for bringing forth Items 10A and 10B.
Clark Reynolds spoke in support of Haitian Heritage Month.
Al Crespo congratulated the newly elected officials and suggested the Village Council consider opening
item-specific public comments after the public has had an opportunity to hear the Council’s discussion of
such item. He further asked the Village Council permit him to provide item-specific public comments
concerning Item 10H.
6) APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
6.A APPROVAL OF THE APRIL 20, 2021 VILLAGE COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES.
Councilwoman Burch moved the approval of the April 20, 2021 Village Council Meeting minutes and the
motion was seconded by Councilmember Wagar. The motion passed unanimously.
3
7) ORDINANCE(S) ON FIRST READING
7.A AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 6, “BUILDINGS AND BUILDING
REGULATIONS”, SECTION 6-10. (c); TO UPDATE THE DEFINITION OF “SUBSTANTIAL
IMPROVEMENT” PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY AND AN
EFFECTIVE DATE (STAFF: PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR).
Ms. Rodriguez read the caption of the ordinance into the record.
Mr. Kendall, Planning & Zoning Director, provided an explanation of the proposed amendment which is
intended to assist applicants who have encountered significant challenges renovating their homes as a
result of a substantial improvement determination when the value of the proposed improvement equals
or is greater than fifty percent (50%) of the value of the structure.
Responding to individual Councilmember’s questions,
- Mr. Kendall explained the definition of reasonable refers to improvements that equal or are less than
forty-nine percent (49%) of the value of the structure.
- Mr. Kendall stated all appraisals of applications are conducted by third parties.
- Mr. Kendall further mentioned the proposed amendment would elicit additional permits should the
applicant choose to forgo renovations under the one master permit. Mr. Kendall explained the item is
intended to provide an avenue of relief for those applicants who have encountered challenges with
the current definition of substantial improvements.
Mayor Wagar moved the approval of the ordinance on first reading and the motion was seconded by
Councilmember Burch.
Vice Mayor Marinberg asked the Village Attorney to review the combination of projects section of the
proposed ordinance before second reading.
There being no further discussion, Mayor Harris called the question and the motion carried a 5-0 voice
vote.
8) RESOLUTION(S)
8.A A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE, FLORIDA,
AUTHORIZING THE CURRENT MAYOR TO BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE PRIOR MAYOR, AS
SIGNATORY FOR APPLICABLE VILLAGE BANK ACCOUNTS, AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE (STAFF: FINANCE DIRECTOR).
The Village Clerk read the caption of the resolution into the record.
Mr. Benton indicated the housekeeping nature of the item and recommended approval.
Councilmember Burch moved to approve the resolution and the motion was seconded by Vice Mayor
Marinberg.
There being no further discussion, Mayor Harris called the question and the motion carried a 5-0 voice
vote.
9) VILLAGE COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS
4
9.A APPOINTMENT OF ONE COUNCIL MEMBER TO THE GENERAL EMPLOYEE PENSION
BOARD.
Vice Mayor Marinberg moved to appoint Councilmember Burch to the General Employee Pension Board.
Councilmember Wagar seconded the motion which carried a 5-0 voice vote.
9.B APPOINTMENT OF TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS TO THE POLICE RETIREMENT PENSION
BOARD.
Vice Mayor Marinberg moved to direct the Village Clerk to open the two ex-officio (civilian) Police
Retirement Pension Board vacancies to qualified Village residents and for the Village Clerk to present
such applications to the Council for consideration in the month of June. Mayor Harris seconded the motion
which carried a 5-0 voice vote.
Due to dual office holding provisions that may conflict with Councilmember Burch’s current service on
the Police Retirement Pension Board, Councilmember Saint Fleur was temporarily appointed to
the General Employee Board until the two vacancies on the Police Retirement Pension Board
have been filled.
9.C APPOINTMENT OF A COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE AND AN ALTERNATE
REPRESENTATIVE TO THE MIAMI-DADE LEAGUE OF CITIES.
Vice Mayor Marinberg moved to appoint Mayor Harris to the Miami-Dade League of Cities.
Councilmember Wagar seconded the motion which carried a 5-0 voice vote. Mayor Harris moved
to appoint Vice Mayor Marinberg as an alternate representative to the Miami-Dade League of
Cities. The motion was seconded Councilmember Wagar which carried a 5-0 voice vote.
9.D APPOINTMENT OF A COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE TO THE FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES.
Councilmember Wagar moved to appoint Councilmember Saint Fleur as council representative to the
Florida League of Cities and directed the Village Manager to allocate additional funding for the entire
Council to attend meetings/conferences for the Miami-Dade League of Cities and Florida League of
Cities. The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Marinberg which carried a 5-0 voice vote.
9.E APPOINTMENT OF A COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE TO THE GREEN CORRIDOR DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
Councilmember Wagar moved to appoint Councilmember Burch to the Green Corridor District
Board of Directors. Vice Mayor Marinberg seconded the motion which carried a 5-0 voice vote.
10)DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS
10.A DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING PLACEMENT OF HANUKKAH
MENORAH AT VILLAGE HALL (SPONSORED BY: COUNCILMEMBER CRYSTAL WAGAR).
Councilmember Wagar provided opening remarks and recommended approval of the item.
Councilmember Saint Fleur moved to approve the placement of Hanukkah Menorah at Village Hall. The
motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Marinberg and the vote passed unanimously in favor of the
motion.
5
There was no further discussion regarding the item.
10.B DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE CELEBRATION OF JUNE 2021 PRIDE
MONTH (SPONSORED BY: COUNCILMEMBER CRYSTAL WAGAR).
Councilmember Wagar provided opening remarks and recommended approval of the item in recognition
of the LGBTQ+ community. Councilmember Wagar further requested for staff to contact neighboring
municipalities to determine the cost of pride flags to adorn NE 2nd Avenue and for staff to bring forth
such numbers for Council consideration. Councilmember Wagar further proposed for the Recreation
Department to plan an event in recognition of Pride Month.
Vice Mayor Marinberg moved to approve the celebration of Pride Month in June 2021 and directed staff
to research the costs associated with the celebration and purchase of pride flags for Council
consideration. The motion was seconded by Mayor Harris and the vote passed unanimously in favor of
the motion.
Councilmember Saint Fleur requested to co-sponsor the item.
There was no further discussion regarding the item.
10.C DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING CELEBRATION OF MAY 2021 HAITIAN
HERITAGE MONTH (SPONSORED BY: VICE MAYOR DANIEL MARINBERG.)
Vice Mayor Marinberg provided opening remarks and recommended approval of the item in recognition
of Haitian Heritage month and he further advocated for the recognition of Asian/Pacific Islander month
as well.
Councilmember Saint Fleur thanked Vice Mayor Marinberg for bringing the item forward given her Haitian
heritage and further pledged to work with staff to plan various forms of recognition that are cost efficient.
Councilmember Saint Fleur moved to approve the celebration of May 2021 Haitian Heritage Month as
well as Asian/Pacific Islander month and directed staff to organize celebration preparations. The motion
was seconded by Mayor Harris and the vote passed unanimously in favor of the motion.
There was no further discussion regarding the item.
10.D DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING PROCEDURE AND TIMING FOR PUBLIC
COMMENTS (SPONSORED BY: COUNCILMEMBER KATIA SAINT FLEUR; CO-SPONSORED BY:
VICE MAYOR DANIEL MARINBERG).
Councilmember Saint Fleur provided opening remarks, indicating the premise of the item which is based
on the feedback she received from residents during the campaign trail. Councilmember Saint Fleur
proposed that speakers shall each be limited to a presentation of two (2) minutes per agenda item; the
same limitation shall apply to open public comment at the beginning of the Council's agenda for the
meeting and to reduce the allotted time to speak for any comments offered after 9PM to one (1) minute
per person. Councilmember Saint Fleur further clarified the intent of the discussion item is to gauge the
views of fellow councilmembers regarding the item and to direct staff to research best practices and for
such findings to be brought forth for Council consideration in the form of a resolution.
Individual Councilmembers offered their respective position regarding public comment protocol and
restrictions, such as
6
- Public comment shall be permitted on all other matters that come before the Council for its
consideration, and for open public comment at the beginning of the Council’s agenda for the meeting.
- Item-specific public comment shall be restricted to discussion of matters relevant to the agenda item
then before the Council and such comments shall be limited to one comment per person for each
agenda item
- W hen a large number of the public wish to speak on an item, groups may be limited to one
representative per group per agenda item or may silently wave in support or in opposition of such
item(s) when the question is asked by the Presiding Officer;
- Any member of the public who wishes to provide public comments on agenda items that are
considered by the Village Council after 9PM, such public comment shall be limited to one (1) minute
per person for each agenda item.
- Any member of the public who wishes to engage in public comments may do so in person or via
eComments (electronic written comments), but not both;
- The deadline to submit eComments should allow the Councilmembers sufficient time to review such
comments.
- eComments provided by any member of the public who remains anonymous will not be read into the
record, but will be circulated to the Village Council and retained as part of the official record.
By way of consensus, the Village Council directed staff to research best practices regarding public
comments and for such findings, including the views presented at the meeting, to be presented in the
form of a resolution for Council consideration.
There was no further discussion regarding the item.
10.E DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING REVISIONS TO ORDINANCES TO
INCLUDE PROTECTIONS FOR SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY
(SPONSORED BY: VICE MAYOR DANIEL MARINBERG).
Vice Mayor Marinberg provided opening remarks, indicating the municipal equality index for the Village
on the Human Rights Campaign Scorecard is 82 out of 100 because the Village does not provide
protections for sexual orientation and gender identity in the Village Code of Ordinances. Therefore, Vice
Mayor Marinberg asked the Village Council to consider directing the Village Attorney to prepare an
ordinance providing for such protections.
Councilmember Wagar moved to direct the Village Attorney to prepare an ordinance providing for
protections regarding sexual orientation and gender identity and for such ordinance to be brought forth
for Council consideration. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Burch and the vote passed
unanimously in favor of the motion.
Councilmember Burch mentioned the importance of the Village Attorney researching the Special
Magistrate section of the Village of Pinecrest ordinance.
There was no further discussion regarding the item.
10.F DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING CHARTER REVISION PROCESS &
PROCEDURES (SPONSORED BY: COUNCILMEMBER CRYSTAL WAGAR).
7
Councilmember Wagar provided opening remarks and sought guidance from the Village Attorney with
respect to the procedures to amend the Village Charter and how long that review must take.
Responding to Councilmember Wagar’s inquiry, Mr. Sarafan provided an explanation of the Charter
amendment process and procedures in accordance with Village Code Section 2-33 which speaks to the
Charter Revision Committee as well as the timeline that governs charter amendments. Mr. Sarafan also
clarified since such provisions are outlined in the Village Code of Ordinances and not the Village Charter,
the Village Council may amend such process by way of ordinance if it’s the pleasure of the Village
Council.
The Village Council, by way of consensus, directed the Village Attorney to prepare a memorandum
concerning Charter amendment process and procedure options along with supporting documentation
of the governing documents that provide for said revisions and for such documents to be brought forth
for Council consideration.
There was no further discussion regarding the item.
10.G DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING FEMA PROPOSED CHANGES TO
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS (FIRMS) (SPONSORED BY: VICE MAYOR DANIEL
MARINBERG).
Vice Mayor Marinberg provided opening remarks and explained that he placed the item on the agenda
in light of the proposed changes to the Flood Insurance Rate Maps and given the approaching 90 day
deadline for municipalities to appeal such changes.
Mr. Kendall provided an update on the proposed changes to FIRMs and mentioned the appeal process
has not started according to FEMA. Mr. Kendall informed the Village Council that in order to appeal the
proposed data, the Village would have to engage the professional services of an engineer to analyze and
certify any flaws or errors in the data.
Responding to the Village Council regarding what it would take for the Village to achieve a Level 5 or
less CRS rating, Mr. Kendall indicated, once the review is conducted, the Village would have a better
idea as to what it would take to get to a lower CRS rating. Vice Mayor Marinberg proposed looking at
the City of Miami Beach to determine how they achieved level 5 CRS rating and to provide information
on how risk rating 2.0 works and its implementation period.
10.H DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING ALLEGATIONS OF CONFLICT OF
INTEREST REGARDING MIAMI SHORES CHIEF OF POLICE AND ADVANTAGE LAW
ENFORCEMENT COMPLIANCE INC. / ADVANTAGE NETWORKING, INC (SPONSORED:
COUNCILMEMBER CRYSTAL WAGAR; CO-SPONSORED: MAYOR SANDRA HARRIS.)
Councilmember Wagar provided opening remarks regarding the memo drafted by the Village’s labor
attorney, Mr. Leonard Carson, and posed various procedural questions regarding the Village’s
procurement/contract administration process. Councilmember Wagar further indicated the crux of the
item is about transparency and accountability.
Chief Lystad answered questions raised by the Village Council regarding his employment agreement,
the extent of his involvement with the formation of Advantage Law Enforcement Compliance Inc. (ALEC),
vetting from the Village Manager and the labor attorney to pursue such endeavor, the filing requirement
for Outside Employment per Miami-Dade County code section 2-11.1(k)(2), among other questions.
8
Chief Lystad stated ALEC is a dormant company and should the Village Council find issue with his
involvement with ALEC, the president of the company is amenable to removing Chief Lystad from the
contract.
Individual Councilmembers thanked Chief Lystad for his dedicated service to Miami Shores Village.
Mr. Benton answered questions regarding the Village’s procurement process, the policy on outside
employment, and was asked to produce copies of the procurement ordinance and list of rollover
contracts.
The Village Clerk was asked to produce copies of the most recent Outside Employment Statements filed
with the Office of the Village Clerk.
Discussion ensued regarding the importance of transparency and accountability.
Mayor Harris expressed interest in settling the matter by referring the allegations to the State Attorney’s
Office or the Miami-Dade Commission on Ethics for an opinion.
Mayor Harris moved to direct the Village Attorney to request an opinion from the Miami-Dade
Commission on Ethics concerning the conflict of interest allegations involving Miami Shores Chief of
Police and Advantage Law Enforcement Compliance Inc and for Chief Lystad to step down from
ALEC. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Wagar and the vote passed unanimously in
favor of the motion.
There was no further discussion regarding the item.
11) ANNOUNCEMENTS
The Village Clerk read the announcements into the record.
12) VILLAGE COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Burch spoke about the importance of Councilmembers providing a memo as back-up to
the agenda item(s) for the purpose of detailing the premise of the item.
Councilmember Saint Fleur thanked everyone for attending the meeting, spoke about the importance of
the Council asking questions when matters arise and for those questions to be addressed promptly to
avoid speculation. She further announced Mr. Benton’s retirement from the Village and thanked him for
his service. Lastly, in light of Mr. Benton’s resignation, Councilmember Saint Fleur moved for a special
meeting to be held on Thursday May, 6, 2021 at 6:30 PM (9900 NE 2nd Avenue). The motion was
seconded by Vice Mayor Marinberg, and the vote passed unanimously in favor of the motion.
Councilmember Wagar thanked Mr. Benton for his service and echoed the sentiments of her colleagues
with respect to receiving answers to questions.
Vice Mayor Marinberg spoke about the interpersonal dynamics associated with working as a new
collective body, understanding the various views of residents, and maintaining respect for differing
perspectives.
Mayor Harris thanked Mr. Benton for his service and apologized to anyone who may have taken offense
to any of her comments during the meeting.
13) ADJOURNMENT
9
There being no further business before the Village Council, the meeting adjourned at 9:18 PM.
Village Council
Meeting Time: 05-04-21 18:30
eComments Report
Meetings Meeting
Time
Agenda
Items
Comments Support Oppose Neutral
Village Council 05-04-21
18:30
30 80 54 12 7
Sentiments for All Meetings
The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented
will be shown.
Overall Sentiment
EXHIBIT A
Village Council
05-04-21 18:30
Agenda Name Comments Support Oppose Neutral
5) PUBLIC COMMENTS 27 26 0 0
7.A) AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MIAMI SHORES
VILLAGE, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,
CHAPTER 6, “BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS”, SECTION
6-10. (c); TO UPDATE THE DEFINITION OF “SUBSTANTIAL
IMPROVEMENT” PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, CODIFICATION,
SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE (STAFF: PLANNING &
ZONING DIRECTOR).
2 1 0 0
9.E) APPOINTMENT OF A COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE TO THE
GREEN CORRIDOR DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
2 2 0 0
10.A) DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING
PLACEMENT OF HANUKKAH MENORAH AT VILLAGE HALL
(SPONSORED BY: COUNCILMEMBER CRYSTAL WAGAR).
9 7 1 1
10.B) DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE
CELEBRATION OF JUNE 2021 PRIDE MONTH (SPONSORED BY:
COUNCILMEMBER CRYSTAL WAGAR).
5 2 2 1
10.C) DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING CELEBRATION
OF MAY 2021 HAITIAN HERITAGE MONTH (SPONSORED BY: VICE
MAYOR DANIEL MARINBERG.)
6 4 0 2
10.D) DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING PROCEDURE
AND TIMING FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS (SPONSORED BY:
COUNCILMEMBER KATIA SAINT FLEUR; CO-SPONSORED BY: VICE
MAYOR DANIEL MARINBERG).
3 2 0 1
10.E) DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING REVISIONS
TO ORDINANCES TO INCLUDE PROTECTIONS FOR SEXUAL
ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY (SPONSORED BY: VICE
MAYOR DANIEL MARINBERG).
3 1 2 0
10.F) DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING CHARTER
REVISION PROCESS & PROCEDURES (SPONSORED BY:
COUNCILMEMBER CRYSTAL WAGAR).
1 1 0 0
10.G) DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING FEMA
PROPOSED CHANGES TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS (FIRMS)
(SPONSORED BY: VICE MAYOR DANIEL MARINBERG).
1 1 0 0
10.H) DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING ALLEGATIONS
OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST REGARDING MIAMI SHORES CHIEF OF
POLICE AND ADVANTAGE LAW ENFORCEMENT COMPLIANCE INC. /
ADVANTAGE NETWORKING, INC (SPONSORED: COUNCILMEMBER
CRYSTAL WAGAR; CO-SPONSORED: MAYOR SANDRA HARRIS.)
21 7 7 2
Sentiments for All Agenda Items
The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented
will be shown.
Overall Sentiment
Agenda Item: eComments for 5) PUBLIC COMMENTS
Overall Sentiment
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 4:19pm 05-04-21
Regarding the replacement of the Sea Wall at Bayfront Park:
Good evening Mayor Harris and members of the Village Council. My name is Patrice Gillespie Smith. I live at 358
NE 101st Street. Thank you to Councilmember Burch and the Village staff for pursuing a FIND grant to replace
the seawall at Bayfront Park. There is no doubt that the livelihood of this Village is reliant upon our ability to
protect ourselves against sea level rise. We appreciate the Village's foresight to find a solution for our aging
seawall before it was to late and securing a $1 million grant. This is $1 million less that the homeowners will have
to pay through property taxes. It is an added bonus that the residents will be able to enjoy a kayak launch. I
encourage everyone to kayak out on the bay, as you will see first hand why it is so important that we save it. If
residents are worried about the crowds, I strongly suggest the Village invest in a pay by phone parking system,
which will keep crowds measured. Pay by phone could not only generate some revenue for the Village (maybe
that could be earmarked for cleaning up the Bay?), but it can also control how long people stay at the park. The
Village is so fortunate to have public space right on Biscayne Bay and this space has been operated for the public
for decades. Let's continue to support this vital community asset and remember it is a park for ALL to enjoy.
Thank you so much for all of your work to keep our community resilient!
Mari-Jamille Decker Alimard
Location:
Submitted At: 10:24am 05-04-21
Among the MANY benefits of adding a local kayak launch would be to encourage healthy physical activity, to
create a safer way to socialize during this pandemic which in turn would relieve stress and promote a happier
and closer-knit community, and most importantly would create further appreciation for our neighborhood.
My children and I walk the beach to pick up trash to help keep our planet beautiful.
Kayakers would be able to use our kayaks to clean our shoreline thereby creating more pride in our neighborhood
and making the Shores even more beautiful!
PLEASE PLEASE allow us to have this amazing benefit right here in our neighborhood. Thank you so much!
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 9:49am 05-04-21
Seng Lam, MSV resident.
I am writing in reference to my support for public access to the waterfront in Miami Shores for kayaks/canoes/ and
paddle boards. Part of the beauty and appeal of living in Miami “Shores” Village is its location on Biscayne Bay. It
only makes sense that our residents have access to the bay that is part of our namesake. Personal non-
motorized watercraft pose no major safety threats nor do they present a negative impact to the surrounding
residential area. There is absolutely a demand from our residents and usage of this access would justify its
existence.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 9:47am 05-04-21
I am writing in reference to my support for public access to the waterfront in Miami Shores for kayaks/canoes/ and
paddle boards. Part of the beauty and appeal of living in Miami “Shores” Village is its location on Biscayne Bay. It
only makes sense that our residents have access to the bay that is part of our namesake. Personal non-
motorized watercraft pose no major safety threats nor do they present a negative impact to the surrounding
residential area. There is absolutely a demand from our residents and usage of this access would justify its
existence.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 9:01am 05-04-21
Keith Freiman
9876 NE 12 ave.
Great addition for our community to stay healthy. We have tennis a amazing Rex center
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 3:52am 05-04-21
I truly don’t believe the kayak launch is going to be the debacle everyone thinks it will be. Having said that, for me
it would be a positive. It would be so nice to be able to launch close to home!!
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 11:18pm 05-03-21
Eric Cheng. Miami Shores. I support the Kayak Launch at Bay front Park.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 5:24pm 05-03-21
Dear Council Members, I'm writing in support of the proposed seawall with kayak ramp at our park on the bay. As
a long-time resident of Miami Shores, I find the park on the bay is under utilized, and it would be ideal to have a
neighborhood location (that already exists) to launch my paddleboards. It is extremely important for us to protect
our community from storm surges and impending threats of sea-level rise. In addition, it is financially irresponsible
not to accept a grant to support the building of this sea wall -- knowing very well the climate threats we face. If I
need to do anything else on my end to support this plan, please advise.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 2:28pm 05-03-21
Upon reviewing attorney Carson's informational letter, it states Chief Lystad addressed the
conflict of interest' issue head-on when negotiating his current contract with the Village.
In addition, the letter states the Chief has received no compensation which also exonerates his culpability and
exhibits his loyalty and service to the Village. The Chief has led the department well since assuming his role and
responds quickly to residents issues and the village's changing needs. This is evidenced by the recently installed
cameras and the addition of speed bumps on problem streets.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 2:23pm 05-03-21
Council:
We are a family of 5 living in the Central Shores. Our whole family loves to kayak, so much so that our kids have
their own kid-sized kayaks. It is a way for us to have family time, exercising and having fun out on the water. We
strongly support the kayak ramp into the bay in our neighborhood. It would be so much easier for the residents
(us included) to launch their kayaks/canoes from our neighborhood rather than having to cart them to North
Miami, North Miami Beach, Oleta, or Morningside.
- The Tims Family
Karen Smith-Gulaskey
Location:
Submitted At: 12:43pm 05-03-21
Karen Smith-Gulaskey and I support accepting the grant money to rebuild the seawall and other improvements at
Bayfront Park. I have lived in Miami Shores for 16 years and served on the Rec. Board for four years,
understanding how much our residents use and support all recreation facilities, including Bayfront Park. Please
pass and accept the grant money to repair the sea wall, along the bay. I walk along the bay, usually twice a day,
seeing old neighbors and meeting new villagers. Everyone is friendly and happy. Since I do not live on the water,
it is a peaceful, beautiful park enjoyed by many. In 16 years, I have never met a rude, mean, harmful or
disrespectful person in this park. The new sea wall will help protect our village and villagers from storm surges,
flooding and effects from other natural disasters. The council needs to focus on the big issue which is re-building
the sea wall. Also, railing improvements will protect our youngest residents (and all residents) from falling into the
bay. The kayak ramp represents 10% of this proposal and is getting 90% of the attention. The council needs to
accept this grant, fix the sea wall, and offer the residents who don't live on the water, a kayak ramp to enjoy the
view of our village beautiful, from the bay. Please pass this, accept the money, and repair the sea wall. Thank
you, and I look forward to working with you all to continue to keep our village beautiful. Thank you for accepting
this grant.
Alejandro Barreras
Location:
Submitted At: 10:09am 05-03-21
I'm writing to express my support for the proposed improvements to North Bayshore park, including the kayak
ramp. Many MSV residents enjoy kayaking in the bay, and many more would be encouraged to take up the
activity with easier access to the water.
Kayaking is inexpensive, healthy and environmentally-friendly. Kayakers won't cause disruption as it has been
suggested. The equipment is minimal and paddling is noiseless –boats and jetskis roaring by on the ICW make
much more noise. Many kayakers are families who want their kids to experience the physical benefits and
closeness to nature that the activity provides.
Biscayne Bay is one of our most precious natural resources but historically, and by design, access to it has been
restricted to those with the means to buy it. Not everyone can afford a boat, much less waterfront property. MSV
council should vote for inclusivity instead of restrictions, and encourage wider use by the whole community of the
precious few public spaces we have, especially North Bayshore park, which right now is underused. A community
that shares its resources is a stronger community. These improvements and the kayak launch will make the park
a more enjoyable asset for all residents.
Daniel Brady
Location:
Submitted At: 10:09am 05-03-21
Was unable to attend the public hearing on the kayak launch area a Bay Shore Drive and 95th Street. Let me tell
you I wholeheartedly support the development of the kayak launch project. It will provide access to Biscayne Bay
for Kayakers that is not available any place else in the village. It is shameful that a narrow range of residents
would like to deny access because they may find it “intrusive”. I live on 95th Street just west of 12th Avenue and
visit the park at the bay most days. I can assure that there is always plenty of parking with the limited exception
of people coming to the park in the early evening, usually to see the moon rise. Rise above the petty few who
wish to keep this beautify project from the rest of the residents and move forward with the project.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 9:42am 05-03-21
Dean Houlzet, 138 NW 109th Street, Miami Shores. I support having access to the bay via a Kayak ramp;
preferably parallel to the bay to avoid any possible drive downs. It could be used as access with Stand Up boards
as well for our neighborhood.
Andrea Lopez
Location:
Submitted At: 11:32pm 05-02-21
My family and I have a paddle board and kayak. We currently head down to the Pelican Marina on 79th Street
when we want to go out. I've always wished there was a closer and easier entry point, especially because I
would love to go at Sunrise. I currently jog from my house bto Bayfront park and it's my favorite place to be at
Sunrise and sunset. While it's inevitable that the ramp would bring additional cars, I don't think it would be
overwhelming as most people want to paddle in more popular areas of Biscayne Bay, close to sandbars and
islands.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 9:15pm 05-02-21
As a Miami Shores resident and kayaker with my own kayaks, I think the idea of a kayak launch in my community
is fantastic. Thank you to all who are championing this idea.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 8:56pm 05-02-21
In support
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 8:43pm 05-02-21
Awesome idea! If this is done we would definitely go and enjoy the outdoor scenery. Miami shores is a beautiful
place to spend the outdoors in. Getting something like this done can only encourage people to get out of their
house and enjoy the outdoors.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 8:41pm 05-02-21
I support the kayak launch
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 8:41pm 05-02-21
Hello I’m a Shores resident for 8 years and avid paddler. Would love to see a kayak launch here!!!
Deirdra FUncheon
Richard Kebrdle
Location:
Submitted At: 8:13pm 05-02-21
Both my wife and I support the kayak ramp. We have two young boys who love the outdoors, and having public
access to the bay and nature would be a unique addition to the Shores that would benefit all village residents.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 6:35pm 05-02-21
I think a kayak ramp would be a nice addition to the Bayfront Park. it shouldn’t take up too much space and is a
good way to give bay access to our residents. Kayakers don’t tend to be rowdy people. I too live next door to a
park and was glad that I supported the Farmer’s Market there pre-pandemic. The vendors were very nice and
didn’t make a lot of unnecessary noise. I think those who oppose will be pleasantly surprised at how little the
impact will be. Besides, the village needs that state money to counter the effects of sea level rise......
Rose Bordeaux
Location:
Submitted At: 6:29pm 05-02-21
Miami shores has this beautiful waterfront space, and those of us that kayak/paddle board have to go to other
communities to enjoy it. If you go to these other launch sites, they are not full of large amounts of people, no wild
partying and no trailers. Adding a non motorized launch to the area will only increase the reasons why Miami
Shores is a great place to live. The kayak ramp adds value to people who enjoy quiet relaxing family or solo time
on the water. It’s easy access for those who live here and also pay taxes.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 6:14pm 05-02-21
I'd love to be able to go to our village public park and go Kayaking. The funds will also make our public property
nicer, and without us spending any money. Win-Win. I am sympathetic with the neighbors that might look at this
as a threat to their life, but I don't think that the ramp will bring any problem. In any case, I do believe the changes
are to the benefit of the many, it's public property and it should be treated as such.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 3:50pm 05-02-21
I like the opportunity. Anyone complaining there’s no parking probably won’t park. The rest of us will see
solutions: friends drop us off, whatever. I promise not to leave any condoms, trash or smoke any weed while on
(or near) kayak launch.
John Ise
Location:
Submitted At: 12:33pm 05-02-21
I want to voice strong, strong support for the redevelopment of the seawall at Miami Shores Bayfront Park that
includes a kayak launch. This will be a terrific amenity for the community and bring value to the park.
susan ackley
Location:
Submitted At: 11:20am 04-29-21
The Miami Shores Fine Arts Commission invites Council Members and our community to an online ZOOM artist
presentation of our village's new mural's inspiration and creation. The event is 7PM, Thursday May 20th.
Everyone may register on Eventbrite, 'Miami Shores Mural'.
Agenda Item: eComments for 7.A) AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 6, “BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS”, SECTION 6-10. (c); TO
UPDATE THE DEFINITION OF “SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT” PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY
AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE (STAFF: PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR).
Overall Sentiment
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 3:34pm 05-04-21
This will make improvements to homes easier for residents without reducing permitting standards. Great solution
to this issue.
Pamela Michels
Location:
Submitted At: 10:53am 05-03-21
7A )I agree with Tom 8A) Agree 9) Agree 10A) Disagree Too expensive to challenge lawsuit. 10B/C) Disagree.
When you single out one special group you discriminate against another group with similar interests. Too
expensive. 10D) Agree. Please follow Councilwoman Burch's format and provide agenda with memos and an
easy format to respond. Select someone to tally results and report to council. Reflect results in minutes. 10E)
Housing discrimination.. Owners should have full discretion in selling or renting without facing expensive legal
allegations. 10F) Conflict of interest when council members appoint members to "charter revision committee"
Special elections are expensive. Only vote in general elections. 10G) Agree. Appeal FIRM 10H) Agree. NO
conflict of interest.
Agenda Item: eComments for 9.E) APPOINTMENT OF A COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE TO THE GREEN CORRIDOR DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
Overall Sentiment
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 5:17pm 05-04-21
Wendy Fleming Saltzburg Please appoint a council representative to the Green Corridor District Board of
Directors.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 9:49am 05-03-21
Village Council, please make a commitment to attend and fully participate on this board - it is a critical tool in your
efforts to confront and contain the impacts of sea-level rise and climate change on our village. Please let me
know if you want more background on Green Corridor PACE district (and Ygrene), I am here to help the next
representative get up to speed.
Sincerely, Sean Brady, Miami Shores, FL
Agenda Item: eComments for 10.A) DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING PLACEMENT OF HANUKKAH
MENORAH AT VILLAGE HALL (SPONSORED BY: COUNCILMEMBER CRYSTAL WAGAR).
Overall Sentiment
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 5:23pm 05-04-21
It's as symbolic as a Christmas Tree or many of the other displays shown during the "Christmas" holidays
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 5:19pm 05-04-21
This is an addition to our already beautiful light display in front of our village hall. It is not a Star of David, or a
Cross. It is a Menorah.
We should include all faiths that are represented in our community. Why are stronger together.
Dennis Leyva
Location:
Submitted At: 4:49pm 05-04-21
100% in support of placement of Hanukkah Menorah at Village Hall. The Village Attorney gave bad legal advise
to Council. Again, Miami Shores like with the non-binding gay marriage resolution shows it is NOT inclusive of its
residents and out of touch. Racist, homophobic and anti-semitic are words that describe Miami Shores past and
today!
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 4:05pm 05-04-21
If the village has any Christmas presentation at the village city hall. They should also be opened to other religious
presentations re: a menorah
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 3:32pm 05-04-21
Please allow the menorah to be place at Village Hall, as we now know, it is legal to do. Please do something
about the ineptitude of the city attorney who provided extremely dated, very incorrect legal council on this matter.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 3:00pm 05-04-21
What about a nativity scene as well?
Steven Dobie
Location:
Submitted At: 7:35am 05-03-21
I support this!
John Ise
Location:
Submitted At: 12:15pm 05-02-21
I would like to express opposition to any explicitly religious artifact placed on any Village (public) property. I fret if
a Menorah is allowed, then the Village will need to allow for a Christian crucifix, a Muslim crescent that leads to a
slippery slope that leads to who knows what. The Christmas tree and the Hanukkah dreidel are areligious
representations of Christmas and Hanukkah respectively, and that should suffice.
brian kronberg
Location:
Submitted At: 9:43am 05-01-21
Thank you Mayor and Council Members for bringing this item up for discussion. My family and I fully support
having a Menorah placed at Village Hall and believe that Miami Shores should welcome people of all races and
religion. If the City wants to display Christmas Trees and Christmas Lights at City Hall we fully support that but
think only right to have a Menorah as well. Miami Shores would not be the first City to have Christmas Trees and
Menorah on City property as it occurs throughout the United States. Thank you for taking this up and for your
support of equality for all Miami Shores residents.
Agenda Item: eComments for 10.B) DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE CELEBRATION OF JUNE 2021 PRIDE
MONTH (SPONSORED BY: COUNCILMEMBER CRYSTAL WAGAR).
Overall Sentiment
Dennis Leyva
Location:
Submitted At: 4:52pm 05-04-21
The Village of Miami Shores has one of the highest percentage of same-sex couples in United States. On our
block there are 10 households and 4 are same-sex married couples. Not only celebrate Pride Month have a Gay
flag flown at Village Hall.
Edward Quinton
Location:
Submitted At: 4:47pm 05-04-21
I would like the Council to consider a few things when discussing celebration of 2021 Pride Month and Haitian
Heritage Month.
1. Keep in mind as you discuss these matters and costs to the Village that we live in a very diverse community
and so it will become an expensive proposition for Miami Shores Village to spend money on “celebrating” multiple
monthly observances. There is also National Hispanic Heritage Month (Sept.), Black History Month (Feb.),
Jewish American Heritage Month (May) and Irish-American Heritage Month (March), to name only a few.
2. Many Shores residents would like the Council to focus on holding some of the community-wide prior events
such as Unity Day and Plaza 98.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 3:29pm 05-04-21
Alice, I am opposed to celebration of June 2021 Pride Month.
Jerome Hurtak, 533 Grand Concourse
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 2:31pm 05-04-21
I support sexual freedom, but do not see the need to celebrate it. Sexuality is a personal choice, and should be
kept as such.
Steven Dobie
Location:
Submitted At: 7:36am 05-03-21
Obviously I support this!
Agenda Item: eComments for 10.C) DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING CELEBRATION OF MAY 2021 HAITIAN
HERITAGE MONTH (SPONSORED BY: VICE MAYOR DANIEL MARINBERG.)
Overall Sentiment
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 5:21pm 05-04-21
May be too late to begin a Haitian Celebration for May of 2021, but again I am all in favor of celebrating our
diversity. Miami Shores has grown.
We are a reflection of different origins that live together peacefully. That is what we should be proud of.
Dennis Leyva
Location:
Submitted At: 4:55pm 05-04-21
The Village needs to embrace and honor its diversity.
Edward Quinton
Location:
Submitted At: 4:48pm 05-04-21
I would like the Council to consider a few things when discussing celebration of 2021 Pride Month and Haitian
Heritage Month.
1. Keep in mind as you discuss these matters and costs to the Village that we live in a very diverse community
and so it will become an expensive proposition for Miami Shores Village to spend money on “celebrating” multiple
monthly observances. There is also National Hispanic Heritage Month (Sept.), Black History Month (Feb.),
Jewish American Heritage Month (May) and Irish-American Heritage Month (March), to name only a few.
2. Many Shores residents would like the Council to focus on holding some of the community-wide prior events
such as Unity Day and Plaza 98.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 2:59pm 05-04-21
What about A Cuban Pride celebration? Can that be done in June?
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 11:17pm 05-03-21
Eric Cheng Miami Shores. Please note May is also Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month.
Steven Dobie
Location:
Submitted At: 7:36am 05-03-21
I support this!
Agenda Item: eComments for 10.D) DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING PROCEDURE AND TIMING FOR PUBLIC
COMMENTS (SPONSORED BY: COUNCILMEMBER KATIA SAINT FLEUR; CO-SPONSORED BY: VICE MAYOR DANIEL
MARINBERG).
Overall Sentiment
Dennis Leyva
Location:
Submitted At: 5:00pm 05-04-21
Allow public comment on agenda items at the beginning of a meeting and then after council members discuss
each item and before they vote. Past councils silenced the voice of the residents and did not want to hear their
opinions.
Steven Dobie
Location:
Submitted At: 8:04am 05-03-21
We moved here four years ago having lived in the Crestview neighborhood (~10k residents) in north central
Austin where I was very active in my neighborhood association. This required me to speak before Council
subcommittees on a variety of issues, & provide comments to the Council on a number of other issues. Austin
allows general comments on any topic during the Citizen Communication period of each council meeting.
Speakers are required to sign up prior to the start of the meeting and are limited to 3 minutes. A maximum of ten
speakers are permitted for each session.
You could speak specifically on agenda items (other than the consent agenda items). The Mayor would open
discussion on the item, take staff reports, and then open a public hearing. Public comment on an agenda item
was limited to 3 minutes. A speaker had to sign up prior to the start of the meeting. You could sign up but rather
than speak donate their time to another speaker (but max was 6 minutes).
The great thing about the City of Austin’s public input process is that you could sign up but choose not to speak.
The cards that the City used at that time allowed you to simply indicate you were for or against the agenda item
and provide a few sentences of comments. You could also check a box on the card that said you did not want to
speak. Your comments still became part of the record for that item and Council members were aware of your
position without having to hear you speak. The majority of citizens took advantage of that, showing up to voice
their support or opposition, but not burdening the Council with hours of repetitive testimony. Most people
(including myself) often just want to be heard, but don’t necessarily want to speak. Once sign up ended at the
start of the council meeting, staff provided a report to the council during session, so they were aware of them
prior to taking a vote on an agenda item.
Austin now uses a kiosk-based electronic registration in the lobby for citizen speakers. But for the Village, the
previous card system they used would be a quick and simple way to allow citizens who show up for meetings to
register. This would certainly close the gap that now exists for folks to be heard. It would also be an efficient way
for citizens to feel they’re able to contribute, without necessarily prolonging meetings with endless speakers on a
controversial topic.
John Ise
Location:
Submitted At: 12:19pm 05-02-21
I'm supportive of allowing added public comments so long as it serves the purpose of informing the Council and
allowing more robust resident voices. Council members needs to ensure though that public comment is not used
to turn meetings into never-ending circuses that inhibit governance and deepens divisions.
Agenda Item: eComments for 10.E) DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING REVISIONS TO ORDINANCES TO
INCLUDE PROTECTIONS FOR SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY (SPONSORED BY: VICE MAYOR DANIEL
MARINBERG).
Overall Sentiment
Dennis Leyva
Location:
Submitted At: 5:07pm 05-04-21
My husband Clark Reynolds and I in 1992 (almost 30 years ago) along with others led the effort in Miami Beach
to include protection for sexual orientation. The Miami Beach Human Rights Ordinance was passed unanimously
by the City commission. This is LONG OVERDUE.
Edward Quinton
Location:
Submitted At: 3:59pm 05-04-21
Vice Mayor Marinberg is proposing that Miami Shores pass a new ordinance to include protections for sexual
orientation and gender identity. However, Miami Shores residents currently have human rights protections in
place, including sexual orientation and gender identity, through Miami-Dade County. There is no reason for Miami
Shores taxpayers to incur significant cost and expense in drafting, implementing and administering the type of
ordinance being requested by Mr. Marinberg. Miami Shores residents currently have comprehensive protections
and existing significant government enforcement of those protections for sexual orientation and gender identity
discrimination pursuant to Chapter 11A of the Miami-Dade County Code, including the Commission on Human
Rights Board which is charged with the enforcement of Miami-Dade County’s Human Rights Ordinance, which
includes use of the County Attorney’s office to bring civil actions.
In his letter to the Council, Vice Mayor Marinberg cites two reasons for the ordinance. First, to improve Miami
Shores’ Municipal Equality Index which is an index created by a national LGBTQ advocacy group and political
lobbying organization called the Human Rights Campaign and the second is “the broader goal of ensuring human
rights protections in Miami Shores Village.” Mr. Marinberg suggests that Miami Shores borrow language from
Pinecrest’s ordinance, which has requirements generating significant administrative costs and expense for
Pinecrest residents.
Miami Shores residents recognize the importance of human rights protections for all people. Unless the human
rights protection and enforcement in place through Miami-Dade County is somehow deficient and Miami Shores
has some unchecked human rights violations which need special ordinance protection, the Miami Shores Village
council should spend taxpayer funds on Shores residents for other matters needing attention in Miami Shores
and not on a private advocacy group’s index score.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 3:34pm 05-04-21
Alice, I'm opposed to revising ordinances to include protections for sexual orientation and gender identity.
Jerome Hurtak, 533 Grand Concourse
Agenda Item: eComments for 10.F) DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING CHARTER REVISION PROCESS &
PROCEDURES (SPONSORED BY: COUNCILMEMBER CRYSTAL WAGAR).
Overall Sentiment
Dennis Leyva
Location:
Submitted At: 5:14pm 05-04-21
A well run municipality would have a Charter Review every five years. Why didn't Village Manager Tom Benton
bring this to the councils attention in the decades he has served as Village Manager?
Agenda Item: eComments for 10.G) DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING FEMA PROPOSED CHANGES TO
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS (FIRMS) (SPONSORED BY: VICE MAYOR DANIEL MARINBERG).
Overall Sentiment
carlos Arrieta
Location:
Submitted At: 4:10pm 05-04-21
Please do not let FEMA dictate flood insurance rates.
Agenda Item: eComments for 10.H) DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING ALLEGATIONS OF CONFLICT OF
INTEREST REGARDING MIAMI SHORES CHIEF OF POLICE AND ADVANTAGE LAW ENFORCEMENT COMPLIANCE INC. /
ADVANTAGE NETWORKING, INC (SPONSORED: COUNCILMEMBER CRYSTAL WAGAR; CO-SPONSORED: MAYOR SANDRA
HARRIS.)
Overall Sentiment
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 5:24pm 05-04-21
I do not understand this situation well enough to make a clear decision. However, if the Police Chief cleared this
extra curricular activity with his boss, and there was not a problem, I do not believe he should be punished for
something that did not adversely affect his work with Miami Shores. Thank you for listening.
Donna Hurtak
Location:
Submitted At: 5:14pm 05-04-21
The chief is above reproach.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 5:01pm 05-04-21
I support the opinion of the Attorney regarding no conflict of interest for the outside employment by Chief Lystad
that was brought to the attention of the Village Administration years ago.
Thank you for supporting Chief Lystad.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 4:46pm 05-04-21
It is absolutely a conflict of interest when your Chief of Police moonlights for a company that is being contracted
by the same Village he serves. Tom Benton is equally as guilty of this as he was very well aware, and approved of
the Chief working for the company. Benton is a disgrace... he supported all the crooked actions of the Village Hall
employees including Ismael Naranjo who arbitrarily ROBBED me of $2400 when we were remodeling our home.
The Village is a disgrace. We pay exorbitant taxes, and it's an embarrassment to see that our Community Center
is a mess, our Field House is old and decrepit... yet our own village leaders are working for other companies that
WE PAY FOR... while WE ALSO PAY THEIR SALARIES... where does it end? WHEN DO WE START HOLDING
THEM ACCOUNTABLE?!
Dennis Leyva
Location:
Submitted At: 4:41pm 05-04-21
There needs to be an investigation by the Miami-Dade County Commission on Ethics and Public Trust regarding
Miami Shores POLICE CHIEF KEVIN LYSTAD employment with:
1) Advantage Law Enforcement Compliance, Inc.; and
2) Advantage Networking, Inc.
Additionally, there should be an ethics investigation on Village Manager Tom Benton on the Bid Process for these
companies and authorizing Chief Lystad outside employment.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 4:24pm 05-04-21
Dead Council, fellow neighbors. These allegations come from the same person who accused volunteer neighbors
of allegedly making back door deals in order to create a community event in Plaza 98 and help generate activity
in our downtown a few years ago.. to me it sounds as another attempt to tarnish the reputation and motives of
hard working well meaning citizens and public servants. Kindly ignore accusation unless actual proof of
misconduct appears. At which point an actual journalist might be presenting the findings. Thank you.
Joseph Clark, AIA
Edward Quinton
Location:
Submitted At: 4:16pm 05-04-21
Comments and allegations asserting improper actions by Police Chief Lystad are unsubstantiated. The Chief has
a right to work outside his Chief's position. He cleared this venture with his superior. We support Chief Lystad
and his honorable work for Miami Shores for 32 years.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 4:09pm 05-04-21
We fully support our chief of police and disagree with this senseless attack on his character after 32 years of
decorated service to our community.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 4:07pm 05-04-21
This is about transparency and accountability. We should have a chief that is solely focused on our community
and the citizens (and council) should know about this outside employment and how it may effect his ability to
perform his duties. My understanding is that no one was privy to this outside employment until recently. This
should be discussed with the council and village manager.
Christian Dunham
carlos Arrieta
Location:
Submitted At: 3:58pm 05-04-21
I am a Miami Shores tax payer and believe that It is a conflict of interest. the chief of police is a public servant
paid by the residents. If he would have preferred to pursue his career in the public sector he could have pursued
that career path. I believe that it's unfair to the residents for him to "try" and make a living in the private sector
while being financially supported by the tax payers. In addition, the mere fact that he holds a leadership position
in a company that is contracted by Miami Shores Village ALL WHILE he was serving as our chief of police is not
only a conflict of interest, it's despicable and action should be taken. Not just with him, but also with Mr. Tom
Benton who clearly let all of this happen - KNOWINGLY - under his watch.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 3:46pm 05-04-21
The attorneys letter opines that the job was disclosed and there is no conflict of interest. The commission should
support the Chief and make it publicly known there is nothing nefarious going on.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 3:32pm 05-04-21
Outside employment for a police chief does not pass the smell test. Certainly keeping the village safe should
totally occupy a police chiefs mind and if it does then he/she not properly focused on the job. This also applies to
the building director. Disgraceful that a small job takes 6 months to get a permit.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 3:10pm 05-04-21
from Linda B Mennes 317 NE 104 ST.
I am writing in support of Chief Lystad. The accusations against him are totaling unfounded.The Chief has been
above board regarding this venture. He cleared it with his boss and had the support of the Village's legal team.
Chief Lysatd. has done an excellent job and should be commended for his service.
Sandra Fittipaldi
Location:
Submitted At: 3:08pm 05-04-21
Chief of Police should resign—if he wants to work for MS then I’m sure we pay him enough for that to be his only
job. If he wants to work elsewhere, he can work in other aspects of law enforcement that don’t involve a company
that also does business in the Shores. Pretty simple—if there is even the appearance of potential conflict, it
needs to be removed. So, my vote is for him to go. We need a CLEAN SWEEP and the removal of all who’ve
been allowed to hang on and milk the system. #timeforchange
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 3:02pm 05-04-21
Please ignore the complaint. I support the chief of police in Miami Shores. I believe that he has conducted
himself in a responsible and professional manner.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 2:59pm 05-04-21
From C Martin Mennes 317 NE 104 Street Miami Shores
I have reviewed the labor attorneys comments and I think it is very poor that the "new" council has to take up
such a non controversial issue.
I sincerely hope the Council moves on from this and gives full support to the Chief .
As the Chief of police Kevin Lystad , in my opinion, has performed in an outstanding manner. The role of Chief is
not an easy one and he should be complemented on his performance and dedication.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 2:56pm 05-04-21
As a 25+ year resident of Miami Shores, I can say that I do not want my Police Chief to be working outside of his
position. The Chief should be solely dedicated to his job as Chief and not on other outside employment
opportunities. Moral is poor, minority hiring in the Police force is almost non-existent, and speeding is out of
control. The Police Chief has enough to do without working for others. At the very least, all outside employment
should be banned for all director and upper management positions. The public perception of the Police and the
Village Administrations needs to be improved. It cannot be improved by keeping the status quo.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 2:39pm 05-04-21
A full time chief of police should recuse themselves from sideline work. Certain positions of trust call for that.
Michael Suman
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 10:45am 05-04-21
Why is the Village Manager’s request to Labor Counsel regarding the allegations not included as an attachment
to the memo? Why is the Chief’s contract not included as an attachment to the memo as sections of it are
specifically referenced? Without this pertinent information, the memo lacks the transparency that is expected by
the residents, and raises further questions.
susan ackley
Location:
Submitted At: 2:36am 05-04-21
Supporting our Chief:
Upon reviewing attorney Carson's informational letter, it states Chief Lystad addressed the
conflict of interest' issue head-on when negotiating his current contract with the Village.
In addition, the letter states the Chief has received no compensation which also exonerates his culpability and
exhibits his loyalty and service to the Village. The Chief has led the department well since assuming his role and
responds quickly to residents issues and the village's changing needs. This is evidenced by the recently installed
cameras and the addition of speed bumps on problem streets.
John Ise
Location:
Submitted At: 12:23pm 05-02-21
Aside from the allegations noted in the agenda item, I voice appreciation to Chief Lystad for his accessibility,
professionalism, and long history of service the the Village. The Village is substantially safer and more orderly
than surrounding communities as a result of a highly capable and professional police department.
From:Robert Menge
To:Ysabely Rodriguez
Cc:Alice Burch; Attykavloff@aol.com; Crystal Wagar; JonathanMeltz; Sean Brady; Janet Goodman; Carol Eannace;
JOE; Gdrody; Michael Green; Carlos33180; Oscar; Jadeocean@live.ca; Agustin Ayuso; Norma C. Ayuso; Philippe
Alluard; jeffrey winograd; Watbon99; Brett Firestone; Noah; A K; EdGriffith@miamisao.com; Thomas Robertson;
Tom Benton; Lazaro Remond; Ismael Naranjo; Sandra Harris; danielmarinburg@msvfl.gov; Katia Saint Fleur;
Hefty, Lee (RER); Grossenbacher, Craig (RER); Gray, Catherine (RER)
Subject:Re: Marine Related Business operated out of Single Family Residences in Manatee Protection Areas and the
Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve.
Date:Tuesday, May 04, 2021 2:01:39 PM
Good afternoon Ysabely,
I would like to submit this statement to be read at the Village Council Meeting this evening.
I would like to thank the Village council and the village Staff for following up and protecting
the Quality of life in our community regarding the recent issues of vessels and businesses
operating out of single family residences. DERM is looking into the number of vessels
allowed in back of a single family residence, but it is also important that the Village Council
continues to support the Village Administration, Code Enforcement to enforce the existing
zoning Laws that do not allow all kinds of businesses at single family residences, especially on
the waterways of our community.
As our New Mayor and Village Council Members we recently elected, we need you to help us
protect the Quality of Life in our community which has made us safe and prosperous, during
times of disasters and uncertainty.
Over the years, we have accomplished a lot as a result of the Council and Administrative staff
listening to the residents of our community. We were able to minimize traffic congestion and
some of the speeding concerns in most of our community, by closing streets to thru traffic,
adding speed bumps and stepping up Police activities to address those issues in problem
areas.
We closed the Shores Motel, a haven for drugs, prostitution, and othe illegal activities, thanks
to the building Department, Code Enforcement and other County and local agencies, working
together to better our Village.
We have been able to control Vacation Rentals, which continue to be a problem in Miami-
Dade County, with the recent death of a 3 year old child, attending a Birthday Party in a
Vacation Rental.
The Shores Golf Course known all over the world, is a treasure in our community that the
Village council residents need to continue to protect, as once green space is gone in South
Florida it can never be brought back or restored to its original condition.
We are lucky to live in our little piece of paradise, and we all need to work together to make
sure we make all the right decisions in protecting our Quality of Life and our local
environment.
We look forward to all of you helping us in our Village Beautiful, thank you.
Virus-free. www.avast.com
On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 8:07 AM T. Septembre <tseptembre@aol.com> wrote:Good morning Robert,
Village Council
Meeting Time: 05-18-21 18:30
eComments Report
Meetings Meeting
Time
Agenda
Items
Comments Support Oppose Neutral
Village Council 05-18-21
18:30
27 83 37 40 1
Sentiments for All Meetings
The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented
will be shown.
Overall Sentiment
Village Council
05-18-21 18:30
Agenda Name Comments Support Oppose Neutral
9.A) DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE
BAYFRONT PARK SEAWALL. (STAFF: VILLAGE MANAGER)
83 37 40 1
Sentiments for All Agenda Items
The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented
will be shown.
Overall Sentiment
Agenda Item: eComments for 9.A) DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE BAYFRONT PARK SEAWALL.
(STAFF: VILLAGE MANAGER)
Overall Sentiment
Walter Bordeaux
Location:
Submitted At: 5:02pm 05-18-21
My name is Walter Bordeaux, I am an home owner at 76 NE 102nd Street in Miami Shores. I support the sea wall
project with public access to the water. This would benefit all the owners of Miami Shores.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 5:02pm 05-18-21
Teresa Kurack
The proposed kayak launch would eliminate part of the green space in the park which is already limited. I am also
concerned on the impact of the ecosystem by the seawall
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 4:59pm 05-18-21
Christina Bordeaux yes I support the building of a kayak ramp
Dorothy Campbell
Location:
Submitted At: 4:55pm 05-18-21
Hello, My name is Dorothy Campbell and I have been a resident of Miami Shores for over 28 years. I want to go
on record for support of the public access to Bayfront Park. I understand the concerns for those who live
proximal to the park. However, for those of us who don't and have to travel outside of Miami Shores to gain
access to the beautiful waters of Biscayne Bay, I support the addition of public access. I am an avid Standup
Paddleboarder and have been enjoying this activity for many years, along with kayaking. You can find me
paddling out on Biscayne Bay often and while there I am picking up the trash from the water and our little bay
islands. At this time I have to travel north to Oleta River State Park, south to Morningside Park or east to Pelican
Harbor to access the beautiful Biscayne Bay. I would love to be able to paddle out of my own back yard instead
of others. I could transport my board via my SUP mule with my bike and would not need to even park my car.
There are many like me who would love to have this public access. I believe this would truly benefit our Miami
Shores Community. Thank you
Rose Bordeaux
Location:
Submitted At: 4:47pm 05-18-21
I’m in favor of a kayak ramp. It will just add to the reasons Miami Shores is a great place to live. The park is a
public park maintained by taxes paid by residents of the entire village and should be a place that benefits
everyone not just the people who live across the street.
Kate Mason
Location:
Submitted At: 4:36pm 05-18-21
I cannot tell from listening to the meetings or reading the attachment whether other grants were considered prior
or since discovering that the kayak launch is a necessity to receiving the grant. If not, this should be done. If there
is no other grant available, then I think research needs to be done on the repercussions of adding the launch in
this area. There seems to be a lot of fear that it would increase traffic, parking, trash etc, but I cannot tell if that's
fear or based on actual information.
Finally, before a substantial project is done for the seawall, I do think we owe it to our neighbors in that area to
research the possible effects no the already horrible flooding situation. Perhaps there is a project that can be
done in coordinations to alleviate that issue. Was this discussed with the resiliency board?
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 4:02pm 05-18-21
Maria McGuinness. I oppose the project. There is no need for a public kayak launch in MSV's residential area.
Pelican Harbor's public kayak launch is 2.2 miles away from Bayfront Park (Legion Park 2.5 mi, Albert Patto Park
4.4 mi, Oleta 6.7 mi). MSV lacks the resources (financial & manpower) to properly control the use, safety and
logistics a public kayak launch will create. The project's environmental impact on the park itself (i.e. reducing
green space including grass and palm trees and increasing concrete) and on the grass beds, reefs and sea life in
Biscayne Bay should be determined and evaluated. The adverse impact of increased watercraft use (boats and
jet skis launching and/or picking up/dropping off riders) in the area should be expected. Costs to MSV for liability
insurance, legal defense and liability payments for injuries and deaths also have to be factored. Additionally, the
proposed kayak launch designs negate the purported objective of the seawall project (i.e. to protect against
predicted sea-level rise) by creating an opportunity for increased water intrusion to an area that is already prone
to substantial flooding when it rains (especially 94th Street). The seawall project itself offers little sea-level rise
protection to the eastern boundary of MSV given that its design for a 3 foot increase of the seawall for the length
of Bayfront Park (NE 94, 95 & 96 Streets) is partial and leaves approximately 80% of the eastern MSV boundary
exposed (91 St. to 104 St. plus canals on 102, 103 and 104 Streets). Water flows to the path of least resistance.
The "free" money of the FIND matching grant that requires the kayak launch is not "free." The tangible and
intangible costs of the project weigh heavily against it.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 3:49pm 05-18-21
While I think that in a perfect world having a kayak ramp in the Shores would be great, I cannot endorse the idea
with the plan as it stands. If the green space in front of the promenade is left as is, there will not be enough
parking and people will park in front of houses and on the swales. And the idea of doing away with the green
space to add more slanted parking spaces just adds to the problem of too much paving, the ensuing flooding,
cars, traffic. This is a quiet neighborhood. That's why people want to live here. There are too many unknowns
with this plan to endorse it. I feel it is bad for the neighborhood as it currently stands.
Karen Smith-Gulaskey
Location:
Submitted At: 3:45pm 05-18-21
I strongly support accepting the grant money to repair the seawall. The big issue is to fix the seawall to protect
our public park, community, and village. If accepting the money includes a small kayak ramp, that will benefit all
Miami Shores residents - then you should still YES and continue. To be able to have access to our beautiful bay,
which now, only people with waterfront property can enjoy, will enhance our whole village and increase home
values. During my last 15 years in fundraising for a local school, I know firsthand how difficult it is to find grants,
and apply for grant money. In 15 years, I applied for many grants and only received one for $1,000. As a taxpayer,
I strongly support using other money to repair the seawall and keep our taxes down. Thank you for finding this
grant that will enhance our neighborhood. I walk in Bayfront Park almost every day, at various times during the
day, and have never seen it crowded or filled with unruly people. Everyone is always friendly. Please vote to
accept this grant. Karen Smith-Gulaskey. 16 year resident.
Mary Benton
Location:
Submitted At: 3:42pm 05-18-21
My husband and I love to walk along the seawall when we get a chance, and we would also love to see more
residents taking advantage of it by being able to access the bay with their kayaks and canoes. It seems a shame
that the bay is there, but is inaccessible for use other than gazing at it and walking along its length. I am sorry for
those who bought homes in front of the park, but they did so knowing that it was a public park. I think any
problems that might arise can be dealt with in a reasonable manner.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 3:38pm 05-18-21
I Natalie Castro of 3 NE 109th st support the park sea wall. The kayak addition will be wonderful.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 3:31pm 05-18-21
Tuyen Tieu
I, along with my husband and two children, wholeheartedly support the kayak ramp in Miami Shores for the
following reasons-
-Having access to the bay will only add to the value and experience of living in this community.
-Kayaking is a non motorized sport that strengthens you mentally and physically
-Brings us closer to the bay to learn about the wildlife that we need to protect.
-The more kayak ramps we have, the better off we all are
-Turning away money for something that is so beneficial to the community is senseless
-Turning down this opportunity will set a precedent for future (progressive) endeavors that involve public spaces.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 3:05pm 05-18-21
My name is Ashley Kebrdle and as a resident of Miami Shores I encourage to accept the grant and allow the
kayak ramp. This will be a great addition to the Shores for families and everyone else that wants to get out into
nature.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 3:04pm 05-18-21
Good evening Mayor Harris and members of the Miami Shores Village Council:
My name is Patrice Gillespie Smith and I reside at 358 NE 101st Street. I first want to thank Councilmember
Burch and the members of the 2019 Village Council for voting to approve the Florida Inland Navigation District
(FIND) Grant application to rebuild the seawall at Bayfront Park. At the May 4 Council Meeting many of you
encouraged the Village Administration to follow Miami Beach's lead and improve our Community Rating Score
(CRS) to help reduce our residents' property insurance. Bolstering our dated and compromised seawall would be
one of the best steps you could take to improve our resiliency. I appreciate that the Village Council of 2019
recognized the significance of this step and encouraged staff to pursue the FIND grant two years ago. Now, we
face an important decision. Do we give back $1 million in grant funds and compromise the safety of the entire
Shores or do we take advantage of these funds and invest in our crumbling seawall? The choice should be
simple-- invest in our seawall. The addition of a kayak launch is just an added bonus to the critical infrastructure
improvement of our first line of defense to sea level rise -- our seawall. Refusing this grant would be irresponsible
-- especially given your mutual desire to improve the Village's CRS. If you are truly concerned about the traffic
that will be generated by a kayak launch, there is an easy solution-- add time limited pay by phone parking on
North Bayshore Drive. By charging a small fee to park, you will not only generate revenue for the Village, you will
limit traffic.
This open space is a park our family has been enjoying for the last 10 years. We bike, walk and scooter to it as a
family. Part of what makes it so wonderful is that it is a park open to everyone. Thus, please don't allow the
unverified fears of a few to disrupt progress on our seawall. Let's make our leadership on resiliency known. Thank
you for your ability to think globally and for remembering the needs of the 10,000 residents of Miami Shores.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 2:44pm 05-18-21
Support building a sea wall for safety and security — Abha Shrivastava
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 2:36pm 05-18-21
I support this initiative. Orville Rodriguez
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 2:28pm 05-18-21
It would be foolish to turn down the grant money for this important improvement, The Kayak launch is almost
besides the point.
MA Armand
Location:
Submitted At: 2:28pm 05-18-21
I support accepting the grant to construct the seawall, as well as, the building of a kayak ramp to provide public
access to the bay.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 2:09pm 05-18-21
I am a Miami Shores resident and fully support the funds for the sea wall and kayak ramp. This will ultimately
make Miami Shores a more desirable place to live.
Sandra Carro
Location:
Submitted At: 1:41pm 05-18-21
I support the park sea wall and kayak ramp. This will bring value to our village!
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 1:28pm 05-18-21
I have a Kayac, but have no access to the bay in our city, despite that our city has a public park adjacent to the
bay.
I strongly support the construction of a ramp
Lisa Herbert
Location:
Submitted At: 1:28pm 05-18-21
Voice in support of seawall. Good for our community.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 1:18pm 05-18-21
PART II
The majority of neighbors that I have talked to are convinced that nearby Bayfront Park plays a significant role in
local crime. I also believe that the park brings drug use, as many afternoons on my daily walks or runs, there is
noticeable odor of marijuana. Although we see the Miami Shores police clearing Bayfront Park at night, that effort
is simply not enough. The planned enhancements of the park will bring only trouble. The additional costs to
address these issues will be significant. I believe that is irresponsible that Miami Shores Village is considering the
installation of a kayak launching ramp into our residential neighborhood. The additional need for parking of people
who want to use the kayak ramp will disrupt traffic flow. Trash and burglaries in the area will increase which will
beget more police patrols. This will quickly amount to costs that will exceed the grant sought by the Village. In
addition, this may lead to the necessity to open other access points, other than 96th Street, which will provide
easier access to our neighborhood and more opportunities for crime. Instead, we need speed bumps and other
ideas to make this neighborhood a safer place to live in. We need a robust solution for our drainage issues to
prevent flooding, better paved roads, and a conscientious collaboration with FPL to secure our power lines. I
oppose this proposition and request that the Village seek alternative means to rebuild the seawall and address
the concerns listed herein. -Christopher DiSchino
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 1:16pm 05-18-21
PART I
I have been living in Miami Shores for 6yrs. 2 yrs ago, we moved to NE 92nd Street for greater security, as 96th
Street is the only access to our neighborhood. Bayfront Park is a highlight for everyone who lives around here
and for many other visitors. There is room for improvement of the park, and we are happy that major issues such
as future sea level rise are addressed by this project. However, the consequences are not being addressed.
Traffic, parking, safety, and security are the greatest concerns. A few years ago, I was a victim of car theft, where
thieves broke into my car and stole my tires and rims. Moreover, at night, there is a constant flow of slow-driving
cars, crawling the neighborhood, looking for vulnerabilities in cars and homes. There have been several
occasions where these conspicuous drivebys have resulted in a call to police. Most recently, one call led to a
high-speed chase through Miami Shores. The police officer involved in the chase returned to my house nearly an
hour later to let me know that the culprit was able to escape by driving full speed down 96th street to I-95 where
he lost the chasing police officers. We have a great neighborhood where people know each other and people talk
to each other. We are tired of speeding cars and worries over our safety and security.
-Christopher DiSchino, NE 92nd Street
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 1:13pm 05-18-21
I am in support for receiving a grant for improvements which include the building of a new kayak ramp. With 3
boys at home, my husband and I would enjoy taking them out to the beautiful bay that we have right in our
backyard.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 1:13pm 05-18-21
I’m Carlos Segura and we live in Miami shores. Our address is 285 NE 98 ST, Miami Florida 33138. I oppose the
kayak ramp for the following reasons: 1 Parking
2 Crime/ security
3 Speeding cars
4 Litter & trash
5 Liability
Thank you
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 1:12pm 05-18-21
Suzan Lam
I support the grant for the sea wall and the kayak ramp. This is great for the residents of Miami Shores.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 1:11pm 05-18-21
Parking
Litter & trash
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 1:04pm 05-18-21
I write in strong support of accepting the grant for the necessary construction of the seawall and the bonus the
kayak ramp. It would be outrageous for a vocal minority to cost the village a million dollars over inflated fears of
kayak users (by and large not exactly a rowdy crowd). There is sufficient public parking at the park already and in
my experience with other local kayak ramps (the ones which do not have rentals) there are normally only a few
users at any given time. The kayak ramp would be a great addition to the village and the alternative: spending an
additional million dollars of our local taxes to do the necessary infrastructure work is completely unacceptable.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 12:50pm 05-18-21
To whom it may concern,
my name is Sylvie Rose Garcon-Duerkop and I live since more than 10 years at 1250 NE 94 ST.
We love Bayfront Park and we appreciate that there is a project to enhance the seawall, drainage and boardwalk.
However, to include a kayak ramp does not make sense. It will only create more problems with parking, speeding
cars and trash. Costs to maintain the ramp will increase. I am opposing the current design for this project as long
as it includes the kayak launching ramp.
Eli Bravo
Location:
Submitted At: 12:12pm 05-18-21
Parking - Crime/Security - Speeding cars - Litter/trash - Liability. I will participate in today's meeting. Thanks.
Elizabeth Hitt
Location:
Submitted At: 11:54am 05-18-21
I am patently against the kayak ramp for reasons that I would be happy to discuss.
Elizabeth B. Hitt
9701 NE 13 Avenue
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 11:50am 05-18-21
David Siqueiros
1230 NE 91 Terrace
Miami Shores, FL 33138
Miami Shores Village Council,
As a Miami Shores home owner, I would like to extend my vote in opposition of building the Kayak launching ramp
on NE 94th St. and N Bayshore Dr.
I recognize that a seawall repair/reconstruction is needed, but the kayak ramp as an addition to this project makes
no sense other than receiving a grant that pales in comparison to the added expense such a ramp would
generate for the village.
The major issues I share with the majority of residents I have spoken to about this project are:
1. Parking
2. Crime/Security
3. Speeding cars
4. Litter and trash
5. Liability
The 79th Street boat ramp has ample parking, regularly patrolled by police and is designed to launch watercraft
and is located where prevailing winds make this a safe endeavor.
I ask you, the council members to consider that what you are contemplating is a construction project that will cost
the city $1Million or more (in addition to a 1 million grant that likely can be found elsewhere) and result in
increased costs and potential crime and accidents when there are 8 or more boat ramps or launches within 10
miles from us.
This ramp is not for Miami Shores residents exclusively. It will be used by people from all over greater Miami and
will result in immeasurable additional costs to the village and its residents.
Please vote against this project to be completed.
All the Best,
David Siqueiros
davidsiqueiros@me.com
Melissa Mazzitelli
Location:
Submitted At: 11:04am 05-18-21
Much of our Village is on or near the water and the seawall is in need of repair. As our budget is relatively limited,
seeking out grants to fund high dollar value projects is a responsible thing to do. If it is a choice between adding
a preventative measure against severe flooding in our low-lying, hurricane-prone village, where the water levels
continue to rise, and major hurricanes are becoming more common, versus possible parking / litter / "riff-raff"
issues, this should not be a difficult decision to make. Adding a kayak/canoe launch to the design of the seawall
should not be the kind of issue that prevents approval of this project. Potential issues like crime and parking can
be addressed by increased patrols, which could also help with traffic calming in the area. There are also possible
community solutions such as a neighborhood watch or community service park clean up days that will bring
people together and keep our Village clean. But more likely, the launch will just provide another lovely amenity for
our community. I know a few of the people who oppose this measure and respect them greatly, and hope that we
can all work together to address their concerns if this measure passes.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 10:55am 05-18-21
I support the new sea wall with a ramp, especially if it helps in getting outside money to help pay for it. The water
access and sea wall would add to property values and be a nice asset for the community.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 9:44am 05-18-21
I oppose the kayak launch. The additional traffic will cause an immense amount of stress on the local police force.
Compromising police availability when a serious crime is committed. Our neighbors are constantly having to
collect trash from the park area due to random visitors that have zero respect. Plastic and other rubbish going
into the bay will increase should this project go ahead. This project isn't a practical idea and I oppose it 100%.
The Bay Area isn't a public park , it is a slither of grass adjacent to the bay. It is already crowded with people that
do not live in miami shores nor pay property taxes to MS. These projects should be for larger public parks with
parking availability not a residential area of single family homes with no parking. It will result in lawsuits and
damages to properties.
John Rourke Miami Shores Resident.
Darryl Proctor
Location:
Submitted At: 9:41am 05-18-21
I vehemently oppose this based on the following:
Crime rise - it goes without question that crime will rise and whilst police are dealing with potentially petty crime,
other more serious crimes will be neglected.
Traffic. It is already an issue with “out of area” traffic racing down 12th ave thinking they can get out at 92nd in
peak times. Not all GPS shows this as blocked. Children and walkers have nearly been hit many times and I have
personally had to call police many times for this. This will be exaggerated massively by frustrated kayakers who
are trying to get out or into the neighborhood to launch at peak times.
Property tax income degradation: Miami Shores will see a decline in property prices as the neighborhood
inevitably declines and therefor tax income will decline too. The east side of Miami shores has seen a
considerable rise in property value and therefore new buyers are paying higher property taxes. This will stagnate
or decline and therefore income affected.
Costs. Miami shores budgets and costs will rise due to increased trash, wear and tear on roads, new policing
requirements, and an increase in park usage will result in higher maintenance costs of the park.
Storm / Hurricane impact.: it is well known that driving water due to wind will travel further on a sloping surface
than a wall. The ramp will act as a natural wave creation tool as it shallows therefore creating risk and additional
flooding to the neighborhood that already suffers from rain based flooding.
Liability insurance and Claims: Miami shores will be liable for any and all slip and falls which will be exacerbated
due to inebriated bay kayakers and users. This will severely impact costs.
Many thanks for taking time to read this note.
Darryl Proctor
Miami Shores Resident
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 5:12am 05-18-21
Terrible idea. Find another way to augment the seawall. Putting in a kayak launch ramp in that area is insane! It
invites increased traffic to an area in which you have previously taken clear steps to limit traffic. That traffic would
then be funneled to an even smaller area that has extreme limits on parking. Traffic and parking aside, it's a
liability nightmare for the city, and frankly it's likely going to cost more money long term for upkeep, insurance,
policing and problem resolution than the amount of the grant in the first place. You would be selling your soul for a
few grant dollars if you accepted this contingent money. Find another solution. They are out there.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 11:01pm 05-17-21
We moved into our home on 96 Street in July. We have already had a few unpleasant experiences in the
evenings walking our dog by the bay. We have watched cars wait for the police to leave after announcing the
park is closed and return to the area. One night in particular, my teenage daughter and I were pretty horrified
listening to the loud/obscene sounds a couple in their parked vehicle were making for anyone to hear. The area
often smells of marijuana. There is no parking. Will these cars now park alongside the street in front of our
homes to drop their kayaks for the day? I’m terrified of the thought of even more traffic in this residential area we
invested in believing it was safe. It is not feeling very safe already. I cannot imagine if this kayak ramp project
goes through.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 9:15pm 05-17-21
I Am adamantly opposed to the addition of the kayak ramp, not the seawall project. Although widening the
walkway by bayfront Park to reduce the green space is a terrible idea.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 9:07pm 05-17-21
As per my previous letters and conversations with council members we remain oposed to the kayak ramp.
ADAM MALAMED
Location:
Submitted At: 8:55pm 05-17-21
Kayak Ramp
I wish to speak at public meeting at 6:30pm May 18th, 2021
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 8:53pm 05-17-21
Danielle Beyda. As a resident of Miami
Shores, I strongly oppose a kayak launch being added to the park on the east side of Miami Shores.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 8:51pm 05-17-21
Andrew Beyda. As a resident of Miami Shores I strongly oppose the addition of a kayak launch to the park on the
east side of the neighborhood.
melissa pregen
Location:
Submitted At: 8:09pm 05-17-21
While I agree that we need to upgrade bayfront park do not support taking the grant money and making the kayak
ramp. I am very concerned about the traffic, noise, unlawful activity, and sanitation issues that will arise because
of the water access. I believe we should be working to make our neighborhood Safer not opening our community
up to these issues which can directly impact quality of life and property value. Please do not move forward with
making this kayak ramp and let try and figure out how we can upgrade bayfront park on our own. Thank you
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 6:02pm 05-17-21
Frederick W. Mueller, Jr and Joan M. Mueller.
We strongly oppose the addition of a Kayak launching ramp as a part of the plan to be included with the proposed
seawall and drainage reconstruction project at Bayfront Park. The impact on the quality of life for residents in the
vicinity, along with logistical challenges such as parking, security, litter, environmental impact, overuse,
management, and liability are obvious and negative. As a lifelong resident of Miami Shores, as a waterman,
paddler, and former captain, I can assure you that is proposed kayak venue would create a nightmare and expose
the village to significant liability. Prevailing (and sometimes strong) winds, potential for significant tidal
fluctuations, extensive rip rap, wave action from weather and powerboat traffic, could make it very hazardous as a
launch site for human powered vessels. Furthermore, I think it is also premature to pursue this project and any
source of grant money that would have a launching ramp as a contingency. The Village has clearly not explored
all options available for funding this project, and erroneously advanced funds toward the project which is
untenable. Move forward with the plans for seawall and drainage reconstruction...but eliminate plans for for a
kayak launching facility. Thank you.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 5:49pm 05-17-21
My wife and I strongly oppose the Kayak ramp part of the project as it will bring lots of traffic to the area with
concerns about parking space and safety in general.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 1:01pm 05-17-21
Bonnie Bennett. 1266 NE 101 St. I’ve just been informed about the proposal 9 A for seawall and kayak ramp at
the bay and 96 St. As a resident (again) I am appalled. What amazes me is it its doubtful that a kayak launch is
legal in a residential area. This is basically an open invitation for people to access properties in the area in a
dangerous way. Currently it is a hotspot for non-residents getting high, hanging with boom boxes etc. Additionally,
how sound is the seawall change for flooding? Additionally, how does Miami Dade County fit into all of this? This
will be heavily opposed; I would not rule out a class action suit by the residents most affected. There was, to my
knowledge, no public forum for disclosure of this plan for ALL residents. I will email the counsel on this as well.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 12:51pm 05-17-21
Daniel Aguiar
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 11:03am 05-17-21
My name is James Turk and I live on the eastern end of 94 street. I am writing to express my concern over the
proposed kayak launch. I have a host of concerns related to traffic, flooding, safety, and liability. Additionally, I am
extremely concerned about the secretive nature in which the initial phases of the project were handled. At the
very least, a comprehensive study is warranted to understand the potential traffic (on a very narrow street),
parking challenges, security, and impact on flooding (this area floods horribly). I am 100% in favor of a sea wall
project, and other strategic efforts to mitigate rising sea level, but this plan is short sighted and will result in
significant quality of life issues for those of us that live close to the proposed site and potentially great longer term
expense for all Miami Shores residents.
Lele Tracy
Location:
Submitted At: 11:01am 05-17-21
I vehemently oppose the Bayfront Park Seawall / Kayak Launch
Janine Turk
Location:
Submitted At: 10:50am 05-17-21
With regard to the rebuilding of the sea wall & kayak launch on 94th ST at the Bayfront Park, I am concerned
about the increased traffic on 94th. It is already an extremely narrow street with major traffic all day and night. It is
difficult for cars to pass through especially when visitors & worker vehicles are parked along the street. I am
particularly worried for the safety of our children, pets and elderly who walk along this street every day because
there are NO sidewalks. The tight corner of 94 street and Bayshore drive is even more dangerous because cars
regularly parked there leave inadequate room for others to make the sharp turn safely. This street is a very
popular walking street for All of our Miami Shores neighbors who come to enjoy the waterfront, however, I fear the
added traffic will make it a lot less safe for them.
Secondly, the distance and location of this ramp would result in further flooding issues on 94th ST which Is
already quite severe. Such a wide-open entry for more water to enter through one of the lowest streets in Miami
Shores would be devastating. It is already well known that this street floods with even a bad rainstorm and worse
with high or king tides, not to mention tropical storms. The flooding is again dangerous for all. There is nowhere
for this water to drain properly and is a safety concern for all of us driving or walking along this street. This is a
huge liability for all.
Please reconsider this project and at the very least provide a responsible study of the concerns and countless
significant impacts and liabilities this will have on our entire neighborhood.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 9:26am 05-17-21
Kristen Mustad
I paddle board weekly. I use the 79th street public boat ramp and have never been inconvenienced by it. I do not
want or need a ramp and the end of our street (or any other street in our neighborhood) as the county has given
us a convenient and well built ramp on 79th street with ample parking. For Miami shores residents, the trip to the
79th st boat ramp will take less than 5 minutes more than going to this proposed ramp that is exposed to East
and NE winds (prevailing winds) and will make launching difficult and dangerous.
Thsi is an irresponsible project.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 9:22am 05-17-21
Karen Bass
As a resident of the 1200 block of NE 94th Street for the past 21 years and am writing to you to express my
concern over the proposed kayak ramp that is under consideration at the end of our block.
There certainly must be better alternatives to raise the seawall that does not include a kayak launching ramp as
part of the grant deal. Let me be clear that we agree that we need to raise the seawall, but not at the expense of
adding a kayak ramp!! A kayak ramp will severely impede the quiet neighborhood feel of our beloved Miami
Shores Bayfront and surrounding homes.
We, along with many others in our community are opposed to the kayak ramp and were quite surprised that it
was even in consideration in our area. The additional unwanted traffic, noise, congestion, liter, crime and liability
is not something that any one of us wants to see in our neighborhood. In addition, where do these kayakers
expect to park their cars? As it is now our street is very narrow and most of us have reflective driveway markers
on the edges of our property to keep everyday vehicles from driving over our lawns or from parking on it and we
do not need our street nor any of the others to become a parking lot.
Please listen to us and don't allow this to happen to our beloved neighborhood.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 11:13pm 05-16-21
Dear Council Members,
in general I am in favor of a new seawall and enhancements of drainage. However, due to potential issues and
additional challenges around overflow parking, crime, trash and speeding cars in narrow NE 94th Street I am
expressing my great displeasure at the proposed kayak launching ramp. Please stop the current design of this
project. Please investigate alternative funding sources that do not make it mandatory to have a kayak ramp.
Timm Duerkop
1250 NE 94 ST
Miami Shores, FL 33138
Veronica Dumas
Location:
Submitted At: 6:47pm 05-16-21
The kayak ramp will pose severe safety, traffic, security, and liability issues for Miami Shores Village.
It will particularly affect the quiet enjoyment of those of us who live near the park.
Please find another way of improving the sea wall without turning Bayfront Park into a highly traffic, congested,
loud and unsafe park.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 5:31pm 05-16-21
I oppose the action as outlined by the council. I support a new seawall but I strongly oppose the addition of a
kayak ramp. It defeats the purpose of keeping out water (the water will push up this ramp). Moreover, there is
absolutely not sufficient parking to assure the easy use of this ramp. There will be too many cars without
appropriate spaces. The liability is also a huge problem. The additional expenses this ramp will incur on the part
of the city negate the matching funds. Instead, let's research other matching grants that do not demand a kayak
ramp.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 5:20pm 05-16-21
We live by bay front park and we feel that the traffic increase, congestion, and potential liabilities associated with
the installation of a kayak launch ramp would create problems for the residents of the neighboring area as well as
adding to the police departments responsibility.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 5:01pm 05-16-21
Eric Cheng 54 NW 104th street. I am in support of the seawall and the Kayak launch.
Yiannis Dumas
Location:
Submitted At: 4:53pm 05-16-21
Dear Mayor Harris and council members,
My name is Yiannis Dumas and my family and I live on 9650 North bayshore drive.
I am writing to you about the proposed project to raise the seawall at Bayfront park and to include a kayak launch
ramp.
We would like to express our concerns with this project:
1- We believe that this project will present a safety risk and potential liability to the Village of Miami Shores. We
see the directions of the winds every day from our windows and believe that kayakers could be pushed towards
the rocks and people could get hurt. Additionally, there are always children running up and down the park and we
feel there could be a risk of someone drowning if there is a ramp with access to the water.
2- Secondly we think that there is a potential HUGE PARKING and TRAFFIC issue. The park does not have a
proper parking lot, like all other kayak launching parks in Miami DADe. This will attract a ridiculous amount of cars
in the park, with extreme congestion to the area. Please remember we live here, and we sincerely believe that
this project will infringe on the QUIET ENJOYMENT of our homes.
3- Third, there is a SECURITY concern. We already have expressed to the Village and the Police department on
numerous occasions that in the last 13 years, we have repeatedly been affected by what goes on in the park,
particularly after dark. Loud music, drugs, one car parked after another with their engines on and polluting our
environment, people engaging in sexual activity in their cars...the list goes on...
The rules ARE NOT enforced, because MSV simply does not have the resources to enforce them. How is this
going to be any different with more and more people being attracted to this park?
What we suggest is to find the proper grant to raise the seawall without having to install a kayak ramp. In the age
of climate change and rising sea levels , there have to be many other options to get funded for the seawall
reinforcement.
As our representative, we sincerely hope that you take these points into consideration and you stop this project
from going any further.
Sincerely,
Yiannis H. Dumas
9650 North Bayshore Drive
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 2:29pm 05-16-21
No - oppose
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 12:51pm 05-16-21
While my family supports the consideration of strengthening the seawall at Bayfront Park, we are vehemently
opposed to the kayak ramp. As one enables the other, we would be solidly against the project altogether.
It's simply naive to think the kayak ramp won't exponentially increase traffic in our neighborhood and create a host
of problems and liabilities for the village and all the residents on 94th-96th streets. Among them:
Parking
- There is no plan to control this - we don't see any feasibility studies around this as part of the planning process
Crime/security
- This is already a serious problem in our neighborhood
Speedsters
- Visitors to the park can be incredibly disrespectful. On any given day there are drivers and motorcycle riders
zooming along at 40mph or more
Environmental Issues and trash
- Last summer there was a terrible environmental breach of Biscayne Bay and it decimated the fish populations
around Bayfront Park. Thousands of fish belly-up on the water for a few weeks and a horrible stench. The fish are
just beginning to come back again, as the coral gets healthy
- Trash - what a problem this is!! Apparently some mamas did not educate their children well enough as to how
and where to dispose of trash. I am often picking up after people and disposing in a trash can 30 feet away
because I do not want to see water bottles and beer bottles in the bay
And not least of all - liability
- Not only will the village bear the guilt of serious injuries and possibly deaths due to weather, winds, waves and
general people's irresponsibility, are you ready to bear the inevitable costs from the lawsuits that are sure to
follow?
- Can you guarantee the safety of all the users and the neighborhood's children?
We are against these plans without further study and alteration.
Thank you.
Tarek & Imelda Korraa - proud residents of Miami Shores
1263 NE 94th St
Miami Shores
305-906-2530
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 2:45pm 05-15-21
Would like to submit a comment in support of the kayak ramp. As a shores resident I think this will enhance our
ability to stay active and enjoy the outdoors. Thank you for your consideration, Paula Garver
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 1:56pm 05-15-21
Karl Markeset - 1438 NE 104 Th St. Miamu Shores. I strongly support the kayak launch. A area of for public
access to the Bay is a much needed amenity in this community. Access can be controlled and a few vocal
residents should not block access for the rest of us. Access to the bay is part of a sustainable community. Thank
you!
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 12:33pm 05-15-21
I support the Kayak ramp. We should build it! Kayak’s are fun. Kayakers are great and non bothersome people!
Let’s do this!
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 12:24pm 05-15-21
I wholeheartedly support the kayak ramp at the end of 94th Street on Bayfront Park. I live on 93rd Street, east of
12th Ave. Every time I walk to the park, I wish I could launch a kayak in my own neighborhood. It is ludicrous
that I have to go to Oleta and pay for a kayak rental, when I am so close to water access. It would be an amenity
that would be of great benefit to me, and to several of the neighbors with whom I’ve spoken. I have yet to hear
any opposition to the ramp that is based on logic or solid reasoning. I can’t see a dramatic increase of traffic or
parking issues at the Park, but assuming arguendo that demand for parking increases, parking enforcement
would curb any issues. Rise in crime, littering, truancy makes no sense, when a kayak ramp is likely to attract
kayakers, who will likely be paddling and picking up the trash they find. I often take my 11-year old kayaking. It is
our time to connect with nature, disconnect from electronics, and reflect on the enormity of what surrounds us. It
is a great way for us to spend quality time together. I would love to have the ability to do this in our own backyard.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 10:36am 05-15-21
My name is Daniel Fruciano and I have been a resident of Miami Shores for 11 years. I wish to go on record to
state that I unequivocally support the addition of public access to the water at Bayfront Park. I have lived near the
water most of my life, having grown up on a small Pacific island and summering on the coast of Maine and Cape
Cod, before moving to Miami Beach and finally The Shores. Whether it’s on a kayak or paddle board or by just
dipping your toes in, water access engenders a connection to our environment that we can get in no other way.
Having also spent my life traveling, I have encountered this universally. From the Embarcadero in San Francisco,
to the steps leading into the water on the seafront in virtually every town in Croatia, Greece and Turkey, or more
locally, the bayfront in St. Petersburg, our ability to access the water is paramount to enjoying a greater quality of
life. My husband and I are incredibly excited about this amazing opportunity to add something that will truly
benefit our whole community so easily!
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 10:03pm 05-14-21
Would be such a wonderful addition to our neighborhood!
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 9:53pm 05-14-21
I am totally opposed to building a seawall with the stipulation of having a kayak ramp. The kayak ramp will bring
more traffic, crime and cause issues with parking in the area. Additionally, the ramp may cause destruction of the
coral and seagrass that butts up to the current seawall. I also think that people will use the kayak ramp to enter
the bay to go swimming. This will be a major liability, as people may hurt themselves in the rocky, shallow water in
the bay near the seawall.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 5:23pm 05-14-21
I'm in full support. The ramp is not going to create a sudden influx of traffic, anyone who's been to the 79th St
launch knows you only have a handful of people each day. In fact, half of us there on any given day are Shores
residents! As for people parking there, people park along the bayfront now. And it pays for a much-needed
upgrade to the seawall. This is a no-brainer.
Julie Brady
Location:
Submitted At: 4:47pm 05-14-21
I support the kayak launch at Bayfront Park for many reasons. We live a block from the park and walk there daily.
I love seeing people enjoying the park but often thought that a kayak launch would be wonderful. We raised our
boys in Miami Shores and enjoyed being so close to beautiful Biscayne Bay. We had to go to other locations to
launch our canoes and kayaks. Having a kayak launch in Miami Shores will make venturing out into the bay a fun
activity. I support this endeavor and hope that we will move forward to make it a reality! Thank you, Julie Brady
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 4:30pm 05-14-21
Bob Smith 230 NE 94th St. I support the installation of a kayak ramp in Miami Shores Bayfront Park.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 12:18pm 05-14-21
We strongly support the installation of a kayak ramp and seawall upgrades. We, as a family, love to kayak (so
much so that our children have their own kid-sized kayaks). This is a win: [1] preparing our Village for the
inevitable effects of climate change; and [2] providing access to our residents to a healthy family activity that
many enjoy. We see no appreciable down side, and we strongly support the installation of the ramp. - The Tims
Family
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 11:53am 05-14-21
Daniel Brady - I am speaking today to support moving forward in the Bayfront Park sea wall and kayak launch
area. I live on 95th Street, second house west of NE 12 Avenue and have visited that park almost once a day,
either walking or riding my bike. It is a beautiful place to take a look at Biscayne Bay and watch both sunrise and
sunset. There are rarely more cars than area for the cars to park and have always found those individuals visiting
the park to be both polite and respectful. It would be a shame to have the 5 house that abutting the park being
the only citizens of Miami Shores who can enjoy the park and limit additional access to Biscayne Bay that the
kayak launch area would provide. Be Brave, move forward with a plan that serves all the residents of the Village.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 11:07am 05-14-21
Lory Freiman - I approve the initiative for the seawall and kayak lift. For our families and to promote outdoor
activities within our small village and boost community culture around something fun.
Alejandro Barreras
Location:
Submitted At: 11:04am 05-14-21
I'd like to state my support for the proposed kayak ramp in North Bayshore Park.
Kayaking is a healthy, environmentally conscious and family-friendly activity. Having a close and easily accessible
launch within the Village will benefit all residents, promote the activity and encourage the use of our outdoor
resources. It won't bring excess traffic or noisy disturbances. Kayaking is also the less expensive alternative to
enjoy our wonderful waters in a manner accessible to all ages and income levels.
Biscayne Bay is one of our most precious community assets, but historically, and by design, access to it has been
limited to those fortunate enough to buy it. North Bayshore is the only part of the Village where the whole
community can enjoy the bay and it's underutilized. It's time to open it for all.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 10:54am 05-14-21
I live in miami shores and I think the addition of a kayak ramp (and corresponding grant) would be an excellent
addition to the community and the park. Kayak ramps aren’t known to majorly increase traffic or attract lewd
behavior - this seems like a no-brainer to me.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 10:54am 05-14-21
I want to express my support for the Kayak ramp initiative. The park is public, it's not a private garden with a
beautiful view. I feel the ramp will benefit the public, a healthy activity for all.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 10:37am 05-14-21
I think it would be an amazing activation of that park (even without the matching grant)! - Tims Family
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 10:22am 05-14-21
This would be a great addition to our wonderful community. A low cost access point to allow young and young a
heart access to our waterways to help enjoy the environment in a non harmful way. The community of kayakers
and paddle boarders is a environmentally friendly one that would only add value to our community
John Ise
Location:
Submitted At: 9:50am 05-14-21
I strongly, strongly support the addition of a kayak launch with any proposed redevelopment of the seawall at
Bayfront Park.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 9:44am 05-14-21
I support the action to reinforce the sea wall and build a kayak launch. Miami Shores must start action against
climate change now and cannot afford any missed opportunities.
Guest User
Location:
Submitted At: 7:57pm 05-13-21
As a resident of East Miami Shores, and a real estate professional, I believe this is a misguided project. I
appreciate the attempt to utilize grant money, but municipalities are obligated to specifically reserve money for
infrastructure projects such as this one. There is simply no where for anyone to park to utilize a ramp. The ramp
will clog up the area and cause untold unwanted passers by. The truth is, Miami Shores residents would be in the
significant minority of users of the ramp. The sea wall is fine for the time being.
The real issue ought to be how to privatize the park as it currently exists since it is barely patrolled as-is.
-Greg Baumann 91st Terrace